particular case of Pythagoras' theorem











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












According to Pythagoras' theorem the hypotenuse of a rectangle triangle is calculated:
$$c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$
There is a similar rectangle triangle that fulfills:
$$C^2=A+B$$
For it:
1) We find the relation of the legs:
$r={aover b}$



2) We raise r squared and calculate:
$d={1over r^2+1}$



3) We obtain a first triangle similar to d, e, f with less leg equal to d, and e, greater leg:
$e=dr$



4) We obtain a second triangle also similar g, h, i where:
$g=e$ and $h=1−d$



5) Now we add the minor and major legs of d, e, f and h, i, j to obtain the ABC triangle:
$A=d+e$ and $B=h+e$



6) This ABC triangle complies with:
$C=sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$



This I have checked in all tests, but I could not make a demonstration.
Note that the calculated C hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the sines of the angles of the triangle not straight.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please take a look at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/… to learn how to format your text.
    – KM101
    Nov 8 at 16:19






  • 2




    Pythagoras' theorem is $c^2=a^2+b^2$, so $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, not $c^2$
    – Aleksa
    Nov 8 at 16:22










  • This is confusing: $C^2=sqrt{A+B}$ .... $A, B$ are not squared?
    – user376343
    Nov 8 at 16:31










  • It's hard to understand what you mean, since you've got Pythagoras's theorem wrong. Please try to restate your question.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 8 at 16:31






  • 1




    So they need to be squared. But above all, what is the question??
    – NickD
    Nov 9 at 15:45















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












According to Pythagoras' theorem the hypotenuse of a rectangle triangle is calculated:
$$c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$
There is a similar rectangle triangle that fulfills:
$$C^2=A+B$$
For it:
1) We find the relation of the legs:
$r={aover b}$



2) We raise r squared and calculate:
$d={1over r^2+1}$



3) We obtain a first triangle similar to d, e, f with less leg equal to d, and e, greater leg:
$e=dr$



4) We obtain a second triangle also similar g, h, i where:
$g=e$ and $h=1−d$



5) Now we add the minor and major legs of d, e, f and h, i, j to obtain the ABC triangle:
$A=d+e$ and $B=h+e$



6) This ABC triangle complies with:
$C=sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$



This I have checked in all tests, but I could not make a demonstration.
Note that the calculated C hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the sines of the angles of the triangle not straight.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Please take a look at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/… to learn how to format your text.
    – KM101
    Nov 8 at 16:19






  • 2




    Pythagoras' theorem is $c^2=a^2+b^2$, so $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, not $c^2$
    – Aleksa
    Nov 8 at 16:22










  • This is confusing: $C^2=sqrt{A+B}$ .... $A, B$ are not squared?
    – user376343
    Nov 8 at 16:31










  • It's hard to understand what you mean, since you've got Pythagoras's theorem wrong. Please try to restate your question.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 8 at 16:31






  • 1




    So they need to be squared. But above all, what is the question??
    – NickD
    Nov 9 at 15:45













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











According to Pythagoras' theorem the hypotenuse of a rectangle triangle is calculated:
$$c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$
There is a similar rectangle triangle that fulfills:
$$C^2=A+B$$
For it:
1) We find the relation of the legs:
$r={aover b}$



2) We raise r squared and calculate:
$d={1over r^2+1}$



3) We obtain a first triangle similar to d, e, f with less leg equal to d, and e, greater leg:
$e=dr$



4) We obtain a second triangle also similar g, h, i where:
$g=e$ and $h=1−d$



5) Now we add the minor and major legs of d, e, f and h, i, j to obtain the ABC triangle:
$A=d+e$ and $B=h+e$



6) This ABC triangle complies with:
$C=sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$



This I have checked in all tests, but I could not make a demonstration.
Note that the calculated C hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the sines of the angles of the triangle not straight.










share|cite|improve this question















According to Pythagoras' theorem the hypotenuse of a rectangle triangle is calculated:
$$c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$$
There is a similar rectangle triangle that fulfills:
$$C^2=A+B$$
For it:
1) We find the relation of the legs:
$r={aover b}$



2) We raise r squared and calculate:
$d={1over r^2+1}$



3) We obtain a first triangle similar to d, e, f with less leg equal to d, and e, greater leg:
$e=dr$



4) We obtain a second triangle also similar g, h, i where:
$g=e$ and $h=1−d$



5) Now we add the minor and major legs of d, e, f and h, i, j to obtain the ABC triangle:
$A=d+e$ and $B=h+e$



6) This ABC triangle complies with:
$C=sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$



This I have checked in all tests, but I could not make a demonstration.
Note that the calculated C hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the sines of the angles of the triangle not straight.







geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 14 at 12:27

























asked Nov 8 at 16:17









user167434

113




113












  • Please take a look at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/… to learn how to format your text.
    – KM101
    Nov 8 at 16:19






  • 2




    Pythagoras' theorem is $c^2=a^2+b^2$, so $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, not $c^2$
    – Aleksa
    Nov 8 at 16:22










  • This is confusing: $C^2=sqrt{A+B}$ .... $A, B$ are not squared?
    – user376343
    Nov 8 at 16:31










  • It's hard to understand what you mean, since you've got Pythagoras's theorem wrong. Please try to restate your question.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 8 at 16:31






  • 1




    So they need to be squared. But above all, what is the question??
    – NickD
    Nov 9 at 15:45


















  • Please take a look at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/… to learn how to format your text.
    – KM101
    Nov 8 at 16:19






  • 2




    Pythagoras' theorem is $c^2=a^2+b^2$, so $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, not $c^2$
    – Aleksa
    Nov 8 at 16:22










  • This is confusing: $C^2=sqrt{A+B}$ .... $A, B$ are not squared?
    – user376343
    Nov 8 at 16:31










  • It's hard to understand what you mean, since you've got Pythagoras's theorem wrong. Please try to restate your question.
    – saulspatz
    Nov 8 at 16:31






  • 1




    So they need to be squared. But above all, what is the question??
    – NickD
    Nov 9 at 15:45
















Please take a look at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/… to learn how to format your text.
– KM101
Nov 8 at 16:19




Please take a look at math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5020/… to learn how to format your text.
– KM101
Nov 8 at 16:19




2




2




Pythagoras' theorem is $c^2=a^2+b^2$, so $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, not $c^2$
– Aleksa
Nov 8 at 16:22




Pythagoras' theorem is $c^2=a^2+b^2$, so $c=sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, not $c^2$
– Aleksa
Nov 8 at 16:22












This is confusing: $C^2=sqrt{A+B}$ .... $A, B$ are not squared?
– user376343
Nov 8 at 16:31




This is confusing: $C^2=sqrt{A+B}$ .... $A, B$ are not squared?
– user376343
Nov 8 at 16:31












It's hard to understand what you mean, since you've got Pythagoras's theorem wrong. Please try to restate your question.
– saulspatz
Nov 8 at 16:31




It's hard to understand what you mean, since you've got Pythagoras's theorem wrong. Please try to restate your question.
– saulspatz
Nov 8 at 16:31




1




1




So they need to be squared. But above all, what is the question??
– NickD
Nov 9 at 15:45




So they need to be squared. But above all, what is the question??
– NickD
Nov 9 at 15:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













I believe the question can be simplified to find particular cases of $$sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$$ We can square both sides and move $A$ and $B^2$ to their other sides, getting $$A^2-A=B-B^2$$ If we replace $B-B^2$ with $C$ then we can create the quadratic equation $$A^2-A-C=0$$ and using the quadratic formula and replacing $C$ we obtain $$A=frac{1pmsqrt{1+4(B-B^2)}}2$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
    – user167434
    Nov 15 at 10:09










  • @user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
    – Kyky
    Nov 16 at 13:41













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2990190%2fparticular-case-of-pythagoras-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













I believe the question can be simplified to find particular cases of $$sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$$ We can square both sides and move $A$ and $B^2$ to their other sides, getting $$A^2-A=B-B^2$$ If we replace $B-B^2$ with $C$ then we can create the quadratic equation $$A^2-A-C=0$$ and using the quadratic formula and replacing $C$ we obtain $$A=frac{1pmsqrt{1+4(B-B^2)}}2$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
    – user167434
    Nov 15 at 10:09










  • @user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
    – Kyky
    Nov 16 at 13:41

















up vote
0
down vote













I believe the question can be simplified to find particular cases of $$sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$$ We can square both sides and move $A$ and $B^2$ to their other sides, getting $$A^2-A=B-B^2$$ If we replace $B-B^2$ with $C$ then we can create the quadratic equation $$A^2-A-C=0$$ and using the quadratic formula and replacing $C$ we obtain $$A=frac{1pmsqrt{1+4(B-B^2)}}2$$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
    – user167434
    Nov 15 at 10:09










  • @user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
    – Kyky
    Nov 16 at 13:41















up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









I believe the question can be simplified to find particular cases of $$sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$$ We can square both sides and move $A$ and $B^2$ to their other sides, getting $$A^2-A=B-B^2$$ If we replace $B-B^2$ with $C$ then we can create the quadratic equation $$A^2-A-C=0$$ and using the quadratic formula and replacing $C$ we obtain $$A=frac{1pmsqrt{1+4(B-B^2)}}2$$






share|cite|improve this answer














I believe the question can be simplified to find particular cases of $$sqrt{A^2+B^2}=sqrt{A+B}$$ We can square both sides and move $A$ and $B^2$ to their other sides, getting $$A^2-A=B-B^2$$ If we replace $B-B^2$ with $C$ then we can create the quadratic equation $$A^2-A-C=0$$ and using the quadratic formula and replacing $C$ we obtain $$A=frac{1pmsqrt{1+4(B-B^2)}}2$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 16 at 13:43

























answered Nov 14 at 12:30









Kyky

399113




399113












  • Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
    – user167434
    Nov 15 at 10:09










  • @user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
    – Kyky
    Nov 16 at 13:41




















  • Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
    – user167434
    Nov 15 at 10:09










  • @user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
    – Kyky
    Nov 16 at 13:41


















Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
– user167434
Nov 15 at 10:09




Consider A = 0.84 and b = 1.12 (values obtained for the relation of legs $4over3$) $$A^2-A = -0.1344$$ and $$ B^2-B = 0.1344$$ Then the equality $$A^2-A=B^2-B $$ is not met. On the other hand, if you do it using $$A^2-A = B-B^2$$
– user167434
Nov 15 at 10:09












@user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
– Kyky
Nov 16 at 13:41






@user167434 Thanks for spotting that error there. Yes, it should be $A^2-A=B-B^2$ than the other way around.
– Kyky
Nov 16 at 13:41




















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2990190%2fparticular-case-of-pythagoras-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei