Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$
$begingroup$
Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.
Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.
thanks in advance :-)
general-topology
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.
Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.
thanks in advance :-)
general-topology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
2
$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33
1
$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.
Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.
thanks in advance :-)
general-topology
$endgroup$
Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.
Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.
thanks in advance :-)
general-topology
general-topology
edited Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
Math is hard
asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:41
Math is hardMath is hard
817211
817211
$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
2
$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33
1
$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
2
$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33
1
$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
2
2
$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33
$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33
1
1
$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.
In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.
As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$
Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.
Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map
$$
g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
$$
from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,
$$
begin{align}
Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
&xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
end{align}
$$
It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038862%2fquestion-about-the-one-point-compactification-mathbbr2-cup-infty-of-s2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.
In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.
As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.
In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.
As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.
In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.
As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.
$endgroup$
Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.
In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.
As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.
edited Dec 14 '18 at 4:18
answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:05
Chris CusterChris Custer
12.9k3827
12.9k3827
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:14
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:39
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
$endgroup$
– Randall
Dec 14 '18 at 3:42
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
$begingroup$
Oh I guess I overlooked that.
$endgroup$
– Chris Custer
Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$
Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$
Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$
Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.
$endgroup$
Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$
Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:09
MelodyMelody
78812
78812
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.
Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map
$$
g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
$$
from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,
$$
begin{align}
Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
&xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
end{align}
$$
It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.
Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map
$$
g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
$$
from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,
$$
begin{align}
Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
&xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
end{align}
$$
It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.
Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map
$$
g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
$$
from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,
$$
begin{align}
Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
&xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
end{align}
$$
It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?
$endgroup$
I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.
Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map
$$
g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
$$
from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,
$$
begin{align}
Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
&xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
end{align}
$$
It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?
edited Dec 14 '18 at 3:18
answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:11
Guido A.Guido A.
7,3901730
7,3901730
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.
$endgroup$
If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.
answered Dec 14 '18 at 5:02
Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma
108k347114
108k347114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038862%2fquestion-about-the-one-point-compactification-mathbbr2-cup-infty-of-s2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46
$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47
2
$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55
$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33
1
$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26