Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$












1












$begingroup$


Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.



Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.



thanks in advance :-)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Guido A.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:46










  • $begingroup$
    nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
    $endgroup$
    – Math is hard
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:47






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:55










  • $begingroup$
    Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
















1












$begingroup$


Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.



Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.



thanks in advance :-)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Guido A.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:46










  • $begingroup$
    nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
    $endgroup$
    – Math is hard
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:47






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:55










  • $begingroup$
    Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 10:26














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.



Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.



thanks in advance :-)










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Question about the one point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $S^2$.



Given $a,b in S^2$, can somebody give me the explicit homeomorphism $gamma$ from $S^2$ to $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ such that $gamma(a) = 0$ and $gamma(b) = infty$? For some reason in my brain I thought this was only possible if $a$ and $b$ are antipodal points, that seems like something that might be true, right? ha. Anyway apparently it's not according to the proof of Lemma 61.2 in Munkres topology, which takes arbitrary $a$ and $b$ and then maps one to $0$ and the other to $infty$.



thanks in advance :-)







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 14 '18 at 2:47







Math is hard

















asked Dec 14 '18 at 2:41









Math is hardMath is hard

817211




817211












  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Guido A.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:46










  • $begingroup$
    nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
    $endgroup$
    – Math is hard
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:47






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:55










  • $begingroup$
    Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 10:26


















  • $begingroup$
    Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Guido A.
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:46










  • $begingroup$
    nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
    $endgroup$
    – Math is hard
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:47






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Dec 14 '18 at 2:55










  • $begingroup$
    Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 9:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Frost
    Dec 14 '18 at 10:26
















$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46




$begingroup$
Do you mean $S^1$? Generally, $(mathbb{R}^k)^* simeq S^k$.
$endgroup$
– Guido A.
Dec 14 '18 at 2:46












$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47




$begingroup$
nope, i meant $mathbb{R}^2$ >.>
$endgroup$
– Math is hard
Dec 14 '18 at 2:47




2




2




$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55




$begingroup$
Start with sterographic projection $S$ that takes $b$ to $infty$ and $a$ to somewhere in the plane. Now compose this with a translation of the plane that takes $S(a)$ to the origin. You need to check that translation of $mathbb R^2$ extends to the $1$-point compactification, which it does.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Dec 14 '18 at 2:55












$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33




$begingroup$
Typo: One point compactification $mathbb{R}^2 cup infty$ of $mathbb{R}^2$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 9:33




1




1




$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26




$begingroup$
By the way, Munkres does not need $gamma(a) = 0$. In Munkres's proof you can easily replace $0$ by an arbitrary $x_0 = gamma(a)$.
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Dec 14 '18 at 10:26










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.



In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.



As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:14










  • $begingroup$
    Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:39










  • $begingroup$
    OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:42










  • $begingroup$
    Oh I guess I overlooked that.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Custer
    Dec 14 '18 at 3:46



















0












$begingroup$

Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$



Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.



    Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map



    $$
    g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
    $$



    from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,



    $$
    begin{align}
    Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
    &xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
    end{align}
    $$



    It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038862%2fquestion-about-the-one-point-compactification-mathbbr2-cup-infty-of-s2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1












        $begingroup$

        Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.



        In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.



        As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:14










        • $begingroup$
          Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:39










        • $begingroup$
          OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:42










        • $begingroup$
          Oh I guess I overlooked that.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
















        1












        $begingroup$

        Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.



        In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.



        As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:14










        • $begingroup$
          Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:39










        • $begingroup$
          OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:42










        • $begingroup$
          Oh I guess I overlooked that.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:46














        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.



        In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.



        As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Stereographic projection: the north pole $P$ corresponds to the point at infinity, the South pole to zero.



        In Cartesian coordinates it's $(x,y,z)to (frac y{1-x},frac z{1-x})$.



        As for mapping two arbitrary points on the sphere to the origin and infinity, see the comment by @Cheerful Parsnip.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 14 '18 at 4:18

























        answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:05









        Chris CusterChris Custer

        12.9k3827




        12.9k3827












        • $begingroup$
          How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:14










        • $begingroup$
          Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:39










        • $begingroup$
          OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:42










        • $begingroup$
          Oh I guess I overlooked that.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:46


















        • $begingroup$
          How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:14










        • $begingroup$
          Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:39










        • $begingroup$
          OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Randall
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:42










        • $begingroup$
          Oh I guess I overlooked that.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Custer
          Dec 14 '18 at 3:46
















        $begingroup$
        How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
        $endgroup$
        – Randall
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:14




        $begingroup$
        How does this map $a$ to $0$ and $b$ to $infty$?
        $endgroup$
        – Randall
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:14












        $begingroup$
        Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Custer
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:39




