Deriving weight formula for exponential moving average












0














According to this and many other places, weight for exponential moving average is just being defined as $omega_t=(1-alpha)alpha^t$, where $t$ is current index and $alpha$ is a smoothing factor.



How does one derives this formula itself and what does $alpha$ mean, and where does one can plug size of averaging window?



This is the problem for me as I expected $omega$ to be a function of window size $N$ and index $t$, but here and everywhere else I got only $t$ and mysterious $alpha$.



I understand that $0<alpha<1$ and that it describes the steepness of the exponential slope, but I am confused that I cant find the derivation of this formula. That is why I cant understand it to the end. Could anybody provide step by step derivation of this?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    According to this and many other places, weight for exponential moving average is just being defined as $omega_t=(1-alpha)alpha^t$, where $t$ is current index and $alpha$ is a smoothing factor.



    How does one derives this formula itself and what does $alpha$ mean, and where does one can plug size of averaging window?



    This is the problem for me as I expected $omega$ to be a function of window size $N$ and index $t$, but here and everywhere else I got only $t$ and mysterious $alpha$.



    I understand that $0<alpha<1$ and that it describes the steepness of the exponential slope, but I am confused that I cant find the derivation of this formula. That is why I cant understand it to the end. Could anybody provide step by step derivation of this?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      According to this and many other places, weight for exponential moving average is just being defined as $omega_t=(1-alpha)alpha^t$, where $t$ is current index and $alpha$ is a smoothing factor.



      How does one derives this formula itself and what does $alpha$ mean, and where does one can plug size of averaging window?



      This is the problem for me as I expected $omega$ to be a function of window size $N$ and index $t$, but here and everywhere else I got only $t$ and mysterious $alpha$.



      I understand that $0<alpha<1$ and that it describes the steepness of the exponential slope, but I am confused that I cant find the derivation of this formula. That is why I cant understand it to the end. Could anybody provide step by step derivation of this?










      share|cite|improve this question













      According to this and many other places, weight for exponential moving average is just being defined as $omega_t=(1-alpha)alpha^t$, where $t$ is current index and $alpha$ is a smoothing factor.



      How does one derives this formula itself and what does $alpha$ mean, and where does one can plug size of averaging window?



      This is the problem for me as I expected $omega$ to be a function of window size $N$ and index $t$, but here and everywhere else I got only $t$ and mysterious $alpha$.



      I understand that $0<alpha<1$ and that it describes the steepness of the exponential slope, but I am confused that I cant find the derivation of this formula. That is why I cant understand it to the end. Could anybody provide step by step derivation of this?







      numerical-methods average






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Feb 24 '18 at 13:23









      bl17zarbl17zar

      11




      11






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          With exponential moving average, your averaging window includes all previous values, although most recent values weight more.
          A finite w can not thus be defined in this case.



          On the other hand, you can select $alpha$ so that the last w samples make up for a given portion of your current estimate.



          In your discrete case, an $alpha$ value such that the last w samples make up for about 62.3% of the current estimate would be:



          $$
          alpha = 1 - e^{(-1/w)}
          $$



          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing#Time_Constant






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2664601%2fderiving-weight-formula-for-exponential-moving-average%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            With exponential moving average, your averaging window includes all previous values, although most recent values weight more.
            A finite w can not thus be defined in this case.



            On the other hand, you can select $alpha$ so that the last w samples make up for a given portion of your current estimate.



            In your discrete case, an $alpha$ value such that the last w samples make up for about 62.3% of the current estimate would be:



            $$
            alpha = 1 - e^{(-1/w)}
            $$



            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing#Time_Constant






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              With exponential moving average, your averaging window includes all previous values, although most recent values weight more.
              A finite w can not thus be defined in this case.



              On the other hand, you can select $alpha$ so that the last w samples make up for a given portion of your current estimate.



              In your discrete case, an $alpha$ value such that the last w samples make up for about 62.3% of the current estimate would be:



              $$
              alpha = 1 - e^{(-1/w)}
              $$



              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing#Time_Constant






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                With exponential moving average, your averaging window includes all previous values, although most recent values weight more.
                A finite w can not thus be defined in this case.



                On the other hand, you can select $alpha$ so that the last w samples make up for a given portion of your current estimate.



                In your discrete case, an $alpha$ value such that the last w samples make up for about 62.3% of the current estimate would be:



                $$
                alpha = 1 - e^{(-1/w)}
                $$



                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing#Time_Constant






                share|cite|improve this answer












                With exponential moving average, your averaging window includes all previous values, although most recent values weight more.
                A finite w can not thus be defined in this case.



                On the other hand, you can select $alpha$ so that the last w samples make up for a given portion of your current estimate.



                In your discrete case, an $alpha$ value such that the last w samples make up for about 62.3% of the current estimate would be:



                $$
                alpha = 1 - e^{(-1/w)}
                $$



                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_smoothing#Time_Constant







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 29 '18 at 11:33









                GianniGianni

                284




                284






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2664601%2fderiving-weight-formula-for-exponential-moving-average%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ellipse (mathématiques)

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Mont Emei