$n$ guests, each guest brings a prize, how many ways may the prizes be given out so nobody gets the prize...
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Each person attending a party has been asked to bring a prize. The person
planning the party has arranged to give out exactly as many prizes as there
are guests, but any person may win any number of the prizes. If there are $n$
guests, in how many ways may the prizes be given out so that nobody gets
the prize that they brought?
My answer was $(n-1)^n$, for I thought that there are $(n-1)$ possible prizes for each of the $n$ guests. However, my answer is wrong. I'm given a hint that it will involve with the inclusion-exclusion principle, I'm not sure how to interpret the problem in this direction.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics inclusion-exclusion
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Each person attending a party has been asked to bring a prize. The person
planning the party has arranged to give out exactly as many prizes as there
are guests, but any person may win any number of the prizes. If there are $n$
guests, in how many ways may the prizes be given out so that nobody gets
the prize that they brought?
My answer was $(n-1)^n$, for I thought that there are $(n-1)$ possible prizes for each of the $n$ guests. However, my answer is wrong. I'm given a hint that it will involve with the inclusion-exclusion principle, I'm not sure how to interpret the problem in this direction.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics inclusion-exclusion
1
Maybe this is just me but I feel like this question screams derangements/subfactorial (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement) and that your answer might be $!n$ in that light. Not sure if it's something you would know about or how deeply involved that notion is with this sort of problem. The last bit of the section on "Counting Derangements" does touch on inclusion-exclusion though.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
Google for derangements. By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the answer is given by $n!sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{(-1)^k}{k!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
There are only two derangements of three objects. However, there are eight ways to distribute three objects to three people so that no person receives the present that he or she brought. In a derangement, each person receives one present, but that is not the case here.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 18 at 18:35
@N.F.Taussig: You make a good point about the wording of the problem, but the OP also reports that the answer $(n-1)^n$ was marked incorrect. If the source of this error is not related to the issue of whether each guest must receive a prize, it might instead be connected to the description "there are (n-1) possible prize for each of the n guest." A better argument is that there are $(n-1)$ possible recipients for each of the $n$ prizes brought by guests (assuming all the prizes are distinct).
– hardmath
Nov 18 at 18:47
Thanks to you guys, I found out a helpful video that taught me how to do derangement! Here is the link if anyone is interested in finding out the answer youtube.com/…
– Linh Dương Phương
Nov 18 at 19:09
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Each person attending a party has been asked to bring a prize. The person
planning the party has arranged to give out exactly as many prizes as there
are guests, but any person may win any number of the prizes. If there are $n$
guests, in how many ways may the prizes be given out so that nobody gets
the prize that they brought?
My answer was $(n-1)^n$, for I thought that there are $(n-1)$ possible prizes for each of the $n$ guests. However, my answer is wrong. I'm given a hint that it will involve with the inclusion-exclusion principle, I'm not sure how to interpret the problem in this direction.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics inclusion-exclusion
Each person attending a party has been asked to bring a prize. The person
planning the party has arranged to give out exactly as many prizes as there
are guests, but any person may win any number of the prizes. If there are $n$
guests, in how many ways may the prizes be given out so that nobody gets
the prize that they brought?
My answer was $(n-1)^n$, for I thought that there are $(n-1)$ possible prizes for each of the $n$ guests. However, my answer is wrong. I'm given a hint that it will involve with the inclusion-exclusion principle, I'm not sure how to interpret the problem in this direction.
combinatorics discrete-mathematics inclusion-exclusion
combinatorics discrete-mathematics inclusion-exclusion
edited Nov 18 at 19:22
N. F. Taussig
42.8k93254
42.8k93254
asked Nov 18 at 18:22
Linh Dương Phương
161
161
1
Maybe this is just me but I feel like this question screams derangements/subfactorial (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement) and that your answer might be $!n$ in that light. Not sure if it's something you would know about or how deeply involved that notion is with this sort of problem. The last bit of the section on "Counting Derangements" does touch on inclusion-exclusion though.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
Google for derangements. By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the answer is given by $n!sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{(-1)^k}{k!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
There are only two derangements of three objects. However, there are eight ways to distribute three objects to three people so that no person receives the present that he or she brought. In a derangement, each person receives one present, but that is not the case here.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 18 at 18:35
@N.F.Taussig: You make a good point about the wording of the problem, but the OP also reports that the answer $(n-1)^n$ was marked incorrect. If the source of this error is not related to the issue of whether each guest must receive a prize, it might instead be connected to the description "there are (n-1) possible prize for each of the n guest." A better argument is that there are $(n-1)$ possible recipients for each of the $n$ prizes brought by guests (assuming all the prizes are distinct).
– hardmath
Nov 18 at 18:47
Thanks to you guys, I found out a helpful video that taught me how to do derangement! Here is the link if anyone is interested in finding out the answer youtube.com/…
– Linh Dương Phương
Nov 18 at 19:09
add a comment |
1
Maybe this is just me but I feel like this question screams derangements/subfactorial (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement) and that your answer might be $!n$ in that light. Not sure if it's something you would know about or how deeply involved that notion is with this sort of problem. The last bit of the section on "Counting Derangements" does touch on inclusion-exclusion though.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
Google for derangements. By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the answer is given by $n!sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{(-1)^k}{k!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
There are only two derangements of three objects. However, there are eight ways to distribute three objects to three people so that no person receives the present that he or she brought. In a derangement, each person receives one present, but that is not the case here.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 18 at 18:35
@N.F.Taussig: You make a good point about the wording of the problem, but the OP also reports that the answer $(n-1)^n$ was marked incorrect. If the source of this error is not related to the issue of whether each guest must receive a prize, it might instead be connected to the description "there are (n-1) possible prize for each of the n guest." A better argument is that there are $(n-1)$ possible recipients for each of the $n$ prizes brought by guests (assuming all the prizes are distinct).
– hardmath
Nov 18 at 18:47
Thanks to you guys, I found out a helpful video that taught me how to do derangement! Here is the link if anyone is interested in finding out the answer youtube.com/…
– Linh Dương Phương
Nov 18 at 19:09
1
1
Maybe this is just me but I feel like this question screams derangements/subfactorial (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement) and that your answer might be $!n$ in that light. Not sure if it's something you would know about or how deeply involved that notion is with this sort of problem. The last bit of the section on "Counting Derangements" does touch on inclusion-exclusion though.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 18 at 18:25
Maybe this is just me but I feel like this question screams derangements/subfactorial (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement) and that your answer might be $!n$ in that light. Not sure if it's something you would know about or how deeply involved that notion is with this sort of problem. The last bit of the section on "Counting Derangements" does touch on inclusion-exclusion though.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
1
Google for derangements. By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the answer is given by $n!sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{(-1)^k}{k!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Nov 18 at 18:25
Google for derangements. By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the answer is given by $n!sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{(-1)^k}{k!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
1
There are only two derangements of three objects. However, there are eight ways to distribute three objects to three people so that no person receives the present that he or she brought. In a derangement, each person receives one present, but that is not the case here.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 18 at 18:35
There are only two derangements of three objects. However, there are eight ways to distribute three objects to three people so that no person receives the present that he or she brought. In a derangement, each person receives one present, but that is not the case here.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 18 at 18:35
@N.F.Taussig: You make a good point about the wording of the problem, but the OP also reports that the answer $(n-1)^n$ was marked incorrect. If the source of this error is not related to the issue of whether each guest must receive a prize, it might instead be connected to the description "there are (n-1) possible prize for each of the n guest." A better argument is that there are $(n-1)$ possible recipients for each of the $n$ prizes brought by guests (assuming all the prizes are distinct).
– hardmath
Nov 18 at 18:47
@N.F.Taussig: You make a good point about the wording of the problem, but the OP also reports that the answer $(n-1)^n$ was marked incorrect. If the source of this error is not related to the issue of whether each guest must receive a prize, it might instead be connected to the description "there are (n-1) possible prize for each of the n guest." A better argument is that there are $(n-1)$ possible recipients for each of the $n$ prizes brought by guests (assuming all the prizes are distinct).
– hardmath
Nov 18 at 18:47
Thanks to you guys, I found out a helpful video that taught me how to do derangement! Here is the link if anyone is interested in finding out the answer youtube.com/…
– Linh Dương Phương
Nov 18 at 19:09
Thanks to you guys, I found out a helpful video that taught me how to do derangement! Here is the link if anyone is interested in finding out the answer youtube.com/…
– Linh Dương Phương
Nov 18 at 19:09
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Let's mark every prize from 1 to n, p1, p2, p3, ... pn
and the people at the guests at the party g1, g2, g3, ... gn
, where pi
is the prize from guest gi
. Your goal is to make sure that you don't match the prizes with the guests that are having the same indices.
In this case you need to make sure that: p1 doesn't go to g1, p2 doesn't go to g2, p3 doesn't go to g3, and so on.
Let's consider |S|
being the case where at least a guest is receiving the same prize. In this case we can write |S|
like this: $$|S| = p1cup p2cup p3cup ...cup pn$$
This can be translated into "Present 1 goes to guest 1 or present 2 goes to guest 2 and so on". If we expand this, we have something like this:
$$|S| = binom{n}{1} - binom{n}{2} + binom{n}{3} + ... + (-1)^nbinom{n}{n}$$
In your case, you need the opposite (the number of ways the people DON'T receive the same prize) so what you need to do is to subtract from the total ways you can distribute the prizes |S|
.
Total number of ways to distribute the n prizes is $n^n$ (not n-1 since you need to count for the case when the person is not receiving anything. Hence:
$$n^n - |S|$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Derangements count the situation where every guest gets exactly 1 prize. However, the OP wording says that every guest can get ANY number of prizes (i.e. $0$ to $n-1$ since he/she cannot get his/her own prize). In this case, the correct answer is indeed $(n-1)^n$, because each of $n$ prizes can go to any of $(n-1)$ recipients. I.e., your teacher is wrong to mark you wrong.
If your teacher insists on using Inclusion Exclusion, then let $A_i$ be the set of arrangements s.t. person $i$ gets his/her own gift. Then I-E gives:
$answer = n^n - sum_i |A_i| + sum_{i<j} |A_i cap A_j| - sum_{i<j<k} |A_i cap A_j cap A_k| + ...$
Now, $|A_i| = n^{n-1}$ since the other $n-1$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly, $|A_i cap A_j| = n^{n-2}$ because the other $n-2$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly for higher terms. So:
$answer = n^n - {n choose 1} n^{n-1} + {n choose 2} n^{n-2} - {n choose 3} n^{n-3} + ... = sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (-1)^k n^{n-k}$
But the last summation is exactly the binomial expansion of $(n-1)^n$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Let's mark every prize from 1 to n, p1, p2, p3, ... pn
and the people at the guests at the party g1, g2, g3, ... gn
, where pi
is the prize from guest gi
. Your goal is to make sure that you don't match the prizes with the guests that are having the same indices.
In this case you need to make sure that: p1 doesn't go to g1, p2 doesn't go to g2, p3 doesn't go to g3, and so on.
Let's consider |S|
being the case where at least a guest is receiving the same prize. In this case we can write |S|
like this: $$|S| = p1cup p2cup p3cup ...cup pn$$
This can be translated into "Present 1 goes to guest 1 or present 2 goes to guest 2 and so on". If we expand this, we have something like this:
$$|S| = binom{n}{1} - binom{n}{2} + binom{n}{3} + ... + (-1)^nbinom{n}{n}$$
In your case, you need the opposite (the number of ways the people DON'T receive the same prize) so what you need to do is to subtract from the total ways you can distribute the prizes |S|
.
Total number of ways to distribute the n prizes is $n^n$ (not n-1 since you need to count for the case when the person is not receiving anything. Hence:
$$n^n - |S|$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Let's mark every prize from 1 to n, p1, p2, p3, ... pn
and the people at the guests at the party g1, g2, g3, ... gn
, where pi
is the prize from guest gi
. Your goal is to make sure that you don't match the prizes with the guests that are having the same indices.
In this case you need to make sure that: p1 doesn't go to g1, p2 doesn't go to g2, p3 doesn't go to g3, and so on.
Let's consider |S|
being the case where at least a guest is receiving the same prize. In this case we can write |S|
like this: $$|S| = p1cup p2cup p3cup ...cup pn$$
This can be translated into "Present 1 goes to guest 1 or present 2 goes to guest 2 and so on". If we expand this, we have something like this:
$$|S| = binom{n}{1} - binom{n}{2} + binom{n}{3} + ... + (-1)^nbinom{n}{n}$$
In your case, you need the opposite (the number of ways the people DON'T receive the same prize) so what you need to do is to subtract from the total ways you can distribute the prizes |S|
.
Total number of ways to distribute the n prizes is $n^n$ (not n-1 since you need to count for the case when the person is not receiving anything. Hence:
$$n^n - |S|$$
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Let's mark every prize from 1 to n, p1, p2, p3, ... pn
and the people at the guests at the party g1, g2, g3, ... gn
, where pi
is the prize from guest gi
. Your goal is to make sure that you don't match the prizes with the guests that are having the same indices.
In this case you need to make sure that: p1 doesn't go to g1, p2 doesn't go to g2, p3 doesn't go to g3, and so on.
Let's consider |S|
being the case where at least a guest is receiving the same prize. In this case we can write |S|
like this: $$|S| = p1cup p2cup p3cup ...cup pn$$
This can be translated into "Present 1 goes to guest 1 or present 2 goes to guest 2 and so on". If we expand this, we have something like this:
$$|S| = binom{n}{1} - binom{n}{2} + binom{n}{3} + ... + (-1)^nbinom{n}{n}$$
In your case, you need the opposite (the number of ways the people DON'T receive the same prize) so what you need to do is to subtract from the total ways you can distribute the prizes |S|
.
Total number of ways to distribute the n prizes is $n^n$ (not n-1 since you need to count for the case when the person is not receiving anything. Hence:
$$n^n - |S|$$
Let's mark every prize from 1 to n, p1, p2, p3, ... pn
and the people at the guests at the party g1, g2, g3, ... gn
, where pi
is the prize from guest gi
. Your goal is to make sure that you don't match the prizes with the guests that are having the same indices.
In this case you need to make sure that: p1 doesn't go to g1, p2 doesn't go to g2, p3 doesn't go to g3, and so on.
Let's consider |S|
being the case where at least a guest is receiving the same prize. In this case we can write |S|
like this: $$|S| = p1cup p2cup p3cup ...cup pn$$
This can be translated into "Present 1 goes to guest 1 or present 2 goes to guest 2 and so on". If we expand this, we have something like this:
$$|S| = binom{n}{1} - binom{n}{2} + binom{n}{3} + ... + (-1)^nbinom{n}{n}$$
In your case, you need the opposite (the number of ways the people DON'T receive the same prize) so what you need to do is to subtract from the total ways you can distribute the prizes |S|
.
Total number of ways to distribute the n prizes is $n^n$ (not n-1 since you need to count for the case when the person is not receiving anything. Hence:
$$n^n - |S|$$
answered Nov 18 at 20:38
Erik Cristian Seulean
456
456
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Derangements count the situation where every guest gets exactly 1 prize. However, the OP wording says that every guest can get ANY number of prizes (i.e. $0$ to $n-1$ since he/she cannot get his/her own prize). In this case, the correct answer is indeed $(n-1)^n$, because each of $n$ prizes can go to any of $(n-1)$ recipients. I.e., your teacher is wrong to mark you wrong.
If your teacher insists on using Inclusion Exclusion, then let $A_i$ be the set of arrangements s.t. person $i$ gets his/her own gift. Then I-E gives:
$answer = n^n - sum_i |A_i| + sum_{i<j} |A_i cap A_j| - sum_{i<j<k} |A_i cap A_j cap A_k| + ...$
Now, $|A_i| = n^{n-1}$ since the other $n-1$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly, $|A_i cap A_j| = n^{n-2}$ because the other $n-2$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly for higher terms. So:
$answer = n^n - {n choose 1} n^{n-1} + {n choose 2} n^{n-2} - {n choose 3} n^{n-3} + ... = sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (-1)^k n^{n-k}$
But the last summation is exactly the binomial expansion of $(n-1)^n$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Derangements count the situation where every guest gets exactly 1 prize. However, the OP wording says that every guest can get ANY number of prizes (i.e. $0$ to $n-1$ since he/she cannot get his/her own prize). In this case, the correct answer is indeed $(n-1)^n$, because each of $n$ prizes can go to any of $(n-1)$ recipients. I.e., your teacher is wrong to mark you wrong.
If your teacher insists on using Inclusion Exclusion, then let $A_i$ be the set of arrangements s.t. person $i$ gets his/her own gift. Then I-E gives:
$answer = n^n - sum_i |A_i| + sum_{i<j} |A_i cap A_j| - sum_{i<j<k} |A_i cap A_j cap A_k| + ...$
Now, $|A_i| = n^{n-1}$ since the other $n-1$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly, $|A_i cap A_j| = n^{n-2}$ because the other $n-2$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly for higher terms. So:
$answer = n^n - {n choose 1} n^{n-1} + {n choose 2} n^{n-2} - {n choose 3} n^{n-3} + ... = sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (-1)^k n^{n-k}$
But the last summation is exactly the binomial expansion of $(n-1)^n$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Derangements count the situation where every guest gets exactly 1 prize. However, the OP wording says that every guest can get ANY number of prizes (i.e. $0$ to $n-1$ since he/she cannot get his/her own prize). In this case, the correct answer is indeed $(n-1)^n$, because each of $n$ prizes can go to any of $(n-1)$ recipients. I.e., your teacher is wrong to mark you wrong.
If your teacher insists on using Inclusion Exclusion, then let $A_i$ be the set of arrangements s.t. person $i$ gets his/her own gift. Then I-E gives:
$answer = n^n - sum_i |A_i| + sum_{i<j} |A_i cap A_j| - sum_{i<j<k} |A_i cap A_j cap A_k| + ...$
Now, $|A_i| = n^{n-1}$ since the other $n-1$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly, $|A_i cap A_j| = n^{n-2}$ because the other $n-2$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly for higher terms. So:
$answer = n^n - {n choose 1} n^{n-1} + {n choose 2} n^{n-2} - {n choose 3} n^{n-3} + ... = sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (-1)^k n^{n-k}$
But the last summation is exactly the binomial expansion of $(n-1)^n$.
Derangements count the situation where every guest gets exactly 1 prize. However, the OP wording says that every guest can get ANY number of prizes (i.e. $0$ to $n-1$ since he/she cannot get his/her own prize). In this case, the correct answer is indeed $(n-1)^n$, because each of $n$ prizes can go to any of $(n-1)$ recipients. I.e., your teacher is wrong to mark you wrong.
If your teacher insists on using Inclusion Exclusion, then let $A_i$ be the set of arrangements s.t. person $i$ gets his/her own gift. Then I-E gives:
$answer = n^n - sum_i |A_i| + sum_{i<j} |A_i cap A_j| - sum_{i<j<k} |A_i cap A_j cap A_k| + ...$
Now, $|A_i| = n^{n-1}$ since the other $n-1$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly, $|A_i cap A_j| = n^{n-2}$ because the other $n-2$ gifts are unconstrained and each can go to any of $n$ recipients. Similarly for higher terms. So:
$answer = n^n - {n choose 1} n^{n-1} + {n choose 2} n^{n-2} - {n choose 3} n^{n-3} + ... = sum_{k=0}^n {n choose k} (-1)^k n^{n-k}$
But the last summation is exactly the binomial expansion of $(n-1)^n$.
answered Nov 18 at 22:13
antkam
1,373112
1,373112
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003917%2fn-guests-each-guest-brings-a-prize-how-many-ways-may-the-prizes-be-given-out%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Maybe this is just me but I feel like this question screams derangements/subfactorial (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derangement) and that your answer might be $!n$ in that light. Not sure if it's something you would know about or how deeply involved that notion is with this sort of problem. The last bit of the section on "Counting Derangements" does touch on inclusion-exclusion though.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
Google for derangements. By the inclusion-exclusion principle, the answer is given by $n!sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{(-1)^k}{k!}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Nov 18 at 18:25
1
There are only two derangements of three objects. However, there are eight ways to distribute three objects to three people so that no person receives the present that he or she brought. In a derangement, each person receives one present, but that is not the case here.
– N. F. Taussig
Nov 18 at 18:35
@N.F.Taussig: You make a good point about the wording of the problem, but the OP also reports that the answer $(n-1)^n$ was marked incorrect. If the source of this error is not related to the issue of whether each guest must receive a prize, it might instead be connected to the description "there are (n-1) possible prize for each of the n guest." A better argument is that there are $(n-1)$ possible recipients for each of the $n$ prizes brought by guests (assuming all the prizes are distinct).
– hardmath
Nov 18 at 18:47
Thanks to you guys, I found out a helpful video that taught me how to do derangement! Here is the link if anyone is interested in finding out the answer youtube.com/…
– Linh Dương Phương
Nov 18 at 19:09