        $begingroup$
        Put in $(1,0,0)$ and $(-1,0,0)$, respectively. You get $"infty "$ and $(0,0)$.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Custer
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:39












        $begingroup$
        OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
        $endgroup$
        – Randall
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:42




        $begingroup$
        OP wants this to work for generic $a neq b in S^2$.
        $endgroup$
        – Randall
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:42












        $begingroup$
        Oh I guess I overlooked that.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Custer
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:46




        $begingroup$
        Oh I guess I overlooked that.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Custer
        Dec 14 '18 at 3:46











        0












        $begingroup$

        Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$



        Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$



          Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$



            Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Well not really explicit at all, but Naturally we can consider $S^2$ to be $text{bd}(B_{mathbb{R}^3}[(0,0,1/2),1/2])$. If we take $a=0$ and $b=(0,0,1),$ then we can find a homeomorphism by stereographic projecting the points of $S^2$ onto the homeomorphic copy of $mathbb{R}^2$ that is ${(x,y,0)|x,yinmathbb{R}}.$ The only thing that's not obvious is where do we map $(0,0,1)?$ That's easy though, infinity. And neighborhoods $epsilon$ of $(0,0,1)$ will get mapped to complements of closed discs in $mathbb{R}^2$. Complements of closed disc are neighborhoods of $infty$ as we define an open set containing $infty$ to be the complement of a compact set in $mathbb{R}^2$



            Now you did mention $a,b$ being arbitrary distinct points, but that's not so hard to fix. You can find a homeomorphism of $S^2to S^2$ sending $ato 0$ and $bto(0,0,1)$ using the disc lemma.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:09









            MelodyMelody

            78812




            78812























                0












                $begingroup$

                I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.



                Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map



                $$
                g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
                $$



                from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,



                $$
                begin{align}
                Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
                &xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
                end{align}
                $$



                It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.



                  Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map



                  $$
                  g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
                  $$



                  from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,



                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
                  &xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
                  end{align}
                  $$



                  It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.



                    Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map



                    $$
                    g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
                    $$



                    from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,



                    $$
                    begin{align}
                    Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
                    &xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
                    end{align}
                    $$



                    It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    I will use the following fact: if $equiv$ denotes 'being homeomorphic' and $Z^*$ is the one point compactification of a space $Z$, then $X equiv Y$ imples $X^* equiv Y^*$. The idea is to take a homeomorphism $f : X to Y$ and define $f^* :X^* to Y^*$ via $f^*(x) = f(x)$ when $x in X$ and $f^*(infty_X) = infty_Y$. After checking that this map is continuous, you just have to observe that $(f^*)^{-1} = (f^{-1})^*$.



                    Now, for any $k geq 1$, the map



                    $$
                    g(x_1, dots, x_{k+1}) = frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k)
                    $$



                    from $X_k := S^k setminus {(0,dots,0,1)}$ to $mathbb{R}^k$ is a homeomorphism. Visually, one takes the line that joins $N_k := (0,dots,1)$ with $x in S^k$, and $g(x)$ is the intersection of the line with ${x_{k+1} = 0} subset mathbb{R}^{k+1}$. Hence, this induces a homeomorphism of the one-point compactifications, $g^* : (X_k)^* to (mathbb{R}^k)^*$. You can check that $S^k equiv (X_k)^*$ via $f(x) = x$ when $x neq N_k$, and $f(N_k) := infty_{X_k}$. The composition then gives an explicit (since $g^*$ depends only of $g$ which we know) homeomorphism between $S^k$ and $mathbb{R}^k$,



                    $$
                    begin{align}
                    Phi : & S^k rightarrow (mathbb{R}^k)^* \
                    &xmapsto cases{frac{1}{1-x_{k+1}}(x_1, dots, x_k) quad text{ if $x neq N_k$} \ infty_{mathbb{R}^k} text{if $x = N_k$}}
                    end{align}
                    $$



                    It is clear from here that $Phi(N_k) = infty$ and $Phi(0,0,dots,-1) = 0$. Thus, it will be enough to find a homeomorphism $S^2 to S^2$ such that $a mapsto N_k$ and $b mapsto (0,0,dots,-1)$ and post-compose it with $Phi$. Can you take it from here?







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 14 '18 at 3:18

























                    answered Dec 14 '18 at 3:11









                    Guido A.Guido A.

                    7,3901730




                    7,3901730























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            If you know complex function theory, working on the Riemann sphere $mathbb{C} cup {infty}$, just take a Moebius transform sending $a$ to $b$ and $b$ to $infty$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 14 '18 at 5:02









                            Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma

                            108k347114




                            108k347114






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3038862%2fquestion-about-the-one-point-compactification-mathbbr2-cup-infty-of-s2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Quarter-circle Tiles

                                build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                                Mont Emei