How to prove pairwise independence of a family of hash functions?












1












$begingroup$


I want to prove pairwise independence of a family of hash functions, but I don't know where to start.



Given the family of hash functions:



H with h(x) = a * x + b (mod M).



( Say h: U -> V, then: M is a prime and M >= IUI )



So how do I show that the family is pairwise independent. The definition is: The probability that h(u1) = v1 AND h(u2) = v2 is 1/M^2.



I can imagine that the solution has something to do with the modulo ring but I don't know how to get there.



Can someone help me?



Thanks a lot in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I want to prove pairwise independence of a family of hash functions, but I don't know where to start.



    Given the family of hash functions:



    H with h(x) = a * x + b (mod M).



    ( Say h: U -> V, then: M is a prime and M >= IUI )



    So how do I show that the family is pairwise independent. The definition is: The probability that h(u1) = v1 AND h(u2) = v2 is 1/M^2.



    I can imagine that the solution has something to do with the modulo ring but I don't know how to get there.



    Can someone help me?



    Thanks a lot in advance!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I want to prove pairwise independence of a family of hash functions, but I don't know where to start.



      Given the family of hash functions:



      H with h(x) = a * x + b (mod M).



      ( Say h: U -> V, then: M is a prime and M >= IUI )



      So how do I show that the family is pairwise independent. The definition is: The probability that h(u1) = v1 AND h(u2) = v2 is 1/M^2.



      I can imagine that the solution has something to do with the modulo ring but I don't know how to get there.



      Can someone help me?



      Thanks a lot in advance!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I want to prove pairwise independence of a family of hash functions, but I don't know where to start.



      Given the family of hash functions:



      H with h(x) = a * x + b (mod M).



      ( Say h: U -> V, then: M is a prime and M >= IUI )



      So how do I show that the family is pairwise independent. The definition is: The probability that h(u1) = v1 AND h(u2) = v2 is 1/M^2.



      I can imagine that the solution has something to do with the modulo ring but I don't know how to get there.



      Can someone help me?



      Thanks a lot in advance!







      probability probability-theory independence hash-function universal-property






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jul 9 '16 at 8:51









      IpsiderIpsider

      83




      83






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Well, we have $h(x) = a x + b pmod{M}$.



          Since M is prime, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that $a x + b$ has at most one solution modulo $m$. Therefore, for a fixed $a$ and $b$, each $x$ will be mapped to a different number in the range $[0 ... M-1]$, and hence, the probability of a specific $x$ to equal one specific element in this range is $1/M$. The logic is the same for $y$. So, the probability that $x$ is equal to one specific value $i$ and $y$ is equal to another specific value $j$ ($i$ can equal $j$) in the range $[0 ... M-1] = frac{1}{M} cdot frac{1}{M} = frac{1}{M^2}$, which is what is required to be shown.



          I hope this helps.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1853891%2fhow-to-prove-pairwise-independence-of-a-family-of-hash-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Well, we have $h(x) = a x + b pmod{M}$.



            Since M is prime, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that $a x + b$ has at most one solution modulo $m$. Therefore, for a fixed $a$ and $b$, each $x$ will be mapped to a different number in the range $[0 ... M-1]$, and hence, the probability of a specific $x$ to equal one specific element in this range is $1/M$. The logic is the same for $y$. So, the probability that $x$ is equal to one specific value $i$ and $y$ is equal to another specific value $j$ ($i$ can equal $j$) in the range $[0 ... M-1] = frac{1}{M} cdot frac{1}{M} = frac{1}{M^2}$, which is what is required to be shown.



            I hope this helps.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Well, we have $h(x) = a x + b pmod{M}$.



              Since M is prime, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that $a x + b$ has at most one solution modulo $m$. Therefore, for a fixed $a$ and $b$, each $x$ will be mapped to a different number in the range $[0 ... M-1]$, and hence, the probability of a specific $x$ to equal one specific element in this range is $1/M$. The logic is the same for $y$. So, the probability that $x$ is equal to one specific value $i$ and $y$ is equal to another specific value $j$ ($i$ can equal $j$) in the range $[0 ... M-1] = frac{1}{M} cdot frac{1}{M} = frac{1}{M^2}$, which is what is required to be shown.



              I hope this helps.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Well, we have $h(x) = a x + b pmod{M}$.



                Since M is prime, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that $a x + b$ has at most one solution modulo $m$. Therefore, for a fixed $a$ and $b$, each $x$ will be mapped to a different number in the range $[0 ... M-1]$, and hence, the probability of a specific $x$ to equal one specific element in this range is $1/M$. The logic is the same for $y$. So, the probability that $x$ is equal to one specific value $i$ and $y$ is equal to another specific value $j$ ($i$ can equal $j$) in the range $[0 ... M-1] = frac{1}{M} cdot frac{1}{M} = frac{1}{M^2}$, which is what is required to be shown.



                I hope this helps.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Well, we have $h(x) = a x + b pmod{M}$.



                Since M is prime, it follows from Lagrange's Theorem that $a x + b$ has at most one solution modulo $m$. Therefore, for a fixed $a$ and $b$, each $x$ will be mapped to a different number in the range $[0 ... M-1]$, and hence, the probability of a specific $x$ to equal one specific element in this range is $1/M$. The logic is the same for $y$. So, the probability that $x$ is equal to one specific value $i$ and $y$ is equal to another specific value $j$ ($i$ can equal $j$) in the range $[0 ... M-1] = frac{1}{M} cdot frac{1}{M} = frac{1}{M^2}$, which is what is required to be shown.



                I hope this helps.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 12 '18 at 5:44









                Xander Henderson

                14.3k103554




                14.3k103554










                answered Dec 12 '18 at 5:25









                mosemosmosemos

                262




                262






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1853891%2fhow-to-prove-pairwise-independence-of-a-family-of-hash-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ellipse (mathématiques)

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Mont Emei