How many ultrafilters there are in an infinite space?











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2












I'm stuck with the next exercise from the book Rings of Continuous Functions by Gillman.




If $X$ is infinite, there exist $2^{2^{|X|}}$ ultrafilters on $X$ all of whose members are of cardinal $X$.




The exercise have a hint based on the next proof (here $beta X$ is the Stone–Čech compactification)



enter image description here



enter image description here



In the proof, the author constructs $2^{2^{X}}$ distinct ultrafilters on $X$. The hint of the exercise says




In the proof of Theorem 9.2, observe that every finite intersection of members of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. Adjoin to each family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ all subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$.




I'm stuck in the two parts of the hint. I don't know how can I prove that every finite intersection of elements of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. I only know that because $mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ and $-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ then $|mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}|leq|X|$ and then $|-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}|leq |X|$. Therefore $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|leq|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}|leq|X|$$But, how can I conclude the another inequality?, i.e., $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|geq|X|$$And, how can it helps to consider the subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$? I think the approach I've taken is so hard or there are something that I can't see because the proof looks so hard for me.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Also see this answer which has full details.
    – Henno Brandsma
    10 hours ago















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2












I'm stuck with the next exercise from the book Rings of Continuous Functions by Gillman.




If $X$ is infinite, there exist $2^{2^{|X|}}$ ultrafilters on $X$ all of whose members are of cardinal $X$.




The exercise have a hint based on the next proof (here $beta X$ is the Stone–Čech compactification)



enter image description here



enter image description here



In the proof, the author constructs $2^{2^{X}}$ distinct ultrafilters on $X$. The hint of the exercise says




In the proof of Theorem 9.2, observe that every finite intersection of members of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. Adjoin to each family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ all subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$.




I'm stuck in the two parts of the hint. I don't know how can I prove that every finite intersection of elements of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. I only know that because $mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ and $-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ then $|mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}|leq|X|$ and then $|-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}|leq |X|$. Therefore $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|leq|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}|leq|X|$$But, how can I conclude the another inequality?, i.e., $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|geq|X|$$And, how can it helps to consider the subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$? I think the approach I've taken is so hard or there are something that I can't see because the proof looks so hard for me.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Also see this answer which has full details.
    – Henno Brandsma
    10 hours ago













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
2






2





I'm stuck with the next exercise from the book Rings of Continuous Functions by Gillman.




If $X$ is infinite, there exist $2^{2^{|X|}}$ ultrafilters on $X$ all of whose members are of cardinal $X$.




The exercise have a hint based on the next proof (here $beta X$ is the Stone–Čech compactification)



enter image description here



enter image description here



In the proof, the author constructs $2^{2^{X}}$ distinct ultrafilters on $X$. The hint of the exercise says




In the proof of Theorem 9.2, observe that every finite intersection of members of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. Adjoin to each family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ all subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$.




I'm stuck in the two parts of the hint. I don't know how can I prove that every finite intersection of elements of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. I only know that because $mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ and $-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ then $|mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}|leq|X|$ and then $|-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}|leq |X|$. Therefore $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|leq|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}|leq|X|$$But, how can I conclude the another inequality?, i.e., $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|geq|X|$$And, how can it helps to consider the subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$? I think the approach I've taken is so hard or there are something that I can't see because the proof looks so hard for me.










share|cite|improve this question















I'm stuck with the next exercise from the book Rings of Continuous Functions by Gillman.




If $X$ is infinite, there exist $2^{2^{|X|}}$ ultrafilters on $X$ all of whose members are of cardinal $X$.




The exercise have a hint based on the next proof (here $beta X$ is the Stone–Čech compactification)



enter image description here



enter image description here



In the proof, the author constructs $2^{2^{X}}$ distinct ultrafilters on $X$. The hint of the exercise says




In the proof of Theorem 9.2, observe that every finite intersection of members of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. Adjoin to each family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ all subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$.




I'm stuck in the two parts of the hint. I don't know how can I prove that every finite intersection of elements of $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ is of cardinal $|X|$. I only know that because $mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ and $-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}subseteq mathscr{F}times Phi$ then $|mathfrak{b}_{S_{i}}|leq|X|$ and then $|-mathfrak{b}_{S_{j}}|leq |X|$. Therefore $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|leq|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}|leq|X|$$But, how can I conclude the another inequality?, i.e., $$|mathfrak{b}_{S_1}capmathfrak{b}_{S_2}capdotscap,mathfrak{b}_{S_k}cap-mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}}capdotscap-mathfrak{b}_{S_n}|geq|X|$$And, how can it helps to consider the subsets of $mathscr{F}timesPhi$ with complement of power less than $|X|$? I think the approach I've taken is so hard or there are something that I can't see because the proof looks so hard for me.







general-topology proof-explanation cardinals filters






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 19 hours ago









Martin Sleziak

44.3k7115266




44.3k7115266










asked 20 hours ago









Carlos Jiménez

2,2801519




2,2801519












  • Also see this answer which has full details.
    – Henno Brandsma
    10 hours ago


















  • Also see this answer which has full details.
    – Henno Brandsma
    10 hours ago
















Also see this answer which has full details.
– Henno Brandsma
10 hours ago




Also see this answer which has full details.
– Henno Brandsma
10 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










To show that all finite intersections of sets in $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ have cardinality $|X|$ it suffices just to construct $|X|$-many elements in the intersection. (This is because, as you have noticed, there cannot be more than $|X|$-many elements in the intersection.)



In the proof given, we have one particular element of this intersection: $$( F = { x_{ij} : i neq j } , varphi = { F cap S_1 , ldots , F cap S_k } ).$$ Suppose that $( F , psi ) in mathscr{F} times Phi$ is such that $phi supseteq varphi$ is finite. Given any $i leq k$ note that we clearly have that $S_i cap F in psi$, and so $( F , psi ) in mathfrak{B}_{S_i}$. Given $k < j leq n$ note that $( F , psi ) in - mathfrak{b}_{S_j}$ as long as $S_j cap F notin psi$. Therefore as long as $psi supseteq phi$ is chosen so that $F cap S_{k+1} , ldots , F cap S_{n} notin psi$, then $( F , psi )$ will belong to the intersection. There are clearly $|X|$-many ways to choose appropriate $psi$.





Let $mathfrak{B} = { mathscr{A} subseteq mathscr{F} times Phi : | ( mathscr{F} times Phi ) setminus mathscr{A} | < |X| }$ denote the family of all subsets of $mathscr{F} times Phi$ with complement of power $< |X|$. Note that not only does $mathfrak{B}$ have the finite intersection property, it is actually closed under finite intersections.



With this observation and the work above it becomes relatively easy to show that given $mathscr{S} subseteq mathcal{P} ( X )$ the family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}} cup mathfrak{B}$ has the finite intersection property. To see this, suppose that $mathfrak{b}_{S_1} , ldots , mathfrak{b}_{S_k} , - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} , ldots , - mathfrak{b}_{S_n} , mathscr{A}_1 , ldots , mathscr{A}_m$ are given. Then




  • by the work above the set $mathfrak{b} = mathfrak{b}_{S_1} cap cdots cap mathfrak{b}_{S_k} cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} cap cdots cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_n}$ has power $|X|$, and

  • by the observation above the complement of $mathscr{A} = mathscr{A}_1 cap cdots cap mathscr{A}_m$ has power $< |X|$.


Thus $mathfrak{b} cap mathscr{A} neq emptyset$.



Therefore this family can be extended to an ultrafilter $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, and since $mathfrak{B} subseteq mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, we know that $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$ cannot include any sets of power $< |X|$.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999390%2fhow-many-ultrafilters-there-are-in-an-infinite-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    To show that all finite intersections of sets in $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ have cardinality $|X|$ it suffices just to construct $|X|$-many elements in the intersection. (This is because, as you have noticed, there cannot be more than $|X|$-many elements in the intersection.)



    In the proof given, we have one particular element of this intersection: $$( F = { x_{ij} : i neq j } , varphi = { F cap S_1 , ldots , F cap S_k } ).$$ Suppose that $( F , psi ) in mathscr{F} times Phi$ is such that $phi supseteq varphi$ is finite. Given any $i leq k$ note that we clearly have that $S_i cap F in psi$, and so $( F , psi ) in mathfrak{B}_{S_i}$. Given $k < j leq n$ note that $( F , psi ) in - mathfrak{b}_{S_j}$ as long as $S_j cap F notin psi$. Therefore as long as $psi supseteq phi$ is chosen so that $F cap S_{k+1} , ldots , F cap S_{n} notin psi$, then $( F , psi )$ will belong to the intersection. There are clearly $|X|$-many ways to choose appropriate $psi$.





    Let $mathfrak{B} = { mathscr{A} subseteq mathscr{F} times Phi : | ( mathscr{F} times Phi ) setminus mathscr{A} | < |X| }$ denote the family of all subsets of $mathscr{F} times Phi$ with complement of power $< |X|$. Note that not only does $mathfrak{B}$ have the finite intersection property, it is actually closed under finite intersections.



    With this observation and the work above it becomes relatively easy to show that given $mathscr{S} subseteq mathcal{P} ( X )$ the family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}} cup mathfrak{B}$ has the finite intersection property. To see this, suppose that $mathfrak{b}_{S_1} , ldots , mathfrak{b}_{S_k} , - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} , ldots , - mathfrak{b}_{S_n} , mathscr{A}_1 , ldots , mathscr{A}_m$ are given. Then




    • by the work above the set $mathfrak{b} = mathfrak{b}_{S_1} cap cdots cap mathfrak{b}_{S_k} cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} cap cdots cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_n}$ has power $|X|$, and

    • by the observation above the complement of $mathscr{A} = mathscr{A}_1 cap cdots cap mathscr{A}_m$ has power $< |X|$.


    Thus $mathfrak{b} cap mathscr{A} neq emptyset$.



    Therefore this family can be extended to an ultrafilter $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, and since $mathfrak{B} subseteq mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, we know that $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$ cannot include any sets of power $< |X|$.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      To show that all finite intersections of sets in $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ have cardinality $|X|$ it suffices just to construct $|X|$-many elements in the intersection. (This is because, as you have noticed, there cannot be more than $|X|$-many elements in the intersection.)



      In the proof given, we have one particular element of this intersection: $$( F = { x_{ij} : i neq j } , varphi = { F cap S_1 , ldots , F cap S_k } ).$$ Suppose that $( F , psi ) in mathscr{F} times Phi$ is such that $phi supseteq varphi$ is finite. Given any $i leq k$ note that we clearly have that $S_i cap F in psi$, and so $( F , psi ) in mathfrak{B}_{S_i}$. Given $k < j leq n$ note that $( F , psi ) in - mathfrak{b}_{S_j}$ as long as $S_j cap F notin psi$. Therefore as long as $psi supseteq phi$ is chosen so that $F cap S_{k+1} , ldots , F cap S_{n} notin psi$, then $( F , psi )$ will belong to the intersection. There are clearly $|X|$-many ways to choose appropriate $psi$.





      Let $mathfrak{B} = { mathscr{A} subseteq mathscr{F} times Phi : | ( mathscr{F} times Phi ) setminus mathscr{A} | < |X| }$ denote the family of all subsets of $mathscr{F} times Phi$ with complement of power $< |X|$. Note that not only does $mathfrak{B}$ have the finite intersection property, it is actually closed under finite intersections.



      With this observation and the work above it becomes relatively easy to show that given $mathscr{S} subseteq mathcal{P} ( X )$ the family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}} cup mathfrak{B}$ has the finite intersection property. To see this, suppose that $mathfrak{b}_{S_1} , ldots , mathfrak{b}_{S_k} , - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} , ldots , - mathfrak{b}_{S_n} , mathscr{A}_1 , ldots , mathscr{A}_m$ are given. Then




      • by the work above the set $mathfrak{b} = mathfrak{b}_{S_1} cap cdots cap mathfrak{b}_{S_k} cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} cap cdots cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_n}$ has power $|X|$, and

      • by the observation above the complement of $mathscr{A} = mathscr{A}_1 cap cdots cap mathscr{A}_m$ has power $< |X|$.


      Thus $mathfrak{b} cap mathscr{A} neq emptyset$.



      Therefore this family can be extended to an ultrafilter $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, and since $mathfrak{B} subseteq mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, we know that $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$ cannot include any sets of power $< |X|$.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        To show that all finite intersections of sets in $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ have cardinality $|X|$ it suffices just to construct $|X|$-many elements in the intersection. (This is because, as you have noticed, there cannot be more than $|X|$-many elements in the intersection.)



        In the proof given, we have one particular element of this intersection: $$( F = { x_{ij} : i neq j } , varphi = { F cap S_1 , ldots , F cap S_k } ).$$ Suppose that $( F , psi ) in mathscr{F} times Phi$ is such that $phi supseteq varphi$ is finite. Given any $i leq k$ note that we clearly have that $S_i cap F in psi$, and so $( F , psi ) in mathfrak{B}_{S_i}$. Given $k < j leq n$ note that $( F , psi ) in - mathfrak{b}_{S_j}$ as long as $S_j cap F notin psi$. Therefore as long as $psi supseteq phi$ is chosen so that $F cap S_{k+1} , ldots , F cap S_{n} notin psi$, then $( F , psi )$ will belong to the intersection. There are clearly $|X|$-many ways to choose appropriate $psi$.





        Let $mathfrak{B} = { mathscr{A} subseteq mathscr{F} times Phi : | ( mathscr{F} times Phi ) setminus mathscr{A} | < |X| }$ denote the family of all subsets of $mathscr{F} times Phi$ with complement of power $< |X|$. Note that not only does $mathfrak{B}$ have the finite intersection property, it is actually closed under finite intersections.



        With this observation and the work above it becomes relatively easy to show that given $mathscr{S} subseteq mathcal{P} ( X )$ the family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}} cup mathfrak{B}$ has the finite intersection property. To see this, suppose that $mathfrak{b}_{S_1} , ldots , mathfrak{b}_{S_k} , - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} , ldots , - mathfrak{b}_{S_n} , mathscr{A}_1 , ldots , mathscr{A}_m$ are given. Then




        • by the work above the set $mathfrak{b} = mathfrak{b}_{S_1} cap cdots cap mathfrak{b}_{S_k} cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} cap cdots cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_n}$ has power $|X|$, and

        • by the observation above the complement of $mathscr{A} = mathscr{A}_1 cap cdots cap mathscr{A}_m$ has power $< |X|$.


        Thus $mathfrak{b} cap mathscr{A} neq emptyset$.



        Therefore this family can be extended to an ultrafilter $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, and since $mathfrak{B} subseteq mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, we know that $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$ cannot include any sets of power $< |X|$.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        To show that all finite intersections of sets in $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}}$ have cardinality $|X|$ it suffices just to construct $|X|$-many elements in the intersection. (This is because, as you have noticed, there cannot be more than $|X|$-many elements in the intersection.)



        In the proof given, we have one particular element of this intersection: $$( F = { x_{ij} : i neq j } , varphi = { F cap S_1 , ldots , F cap S_k } ).$$ Suppose that $( F , psi ) in mathscr{F} times Phi$ is such that $phi supseteq varphi$ is finite. Given any $i leq k$ note that we clearly have that $S_i cap F in psi$, and so $( F , psi ) in mathfrak{B}_{S_i}$. Given $k < j leq n$ note that $( F , psi ) in - mathfrak{b}_{S_j}$ as long as $S_j cap F notin psi$. Therefore as long as $psi supseteq phi$ is chosen so that $F cap S_{k+1} , ldots , F cap S_{n} notin psi$, then $( F , psi )$ will belong to the intersection. There are clearly $|X|$-many ways to choose appropriate $psi$.





        Let $mathfrak{B} = { mathscr{A} subseteq mathscr{F} times Phi : | ( mathscr{F} times Phi ) setminus mathscr{A} | < |X| }$ denote the family of all subsets of $mathscr{F} times Phi$ with complement of power $< |X|$. Note that not only does $mathfrak{B}$ have the finite intersection property, it is actually closed under finite intersections.



        With this observation and the work above it becomes relatively easy to show that given $mathscr{S} subseteq mathcal{P} ( X )$ the family $mathfrak{B}_{mathscr{S}} cup mathfrak{B}$ has the finite intersection property. To see this, suppose that $mathfrak{b}_{S_1} , ldots , mathfrak{b}_{S_k} , - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} , ldots , - mathfrak{b}_{S_n} , mathscr{A}_1 , ldots , mathscr{A}_m$ are given. Then




        • by the work above the set $mathfrak{b} = mathfrak{b}_{S_1} cap cdots cap mathfrak{b}_{S_k} cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_{k+1}} cap cdots cap - mathfrak{b}_{S_n}$ has power $|X|$, and

        • by the observation above the complement of $mathscr{A} = mathscr{A}_1 cap cdots cap mathscr{A}_m$ has power $< |X|$.


        Thus $mathfrak{b} cap mathscr{A} neq emptyset$.



        Therefore this family can be extended to an ultrafilter $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, and since $mathfrak{B} subseteq mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$, we know that $mathfrak{U}_{mathscr{S}}$ cannot include any sets of power $< |X|$.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 16 hours ago









        stochastic randomness

        1436




        1436




        New contributor




        stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        stochastic randomness is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999390%2fhow-many-ultrafilters-there-are-in-an-infinite-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Ellipse (mathématiques)

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            Mont Emei