Find the sum $sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)*(n+2)}$












-1












$begingroup$


Need to find the sum $sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$





What I did based on the suggestions:




  1. Multiplied and divided by $x$

  2. "forgot" the $x$ in the denominator and then took the derivative of the remaining expression 2 times: ended up getting $frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n$

  3. Expanded this geometric series and then integrated the result once:


$frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n = frac{1}{x}int frac{x}{1-x}dx = frac{1}{x}(-x - ln(1-x)) $




  1. And then integrated again:


$frac{1}{x}int (-x - ln(1-x))dx = frac{1}{x}(-0.5x^2+x-xln(1-x)+ln(1-x)) $ which is apparently a correct answer.



Is there any other more adequate way of solving this? Seems really non-intuitive to me, especially the double derivative-double integral part. Or maybe someone could shed the light regarding this concept ... like, why does it work in such a marvelous way










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Please remove the $*$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:27










  • $begingroup$
    Done. Is there a way to properly use multiplication? Sometimes my input bugs out if I try to put different functions in a line
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    First multiply by $x$. Then differentiate w.r.t. $x$ twice. You'll then have a geometric series.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:36










  • $begingroup$
    This is exactly what I did, I just don't understand, why it works
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:39
















-1












$begingroup$


Need to find the sum $sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$





What I did based on the suggestions:




  1. Multiplied and divided by $x$

  2. "forgot" the $x$ in the denominator and then took the derivative of the remaining expression 2 times: ended up getting $frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n$

  3. Expanded this geometric series and then integrated the result once:


$frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n = frac{1}{x}int frac{x}{1-x}dx = frac{1}{x}(-x - ln(1-x)) $




  1. And then integrated again:


$frac{1}{x}int (-x - ln(1-x))dx = frac{1}{x}(-0.5x^2+x-xln(1-x)+ln(1-x)) $ which is apparently a correct answer.



Is there any other more adequate way of solving this? Seems really non-intuitive to me, especially the double derivative-double integral part. Or maybe someone could shed the light regarding this concept ... like, why does it work in such a marvelous way










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Please remove the $*$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:27










  • $begingroup$
    Done. Is there a way to properly use multiplication? Sometimes my input bugs out if I try to put different functions in a line
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    First multiply by $x$. Then differentiate w.r.t. $x$ twice. You'll then have a geometric series.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:36










  • $begingroup$
    This is exactly what I did, I just don't understand, why it works
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:39














-1












-1








-1


0



$begingroup$


Need to find the sum $sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$





What I did based on the suggestions:




  1. Multiplied and divided by $x$

  2. "forgot" the $x$ in the denominator and then took the derivative of the remaining expression 2 times: ended up getting $frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n$

  3. Expanded this geometric series and then integrated the result once:


$frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n = frac{1}{x}int frac{x}{1-x}dx = frac{1}{x}(-x - ln(1-x)) $




  1. And then integrated again:


$frac{1}{x}int (-x - ln(1-x))dx = frac{1}{x}(-0.5x^2+x-xln(1-x)+ln(1-x)) $ which is apparently a correct answer.



Is there any other more adequate way of solving this? Seems really non-intuitive to me, especially the double derivative-double integral part. Or maybe someone could shed the light regarding this concept ... like, why does it work in such a marvelous way










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Need to find the sum $sum_{n=1}^{infty} frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$





What I did based on the suggestions:




  1. Multiplied and divided by $x$

  2. "forgot" the $x$ in the denominator and then took the derivative of the remaining expression 2 times: ended up getting $frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n$

  3. Expanded this geometric series and then integrated the result once:


$frac{1}{x}sum_{n=1}^{infty} x^n = frac{1}{x}int frac{x}{1-x}dx = frac{1}{x}(-x - ln(1-x)) $




  1. And then integrated again:


$frac{1}{x}int (-x - ln(1-x))dx = frac{1}{x}(-0.5x^2+x-xln(1-x)+ln(1-x)) $ which is apparently a correct answer.



Is there any other more adequate way of solving this? Seems really non-intuitive to me, especially the double derivative-double integral part. Or maybe someone could shed the light regarding this concept ... like, why does it work in such a marvelous way







sequences-and-series power-series






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 7 '18 at 6:30







Makina

















asked Dec 7 '18 at 6:19









MakinaMakina

1,1581316




1,1581316












  • $begingroup$
    Please remove the $*$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:27










  • $begingroup$
    Done. Is there a way to properly use multiplication? Sometimes my input bugs out if I try to put different functions in a line
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    First multiply by $x$. Then differentiate w.r.t. $x$ twice. You'll then have a geometric series.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:36










  • $begingroup$
    This is exactly what I did, I just don't understand, why it works
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:39


















  • $begingroup$
    Please remove the $*$ notation.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:27










  • $begingroup$
    Done. Is there a way to properly use multiplication? Sometimes my input bugs out if I try to put different functions in a line
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:31










  • $begingroup$
    First multiply by $x$. Then differentiate w.r.t. $x$ twice. You'll then have a geometric series.
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:36










  • $begingroup$
    This is exactly what I did, I just don't understand, why it works
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 6:39
















$begingroup$
Please remove the $*$ notation.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 7 '18 at 6:27




$begingroup$
Please remove the $*$ notation.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 7 '18 at 6:27












$begingroup$
Done. Is there a way to properly use multiplication? Sometimes my input bugs out if I try to put different functions in a line
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 6:31




$begingroup$
Done. Is there a way to properly use multiplication? Sometimes my input bugs out if I try to put different functions in a line
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 6:31












$begingroup$
First multiply by $x$. Then differentiate w.r.t. $x$ twice. You'll then have a geometric series.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 7 '18 at 6:36




$begingroup$
First multiply by $x$. Then differentiate w.r.t. $x$ twice. You'll then have a geometric series.
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
Dec 7 '18 at 6:36












$begingroup$
This is exactly what I did, I just don't understand, why it works
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 6:39




$begingroup$
This is exactly what I did, I just don't understand, why it works
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 6:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Note that the radius of convergence is $1$.



If $x=0$, the sum is $0$.



Otherwise, the Taylor series of $ln(1-x)$ for $x in [-1,1) setminus {0}$ is$$ln(1-x) = sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} tag{1}$$



$$ln(1-x) = xsum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n}}{n+1}=xsum_{n=-1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2}$$



$$frac{ln(1-x)}{x}-1 =sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2} tag{2}$$



Use $(1)$ to subtract $(2)$,



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=frac{x}{2}+sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}=-ln (1-x) + frac{ln (1-x)}{x}-1-frac{x}{2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50





















2












$begingroup$

All the approaches I have read so far are essentially based around the fact that the radius of convergence of a (complex) power series $f(z)$ remains the same when integrating and differentiating $f(z)$ term by term. A possible approach (which is basically the same argument, written formally) is to find an ordinary differential equation that $f(z)$ satisfies and try to solve such equation on a suitable domain*.



That is, if you let $f(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$ then $f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n}}{n+2}$ for all $xin (-1,1)$ by the first theorem I mentioned. Hence
begin{equation}
x^2f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+2}}{n+2}=frac{1}{2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)
end{equation}

by the uniqueness of Taylor expansions. Therefore $f(x)$ satisfies the (trivial) ordinary differential equation $f'(x)=h(x)$ where $h(x)=frac{1}{2x^2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)$. Since $hin C^{1}(0,1)$ one can apply the machinery from the theorems of existence and uniqueness for first-order ODE’s to find that
begin{equation}
f(x)=-1-frac{x}{2}-log (1-x)+frac{log (1-x)}{x}
end{equation}

in $(0,1)$.





*A theorem one could apply is the following. Let $Omegasubset mathbb{C}$ be a simply connected region and $z_0in Omega$. For any complex numbers $h_0,dots,h_{n-1}$ there exists a unique holomorphic function $h$ on $Omega$ such that
begin{equation}
frac{d^n h}{dz^n}+a_1frac{d^{n-1} h}{dz^{n-1}}+cdots+a_{n-1}frac{dh}{dz}+a_nh=0
end{equation}

in $Omega$ and moreover $h(z_0)=h_0$, $h'(z_0)=h_1$,$dots$, $h^{(n-1)}(z_0)=h_{n-1}$.



Sadly, this theorem does not apply to the the non-homogenous ODE I that found.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029556%2ffind-the-sum-sum-n-1-infty-fracxn1n1n2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Note that the radius of convergence is $1$.



If $x=0$, the sum is $0$.



Otherwise, the Taylor series of $ln(1-x)$ for $x in [-1,1) setminus {0}$ is$$ln(1-x) = sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} tag{1}$$



$$ln(1-x) = xsum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n}}{n+1}=xsum_{n=-1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2}$$



$$frac{ln(1-x)}{x}-1 =sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2} tag{2}$$



Use $(1)$ to subtract $(2)$,



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=frac{x}{2}+sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}=-ln (1-x) + frac{ln (1-x)}{x}-1-frac{x}{2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50


















2












$begingroup$

Note that the radius of convergence is $1$.



If $x=0$, the sum is $0$.



Otherwise, the Taylor series of $ln(1-x)$ for $x in [-1,1) setminus {0}$ is$$ln(1-x) = sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} tag{1}$$



$$ln(1-x) = xsum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n}}{n+1}=xsum_{n=-1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2}$$



$$frac{ln(1-x)}{x}-1 =sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2} tag{2}$$



Use $(1)$ to subtract $(2)$,



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=frac{x}{2}+sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}=-ln (1-x) + frac{ln (1-x)}{x}-1-frac{x}{2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50
















2












2








2





$begingroup$

Note that the radius of convergence is $1$.



If $x=0$, the sum is $0$.



Otherwise, the Taylor series of $ln(1-x)$ for $x in [-1,1) setminus {0}$ is$$ln(1-x) = sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} tag{1}$$



$$ln(1-x) = xsum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n}}{n+1}=xsum_{n=-1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2}$$



$$frac{ln(1-x)}{x}-1 =sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2} tag{2}$$



Use $(1)$ to subtract $(2)$,



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=frac{x}{2}+sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}=-ln (1-x) + frac{ln (1-x)}{x}-1-frac{x}{2}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Note that the radius of convergence is $1$.



If $x=0$, the sum is $0$.



Otherwise, the Taylor series of $ln(1-x)$ for $x in [-1,1) setminus {0}$ is$$ln(1-x) = sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n+1}}{n+1} tag{1}$$



$$ln(1-x) = xsum_{n=0}^inftyfrac{x^{n}}{n+1}=xsum_{n=-1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2}$$



$$frac{ln(1-x)}{x}-1 =sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{n+2} tag{2}$$



Use $(1)$ to subtract $(2)$,



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$ln (1-x) - frac{ln (1-x)}{x}+1=frac{x}{2}+sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$$



$$sum_{n=1}^infty frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}=-ln (1-x) + frac{ln (1-x)}{x}-1-frac{x}{2}$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 7 '18 at 7:54

























answered Dec 7 '18 at 6:48









Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

100k1466117




100k1466117












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50




















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50


















$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 20:50






$begingroup$
Thank you for the answer. Really cool technique with this sum partitioning $($when you made sum from $n = 0$ to the sum from $n = -1)$
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 20:50













2












$begingroup$

All the approaches I have read so far are essentially based around the fact that the radius of convergence of a (complex) power series $f(z)$ remains the same when integrating and differentiating $f(z)$ term by term. A possible approach (which is basically the same argument, written formally) is to find an ordinary differential equation that $f(z)$ satisfies and try to solve such equation on a suitable domain*.



That is, if you let $f(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$ then $f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n}}{n+2}$ for all $xin (-1,1)$ by the first theorem I mentioned. Hence
begin{equation}
x^2f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+2}}{n+2}=frac{1}{2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)
end{equation}

by the uniqueness of Taylor expansions. Therefore $f(x)$ satisfies the (trivial) ordinary differential equation $f'(x)=h(x)$ where $h(x)=frac{1}{2x^2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)$. Since $hin C^{1}(0,1)$ one can apply the machinery from the theorems of existence and uniqueness for first-order ODE’s to find that
begin{equation}
f(x)=-1-frac{x}{2}-log (1-x)+frac{log (1-x)}{x}
end{equation}

in $(0,1)$.





*A theorem one could apply is the following. Let $Omegasubset mathbb{C}$ be a simply connected region and $z_0in Omega$. For any complex numbers $h_0,dots,h_{n-1}$ there exists a unique holomorphic function $h$ on $Omega$ such that
begin{equation}
frac{d^n h}{dz^n}+a_1frac{d^{n-1} h}{dz^{n-1}}+cdots+a_{n-1}frac{dh}{dz}+a_nh=0
end{equation}

in $Omega$ and moreover $h(z_0)=h_0$, $h'(z_0)=h_1$,$dots$, $h^{(n-1)}(z_0)=h_{n-1}$.



Sadly, this theorem does not apply to the the non-homogenous ODE I that found.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50
















2












$begingroup$

All the approaches I have read so far are essentially based around the fact that the radius of convergence of a (complex) power series $f(z)$ remains the same when integrating and differentiating $f(z)$ term by term. A possible approach (which is basically the same argument, written formally) is to find an ordinary differential equation that $f(z)$ satisfies and try to solve such equation on a suitable domain*.



That is, if you let $f(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$ then $f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n}}{n+2}$ for all $xin (-1,1)$ by the first theorem I mentioned. Hence
begin{equation}
x^2f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+2}}{n+2}=frac{1}{2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)
end{equation}

by the uniqueness of Taylor expansions. Therefore $f(x)$ satisfies the (trivial) ordinary differential equation $f'(x)=h(x)$ where $h(x)=frac{1}{2x^2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)$. Since $hin C^{1}(0,1)$ one can apply the machinery from the theorems of existence and uniqueness for first-order ODE’s to find that
begin{equation}
f(x)=-1-frac{x}{2}-log (1-x)+frac{log (1-x)}{x}
end{equation}

in $(0,1)$.





