Does $O(log n)$ (space) equality testing of $n$-bit integers using $f(x) = x mod p$ fingerprinting work...












1












$begingroup$


I found the following lecture from CS271 at UC Berkeley interesting and was taking a look at some of the examples, namely 3.1 on the first page: Link



Here is a summary of the problem: Alice has a $n$-bit integer $a$ and Bob has a $n$-bit integer $b$. Can Alice send Bob $O(log n)$ bits such that Bob can verify whether or not $a = b$ with high probability?



Here is the algorithm: Alice picks prime number $p$ uniformly at random from ${2,...,cn text{ln} n}$ and computes $F(a) = a text{mod} p$. Alice sends $F(a)$ and $p$ to Bob. Bob computes $F(b) = b text{mod} p$ and checks whether or not $F(a) = F(b)$. The algorithm returns true if they are equal, and false if not (with a small probability of failure of $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$ if $F(a) neq F(b)$ due to hash collision.



My question is whether or not you can extend the algorithm to work for negative integers as well and still maintain that Pr[error] = $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$. Intuitively, if $a$ and $b$ are both negative it should work just fine but I am unsure of the case where one of $a$ or $b$ is negative and the other is positive.



Would the algorithm work if you extend the problem such that $a$ and $b$ have can be negative as well?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I found the following lecture from CS271 at UC Berkeley interesting and was taking a look at some of the examples, namely 3.1 on the first page: Link



    Here is a summary of the problem: Alice has a $n$-bit integer $a$ and Bob has a $n$-bit integer $b$. Can Alice send Bob $O(log n)$ bits such that Bob can verify whether or not $a = b$ with high probability?



    Here is the algorithm: Alice picks prime number $p$ uniformly at random from ${2,...,cn text{ln} n}$ and computes $F(a) = a text{mod} p$. Alice sends $F(a)$ and $p$ to Bob. Bob computes $F(b) = b text{mod} p$ and checks whether or not $F(a) = F(b)$. The algorithm returns true if they are equal, and false if not (with a small probability of failure of $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$ if $F(a) neq F(b)$ due to hash collision.



    My question is whether or not you can extend the algorithm to work for negative integers as well and still maintain that Pr[error] = $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$. Intuitively, if $a$ and $b$ are both negative it should work just fine but I am unsure of the case where one of $a$ or $b$ is negative and the other is positive.



    Would the algorithm work if you extend the problem such that $a$ and $b$ have can be negative as well?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I found the following lecture from CS271 at UC Berkeley interesting and was taking a look at some of the examples, namely 3.1 on the first page: Link



      Here is a summary of the problem: Alice has a $n$-bit integer $a$ and Bob has a $n$-bit integer $b$. Can Alice send Bob $O(log n)$ bits such that Bob can verify whether or not $a = b$ with high probability?



      Here is the algorithm: Alice picks prime number $p$ uniformly at random from ${2,...,cn text{ln} n}$ and computes $F(a) = a text{mod} p$. Alice sends $F(a)$ and $p$ to Bob. Bob computes $F(b) = b text{mod} p$ and checks whether or not $F(a) = F(b)$. The algorithm returns true if they are equal, and false if not (with a small probability of failure of $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$ if $F(a) neq F(b)$ due to hash collision.



      My question is whether or not you can extend the algorithm to work for negative integers as well and still maintain that Pr[error] = $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$. Intuitively, if $a$ and $b$ are both negative it should work just fine but I am unsure of the case where one of $a$ or $b$ is negative and the other is positive.



      Would the algorithm work if you extend the problem such that $a$ and $b$ have can be negative as well?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I found the following lecture from CS271 at UC Berkeley interesting and was taking a look at some of the examples, namely 3.1 on the first page: Link



      Here is a summary of the problem: Alice has a $n$-bit integer $a$ and Bob has a $n$-bit integer $b$. Can Alice send Bob $O(log n)$ bits such that Bob can verify whether or not $a = b$ with high probability?



      Here is the algorithm: Alice picks prime number $p$ uniformly at random from ${2,...,cn text{ln} n}$ and computes $F(a) = a text{mod} p$. Alice sends $F(a)$ and $p$ to Bob. Bob computes $F(b) = b text{mod} p$ and checks whether or not $F(a) = F(b)$. The algorithm returns true if they are equal, and false if not (with a small probability of failure of $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$ if $F(a) neq F(b)$ due to hash collision.



      My question is whether or not you can extend the algorithm to work for negative integers as well and still maintain that Pr[error] = $frac{1}{c} + o(1)$. Intuitively, if $a$ and $b$ are both negative it should work just fine but I am unsure of the case where one of $a$ or $b$ is negative and the other is positive.



      Would the algorithm work if you extend the problem such that $a$ and $b$ have can be negative as well?







      number-theory elementary-number-theory algorithms modular-arithmetic cryptography






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 5 at 16:37









      amWhy

      1




      1










      asked Jan 5 at 12:05









      TheSalamanderTheSalamander

      1839




      1839






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The sign is essentially just an extra bit, i.e., performing the experiment for tha number range $-2^n,ldots, 2^n-1$ is the same as doing it for $0,ldots, 2^{n+1}-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062654%2fdoes-olog-n-space-equality-testing-of-n-bit-integers-using-fx-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The sign is essentially just an extra bit, i.e., performing the experiment for tha number range $-2^n,ldots, 2^n-1$ is the same as doing it for $0,ldots, 2^{n+1}-1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              The sign is essentially just an extra bit, i.e., performing the experiment for tha number range $-2^n,ldots, 2^n-1$ is the same as doing it for $0,ldots, 2^{n+1}-1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The sign is essentially just an extra bit, i.e., performing the experiment for tha number range $-2^n,ldots, 2^n-1$ is the same as doing it for $0,ldots, 2^{n+1}-1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The sign is essentially just an extra bit, i.e., performing the experiment for tha number range $-2^n,ldots, 2^n-1$ is the same as doing it for $0,ldots, 2^{n+1}-1$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 5 at 12:48









                Hagen von EitzenHagen von Eitzen

                282k23272506




                282k23272506






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062654%2fdoes-olog-n-space-equality-testing-of-n-bit-integers-using-fx-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ellipse (mathématiques)

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Mont Emei