Orthogonal Grassmannian












1












$begingroup$


The orthogonal Grassmannian $OG(k,n)$ is the set of all isotropic $k$ dimensional subspaces of a $n$ dimensional subspaces with respect to a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form. Is it isomorphic to a $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is the maximal parabolic subgroup with respect to a simple root ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I would almost say yes, up to the point that it is $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is parabolic (that is a very standard one-line argument using Witt's theorem). However, $P_k$ is not maximal in general, so could you clarify what "maximal with respect to a simple root" means?
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    The maximal parabolic associated to the simple root $alpha_k$ is the subgroup generated by the Borel subgroup $B$ and ${n_{alpha}: alpha in S setminus {alpha_k}}$ where $S$ is the set of simple roots and $n_{alpha}$ is a representative of $s_{alpha}$ in $N_G(T)$.
    $endgroup$
    – icmes imrf
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:33












  • $begingroup$
    Did you write down the stabilizer of a space in $OG(k,n)$ in matrix notation? It is a block triangular matrix with two blocks, so it should contain every Coxeter generator but one. Sorry, my knowledge of the general terminology, without writing it down with matrices, is not good enough to answer in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:40
















1












$begingroup$


The orthogonal Grassmannian $OG(k,n)$ is the set of all isotropic $k$ dimensional subspaces of a $n$ dimensional subspaces with respect to a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form. Is it isomorphic to a $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is the maximal parabolic subgroup with respect to a simple root ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I would almost say yes, up to the point that it is $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is parabolic (that is a very standard one-line argument using Witt's theorem). However, $P_k$ is not maximal in general, so could you clarify what "maximal with respect to a simple root" means?
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    The maximal parabolic associated to the simple root $alpha_k$ is the subgroup generated by the Borel subgroup $B$ and ${n_{alpha}: alpha in S setminus {alpha_k}}$ where $S$ is the set of simple roots and $n_{alpha}$ is a representative of $s_{alpha}$ in $N_G(T)$.
    $endgroup$
    – icmes imrf
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:33












  • $begingroup$
    Did you write down the stabilizer of a space in $OG(k,n)$ in matrix notation? It is a block triangular matrix with two blocks, so it should contain every Coxeter generator but one. Sorry, my knowledge of the general terminology, without writing it down with matrices, is not good enough to answer in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:40














1












1








1





$begingroup$


The orthogonal Grassmannian $OG(k,n)$ is the set of all isotropic $k$ dimensional subspaces of a $n$ dimensional subspaces with respect to a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form. Is it isomorphic to a $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is the maximal parabolic subgroup with respect to a simple root ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The orthogonal Grassmannian $OG(k,n)$ is the set of all isotropic $k$ dimensional subspaces of a $n$ dimensional subspaces with respect to a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear form. Is it isomorphic to a $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is the maximal parabolic subgroup with respect to a simple root ?







differential-geometry algebraic-geometry representation-theory schubert-calculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 11:17









Matt Samuel

38.7k63769




38.7k63769










asked Jan 9 '18 at 10:21









icmes imrficmes imrf

705




705












  • $begingroup$
    I would almost say yes, up to the point that it is $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is parabolic (that is a very standard one-line argument using Witt's theorem). However, $P_k$ is not maximal in general, so could you clarify what "maximal with respect to a simple root" means?
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    The maximal parabolic associated to the simple root $alpha_k$ is the subgroup generated by the Borel subgroup $B$ and ${n_{alpha}: alpha in S setminus {alpha_k}}$ where $S$ is the set of simple roots and $n_{alpha}$ is a representative of $s_{alpha}$ in $N_G(T)$.
    $endgroup$
    – icmes imrf
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:33












  • $begingroup$
    Did you write down the stabilizer of a space in $OG(k,n)$ in matrix notation? It is a block triangular matrix with two blocks, so it should contain every Coxeter generator but one. Sorry, my knowledge of the general terminology, without writing it down with matrices, is not good enough to answer in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:40


















  • $begingroup$
    I would almost say yes, up to the point that it is $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is parabolic (that is a very standard one-line argument using Witt's theorem). However, $P_k$ is not maximal in general, so could you clarify what "maximal with respect to a simple root" means?
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:27










  • $begingroup$
    The maximal parabolic associated to the simple root $alpha_k$ is the subgroup generated by the Borel subgroup $B$ and ${n_{alpha}: alpha in S setminus {alpha_k}}$ where $S$ is the set of simple roots and $n_{alpha}$ is a representative of $s_{alpha}$ in $N_G(T)$.
    $endgroup$
    – icmes imrf
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:33












  • $begingroup$
    Did you write down the stabilizer of a space in $OG(k,n)$ in matrix notation? It is a block triangular matrix with two blocks, so it should contain every Coxeter generator but one. Sorry, my knowledge of the general terminology, without writing it down with matrices, is not good enough to answer in general.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk Liebhold
    Jan 9 '18 at 10:40
















$begingroup$
I would almost say yes, up to the point that it is $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is parabolic (that is a very standard one-line argument using Witt's theorem). However, $P_k$ is not maximal in general, so could you clarify what "maximal with respect to a simple root" means?
$endgroup$
– Dirk Liebhold
Jan 9 '18 at 10:27




$begingroup$
I would almost say yes, up to the point that it is $SO(n)/P_k$ where $P_k$ is parabolic (that is a very standard one-line argument using Witt's theorem). However, $P_k$ is not maximal in general, so could you clarify what "maximal with respect to a simple root" means?
$endgroup$
– Dirk Liebhold
Jan 9 '18 at 10:27












$begingroup$
The maximal parabolic associated to the simple root $alpha_k$ is the subgroup generated by the Borel subgroup $B$ and ${n_{alpha}: alpha in S setminus {alpha_k}}$ where $S$ is the set of simple roots and $n_{alpha}$ is a representative of $s_{alpha}$ in $N_G(T)$.
$endgroup$
– icmes imrf
Jan 9 '18 at 10:33






$begingroup$
The maximal parabolic associated to the simple root $alpha_k$ is the subgroup generated by the Borel subgroup $B$ and ${n_{alpha}: alpha in S setminus {alpha_k}}$ where $S$ is the set of simple roots and $n_{alpha}$ is a representative of $s_{alpha}$ in $N_G(T)$.
$endgroup$
– icmes imrf
Jan 9 '18 at 10:33














$begingroup$
Did you write down the stabilizer of a space in $OG(k,n)$ in matrix notation? It is a block triangular matrix with two blocks, so it should contain every Coxeter generator but one. Sorry, my knowledge of the general terminology, without writing it down with matrices, is not good enough to answer in general.
$endgroup$
– Dirk Liebhold
Jan 9 '18 at 10:40




$begingroup$
Did you write down the stabilizer of a space in $OG(k,n)$ in matrix notation? It is a block triangular matrix with two blocks, so it should contain every Coxeter generator but one. Sorry, my knowledge of the general terminology, without writing it down with matrices, is not good enough to answer in general.
$endgroup$
– Dirk Liebhold
Jan 9 '18 at 10:40










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2598038%2forthogonal-grassmannian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2598038%2forthogonal-grassmannian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei