Continuous function of $R_0$-space into non-$R_0$











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a continuous function of an $R_0$-space into a topological space (non-necessary $R_0$-space) (see Wiki to recall what an $R_0$-space is).



I wish to find out the conditions to ensure that if $X$ is $R_0$ then $f(X)$ also is.



For the momment, I have found that if $f$ is open and injective then $f(X)$ is $R_0$. Moreover, I know that if $f$ is not open or is not injective, then $f(X)$ may be no $R_0$:




  • For if $f$ is not open, given two separated points $x,yin X$ and two (open) neighbourhoods $V_x$ and $V_y$ such that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, then $f(y)notin f(V_x)$ and $f(x)notin f(V_y)$, but $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ needn't to be neigbhbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ resp. An example illustrating that is the identity map of ${0,1}$ (discrete) onto ${0,1}$ (Sierpinski space).


  • Similarly, if $f$ is open but not injective, despite that $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ are neighbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ and that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, it is poosible that $f(x)in f(V_y)$ and that $f(y)in f(V_x)$ (for example if $f(x)=f(y)$).



However, I can't find an example illustrating the second case. My problem is that I can't find continuous open functions of an $R_0$-space into a non-$R_0$-space. My first try was to consider a map from the Sorgrenfey line onto the Sierpinski space (because it is disconnected) but that map was not open. Then I considered the identity from $[-1,1]$ with the usual subspace topology onto $[-1,1]$ endowed with the overlapping interval topology, but it was open neither.



Can you provide an example for the second case, please?



EDIT: The result is trivial if $f$ is constant. I'm interested when $f$ is non-constant, i.e. $f(X)$ has at least two points, so in the above, asuume that $f$ is non-constant.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I'm fairly sure neither of your conditions is necessary: Take $X$ to be the disjoint union of an $R_0$ space $A$ with a space $B$ that is not $R_0$, with the obvious topology. This is not $R_0$ because of the $B$ part. Take $f$ to be open and injective (and whatever other conditions are needed to ensure that $f(B)$ is $R_0$) on $B$, and neither open nor injective on $A$. Then $f$ is neither open nor injective, but $f(X) = f(A)cup f(B)$ is $R_0$, since $A$ is $R_0$ and $f|_B$ is open and injective. More explictly, the constant map is neither open nor injective, but $f(X)$ is $R_0$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 10:45










  • I can't follows your reasoning. If $B$ is not $R_0$, I can't imagine how $f(B)$ (that for you is homeomorphict to $B$) can be $R_0$. On the other hand, if $f$ is neither open nor injective, then $f(A)$ needn't to be $R_0$ (see my example). Regarding your final sentence, I'l edit your question to exclude a single-point spaces.
    – Dog_69
    Nov 16 at 11:00










  • @Dog_69 The statement "i'm interested in spaces with at least two points" is unrelated to "$f$ being constant is trivial". Unless you additionally assume that $f$ is surjective?
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:08












  • Also, consider $f:Xto Y$ continuous, surjective, non-open, non-injective with both $X,Y$ being $R_0$, e.g. the double wrapping map $[0,2)to S^1$. These conditions are clearly not necessary.
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:16












  • @Dog_69 It's nothing to do with 1-point spaces. Take any $R_0$ space $X$ with more than one point and any space $Y$. Choose some $y_0 in Y$. Then $f: X to Y$ such that $f(x) = y_0$ for all $x$ has $f(X) = {y_0}$ is both trivial and discrete, so is $R_0$, but $f$ is neither open nor injective. You being able to find one map that is not open/injective but does not have your property does not mean that all non-open/injective maps do not have your property.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 11:43















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a continuous function of an $R_0$-space into a topological space (non-necessary $R_0$-space) (see Wiki to recall what an $R_0$-space is).



I wish to find out the conditions to ensure that if $X$ is $R_0$ then $f(X)$ also is.



For the momment, I have found that if $f$ is open and injective then $f(X)$ is $R_0$. Moreover, I know that if $f$ is not open or is not injective, then $f(X)$ may be no $R_0$:




  • For if $f$ is not open, given two separated points $x,yin X$ and two (open) neighbourhoods $V_x$ and $V_y$ such that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, then $f(y)notin f(V_x)$ and $f(x)notin f(V_y)$, but $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ needn't to be neigbhbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ resp. An example illustrating that is the identity map of ${0,1}$ (discrete) onto ${0,1}$ (Sierpinski space).


  • Similarly, if $f$ is open but not injective, despite that $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ are neighbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ and that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, it is poosible that $f(x)in f(V_y)$ and that $f(y)in f(V_x)$ (for example if $f(x)=f(y)$).



However, I can't find an example illustrating the second case. My problem is that I can't find continuous open functions of an $R_0$-space into a non-$R_0$-space. My first try was to consider a map from the Sorgrenfey line onto the Sierpinski space (because it is disconnected) but that map was not open. Then I considered the identity from $[-1,1]$ with the usual subspace topology onto $[-1,1]$ endowed with the overlapping interval topology, but it was open neither.



Can you provide an example for the second case, please?



EDIT: The result is trivial if $f$ is constant. I'm interested when $f$ is non-constant, i.e. $f(X)$ has at least two points, so in the above, asuume that $f$ is non-constant.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • I'm fairly sure neither of your conditions is necessary: Take $X$ to be the disjoint union of an $R_0$ space $A$ with a space $B$ that is not $R_0$, with the obvious topology. This is not $R_0$ because of the $B$ part. Take $f$ to be open and injective (and whatever other conditions are needed to ensure that $f(B)$ is $R_0$) on $B$, and neither open nor injective on $A$. Then $f$ is neither open nor injective, but $f(X) = f(A)cup f(B)$ is $R_0$, since $A$ is $R_0$ and $f|_B$ is open and injective. More explictly, the constant map is neither open nor injective, but $f(X)$ is $R_0$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 10:45










  • I can't follows your reasoning. If $B$ is not $R_0$, I can't imagine how $f(B)$ (that for you is homeomorphict to $B$) can be $R_0$. On the other hand, if $f$ is neither open nor injective, then $f(A)$ needn't to be $R_0$ (see my example). Regarding your final sentence, I'l edit your question to exclude a single-point spaces.
    – Dog_69
    Nov 16 at 11:00










  • @Dog_69 The statement "i'm interested in spaces with at least two points" is unrelated to "$f$ being constant is trivial". Unless you additionally assume that $f$ is surjective?
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:08












  • Also, consider $f:Xto Y$ continuous, surjective, non-open, non-injective with both $X,Y$ being $R_0$, e.g. the double wrapping map $[0,2)to S^1$. These conditions are clearly not necessary.
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:16












  • @Dog_69 It's nothing to do with 1-point spaces. Take any $R_0$ space $X$ with more than one point and any space $Y$. Choose some $y_0 in Y$. Then $f: X to Y$ such that $f(x) = y_0$ for all $x$ has $f(X) = {y_0}$ is both trivial and discrete, so is $R_0$, but $f$ is neither open nor injective. You being able to find one map that is not open/injective but does not have your property does not mean that all non-open/injective maps do not have your property.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 11:43













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a continuous function of an $R_0$-space into a topological space (non-necessary $R_0$-space) (see Wiki to recall what an $R_0$-space is).



I wish to find out the conditions to ensure that if $X$ is $R_0$ then $f(X)$ also is.



For the momment, I have found that if $f$ is open and injective then $f(X)$ is $R_0$. Moreover, I know that if $f$ is not open or is not injective, then $f(X)$ may be no $R_0$:




  • For if $f$ is not open, given two separated points $x,yin X$ and two (open) neighbourhoods $V_x$ and $V_y$ such that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, then $f(y)notin f(V_x)$ and $f(x)notin f(V_y)$, but $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ needn't to be neigbhbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ resp. An example illustrating that is the identity map of ${0,1}$ (discrete) onto ${0,1}$ (Sierpinski space).


  • Similarly, if $f$ is open but not injective, despite that $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ are neighbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ and that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, it is poosible that $f(x)in f(V_y)$ and that $f(y)in f(V_x)$ (for example if $f(x)=f(y)$).



However, I can't find an example illustrating the second case. My problem is that I can't find continuous open functions of an $R_0$-space into a non-$R_0$-space. My first try was to consider a map from the Sorgrenfey line onto the Sierpinski space (because it is disconnected) but that map was not open. Then I considered the identity from $[-1,1]$ with the usual subspace topology onto $[-1,1]$ endowed with the overlapping interval topology, but it was open neither.



Can you provide an example for the second case, please?



EDIT: The result is trivial if $f$ is constant. I'm interested when $f$ is non-constant, i.e. $f(X)$ has at least two points, so in the above, asuume that $f$ is non-constant.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $f:Xrightarrow Y$ be a continuous function of an $R_0$-space into a topological space (non-necessary $R_0$-space) (see Wiki to recall what an $R_0$-space is).



I wish to find out the conditions to ensure that if $X$ is $R_0$ then $f(X)$ also is.



For the momment, I have found that if $f$ is open and injective then $f(X)$ is $R_0$. Moreover, I know that if $f$ is not open or is not injective, then $f(X)$ may be no $R_0$:




  • For if $f$ is not open, given two separated points $x,yin X$ and two (open) neighbourhoods $V_x$ and $V_y$ such that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, then $f(y)notin f(V_x)$ and $f(x)notin f(V_y)$, but $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ needn't to be neigbhbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ resp. An example illustrating that is the identity map of ${0,1}$ (discrete) onto ${0,1}$ (Sierpinski space).


  • Similarly, if $f$ is open but not injective, despite that $f(V_x)$ and $f(V_y)$ are neighbourhoods of $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ and that $ynotin V_x$ and $xnotin V_y$, it is poosible that $f(x)in f(V_y)$ and that $f(y)in f(V_x)$ (for example if $f(x)=f(y)$).



However, I can't find an example illustrating the second case. My problem is that I can't find continuous open functions of an $R_0$-space into a non-$R_0$-space. My first try was to consider a map from the Sorgrenfey line onto the Sierpinski space (because it is disconnected) but that map was not open. Then I considered the identity from $[-1,1]$ with the usual subspace topology onto $[-1,1]$ endowed with the overlapping interval topology, but it was open neither.



Can you provide an example for the second case, please?



EDIT: The result is trivial if $f$ is constant. I'm interested when $f$ is non-constant, i.e. $f(X)$ has at least two points, so in the above, asuume that $f$ is non-constant.







general-topology examples-counterexamples






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 16 at 15:44

























asked Nov 16 at 10:33









Dog_69

5211422




5211422












  • I'm fairly sure neither of your conditions is necessary: Take $X$ to be the disjoint union of an $R_0$ space $A$ with a space $B$ that is not $R_0$, with the obvious topology. This is not $R_0$ because of the $B$ part. Take $f$ to be open and injective (and whatever other conditions are needed to ensure that $f(B)$ is $R_0$) on $B$, and neither open nor injective on $A$. Then $f$ is neither open nor injective, but $f(X) = f(A)cup f(B)$ is $R_0$, since $A$ is $R_0$ and $f|_B$ is open and injective. More explictly, the constant map is neither open nor injective, but $f(X)$ is $R_0$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 10:45










  • I can't follows your reasoning. If $B$ is not $R_0$, I can't imagine how $f(B)$ (that for you is homeomorphict to $B$) can be $R_0$. On the other hand, if $f$ is neither open nor injective, then $f(A)$ needn't to be $R_0$ (see my example). Regarding your final sentence, I'l edit your question to exclude a single-point spaces.
    – Dog_69
    Nov 16 at 11:00










  • @Dog_69 The statement "i'm interested in spaces with at least two points" is unrelated to "$f$ being constant is trivial". Unless you additionally assume that $f$ is surjective?
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:08












  • Also, consider $f:Xto Y$ continuous, surjective, non-open, non-injective with both $X,Y$ being $R_0$, e.g. the double wrapping map $[0,2)to S^1$. These conditions are clearly not necessary.
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:16












  • @Dog_69 It's nothing to do with 1-point spaces. Take any $R_0$ space $X$ with more than one point and any space $Y$. Choose some $y_0 in Y$. Then $f: X to Y$ such that $f(x) = y_0$ for all $x$ has $f(X) = {y_0}$ is both trivial and discrete, so is $R_0$, but $f$ is neither open nor injective. You being able to find one map that is not open/injective but does not have your property does not mean that all non-open/injective maps do not have your property.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 11:43


















  • I'm fairly sure neither of your conditions is necessary: Take $X$ to be the disjoint union of an $R_0$ space $A$ with a space $B$ that is not $R_0$, with the obvious topology. This is not $R_0$ because of the $B$ part. Take $f$ to be open and injective (and whatever other conditions are needed to ensure that $f(B)$ is $R_0$) on $B$, and neither open nor injective on $A$. Then $f$ is neither open nor injective, but $f(X) = f(A)cup f(B)$ is $R_0$, since $A$ is $R_0$ and $f|_B$ is open and injective. More explictly, the constant map is neither open nor injective, but $f(X)$ is $R_0$.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 10:45










  • I can't follows your reasoning. If $B$ is not $R_0$, I can't imagine how $f(B)$ (that for you is homeomorphict to $B$) can be $R_0$. On the other hand, if $f$ is neither open nor injective, then $f(A)$ needn't to be $R_0$ (see my example). Regarding your final sentence, I'l edit your question to exclude a single-point spaces.
    – Dog_69
    Nov 16 at 11:00










  • @Dog_69 The statement "i'm interested in spaces with at least two points" is unrelated to "$f$ being constant is trivial". Unless you additionally assume that $f$ is surjective?
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:08












  • Also, consider $f:Xto Y$ continuous, surjective, non-open, non-injective with both $X,Y$ being $R_0$, e.g. the double wrapping map $[0,2)to S^1$. These conditions are clearly not necessary.
    – freakish
    Nov 16 at 11:16












  • @Dog_69 It's nothing to do with 1-point spaces. Take any $R_0$ space $X$ with more than one point and any space $Y$. Choose some $y_0 in Y$. Then $f: X to Y$ such that $f(x) = y_0$ for all $x$ has $f(X) = {y_0}$ is both trivial and discrete, so is $R_0$, but $f$ is neither open nor injective. You being able to find one map that is not open/injective but does not have your property does not mean that all non-open/injective maps do not have your property.
    – user3482749
    Nov 16 at 11:43
















I'm fairly sure neither of your conditions is necessary: Take $X$ to be the disjoint union of an $R_0$ space $A$ with a space $B$ that is not $R_0$, with the obvious topology. This is not $R_0$ because of the $B$ part. Take $f$ to be open and injective (and whatever other conditions are needed to ensure that $f(B)$ is $R_0$) on $B$, and neither open nor injective on $A$. Then $f$ is neither open nor injective, but $f(X) = f(A)cup f(B)$ is $R_0$, since $A$ is $R_0$ and $f|_B$ is open and injective. More explictly, the constant map is neither open nor injective, but $f(X)$ is $R_0$.
– user3482749
Nov 16 at 10:45




I'm fairly sure neither of your conditions is necessary: Take $X$ to be the disjoint union of an $R_0$ space $A$ with a space $B$ that is not $R_0$, with the obvious topology. This is not $R_0$ because of the $B$ part. Take $f$ to be open and injective (and whatever other conditions are needed to ensure that $f(B)$ is $R_0$) on $B$, and neither open nor injective on $A$. Then $f$ is neither open nor injective, but $f(X) = f(A)cup f(B)$ is $R_0$, since $A$ is $R_0$ and $f|_B$ is open and injective. More explictly, the constant map is neither open nor injective, but $f(X)$ is $R_0$.
– user3482749
Nov 16 at 10:45












I can't follows your reasoning. If $B$ is not $R_0$, I can't imagine how $f(B)$ (that for you is homeomorphict to $B$) can be $R_0$. On the other hand, if $f$ is neither open nor injective, then $f(A)$ needn't to be $R_0$ (see my example). Regarding your final sentence, I'l edit your question to exclude a single-point spaces.
– Dog_69
Nov 16 at 11:00




I can't follows your reasoning. If $B$ is not $R_0$, I can't imagine how $f(B)$ (that for you is homeomorphict to $B$) can be $R_0$. On the other hand, if $f$ is neither open nor injective, then $f(A)$ needn't to be $R_0$ (see my example). Regarding your final sentence, I'l edit your question to exclude a single-point spaces.
– Dog_69
Nov 16 at 11:00












@Dog_69 The statement "i'm interested in spaces with at least two points" is unrelated to "$f$ being constant is trivial". Unless you additionally assume that $f$ is surjective?
– freakish
Nov 16 at 11:08






@Dog_69 The statement "i'm interested in spaces with at least two points" is unrelated to "$f$ being constant is trivial". Unless you additionally assume that $f$ is surjective?
– freakish
Nov 16 at 11:08














Also, consider $f:Xto Y$ continuous, surjective, non-open, non-injective with both $X,Y$ being $R_0$, e.g. the double wrapping map $[0,2)to S^1$. These conditions are clearly not necessary.
– freakish
Nov 16 at 11:16






Also, consider $f:Xto Y$ continuous, surjective, non-open, non-injective with both $X,Y$ being $R_0$, e.g. the double wrapping map $[0,2)to S^1$. These conditions are clearly not necessary.
– freakish
Nov 16 at 11:16














@Dog_69 It's nothing to do with 1-point spaces. Take any $R_0$ space $X$ with more than one point and any space $Y$. Choose some $y_0 in Y$. Then $f: X to Y$ such that $f(x) = y_0$ for all $x$ has $f(X) = {y_0}$ is both trivial and discrete, so is $R_0$, but $f$ is neither open nor injective. You being able to find one map that is not open/injective but does not have your property does not mean that all non-open/injective maps do not have your property.
– user3482749
Nov 16 at 11:43




@Dog_69 It's nothing to do with 1-point spaces. Take any $R_0$ space $X$ with more than one point and any space $Y$. Choose some $y_0 in Y$. Then $f: X to Y$ such that $f(x) = y_0$ for all $x$ has $f(X) = {y_0}$ is both trivial and discrete, so is $R_0$, but $f$ is neither open nor injective. You being able to find one map that is not open/injective but does not have your property does not mean that all non-open/injective maps do not have your property.
– user3482749
Nov 16 at 11:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













It seems there was a simple example:



Let $X=mathbb R$ with the usual topology and $Y={0,1}$ be the Sierpinski space (with ${1}$ open). Consider $f:Xrightarrow Y$ defined as $f(0)=0$ and $1$ otherwise. Then:




  • $f$ is continuous because $f^{-1}({1})=(-infty,0)cup(0,+infty)$ is open and $f^{-1}({0,1})=mathbb R$ is also open.


  • $f$ is open because $f((a,b))={1}$ if $0notin (a,b)$ and ${0,1}$ if $0in(a,b)$; in both cases they are open.


  • The Sierpinski space is not symmetric because $0$ and $1$ are topologically distinguishable but $1$ belongs to each neighbourhood of $0$.







share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000988%2fcontinuous-function-of-r-0-space-into-non-r-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    It seems there was a simple example:



    Let $X=mathbb R$ with the usual topology and $Y={0,1}$ be the Sierpinski space (with ${1}$ open). Consider $f:Xrightarrow Y$ defined as $f(0)=0$ and $1$ otherwise. Then:




    • $f$ is continuous because $f^{-1}({1})=(-infty,0)cup(0,+infty)$ is open and $f^{-1}({0,1})=mathbb R$ is also open.


    • $f$ is open because $f((a,b))={1}$ if $0notin (a,b)$ and ${0,1}$ if $0in(a,b)$; in both cases they are open.


    • The Sierpinski space is not symmetric because $0$ and $1$ are topologically distinguishable but $1$ belongs to each neighbourhood of $0$.







    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      It seems there was a simple example:



      Let $X=mathbb R$ with the usual topology and $Y={0,1}$ be the Sierpinski space (with ${1}$ open). Consider $f:Xrightarrow Y$ defined as $f(0)=0$ and $1$ otherwise. Then:




      • $f$ is continuous because $f^{-1}({1})=(-infty,0)cup(0,+infty)$ is open and $f^{-1}({0,1})=mathbb R$ is also open.


      • $f$ is open because $f((a,b))={1}$ if $0notin (a,b)$ and ${0,1}$ if $0in(a,b)$; in both cases they are open.


      • The Sierpinski space is not symmetric because $0$ and $1$ are topologically distinguishable but $1$ belongs to each neighbourhood of $0$.







      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        It seems there was a simple example:



        Let $X=mathbb R$ with the usual topology and $Y={0,1}$ be the Sierpinski space (with ${1}$ open). Consider $f:Xrightarrow Y$ defined as $f(0)=0$ and $1$ otherwise. Then:




        • $f$ is continuous because $f^{-1}({1})=(-infty,0)cup(0,+infty)$ is open and $f^{-1}({0,1})=mathbb R$ is also open.


        • $f$ is open because $f((a,b))={1}$ if $0notin (a,b)$ and ${0,1}$ if $0in(a,b)$; in both cases they are open.


        • The Sierpinski space is not symmetric because $0$ and $1$ are topologically distinguishable but $1$ belongs to each neighbourhood of $0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        It seems there was a simple example:



        Let $X=mathbb R$ with the usual topology and $Y={0,1}$ be the Sierpinski space (with ${1}$ open). Consider $f:Xrightarrow Y$ defined as $f(0)=0$ and $1$ otherwise. Then:




        • $f$ is continuous because $f^{-1}({1})=(-infty,0)cup(0,+infty)$ is open and $f^{-1}({0,1})=mathbb R$ is also open.


        • $f$ is open because $f((a,b))={1}$ if $0notin (a,b)$ and ${0,1}$ if $0in(a,b)$; in both cases they are open.


        • The Sierpinski space is not symmetric because $0$ and $1$ are topologically distinguishable but $1$ belongs to each neighbourhood of $0$.








        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 19 at 16:07









        Dog_69

        5211422




        5211422






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000988%2fcontinuous-function-of-r-0-space-into-non-r-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei