Finding function through a graph












1












$begingroup$


enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:22
















1












$begingroup$


enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:22














1












1








1





$begingroup$


enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




enter image description here



My understanding about checking if the function value lies on the graph is putting the x value and checking if it lies on the graph. Now in this example I'm a bit confused, when I solve a b and c, a gives function which will cover values greater than 1, and c will do the reverse. I think b option will cover the values in both + and -ve x axis. Am I interpreting it correctly?







linear-algebra functional-analysis functions arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 30 '18 at 20:20









Misha Lavrov

44.4k555106




44.4k555106










asked Nov 30 '18 at 18:14









shawn kshawn k

396




396








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:22














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:17










  • $begingroup$
    @caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:20










  • $begingroup$
    $(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
    $endgroup$
    – caverac
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:21








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:22








2




2




$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17




$begingroup$
Note that $f(0) = 0$, which of the options satisfy this constraint?
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:17












$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20




$begingroup$
@caverac none of these first 3 options are satisfying this condition!? then?
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:20












$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21




$begingroup$
$(B)$ clearly satisfies that.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21












$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21






$begingroup$
Yes, one of them does. What I mean is, when you evaluate the function at $x = 0$, the result should be $0$
$endgroup$
– caverac
Nov 30 '18 at 18:21






1




1




$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22




$begingroup$
Option $(B)$ is what is known as a piecewise function (really just an absolute value function in this case). At $x = 0$, $x < 3$ so you use $y = -x$.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Nov 30 '18 at 18:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 for awesomeness!
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:35











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 for awesomeness!
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
















2












$begingroup$

From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1 for awesomeness!
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:35














2












2








2





$begingroup$

From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



From inspection, it is clear the graph passes through $(0, 0)$, the origin. Neither $y = vert 3x-3vert$ nor $y = vert3x-1vert$ satisfy this.



Looking at option $(B)$, at $x = 0$, you have $x < 3$, so $y = -x$, meaning $y = 0$. Hence, $(B)$ satisfies this condition. Checking the other two points, you can see both $(3, -3)$ and $(6, 0)$ satisfy $y = x-6$ (because $x geq 3$). Hence, option $(B)$ is correct.



This function is known known as a “piecewise function” since the function contains two “sub-functions” which apply for a certain part of the domain. If $x geq 3$, you have a different function than if $x < 3$ (and they’re independent of each other). The absolute value function is a piecewise function because $vert xvert = x$ if $x geq 0$ and $vert xvert = -x$ if $x < 0$, and option $(B)$’s function is actually the absolute value function $y = vert x-3vert -3$ but it’s written as two separate functions.



$$xgeq 3 implies x-3 geq 0 implies y = x-3-3 implies y = x-6$$



$$x < 3 implies x-3 < 0 implies y = -(x-3)-3 implies y = -x+3-3 implies y = -x$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Dec 6 '18 at 6:42

























answered Nov 30 '18 at 18:29









KM101KM101

5,9061423




5,9061423












  • $begingroup$
    +1 for awesomeness!
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:35


















  • $begingroup$
    +1 for awesomeness!
    $endgroup$
    – shawn k
    Nov 30 '18 at 18:35
















$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35




$begingroup$
+1 for awesomeness!
$endgroup$
– shawn k
Nov 30 '18 at 18:35


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020430%2ffinding-function-through-a-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei