identify GNS construction as asubalgebra of $R^{omega}$












1












$begingroup$


enter image description hereenter image description here



I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.



1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
















1












$begingroup$


enter image description hereenter image description here



I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.



1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 7 '18 at 11:51














1












1








1





$begingroup$


enter image description hereenter image description here



I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.



1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description hereenter image description here



I have two questions In lemma6.5.5.



1.why can we identify the GNS representation of $prod M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)/bigoplus M_{k(n)}(Bbb C)$ with respect to $tau _{omega}$ with a subalgebra of $R^{omega}$.
2.why is the Gns construction unique?







operator-theory operator-algebras c-star-algebras von-neumann-algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 7 '18 at 5:23









mathrookiemathrookie

845512




845512












  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 7 '18 at 11:51


















  • $begingroup$
    In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrián González-Pérez
    Dec 7 '18 at 11:51
















$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51




$begingroup$
In the second question, do you mean, why $tau_omega circ sigma pi$ is the canonical group trace? The fact that the GNS constructions under equal traces seems quite straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Adrián González-Pérez
Dec 7 '18 at 11:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

For the first point:



Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$

Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is it injective ?
    $endgroup$
    – André S.
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:02











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029502%2fidentify-gns-construction-as-asubalgebra-of-r-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

For the first point:



Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$

Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is it injective ?
    $endgroup$
    – André S.
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
















0












$begingroup$

For the first point:



Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$

Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is it injective ?
    $endgroup$
    – André S.
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:02














0












0








0





$begingroup$

For the first point:



Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$

Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



For the first point:



Just assume $k(n) > 1$ for infinitely many $n$ (otherwise the claim is trivial). Note that
$$
R = overline{bigotimes}_n M_{k(n)}
$$

Any sequence $(x_n)_n in prod M_{k(n)}$ gives a sequence in $prod R$ by $x_n mapsto 1^{otimes (n - 1)} otimes x_n$. This gives a map $prod M_k(n) to prod R$. Compose that with the quotient map to get $prod M_k(n) to R^omega$. Recall that $R^omega = prod R / J_omega$. Now check that the $bigoplus M_{k(n)}$ lays inside the tracial ideal $J_omega$ and that the traces agree.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 7 '18 at 11:59









Adrián González-PérezAdrián González-Pérez

1,086139




1,086139












  • $begingroup$
    Is it injective ?
    $endgroup$
    – André S.
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:02


















  • $begingroup$
    Is it injective ?
    $endgroup$
    – André S.
    Dec 7 '18 at 13:02
















$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02




$begingroup$
Is it injective ?
$endgroup$
– André S.
Dec 7 '18 at 13:02


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3029502%2fidentify-gns-construction-as-asubalgebra-of-r-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Quarter-circle Tiles

Mont Emei