Ring extension where primes can be lifted is integral?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $B/A$ be a ring extension of unital commutative rings.
Suppose for each prime $psubset A$, there is $q subset B$ prime with $q cap A = p$.
It is not true that $B$ is integral over $A$, for instance if we take a transcedental extension of a field, then it's just that there's no nonzero prime ideals.
My question is how close is the relationship between integrability and lifting primes, meaning what conditions can we add, so that a ring extension satisfying it is an integral extension?
commutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $B/A$ be a ring extension of unital commutative rings.
Suppose for each prime $psubset A$, there is $q subset B$ prime with $q cap A = p$.
It is not true that $B$ is integral over $A$, for instance if we take a transcedental extension of a field, then it's just that there's no nonzero prime ideals.
My question is how close is the relationship between integrability and lifting primes, meaning what conditions can we add, so that a ring extension satisfying it is an integral extension?
commutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $B/A$ be a ring extension of unital commutative rings.
Suppose for each prime $psubset A$, there is $q subset B$ prime with $q cap A = p$.
It is not true that $B$ is integral over $A$, for instance if we take a transcedental extension of a field, then it's just that there's no nonzero prime ideals.
My question is how close is the relationship between integrability and lifting primes, meaning what conditions can we add, so that a ring extension satisfying it is an integral extension?
commutative-algebra
Let $B/A$ be a ring extension of unital commutative rings.
Suppose for each prime $psubset A$, there is $q subset B$ prime with $q cap A = p$.
It is not true that $B$ is integral over $A$, for instance if we take a transcedental extension of a field, then it's just that there's no nonzero prime ideals.
My question is how close is the relationship between integrability and lifting primes, meaning what conditions can we add, so that a ring extension satisfying it is an integral extension?
commutative-algebra
commutative-algebra
asked Nov 16 at 10:41
Andy
485513
485513
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000993%2fring-extension-where-primes-can-be-lifted-is-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown