Subgroups of direct products of free groups
$begingroup$
I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/
He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.
I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.
group-theory free-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/
He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.
I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.
group-theory free-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44
1
$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/
He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.
I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.
group-theory free-groups direct-product
$endgroup$
I am reading the following paper of Miller: http://researchers.ms.unimelb.edu.au/
He says that if $G= F_{1} times F_{2}$ is a direct product of two free groups and $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then it can be assumed that the projection maps $$text{p}_{i} colon H rightarrow F_{i}$$ are surjective.
I do not understand why is this trivial. If ${f_{1},cdots,f_{n}}$ is a basis of the free group $F_{1}$, why should we have elements of the form $(f_{i},h_{i})$ in $H$ for all $iin {1,cdots,n}$? He simply says that this follows because subgroups of free groups are free.
group-theory free-groups direct-product
group-theory free-groups direct-product
asked Jan 3 at 17:33
KarenKaren
946
946
3
$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44
1
$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44
1
$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51
3
3
$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44
1
1
$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51
$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060810%2fsubgroups-of-direct-products-of-free-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060810%2fsubgroups-of-direct-products-of-free-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Let $H_isubset F_i$ be the image of $H$ under $p_i$. Then $H_i$ is free and $Hsubset H_1times H_2$
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 3 at 17:37
$begingroup$
Omg it was trivial and I have been ages thinking about it! Thank you very much @Max :)
$endgroup$
– Karen
Jan 3 at 17:44
1
$begingroup$
Don't beat yourself up about it, @Karen; it took over three hundred pages of dense symbol shuffling to get to a proof that, in fact, yes, $1+1=2$ in Russell & Whitehead's "Principia Mathematica".
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Jan 3 at 17:51