If $f$ is analytic on $mathbb{R}$, is it necessary that $f = sum_{n = 0}^{infty} a_{n} x^{n}$ converges for...
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is correct.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:13
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:14
1
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
Nov 16 at 8:14
Yes. This is correct.
– Andrej
Nov 16 at 8:16
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 8:21
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have two questions regarding analyticity. They are pretty easy, and I think I have them correct, but I just want to make sure.
First, regarding the question in the title,
I think that it is necessary. By the definition of analyticity, we must have the power series in some radius of the function. So, if it is analytic on all of $mathbb{R}$, it must be within some radius (and thus convergent) for all of $mathbb{R}$.
Second, if $f$ is analytic, is it necessary for $text{exp}(f)$ to be analytic? Pretty sure that this again is necessary since $e^{x}$ is analytic, and the composition of analytic functions is analytic.
real-analysis functions analyticity
real-analysis functions analyticity
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
asked Nov 16 at 8:08
Dillain Smith
396
396
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is correct.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:13
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:14
1
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
Nov 16 at 8:14
Yes. This is correct.
– Andrej
Nov 16 at 8:16
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 8:21
add a comment |
This is correct.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:13
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:14
1
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
Nov 16 at 8:14
Yes. This is correct.
– Andrej
Nov 16 at 8:16
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 8:21
This is correct.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:13
This is correct.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:13
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:14
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:14
1
1
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
Nov 16 at 8:14
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
Nov 16 at 8:14
Yes. This is correct.
– Andrej
Nov 16 at 8:16
Yes. This is correct.
– Andrej
Nov 16 at 8:16
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 8:21
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 8:21
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$. The Maclaurin series of it does not converge everywhere is because $f$ is a meromorphic function in $mathbb{C}$.
If $f(z)$ is analytic on $mathbb{C}$, the series you gave is convergent everywhere.
Your explanation of question 2 is correct.
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
answered Nov 16 at 8:28
Kemono Chen
1,601330
1,601330
add a comment |
add a comment |
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Dillain Smith is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000869%2fif-f-is-analytic-on-mathbbr-is-it-necessary-that-f-sum-n-0-inf%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is correct.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:13
Only an accumuled point is required.
– Zanzi
Nov 16 at 8:14
1
Counterexample to question 1: $f(x)=frac1{1+x^2}$.
– Kemono Chen
Nov 16 at 8:14
Yes. This is correct.
– Andrej
Nov 16 at 8:16
@KemonoChen Why not an official answer even it is short?
– Paul Frost
Nov 16 at 8:21