Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1, ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
$(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
    $(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




    Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




    I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
      $(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




      Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




      I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Let $V$ be a real vector space and $W_1$ and $W_2$ two finite dimensional subspaces. Let
      $(u_1,ldots, u_m)$ be a basis for $W_1$ and $(v_1,ldots, v_n)$ be a basis for $W2$.




      Suppose that $(u_1,ldots, u_m, v_1,ldots, v_n)$ is linearly independent. Prove that $W_1 ∩ W_2 = {0}$.




      I know that if $w ∈ W_1 ∩ W_2$, then $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$ and also a linear combination of the $v_j$). I am however not sure how to proceed next.







      linear-algebra vector-spaces






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 at 9:49









      José Carlos Santos

      140k19111204




      140k19111204






      New contributor




      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Nov 16 at 9:40









      Lowly0palace

      11




      11




      New contributor




      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Lowly0palace is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Lowly0palace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000949%2fsuppose-that-u-1-ldots-u-m-v-1-ldots-v-n-is-linearly-independent-prov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Since $w$ is a linear combination of the $u_i$'s and also of the $v_j$'s, then you have$$w=alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m=beta_1v_1+cdots+beta_nv_n.$$But then$$alpha_1u_1+cdots+alpha_mu_m-beta_1v_1-cdots-beta_nv_n=0.$$Therefore, the linear independence implies that all coefficients are $0$. In particular, $w=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 16 at 9:47









                José Carlos Santos

                140k19111204




                140k19111204






















                    Lowly0palace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


















                    Lowly0palace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Lowly0palace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Lowly0palace is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000949%2fsuppose-that-u-1-ldots-u-m-v-1-ldots-v-n-is-linearly-independent-prov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei