What are the attaching maps for the real Grassmannian?












17












$begingroup$


The Grassmannian $G_n(mathbb{R}^k)$ of n-planes in $mathbb{R}^k$ has a CW-complex structure coming from the Schubert cell decomposition.



The study of characteristic classes tells us that these Schubert cells generate the cohomology of the Grassmannian and so the differentials in the cochain complex with $mathbb{Z}/2$ coefficients are all zero.



I am studying the $RO(mathbb{Z}/2)$-graded equivariant cohomology of Grassmann manifolds and there can be non-trivial differentials (in the appropriate spectral sequence) arising from a non-trivial attaching of a high dimensional cell to lower dimensional cells which will affect the cohomology. (This differs from the non-equivariant setting in that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell influences only the adjacent cohomology groups and no others. It turns out that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell can affect the equivariant cohomology in a larger range of dimensions.)



Hence, I am interested in knowing which of these Schubert cells are non-trivially attached to which other cells and how to detect this behavior.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    17












    $begingroup$


    The Grassmannian $G_n(mathbb{R}^k)$ of n-planes in $mathbb{R}^k$ has a CW-complex structure coming from the Schubert cell decomposition.



    The study of characteristic classes tells us that these Schubert cells generate the cohomology of the Grassmannian and so the differentials in the cochain complex with $mathbb{Z}/2$ coefficients are all zero.



    I am studying the $RO(mathbb{Z}/2)$-graded equivariant cohomology of Grassmann manifolds and there can be non-trivial differentials (in the appropriate spectral sequence) arising from a non-trivial attaching of a high dimensional cell to lower dimensional cells which will affect the cohomology. (This differs from the non-equivariant setting in that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell influences only the adjacent cohomology groups and no others. It turns out that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell can affect the equivariant cohomology in a larger range of dimensions.)



    Hence, I am interested in knowing which of these Schubert cells are non-trivially attached to which other cells and how to detect this behavior.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      17












      17








      17


      2



      $begingroup$


      The Grassmannian $G_n(mathbb{R}^k)$ of n-planes in $mathbb{R}^k$ has a CW-complex structure coming from the Schubert cell decomposition.



      The study of characteristic classes tells us that these Schubert cells generate the cohomology of the Grassmannian and so the differentials in the cochain complex with $mathbb{Z}/2$ coefficients are all zero.



      I am studying the $RO(mathbb{Z}/2)$-graded equivariant cohomology of Grassmann manifolds and there can be non-trivial differentials (in the appropriate spectral sequence) arising from a non-trivial attaching of a high dimensional cell to lower dimensional cells which will affect the cohomology. (This differs from the non-equivariant setting in that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell influences only the adjacent cohomology groups and no others. It turns out that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell can affect the equivariant cohomology in a larger range of dimensions.)



      Hence, I am interested in knowing which of these Schubert cells are non-trivially attached to which other cells and how to detect this behavior.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The Grassmannian $G_n(mathbb{R}^k)$ of n-planes in $mathbb{R}^k$ has a CW-complex structure coming from the Schubert cell decomposition.



      The study of characteristic classes tells us that these Schubert cells generate the cohomology of the Grassmannian and so the differentials in the cochain complex with $mathbb{Z}/2$ coefficients are all zero.



      I am studying the $RO(mathbb{Z}/2)$-graded equivariant cohomology of Grassmann manifolds and there can be non-trivial differentials (in the appropriate spectral sequence) arising from a non-trivial attaching of a high dimensional cell to lower dimensional cells which will affect the cohomology. (This differs from the non-equivariant setting in that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell influences only the adjacent cohomology groups and no others. It turns out that attaching an $n$-dimensional cell can affect the equivariant cohomology in a larger range of dimensions.)



      Hence, I am interested in knowing which of these Schubert cells are non-trivially attached to which other cells and how to detect this behavior.







      general-topology algebraic-topology grassmannian schubert-calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 5 at 11:19









      Matt Samuel

      38.7k63769




      38.7k63769










      asked May 5 '11 at 16:05









      wckronholmwckronholm

      3,06711329




      3,06711329






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          This seems to be a difficult problem; in this link, it is mentioned that Bill Richter computed the attaching maps in his University of Washington PhD thesis using Morse theory (I haven't been able to find it online, but if you contact the university, they should be able to help). Also, they mention a "1934 Annals paper by Ehresmann" discussing this topic, and point out that this is before spectral sequences. There is an unanswered Mathoverflow question discussing all of this as well:https://mathoverflow.net/questions/19980/attaching-maps-for-grassmann-manifolds






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37208%2fwhat-are-the-attaching-maps-for-the-real-grassmannian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            This seems to be a difficult problem; in this link, it is mentioned that Bill Richter computed the attaching maps in his University of Washington PhD thesis using Morse theory (I haven't been able to find it online, but if you contact the university, they should be able to help). Also, they mention a "1934 Annals paper by Ehresmann" discussing this topic, and point out that this is before spectral sequences. There is an unanswered Mathoverflow question discussing all of this as well:https://mathoverflow.net/questions/19980/attaching-maps-for-grassmann-manifolds






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              This seems to be a difficult problem; in this link, it is mentioned that Bill Richter computed the attaching maps in his University of Washington PhD thesis using Morse theory (I haven't been able to find it online, but if you contact the university, they should be able to help). Also, they mention a "1934 Annals paper by Ehresmann" discussing this topic, and point out that this is before spectral sequences. There is an unanswered Mathoverflow question discussing all of this as well:https://mathoverflow.net/questions/19980/attaching-maps-for-grassmann-manifolds






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                This seems to be a difficult problem; in this link, it is mentioned that Bill Richter computed the attaching maps in his University of Washington PhD thesis using Morse theory (I haven't been able to find it online, but if you contact the university, they should be able to help). Also, they mention a "1934 Annals paper by Ehresmann" discussing this topic, and point out that this is before spectral sequences. There is an unanswered Mathoverflow question discussing all of this as well:https://mathoverflow.net/questions/19980/attaching-maps-for-grassmann-manifolds






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                This seems to be a difficult problem; in this link, it is mentioned that Bill Richter computed the attaching maps in his University of Washington PhD thesis using Morse theory (I haven't been able to find it online, but if you contact the university, they should be able to help). Also, they mention a "1934 Annals paper by Ehresmann" discussing this topic, and point out that this is before spectral sequences. There is an unanswered Mathoverflow question discussing all of this as well:https://mathoverflow.net/questions/19980/attaching-maps-for-grassmann-manifolds







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:58









                Community

                1




                1










                answered Jun 11 '13 at 3:07









                Brian RushtonBrian Rushton

                11.5k85085




                11.5k85085






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37208%2fwhat-are-the-attaching-maps-for-the-real-grassmannian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei