Explaination of the Frechet Derivative












0












$begingroup$



Let $E$ and $F$ be Banach spaces and let $U$ be an open subset of $E$. Suppose $g:U to F $. $g$ is continuous at $x_0$ if there exists a linear transformation, $T_{x_0}$, such that $$ lim limits_{x_0 to 0}dfrac{||g(x_0+h)-g(x_0)-T_{x_0}(h)||}{||h||}. $$ Then $Dg_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ is then the Frechet derivative of $g$ at $x_0$.




I have a question about this with two examples from this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKHx1vQdZko).



For the first example we compute the Frechet derivative of $f(x)=x^2$ and we get that $T_x(h) = h(2x)$. For the second example we find the Frechet derivative of $f(x,y)=(xy , x+y)$ and here we get that $T_{(x,y)}(h,v)=begin{bmatrix}
y & x \
1 & 1 \
end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}
h \
v \
end{bmatrix}$
.



But the definition says that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ so does that mean that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}(1)$? It seems to be the case for both of these examples. I believe this is always but am unsure. The reason why I think this is that the transformation is linear so $T_{x_0}(h)=h(Df_{x_0})$ since $T$ linearly maps $h$ so if we let $h=1$ then we are just left with $Df_{x_0}$. Does my reasoning make sense?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    No. What does even $h = 1$ mean in Banach spaces?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:56
















0












$begingroup$



Let $E$ and $F$ be Banach spaces and let $U$ be an open subset of $E$. Suppose $g:U to F $. $g$ is continuous at $x_0$ if there exists a linear transformation, $T_{x_0}$, such that $$ lim limits_{x_0 to 0}dfrac{||g(x_0+h)-g(x_0)-T_{x_0}(h)||}{||h||}. $$ Then $Dg_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ is then the Frechet derivative of $g$ at $x_0$.




I have a question about this with two examples from this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKHx1vQdZko).



For the first example we compute the Frechet derivative of $f(x)=x^2$ and we get that $T_x(h) = h(2x)$. For the second example we find the Frechet derivative of $f(x,y)=(xy , x+y)$ and here we get that $T_{(x,y)}(h,v)=begin{bmatrix}
y & x \
1 & 1 \
end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}
h \
v \
end{bmatrix}$
.



But the definition says that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ so does that mean that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}(1)$? It seems to be the case for both of these examples. I believe this is always but am unsure. The reason why I think this is that the transformation is linear so $T_{x_0}(h)=h(Df_{x_0})$ since $T$ linearly maps $h$ so if we let $h=1$ then we are just left with $Df_{x_0}$. Does my reasoning make sense?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    No. What does even $h = 1$ mean in Banach spaces?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:56














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Let $E$ and $F$ be Banach spaces and let $U$ be an open subset of $E$. Suppose $g:U to F $. $g$ is continuous at $x_0$ if there exists a linear transformation, $T_{x_0}$, such that $$ lim limits_{x_0 to 0}dfrac{||g(x_0+h)-g(x_0)-T_{x_0}(h)||}{||h||}. $$ Then $Dg_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ is then the Frechet derivative of $g$ at $x_0$.




I have a question about this with two examples from this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKHx1vQdZko).



For the first example we compute the Frechet derivative of $f(x)=x^2$ and we get that $T_x(h) = h(2x)$. For the second example we find the Frechet derivative of $f(x,y)=(xy , x+y)$ and here we get that $T_{(x,y)}(h,v)=begin{bmatrix}
y & x \
1 & 1 \
end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}
h \
v \
end{bmatrix}$
.



But the definition says that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ so does that mean that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}(1)$? It seems to be the case for both of these examples. I believe this is always but am unsure. The reason why I think this is that the transformation is linear so $T_{x_0}(h)=h(Df_{x_0})$ since $T$ linearly maps $h$ so if we let $h=1$ then we are just left with $Df_{x_0}$. Does my reasoning make sense?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Let $E$ and $F$ be Banach spaces and let $U$ be an open subset of $E$. Suppose $g:U to F $. $g$ is continuous at $x_0$ if there exists a linear transformation, $T_{x_0}$, such that $$ lim limits_{x_0 to 0}dfrac{||g(x_0+h)-g(x_0)-T_{x_0}(h)||}{||h||}. $$ Then $Dg_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ is then the Frechet derivative of $g$ at $x_0$.




I have a question about this with two examples from this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKHx1vQdZko).



For the first example we compute the Frechet derivative of $f(x)=x^2$ and we get that $T_x(h) = h(2x)$. For the second example we find the Frechet derivative of $f(x,y)=(xy , x+y)$ and here we get that $T_{(x,y)}(h,v)=begin{bmatrix}
y & x \
1 & 1 \
end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}
h \
v \
end{bmatrix}$
.



But the definition says that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}$ so does that mean that $Df_{x_0}=T_{x_0}(1)$? It seems to be the case for both of these examples. I believe this is always but am unsure. The reason why I think this is that the transformation is linear so $T_{x_0}(h)=h(Df_{x_0})$ since $T$ linearly maps $h$ so if we let $h=1$ then we are just left with $Df_{x_0}$. Does my reasoning make sense?







frechet-derivative






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Sep 30 '18 at 3:11









alpastalpast

468314




468314












  • $begingroup$
    No. What does even $h = 1$ mean in Banach spaces?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:56


















  • $begingroup$
    No. What does even $h = 1$ mean in Banach spaces?
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Nov 26 '18 at 4:56
















$begingroup$
No. What does even $h = 1$ mean in Banach spaces?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Nov 26 '18 at 4:56




$begingroup$
No. What does even $h = 1$ mean in Banach spaces?
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Nov 26 '18 at 4:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Yes, it makes sense in case $E = mathbb{K}$ where $mathbb{K}$ is $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, i.e. what you said makes sense for your first example. The comment of @WillM. is key here, as $h=1$ in Banach spaces only means something if the Banach space is a field too. Note that your equation $T_{x_0}(h) = h(Df_{x_0})$ doesn't make sense in any other case.



More precisely: $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)$ is isometrically isomorphic to $F$ via $varphicolonmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)to F,, Amapsto A1$.



To see this, note that $varphi$ obviously is linear and injective. Next, consider, given $vin F$, the definition $(A_vx:=xcdot v,; xinmathbb{K})$. That way we get $A_vinmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)$ and $A_v1 = v$, i.e. $varphi$ is surjective. Finally,
$$ Vert AxVert_F = vert xvert Vert A1Vert_Fleq Vert A1Vert_f,quad vert xvert leq 1,; Ainmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F),$$
which easily shows that $Vert AVert_{mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)} = Vert A1Vert_F$.



In conclusion, you may identify $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F) = F$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2936202%2fexplaination-of-the-frechet-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it makes sense in case $E = mathbb{K}$ where $mathbb{K}$ is $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, i.e. what you said makes sense for your first example. The comment of @WillM. is key here, as $h=1$ in Banach spaces only means something if the Banach space is a field too. Note that your equation $T_{x_0}(h) = h(Df_{x_0})$ doesn't make sense in any other case.



    More precisely: $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)$ is isometrically isomorphic to $F$ via $varphicolonmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)to F,, Amapsto A1$.



    To see this, note that $varphi$ obviously is linear and injective. Next, consider, given $vin F$, the definition $(A_vx:=xcdot v,; xinmathbb{K})$. That way we get $A_vinmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)$ and $A_v1 = v$, i.e. $varphi$ is surjective. Finally,
    $$ Vert AxVert_F = vert xvert Vert A1Vert_Fleq Vert A1Vert_f,quad vert xvert leq 1,; Ainmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F),$$
    which easily shows that $Vert AVert_{mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)} = Vert A1Vert_F$.



    In conclusion, you may identify $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F) = F$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Yes, it makes sense in case $E = mathbb{K}$ where $mathbb{K}$ is $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, i.e. what you said makes sense for your first example. The comment of @WillM. is key here, as $h=1$ in Banach spaces only means something if the Banach space is a field too. Note that your equation $T_{x_0}(h) = h(Df_{x_0})$ doesn't make sense in any other case.



      More precisely: $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)$ is isometrically isomorphic to $F$ via $varphicolonmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)to F,, Amapsto A1$.



      To see this, note that $varphi$ obviously is linear and injective. Next, consider, given $vin F$, the definition $(A_vx:=xcdot v,; xinmathbb{K})$. That way we get $A_vinmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)$ and $A_v1 = v$, i.e. $varphi$ is surjective. Finally,
      $$ Vert AxVert_F = vert xvert Vert A1Vert_Fleq Vert A1Vert_f,quad vert xvert leq 1,; Ainmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F),$$
      which easily shows that $Vert AVert_{mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)} = Vert A1Vert_F$.



      In conclusion, you may identify $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F) = F$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Yes, it makes sense in case $E = mathbb{K}$ where $mathbb{K}$ is $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, i.e. what you said makes sense for your first example. The comment of @WillM. is key here, as $h=1$ in Banach spaces only means something if the Banach space is a field too. Note that your equation $T_{x_0}(h) = h(Df_{x_0})$ doesn't make sense in any other case.



        More precisely: $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)$ is isometrically isomorphic to $F$ via $varphicolonmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)to F,, Amapsto A1$.



        To see this, note that $varphi$ obviously is linear and injective. Next, consider, given $vin F$, the definition $(A_vx:=xcdot v,; xinmathbb{K})$. That way we get $A_vinmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)$ and $A_v1 = v$, i.e. $varphi$ is surjective. Finally,
        $$ Vert AxVert_F = vert xvert Vert A1Vert_Fleq Vert A1Vert_f,quad vert xvert leq 1,; Ainmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F),$$
        which easily shows that $Vert AVert_{mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)} = Vert A1Vert_F$.



        In conclusion, you may identify $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F) = F$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Yes, it makes sense in case $E = mathbb{K}$ where $mathbb{K}$ is $mathbb{R}$ or $mathbb{C}$, i.e. what you said makes sense for your first example. The comment of @WillM. is key here, as $h=1$ in Banach spaces only means something if the Banach space is a field too. Note that your equation $T_{x_0}(h) = h(Df_{x_0})$ doesn't make sense in any other case.



        More precisely: $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)$ is isometrically isomorphic to $F$ via $varphicolonmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)to F,, Amapsto A1$.



        To see this, note that $varphi$ obviously is linear and injective. Next, consider, given $vin F$, the definition $(A_vx:=xcdot v,; xinmathbb{K})$. That way we get $A_vinmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F)$ and $A_v1 = v$, i.e. $varphi$ is surjective. Finally,
        $$ Vert AxVert_F = vert xvert Vert A1Vert_Fleq Vert A1Vert_f,quad vert xvert leq 1,; Ainmathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F),$$
        which easily shows that $Vert AVert_{mathcal{L}(mathbb{K},F)} = Vert A1Vert_F$.



        In conclusion, you may identify $mathcal{L}(mathbb{K}, F) = F$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 '18 at 18:44

























        answered Dec 3 '18 at 18:32









        RamenRamen

        463412




        463412






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2936202%2fexplaination-of-the-frechet-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei