Is it possible to calculate when we are close to solving the Rubik's cube?
$begingroup$
While the Hamiltonian circuit can apparently represent the various combinations, I considered that if we can start with a solved Rubik's cube and start making twists and turns and record the 'path' created in the Hamiltonian circuit by each twist of the cube and if all possible such paths are created, then would it be possible to mathematically estimate for any unsolved Rubik's cube, how close it is to getting solved? Because whatever unsolved state it is at, will be some position in the circuit path, and it should be possible to estimate a 'distance' or the number of twists required to reach a solution.
Would it be possible to make such an estimate?
UPDATE: There seems to be a clue here.
combinatorics rubiks-cube
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the Hamiltonian circuit can apparently represent the various combinations, I considered that if we can start with a solved Rubik's cube and start making twists and turns and record the 'path' created in the Hamiltonian circuit by each twist of the cube and if all possible such paths are created, then would it be possible to mathematically estimate for any unsolved Rubik's cube, how close it is to getting solved? Because whatever unsolved state it is at, will be some position in the circuit path, and it should be possible to estimate a 'distance' or the number of twists required to reach a solution.
Would it be possible to make such an estimate?
UPDATE: There seems to be a clue here.
combinatorics rubiks-cube
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Trivially, yes: do a database with all the positions and relations between them (possible with enough big hard disks).
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 9 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
It's how to decide the relations between the positions that's the confusing part. I was also considering storing the data in the way Principal Component Analysis or Holograms store various dimensions of related data.
$endgroup$
– Nav
Dec 9 '18 at 17:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
While the Hamiltonian circuit can apparently represent the various combinations, I considered that if we can start with a solved Rubik's cube and start making twists and turns and record the 'path' created in the Hamiltonian circuit by each twist of the cube and if all possible such paths are created, then would it be possible to mathematically estimate for any unsolved Rubik's cube, how close it is to getting solved? Because whatever unsolved state it is at, will be some position in the circuit path, and it should be possible to estimate a 'distance' or the number of twists required to reach a solution.
Would it be possible to make such an estimate?
UPDATE: There seems to be a clue here.
combinatorics rubiks-cube
$endgroup$
While the Hamiltonian circuit can apparently represent the various combinations, I considered that if we can start with a solved Rubik's cube and start making twists and turns and record the 'path' created in the Hamiltonian circuit by each twist of the cube and if all possible such paths are created, then would it be possible to mathematically estimate for any unsolved Rubik's cube, how close it is to getting solved? Because whatever unsolved state it is at, will be some position in the circuit path, and it should be possible to estimate a 'distance' or the number of twists required to reach a solution.
Would it be possible to make such an estimate?
UPDATE: There seems to be a clue here.
combinatorics rubiks-cube
combinatorics rubiks-cube
edited Dec 5 '18 at 13:42
Nav
asked Oct 23 '18 at 7:37
NavNav
253114
253114
$begingroup$
Trivially, yes: do a database with all the positions and relations between them (possible with enough big hard disks).
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 9 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
It's how to decide the relations between the positions that's the confusing part. I was also considering storing the data in the way Principal Component Analysis or Holograms store various dimensions of related data.
$endgroup$
– Nav
Dec 9 '18 at 17:18
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Trivially, yes: do a database with all the positions and relations between them (possible with enough big hard disks).
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 9 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
It's how to decide the relations between the positions that's the confusing part. I was also considering storing the data in the way Principal Component Analysis or Holograms store various dimensions of related data.
$endgroup$
– Nav
Dec 9 '18 at 17:18
$begingroup$
Trivially, yes: do a database with all the positions and relations between them (possible with enough big hard disks).
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 9 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
Trivially, yes: do a database with all the positions and relations between them (possible with enough big hard disks).
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 9 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
It's how to decide the relations between the positions that's the confusing part. I was also considering storing the data in the way Principal Component Analysis or Holograms store various dimensions of related data.
$endgroup$
– Nav
Dec 9 '18 at 17:18
$begingroup$
It's how to decide the relations between the positions that's the confusing part. I was also considering storing the data in the way Principal Component Analysis or Holograms store various dimensions of related data.
$endgroup$
– Nav
Dec 9 '18 at 17:18
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2967237%2fis-it-possible-to-calculate-when-we-are-close-to-solving-the-rubiks-cube%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2967237%2fis-it-possible-to-calculate-when-we-are-close-to-solving-the-rubiks-cube%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Trivially, yes: do a database with all the positions and relations between them (possible with enough big hard disks).
$endgroup$
– Martín-Blas Pérez Pinilla
Dec 9 '18 at 15:11
$begingroup$
It's how to decide the relations between the positions that's the confusing part. I was also considering storing the data in the way Principal Component Analysis or Holograms store various dimensions of related data.
$endgroup$
– Nav
Dec 9 '18 at 17:18