Suppose $kappa$ is a cardinal, such that $2 kappa = kappa$. Can it be proven that $kappa ! = 2^kappa$ without...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












The original question is given in an exercise. The first part of the problem is to show that if $left|Aright| = left|Aright| +left|Aright|$ for some set $A$, then there exists a partition of $A$, with every cell in the partition having cardinality $2$ (i.e. a partition of $A$ into pairs). The second part of the problem is to show that the cardinality of the set of permutations of $A$ is $2^{left|Aright|}$.



Using the first part of the problem, it's not hard to show that that cardinality of set of permutations of $A$ is bounded between $2^{left|Aright|}$ and $left|Aright|^{left|Aright|}$. But I couldn't find a way to proceed from here without assuming that $left|Aright| = left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|$.



Is it possible to complete the proof without choice?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Is that an exercise in a book?
    – bof
    5 hours ago










  • @bof No, it's from an exercise sheet given in a course. The exercise doesn't ask to avoid choice explicitly, but I thought it is implicit because the only assumption is that $left|Aright| + left|Aright| = left|Aright|$, and because the next problem goes "In the previous problem we saw that $left|Aright|+left|Aright|=left|Aright|$ implies that $A$ can be partitioned to pairs. What partition can we find if $left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|=left|Aright|$?".
    – j3M
    4 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












The original question is given in an exercise. The first part of the problem is to show that if $left|Aright| = left|Aright| +left|Aright|$ for some set $A$, then there exists a partition of $A$, with every cell in the partition having cardinality $2$ (i.e. a partition of $A$ into pairs). The second part of the problem is to show that the cardinality of the set of permutations of $A$ is $2^{left|Aright|}$.



Using the first part of the problem, it's not hard to show that that cardinality of set of permutations of $A$ is bounded between $2^{left|Aright|}$ and $left|Aright|^{left|Aright|}$. But I couldn't find a way to proceed from here without assuming that $left|Aright| = left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|$.



Is it possible to complete the proof without choice?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Is that an exercise in a book?
    – bof
    5 hours ago










  • @bof No, it's from an exercise sheet given in a course. The exercise doesn't ask to avoid choice explicitly, but I thought it is implicit because the only assumption is that $left|Aright| + left|Aright| = left|Aright|$, and because the next problem goes "In the previous problem we saw that $left|Aright|+left|Aright|=left|Aright|$ implies that $A$ can be partitioned to pairs. What partition can we find if $left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|=left|Aright|$?".
    – j3M
    4 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





The original question is given in an exercise. The first part of the problem is to show that if $left|Aright| = left|Aright| +left|Aright|$ for some set $A$, then there exists a partition of $A$, with every cell in the partition having cardinality $2$ (i.e. a partition of $A$ into pairs). The second part of the problem is to show that the cardinality of the set of permutations of $A$ is $2^{left|Aright|}$.



Using the first part of the problem, it's not hard to show that that cardinality of set of permutations of $A$ is bounded between $2^{left|Aright|}$ and $left|Aright|^{left|Aright|}$. But I couldn't find a way to proceed from here without assuming that $left|Aright| = left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|$.



Is it possible to complete the proof without choice?










share|cite|improve this question













The original question is given in an exercise. The first part of the problem is to show that if $left|Aright| = left|Aright| +left|Aright|$ for some set $A$, then there exists a partition of $A$, with every cell in the partition having cardinality $2$ (i.e. a partition of $A$ into pairs). The second part of the problem is to show that the cardinality of the set of permutations of $A$ is $2^{left|Aright|}$.



Using the first part of the problem, it's not hard to show that that cardinality of set of permutations of $A$ is bounded between $2^{left|Aright|}$ and $left|Aright|^{left|Aright|}$. But I couldn't find a way to proceed from here without assuming that $left|Aright| = left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|$.



Is it possible to complete the proof without choice?







elementary-set-theory cardinals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









j3M

594416




594416












  • Is that an exercise in a book?
    – bof
    5 hours ago










  • @bof No, it's from an exercise sheet given in a course. The exercise doesn't ask to avoid choice explicitly, but I thought it is implicit because the only assumption is that $left|Aright| + left|Aright| = left|Aright|$, and because the next problem goes "In the previous problem we saw that $left|Aright|+left|Aright|=left|Aright|$ implies that $A$ can be partitioned to pairs. What partition can we find if $left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|=left|Aright|$?".
    – j3M
    4 hours ago


















  • Is that an exercise in a book?
    – bof
    5 hours ago










  • @bof No, it's from an exercise sheet given in a course. The exercise doesn't ask to avoid choice explicitly, but I thought it is implicit because the only assumption is that $left|Aright| + left|Aright| = left|Aright|$, and because the next problem goes "In the previous problem we saw that $left|Aright|+left|Aright|=left|Aright|$ implies that $A$ can be partitioned to pairs. What partition can we find if $left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|=left|Aright|$?".
    – j3M
    4 hours ago
















Is that an exercise in a book?
– bof
5 hours ago




Is that an exercise in a book?
– bof
5 hours ago












@bof No, it's from an exercise sheet given in a course. The exercise doesn't ask to avoid choice explicitly, but I thought it is implicit because the only assumption is that $left|Aright| + left|Aright| = left|Aright|$, and because the next problem goes "In the previous problem we saw that $left|Aright|+left|Aright|=left|Aright|$ implies that $A$ can be partitioned to pairs. What partition can we find if $left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|=left|Aright|$?".
– j3M
4 hours ago




@bof No, it's from an exercise sheet given in a course. The exercise doesn't ask to avoid choice explicitly, but I thought it is implicit because the only assumption is that $left|Aright| + left|Aright| = left|Aright|$, and because the next problem goes "In the previous problem we saw that $left|Aright|+left|Aright|=left|Aright|$ implies that $A$ can be partitioned to pairs. What partition can we find if $left|Aright|cdotleft|Aright|=left|Aright|$?".
– j3M
4 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999453%2fsuppose-kappa-is-a-cardinal-such-that-2-kappa-kappa-can-it-be-proven%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999453%2fsuppose-kappa-is-a-cardinal-such-that-2-kappa-kappa-can-it-be-proven%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei