Given a book with $100$ pages and a $100$ lemmas, prove that there is some lemma written on the same page as...











up vote
15
down vote

favorite
3













A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    2 days ago






  • 8




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    2 days ago















up vote
15
down vote

favorite
3













A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    2 days ago






  • 8




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    2 days ago













up vote
15
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
15
down vote

favorite
3






3






A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?










share|cite|improve this question
















A book consists of 100 pages and contains 100 lemmas and some images. Each lemma is at most one page long and can't be split into two pages (it has to fit in one page). The lemmas are numbered from 1 to 100 and are written in ascending order. Prove that there must be at least one lemma written on a page with the same number as the lemma's number.




If lemma no 1 is written on page no 1, then it is proved. Let's assume lemma nr 1 is written on page nr k, k>1. Then in at least one page there must be 2 lemmas. Let's assume that always in page k+i we have the lemma nr i+1 and so on. Then the last 100-k-i lemmas must fit in the last page, which means that there will be at least one lemma (number 100) in page 100.
But I don't know how to express it in a more mathematical way!



Any help?







combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Asaf Karagila

300k32421751




300k32421751










asked 2 days ago









Reyansh Laghari

1515




1515








  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    2 days ago






  • 8




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    2 days ago














  • 1




    Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
    – Chickenmancer
    2 days ago






  • 8




    @Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago










  • I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
    – paul garrett
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
    – Servaes
    2 days ago








1




1




Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
2 days ago




Lemma 1 occurs on page 1.
– Chickenmancer
2 days ago




8




8




@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
2 days ago




@Chickenmancer An image could be on the first page.
– Oldboy
2 days ago












I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
2 days ago




I edited your tags from "number theory" and "elementary number theory" to "combinatorics", which I'm fairly confident more accurately reflects how other people would perceive the topic...
– paul garrett
2 days ago




1




1




Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
2 days ago




Are the pages numbered (in ascending order)?
– Servaes
2 days ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote













We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    2 days ago










  • That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    yesterday










  • @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
    – Tim Pederick
    yesterday






  • 1




    @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
    – awkward
    yesterday












  • @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    yesterday


















up vote
6
down vote













For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



We have the following sequence:



$$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



$$p(i)<i$$



$$p(j)ge j$$



This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago


















up vote
6
down vote













Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    2 days ago


















up vote
2
down vote













Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



(This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago










  • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    2 days ago










  • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago






  • 1




    It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    yesterday


















up vote
1
down vote













Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.



Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.



Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.



We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.



So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.



Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.



Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.



Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016149%2fgiven-a-book-with-100-pages-and-a-100-lemmas-prove-that-there-is-some-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    11
    down vote













    We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



    Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • +1 The way to go!
      – Servaes
      2 days ago










    • That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday










    • @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
      – Tim Pederick
      yesterday






    • 1




      @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
      – awkward
      yesterday












    • @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday















    up vote
    11
    down vote













    We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



    Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • +1 The way to go!
      – Servaes
      2 days ago










    • That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday










    • @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
      – Tim Pederick
      yesterday






    • 1




      @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
      – awkward
      yesterday












    • @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday













    up vote
    11
    down vote










    up vote
    11
    down vote









    We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



    Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    We claim more generally that a book of $n$ pages and $n$ lemmas numbered $1$ through $n$ has at least one lemma on a page matching its number.



    Proof by induction on $n$: The case $n=1$ is obvious. Now suppose the statement is true for some $n$, and suppose we have a book of $n+1$ lemmas and $n+1$ pages. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ must be on pages $1$ through $n$, and there must be at least one lemma on a same-numbered page by the inductive hypothesis. If not, then lemma $n+1$ is on page $n+1$, and we're done.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    awkward

    5,70111022




    5,70111022












    • +1 The way to go!
      – Servaes
      2 days ago










    • That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday










    • @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
      – Tim Pederick
      yesterday






    • 1




      @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
      – awkward
      yesterday












    • @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday


















    • +1 The way to go!
      – Servaes
      2 days ago










    • That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday










    • @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
      – Tim Pederick
      yesterday






    • 1




      @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
      – awkward
      yesterday












    • @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
      – Stephan Kolassa
      yesterday
















    +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    2 days ago




    +1 The way to go!
    – Servaes
    2 days ago












    That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    yesterday




    That does not seem to work. If lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$, then lemmas $1$ through $n$ are spread over pages $1$ through $n+1$, not pages $1$ through $n$! So you can't apply the induction hypothesis.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    yesterday












    @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
    – Tim Pederick
    yesterday




    @StephanKolassa: Doesn't lemma $n$ have to be on the same page as, or an earlier page than, lemma $n+1$? In which case, if lemma $n+1$ is on a page numbered less than $n+1$ (thus less than or equal to $n$), lemma $n$ is too.
    – Tim Pederick
    yesterday




    1




    1




    @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
    – awkward
    yesterday






    @StephanKolassa The page numbers of the lemmas form a non-decreasing sequence. If the page number of lemma $n+1$ is less than $n+1$, then the page number of lemma $n$ is less than $n+1$, hence less than or equal to $n$.
    – awkward
    yesterday














    @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    yesterday




    @awkward: thanks, that helps - I had overlooked that little detail. Better to read first, comment later.
    – Stephan Kolassa
    yesterday










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



    We have the following sequence:



    $$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



    If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



    Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



    The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



    Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



    $$p(i)<i$$



    $$p(j)ge j$$



    This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



    We have the following sequence:



    $$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



    If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



    Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



    The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



    Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



    $$p(i)<i$$



    $$p(j)ge j$$



    This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago













    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



    We have the following sequence:



    $$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



    If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



    Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



    The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



    Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



    $$p(i)<i$$



    $$p(j)ge j$$



    This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    For each page $i$ assign a number $p(i)$ that defines the highest number of lemma printed on all pages starting from page 1 up to page $i$ (inclusive). So if we have lemmas 3, 4 and 5 printed on page 12, with page 13 having images only: $p(12)=p(13)=5$.



    We have the following sequence:



    $$p(1), p(2), dots, p(100)=100tag{1}$$



    If $p(1)ge1$ it means that lemma 1 is printed on the first page and we are done.



    Let us consider a case when $p(1)=0$ (which basically means that the first page is reserved for images only).



    The sequence of page numbers $i$ is strictly increasing and the sequence of values $p(i)$ is non-decreasing. Both sequencies have the same number of items (100), with $p(1)<1$ and $p(100)=100$.



    Because of that we must have a pair of consecutive pages $i,space j=i+1$ such that:



    $$p(i)<i$$



    $$p(j)ge j$$



    This basically means that lemma $j$ is not printed on page $i$ or on any other page before it. It is actually printed on page $j$ and this completes the proof.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    Oldboy

    5,7731628




    5,7731628












    • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago


















    • +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago
















    +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago




    +1 very nice. I wonder if my solution is essentially the same as yours.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



    Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



    Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 1




      I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
      – user113102
      2 days ago















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



    Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



    Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • 1




      I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
      – user113102
      2 days ago













    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



    Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



    Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    Slight rephrasing of Oldboy's argument:



    Let $a_i = i - p_i$, where $p_i$ is the page number of lemma $i$.



    Then $a_1 leq 0$, $a_{100} geq 0$, and $a_{i+1}-a_{i} leq 1$. Thus $a_i$ must be $0$ for some $i$.







    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer






    New contributor




    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 2 days ago









    user113102

    612




    612




    New contributor




    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    user113102 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    • 1




      I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
      – user113102
      2 days ago














    • 1




      I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
      – user113102
      2 days ago








    1




    1




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    2 days ago




    I guess this is the same idea as both Ethan's and Oldboy's arguments, but feels cleaner to me.
    – user113102
    2 days ago










    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



    Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



    (This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 2




      "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
      – Oldboy
      2 days ago










    • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
      – Reyansh Laghari
      2 days ago










    • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      It’s ok now, +1.
      – Oldboy
      yesterday















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



    Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



    (This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 2




      "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
      – Oldboy
      2 days ago










    • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
      – Reyansh Laghari
      2 days ago










    • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      It’s ok now, +1.
      – Oldboy
      yesterday













    up vote
    2
    down vote










    up vote
    2
    down vote









    Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



    Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



    (This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)






    share|cite|improve this answer














    Consider the path of points $(L, p(L))$ where lemma $L$ is on page $p(L)$. Plot that path on the grid of lattice points $(x,y)$ for $1 le x, y le 100$. The path starts on or above the diagonal at point $(1, p(1))$ and ends on or below the diagonal at point $(100, p(100))$.



    Following that path, you move to the right one step at a time as the lemma count increases. You may stay at the same horizontal level since many lemmas can appear on a page. Vertical steps can be longer, if pages of images intervene. Since you start out above the diagonal, you can't cross it for the first time on a vertical step. Since in order to end up on the other side of the diagonal you must cross it once, that must be a horizontal step, so you have landed on it on the way to the other side.



    (This doesn't exactly answer your question, which calls "expressing [your proof] in a more mathematical way". I might be wrong, but I don't think that's possible.)







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered 2 days ago









    Ethan Bolker

    39.7k543103




    39.7k543103








    • 2




      "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
      – Oldboy
      2 days ago










    • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
      – Reyansh Laghari
      2 days ago










    • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      It’s ok now, +1.
      – Oldboy
      yesterday














    • 2




      "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
      – Oldboy
      2 days ago










    • I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
      – Reyansh Laghari
      2 days ago










    • @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
      – Ethan Bolker
      2 days ago






    • 1




      It’s ok now, +1.
      – Oldboy
      yesterday








    2




    2




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago




    "since at most one lemma fits on a page": This is not given.
    – Oldboy
    2 days ago












    I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    2 days ago




    I believe that the path steps horizontally at most one but can step up many steps, right?
    – Reyansh Laghari
    2 days ago












    @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago




    @ReyanshLaghari I think my proof is fixable but I can't do it right now. You can edit it if you figure it out. If not I will return later today.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago




    1




    1




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago




    @Oldboy Fixed the argument thank you.
    – Ethan Bolker
    2 days ago




    1




    1




    It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    yesterday




    It’s ok now, +1.
    – Oldboy
    yesterday










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.



    Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.



    Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.



    We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.



    So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.



    Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.



    Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.



    Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.



      Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.



      Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.



      We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.



      So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.



      Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.



      Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.



      Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.



        Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.



        Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.



        We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.



        So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.



        Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.



        Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.



        Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Here's a slightly amended proof by induction, which I hope will make the induction step more obvious.



        Let $P_n$ be the proposition that for a book with $n$ sequentially numbered pages and $n$ or more sequentially numbered lemmas, at least one lemma is on a page with the same number as the lemma.



        Suppose $P_n$ is true for some $n=k$, and consider the case of $k+1$ pages and $k+1$ lemmas. To avoid being on its own-numbered page, lemma $k+1$ has to be somewhere in the first $k$ pages, and to keep the lemmas in sequence, no other lemma can go on page $k+1$.



        We therefore have to fit all $k+1$ lemmas onto the first $k$ pages. By $P_k$, this puts at least one of them on its own-numbered page.



        So wherever lemma $k+1$ is, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page.



        Clearly this remains true if we add more lemmas without adding more pages. That is, with $k+1$ pages and $ge k+1$ lemmas, at least one lemma is on its own-numbered page: ie $P_{k+1}$ holds. That is, if $P_n$ is true for $n=k$, it is also true for $n=k+1$.



        Now consider the case of $1$ page and $ge 1$ lemmas. Clearly lemma 1 is on page 1, so $P_1$ is true. Therefore, by induction, $P_n$ is true for all $nge 1$.



        Finally, putting $n=100$ proves the case in the original question.







        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday





















        New contributor




        timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        timtfj

        817




        817




        New contributor




        timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        timtfj is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016149%2fgiven-a-book-with-100-pages-and-a-100-lemmas-prove-that-there-is-some-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei