Subgroups of direct products of free groups












1












$begingroup$


I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/



He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.



I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 3 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
    $endgroup$
    – Karen
    Jan 3 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Jan 3 at 17:51
















1












$begingroup$


I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/



He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.



I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 3 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
    $endgroup$
    – Karen
    Jan 3 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Jan 3 at 17:51














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/



He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.



I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/



He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.



I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.







group-theory free-groups direct-product






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 3 at 17:33









KarenKaren

946




946








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 3 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
    $endgroup$
    – Karen
    Jan 3 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Jan 3 at 17:51














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 3 at 17:37










  • $begingroup$
    Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
    $endgroup$
    – Karen
    Jan 3 at 17:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Jan 3 at 17:51








3




3




$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37




$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37












$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44




$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44




1




1




$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51




$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060810%2fsubgroups-of-direct-products-of-free-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060810%2fsubgroups-of-direct-products-of-free-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei