Finding function through a graph
$begingroup$
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17
$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20
$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
1
$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
$endgroup$
My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic
edited Nov 30 '18 at 20:20
Misha Lavrov
44.4k555106
44.4k555106
asked Nov 30 '18 at 18:14
shawn kshawn k
396
396
2
$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17
$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20
$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
1
$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17
$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20
$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
1
$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22
2
2
$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17
$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17
$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20
$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20
$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
1
1
$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22
$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22
|
show 3 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$
$endgroup$
From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.
Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.
This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.
$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$
$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$
edited Dec 6 '18 at 6:42
answered Nov 30 '18 at 18:29
KM101KM101
5,9061423
5,9061423
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17
$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20
$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21
1
$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22