identify GNS construction as asubalgebra of $R^{omega}$
$begingroup$
I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.
1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.
1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.
1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
$endgroup$
I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.
1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras
asked Dec 7 '18 at 5:23
mathrookiemathrookie
845512
845512
$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the first point:
Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$
Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029502%2fidentify-gns-construction-as-asubalgebra-of-r-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
For the first point:
Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$
Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first point:
Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$
Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the first point:
Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$
Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.
$endgroup$
For the first point:
Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$
Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.
answered Dec 7 '18 at 11:59
Adrián González-PérezAdrián González-Pérez
1,086139
1,086139
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029502%2fidentify-gns-construction-as-asubalgebra-of-r-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51