Using vectors to prove midpoints bisect











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Solved!
Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
quadrilateral bisect each other.



enter image description here



My work:



$$U + Z = W + V$$



Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



$$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



$$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Solved!
    Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



    Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
    quadrilateral bisect each other.



    enter image description here



    My work:



    $$U + Z = W + V$$



    Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



    Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



    $$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



    $$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



    ^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Solved!
      Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



      Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
      quadrilateral bisect each other.



      enter image description here



      My work:



      $$U + Z = W + V$$



      Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



      Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



      $$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



      $$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



      ^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question















      Solved!
      Thank you to those who answered my question. I managed to solve it while I was away. Will edit this question with my solution so that others can check.



      Problem: Prove that the line segments joining the midpoints of opposite sides of a
      quadrilateral bisect each other.



      enter image description here



      My work:



      $$U + Z = W + V$$



      Let the segment from $frac12U$ to $frac12 W$ be vector $AB$.



      Let the segment from $frac12 Z$ to $frac12V$ be vector $CD$.



      $$frac12(AB) = frac12U + frac12W + V$$



      $$frac12(CD) = frac12Z + frac12V + U$$



      ^I'm not sure if the above will help me, but it seems like the hint that was given:



      enter image description here







      vectors quadrilateral






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 24 '17 at 1:24









      Siong Thye Goh

      92.3k1461114




      92.3k1461114










      asked Jan 14 '14 at 2:38









      Quaxton Hale

      64911126




      64911126






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



          the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



          since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



            $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Watch the signs of your vectors.
              -U/2+V+w/2=AB



              Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



              Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
              Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
              Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
              You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



              Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
              Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
              Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
              Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
              Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



              2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



              Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



              Now look to the upper right.
              W-Z=-B+C



              In the lower left
              U-V=A-D



              -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



              -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



              U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



              (A+B)=(C+D)



              But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
              B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
              D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



              The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



              A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



              The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



              Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



              If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



              In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






              share|cite|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.


















                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f637638%2fusing-vectors-to-prove-midpoints-bisect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                0
                down vote













                let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                  the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                  since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                    the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                    since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    let the vertices be $4A,4B,4C,4D$ chosen to ensure $A+B+C+D=0$ so the lines joining opposite midpoints meet at $0=frac12(frac12(4A+4B)+frac12(4C+4D))$.



                    the midpoint of the line joining $4A$ to $4B$ is $2A+2B$, and likewise the opposite midpoint is $2C+2D$



                    since $0=(2A+2B)+(2C+2D)$ the origin is thus the midpoint of the either line joining the midpoints of a pair of opposite sides







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 14 '14 at 3:03









                    David Holden

                    14.5k21223




                    14.5k21223






















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                        $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                          $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                            $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Assuming that you can show that the midpoints are, indeed, as given in the hint, subtract the two expressions, to get



                            $$frac14(u-v+z -w)=frac14((u+z) - (v+w)) = 0,$$ the last equality being true since $u+z$ and $v+w$ are both the upper left vertex of your quadrilateral.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 14 '14 at 3:03









                            Igor Rivin

                            15.9k11134




                            15.9k11134






















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                Now look to the upper right.
                                W-Z=-B+C



                                In the lower left
                                U-V=A-D



                                -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                (A+B)=(C+D)



                                But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






                                share|cite|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                  -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                  Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                  Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                  Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                  Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                  You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                  Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                  Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                  Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                  Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                  Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                  2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                  Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                  Now look to the upper right.
                                  W-Z=-B+C



                                  In the lower left
                                  U-V=A-D



                                  -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                  -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                  U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                  (A+B)=(C+D)



                                  But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                  B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                  D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                  The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                  A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                  The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                  Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                  If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                  In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer










                                  New contributor




                                  Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                    -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                    Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                    Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                    Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                    Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                    You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                    Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                    Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                    Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                    Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                    Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                    2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                    Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                    Now look to the upper right.
                                    W-Z=-B+C



                                    In the lower left
                                    U-V=A-D



                                    -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                    -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                    U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                    (A+B)=(C+D)



                                    But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                    B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                    D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                    The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                    A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                    The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                    Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                    If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                    In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    New contributor




                                    Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                    Watch the signs of your vectors.
                                    -U/2+V+w/2=AB



                                    Also note that is ALL of AB and not AB/2 as you have written.



                                    Make life easier on yourself. Make the left side 2U and the top 2Z.
                                    Make the bottom 2V and the right hand side 2W.
                                    Now you dont have to bother with all those fractions.
                                    You can keep the same orientations ie U and W point generally upward and V and Z toward the right. If you use the opposite sense of these vectors you MUST use a minus sign before the vector.



                                    Now make the point of intersection the origin to also make life easy on yourself.
                                    Let vector A point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2U vector.
                                    Let vector B point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2W vector.
                                    Let Vector C point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2Z vector.
                                    Let Vector D point from the origin to the midpoint of the 2V vector.



                                    2U+2Z=2V+2W so U+Z=V+W or equivalently U-V+W-Z=0



                                    Try to get this last equation in terms of vectors A, B, C, and D so you can say something about these vectors.



                                    Now look to the upper right.
                                    W-Z=-B+C



                                    In the lower left
                                    U-V=A-D



                                    -1 times the upper right equation plus 1 times the lower left equation yields



                                    -(W-Z)+(U-V)=-(-B+C)+(A-D)



                                    U+Z-W-V=0 so B-C+A-D=0



                                    (A+B)=(C+D)



                                    But the A and C vectors point in different directions.
                                    B is just a some multiple of A but with the opposite direction.
                                    D is a multiple of C but in the opposite direction from C.



                                    The equation then reads...some multiple of the A vector equals some multiple of the C vector. This is true iff the multiple of A and the multiple of C are both zero.



                                    A and B must be equal in magnitude but in opposite directions to add to yield the zero vector. The same type of thing is true with vectors C and D. They must be equal in magnitude and opposite directions.



                                    The huge leap in this problem is realizing that for 2 independent vectors ie pointing in different directions to be equal to each other, they must be the zero vector.



                                    Another helpful hint is if a problem has lines that cross, label that point as something which allows you to create vectors to and from that point.



                                    If a problem has a line broken into 2 equal parts, label each part with the same vector ex. V and label the entire line 2V. If the line is broken into 3 equal parts, use V as the one third portion and 3V as the entire vector. This eliminates the problem of having to work with fractions and at times lets you find and equivalent for the vector V using other vectors in a drawing.



                                    In this question your trying to say what you can about the diagonals. Before you write equations about the parts in question, say what you can about the remainder of the drawing. Those equations might help you cancel some things out of the later equations. In this diagram writing about the items not asked ie the outside of the diagram... was not much. It was one equation. Still, this was critical to finding a solution.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    New contributor




                                    Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited 8 hours ago





















                                    New contributor




                                    Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                    answered 8 hours ago









                                    Katherine Rogers

                                    11




                                    11




                                    New contributor




                                    Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                    New contributor





                                    Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                    Katherine Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded



















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f637638%2fusing-vectors-to-prove-midpoints-bisect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Quarter-circle Tiles

                                        build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                                        Mont Emei