*A theorem one could apply is the following. Let $Omegasubset mathbb{C}$ be a simply connected region and $z_0in Omega$. For any complex numbers $h_0,dots,h_{n-1}$ there exists a unique holomorphic function $h$ on $Omega$ such that
begin{equation}
frac{d^n h}{dz^n}+a_1frac{d^{n-1} h}{dz^{n-1}}+cdots+a_{n-1}frac{dh}{dz}+a_nh=0
end{equation}

in $Omega$ and moreover $h(z_0)=h_0$, $h'(z_0)=h_1$,$dots$, $h^{(n-1)}(z_0)=h_{n-1}$.



Sadly, this theorem does not apply to the the non-homogenous ODE I that found.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50














2












2








2





$begingroup$

All the approaches I have read so far are essentially based around the fact that the radius of convergence of a (complex) power series $f(z)$ remains the same when integrating and differentiating $f(z)$ term by term. A possible approach (which is basically the same argument, written formally) is to find an ordinary differential equation that $f(z)$ satisfies and try to solve such equation on a suitable domain*.



That is, if you let $f(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$ then $f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n}}{n+2}$ for all $xin (-1,1)$ by the first theorem I mentioned. Hence
begin{equation}
x^2f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+2}}{n+2}=frac{1}{2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)
end{equation}

by the uniqueness of Taylor expansions. Therefore $f(x)$ satisfies the (trivial) ordinary differential equation $f'(x)=h(x)$ where $h(x)=frac{1}{2x^2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)$. Since $hin C^{1}(0,1)$ one can apply the machinery from the theorems of existence and uniqueness for first-order ODE’s to find that
begin{equation}
f(x)=-1-frac{x}{2}-log (1-x)+frac{log (1-x)}{x}
end{equation}

in $(0,1)$.





*A theorem one could apply is the following. Let $Omegasubset mathbb{C}$ be a simply connected region and $z_0in Omega$. For any complex numbers $h_0,dots,h_{n-1}$ there exists a unique holomorphic function $h$ on $Omega$ such that
begin{equation}
frac{d^n h}{dz^n}+a_1frac{d^{n-1} h}{dz^{n-1}}+cdots+a_{n-1}frac{dh}{dz}+a_nh=0
end{equation}

in $Omega$ and moreover $h(z_0)=h_0$, $h'(z_0)=h_1$,$dots$, $h^{(n-1)}(z_0)=h_{n-1}$.



Sadly, this theorem does not apply to the the non-homogenous ODE I that found.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



All the approaches I have read so far are essentially based around the fact that the radius of convergence of a (complex) power series $f(z)$ remains the same when integrating and differentiating $f(z)$ term by term. A possible approach (which is basically the same argument, written formally) is to find an ordinary differential equation that $f(z)$ satisfies and try to solve such equation on a suitable domain*.



That is, if you let $f(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+1}}{(n+1)(n+2)}$ then $f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n}}{n+2}$ for all $xin (-1,1)$ by the first theorem I mentioned. Hence
begin{equation}
x^2f'(x)=sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{x^{n+2}}{n+2}=frac{1}{2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)
end{equation}

by the uniqueness of Taylor expansions. Therefore $f(x)$ satisfies the (trivial) ordinary differential equation $f'(x)=h(x)$ where $h(x)=frac{1}{2x^2} left(-x^2-2 x-2 log (1-x)right)$. Since $hin C^{1}(0,1)$ one can apply the machinery from the theorems of existence and uniqueness for first-order ODE’s to find that
begin{equation}
f(x)=-1-frac{x}{2}-log (1-x)+frac{log (1-x)}{x}
end{equation}

in $(0,1)$.





*A theorem one could apply is the following. Let $Omegasubset mathbb{C}$ be a simply connected region and $z_0in Omega$. For any complex numbers $h_0,dots,h_{n-1}$ there exists a unique holomorphic function $h$ on $Omega$ such that
begin{equation}
frac{d^n h}{dz^n}+a_1frac{d^{n-1} h}{dz^{n-1}}+cdots+a_{n-1}frac{dh}{dz}+a_nh=0
end{equation}

in $Omega$ and moreover $h(z_0)=h_0$, $h'(z_0)=h_1$,$dots$, $h^{(n-1)}(z_0)=h_{n-1}$.



Sadly, this theorem does not apply to the the non-homogenous ODE I that found.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 7 '18 at 7:54









uuuuuuuuuuuu

211




211












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Makina
    Dec 7 '18 at 20:50
















$begingroup$
Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 20:50




$begingroup$
Thank you for your reply. Looks interesting, but rather complicated compared to the other offered solution.
$endgroup$
– Makina
Dec 7 '18 at 20:50


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029556%2ffind-the-sum-sum-n-1-infty-fracxn1n1n2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei