tracker-extract is using a huge amount of RAM
I looked online for an easy solution, but I couldn't find any. I know it's part of GNOME desktop environment. This is the memory usage that appears in the Processes tab of System Monitor.
Process Name User %CPU ID Memory ▼ Disk read total
tracker-extract Zipdox 0 4825 5.0 GiB 59.7 MiB
Discord Zipdox 1 6540 209.8 MiB 9.9 MiB
firefox Zipdox 0 6119 157.3 MiB 25.8 MiB
Web Content Zipdox 0 6192 127.6 MiB N/A
gnome-shell Zipdox 1 4503 106.0 MiB 16.3 MiB
gnome-software Zipdox 0 5266 105.4 MiB 19.0 MiB
WebExtensions Zipdox 0 6237 72.1 MiB N/A
edit: I tried all of these solutions https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/9822/how-do-i-disable-tracker-in-gnome/ but none of them worked. I ended up writing a script that kills it all the time but this is not a good solution.
gnome ram tracker
add a comment |
I looked online for an easy solution, but I couldn't find any. I know it's part of GNOME desktop environment. This is the memory usage that appears in the Processes tab of System Monitor.
Process Name User %CPU ID Memory ▼ Disk read total
tracker-extract Zipdox 0 4825 5.0 GiB 59.7 MiB
Discord Zipdox 1 6540 209.8 MiB 9.9 MiB
firefox Zipdox 0 6119 157.3 MiB 25.8 MiB
Web Content Zipdox 0 6192 127.6 MiB N/A
gnome-shell Zipdox 1 4503 106.0 MiB 16.3 MiB
gnome-software Zipdox 0 5266 105.4 MiB 19.0 MiB
WebExtensions Zipdox 0 6237 72.1 MiB N/A
edit: I tried all of these solutions https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/9822/how-do-i-disable-tracker-in-gnome/ but none of them worked. I ended up writing a script that kills it all the time but this is not a good solution.
gnome ram tracker
5.0 GiB memory is not normal RAM usage for Tracker (possibly a bug). According to wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/WhatIsTracker typical RAM usage for Tracker is 4-6 MB. Tracker runs at nice+19 so it should have a minimal impact on your system. 5.0 GiB memory is not minimal impact on your system.
– karel
Jan 3 at 4:49
unix.stackexchange.com/a/481214/255251
– P_Yadav
Jan 3 at 6:51
Edit your question to clearly reflect the question. Tracker indeed is eating CPU and memory. Probably this is why Ubuntu does not include it by default, although that may change with 19.04. I will then remove it right away. Tried it several times on Antergos without satisfactory results (would not find files by file name!)
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 9:25
@vanadium I edited this question. Pleae comment if there's anything else that could be added to this question.
– karel
Jan 3 at 19:00
Still no actual question is being formulated.
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
I looked online for an easy solution, but I couldn't find any. I know it's part of GNOME desktop environment. This is the memory usage that appears in the Processes tab of System Monitor.
Process Name User %CPU ID Memory ▼ Disk read total
tracker-extract Zipdox 0 4825 5.0 GiB 59.7 MiB
Discord Zipdox 1 6540 209.8 MiB 9.9 MiB
firefox Zipdox 0 6119 157.3 MiB 25.8 MiB
Web Content Zipdox 0 6192 127.6 MiB N/A
gnome-shell Zipdox 1 4503 106.0 MiB 16.3 MiB
gnome-software Zipdox 0 5266 105.4 MiB 19.0 MiB
WebExtensions Zipdox 0 6237 72.1 MiB N/A
edit: I tried all of these solutions https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/9822/how-do-i-disable-tracker-in-gnome/ but none of them worked. I ended up writing a script that kills it all the time but this is not a good solution.
gnome ram tracker
I looked online for an easy solution, but I couldn't find any. I know it's part of GNOME desktop environment. This is the memory usage that appears in the Processes tab of System Monitor.
Process Name User %CPU ID Memory ▼ Disk read total
tracker-extract Zipdox 0 4825 5.0 GiB 59.7 MiB
Discord Zipdox 1 6540 209.8 MiB 9.9 MiB
firefox Zipdox 0 6119 157.3 MiB 25.8 MiB
Web Content Zipdox 0 6192 127.6 MiB N/A
gnome-shell Zipdox 1 4503 106.0 MiB 16.3 MiB
gnome-software Zipdox 0 5266 105.4 MiB 19.0 MiB
WebExtensions Zipdox 0 6237 72.1 MiB N/A
edit: I tried all of these solutions https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/9822/how-do-i-disable-tracker-in-gnome/ but none of them worked. I ended up writing a script that kills it all the time but this is not a good solution.
gnome ram tracker
gnome ram tracker
edited Jan 7 at 11:37
Zipdox
asked Jan 2 at 20:28
ZipdoxZipdox
63
63
5.0 GiB memory is not normal RAM usage for Tracker (possibly a bug). According to wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/WhatIsTracker typical RAM usage for Tracker is 4-6 MB. Tracker runs at nice+19 so it should have a minimal impact on your system. 5.0 GiB memory is not minimal impact on your system.
– karel
Jan 3 at 4:49
unix.stackexchange.com/a/481214/255251
– P_Yadav
Jan 3 at 6:51
Edit your question to clearly reflect the question. Tracker indeed is eating CPU and memory. Probably this is why Ubuntu does not include it by default, although that may change with 19.04. I will then remove it right away. Tried it several times on Antergos without satisfactory results (would not find files by file name!)
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 9:25
@vanadium I edited this question. Pleae comment if there's anything else that could be added to this question.
– karel
Jan 3 at 19:00
Still no actual question is being formulated.
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
5.0 GiB memory is not normal RAM usage for Tracker (possibly a bug). According to wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/WhatIsTracker typical RAM usage for Tracker is 4-6 MB. Tracker runs at nice+19 so it should have a minimal impact on your system. 5.0 GiB memory is not minimal impact on your system.
– karel
Jan 3 at 4:49
unix.stackexchange.com/a/481214/255251
– P_Yadav
Jan 3 at 6:51
Edit your question to clearly reflect the question. Tracker indeed is eating CPU and memory. Probably this is why Ubuntu does not include it by default, although that may change with 19.04. I will then remove it right away. Tried it several times on Antergos without satisfactory results (would not find files by file name!)
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 9:25
@vanadium I edited this question. Pleae comment if there's anything else that could be added to this question.
– karel
Jan 3 at 19:00
Still no actual question is being formulated.
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 20:13
5.0 GiB memory is not normal RAM usage for Tracker (possibly a bug). According to wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/WhatIsTracker typical RAM usage for Tracker is 4-6 MB. Tracker runs at nice+19 so it should have a minimal impact on your system. 5.0 GiB memory is not minimal impact on your system.
– karel
Jan 3 at 4:49
5.0 GiB memory is not normal RAM usage for Tracker (possibly a bug). According to wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/WhatIsTracker typical RAM usage for Tracker is 4-6 MB. Tracker runs at nice+19 so it should have a minimal impact on your system. 5.0 GiB memory is not minimal impact on your system.
– karel
Jan 3 at 4:49
unix.stackexchange.com/a/481214/255251
– P_Yadav
Jan 3 at 6:51
unix.stackexchange.com/a/481214/255251
– P_Yadav
Jan 3 at 6:51
Edit your question to clearly reflect the question. Tracker indeed is eating CPU and memory. Probably this is why Ubuntu does not include it by default, although that may change with 19.04. I will then remove it right away. Tried it several times on Antergos without satisfactory results (would not find files by file name!)
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 9:25
Edit your question to clearly reflect the question. Tracker indeed is eating CPU and memory. Probably this is why Ubuntu does not include it by default, although that may change with 19.04. I will then remove it right away. Tried it several times on Antergos without satisfactory results (would not find files by file name!)
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 9:25
@vanadium I edited this question. Pleae comment if there's anything else that could be added to this question.
– karel
Jan 3 at 19:00
@vanadium I edited this question. Pleae comment if there's anything else that could be added to this question.
– karel
Jan 3 at 19:00
Still no actual question is being formulated.
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 20:13
Still no actual question is being formulated.
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 20:13
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1106386%2ftracker-extract-is-using-a-huge-amount-of-ram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1106386%2ftracker-extract-is-using-a-huge-amount-of-ram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5.0 GiB memory is not normal RAM usage for Tracker (possibly a bug). According to wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Tracker/WhatIsTracker typical RAM usage for Tracker is 4-6 MB. Tracker runs at nice+19 so it should have a minimal impact on your system. 5.0 GiB memory is not minimal impact on your system.
– karel
Jan 3 at 4:49
unix.stackexchange.com/a/481214/255251
– P_Yadav
Jan 3 at 6:51
Edit your question to clearly reflect the question. Tracker indeed is eating CPU and memory. Probably this is why Ubuntu does not include it by default, although that may change with 19.04. I will then remove it right away. Tried it several times on Antergos without satisfactory results (would not find files by file name!)
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 9:25
@vanadium I edited this question. Pleae comment if there's anything else that could be added to this question.
– karel
Jan 3 at 19:00
Still no actual question is being formulated.
– vanadium
Jan 3 at 20:13