$(x_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is cauchy if and only if $d(x_{n_k},x_{m_k}) rightarrow 0$ for any two sequences...












1












$begingroup$


I want to know if the following assertion is correct:




If $(M,d)$ is a metric space, then $(x_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is cauchy if and only if $d(x_{n_k},x_{m_k}) rightarrow 0$ for any two sequences of natural numbers $n_k, m_k rightarrow infty$




Of course the direction from left to right is true. But I am unsure of the direction from right to left. Can anyone give a proof or state a counterexample?



Thanks a lot in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd assume the sequence of the distances to tend to $0$ instead of $infty$ for a Cauchy series!
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, that was a typo. Do you know how to check if this is true?
    $endgroup$
    – vaoy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    Just the negation of $(x_n)$ being Cauchy. You will get the implication from right to left easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:50
















1












$begingroup$


I want to know if the following assertion is correct:




If $(M,d)$ is a metric space, then $(x_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is cauchy if and only if $d(x_{n_k},x_{m_k}) rightarrow 0$ for any two sequences of natural numbers $n_k, m_k rightarrow infty$




Of course the direction from left to right is true. But I am unsure of the direction from right to left. Can anyone give a proof or state a counterexample?



Thanks a lot in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd assume the sequence of the distances to tend to $0$ instead of $infty$ for a Cauchy series!
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, that was a typo. Do you know how to check if this is true?
    $endgroup$
    – vaoy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    Just the negation of $(x_n)$ being Cauchy. You will get the implication from right to left easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:50














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I want to know if the following assertion is correct:




If $(M,d)$ is a metric space, then $(x_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is cauchy if and only if $d(x_{n_k},x_{m_k}) rightarrow 0$ for any two sequences of natural numbers $n_k, m_k rightarrow infty$




Of course the direction from left to right is true. But I am unsure of the direction from right to left. Can anyone give a proof or state a counterexample?



Thanks a lot in advance!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I want to know if the following assertion is correct:




If $(M,d)$ is a metric space, then $(x_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is cauchy if and only if $d(x_{n_k},x_{m_k}) rightarrow 0$ for any two sequences of natural numbers $n_k, m_k rightarrow infty$




Of course the direction from left to right is true. But I am unsure of the direction from right to left. Can anyone give a proof or state a counterexample?



Thanks a lot in advance!







real-analysis sequences-and-series analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 23 '18 at 23:03







vaoy

















asked Oct 23 '18 at 22:52









vaoyvaoy

537210




537210








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd assume the sequence of the distances to tend to $0$ instead of $infty$ for a Cauchy series!
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, that was a typo. Do you know how to check if this is true?
    $endgroup$
    – vaoy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    Just the negation of $(x_n)$ being Cauchy. You will get the implication from right to left easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:50














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I'd assume the sequence of the distances to tend to $0$ instead of $infty$ for a Cauchy series!
    $endgroup$
    – Ingix
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:00










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, that was a typo. Do you know how to check if this is true?
    $endgroup$
    – vaoy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:05










  • $begingroup$
    Just the negation of $(x_n)$ being Cauchy. You will get the implication from right to left easily.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Oct 23 '18 at 23:50








1




1




$begingroup$
I'd assume the sequence of the distances to tend to $0$ instead of $infty$ for a Cauchy series!
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Oct 23 '18 at 23:00




$begingroup$
I'd assume the sequence of the distances to tend to $0$ instead of $infty$ for a Cauchy series!
$endgroup$
– Ingix
Oct 23 '18 at 23:00












$begingroup$
Oh yes, that was a typo. Do you know how to check if this is true?
$endgroup$
– vaoy
Oct 23 '18 at 23:05




$begingroup$
Oh yes, that was a typo. Do you know how to check if this is true?
$endgroup$
– vaoy
Oct 23 '18 at 23:05












$begingroup$
Just the negation of $(x_n)$ being Cauchy. You will get the implication from right to left easily.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 23 '18 at 23:50




$begingroup$
Just the negation of $(x_n)$ being Cauchy. You will get the implication from right to left easily.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Oct 23 '18 at 23:50










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Since the right side is true for any sequences $n_k$ and $m_k$, simply take $n_k=k$ and $m_k=k+1$ and conclude.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2968379%2fx-n-n-in-mathbbn-is-cauchy-if-and-only-if-dx-n-k-x-m-k-rightar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Since the right side is true for any sequences $n_k$ and $m_k$, simply take $n_k=k$ and $m_k=k+1$ and conclude.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Since the right side is true for any sequences $n_k$ and $m_k$, simply take $n_k=k$ and $m_k=k+1$ and conclude.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Since the right side is true for any sequences $n_k$ and $m_k$, simply take $n_k=k$ and $m_k=k+1$ and conclude.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since the right side is true for any sequences $n_k$ and $m_k$, simply take $n_k=k$ and $m_k=k+1$ and conclude.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 30 '18 at 18:47









        Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

        14.8k3938




        14.8k3938






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2968379%2fx-n-n-in-mathbbn-is-cauchy-if-and-only-if-dx-n-k-x-m-k-rightar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei