Prove, that $M={(a,b)mid a,b in mathbb{N_0} land (a-b) text{ mod } 4 = 0} $ is a equivalence relation
Prove, that $M={(a,b)mid a,b in mathbb{N_0} land (a-b) text{ mod } 4 = 0} $ is an equivalence-relation.
Refl.: $a-a=0 text{ mod } 4 =0$
Sym.: $forall x,y in M: (x,y) implies (y,x)$ (Not sure about this.)
Trans.: $left((a-b)+(b-c)right)text{ mod } 4 = 0 iff (a-c)text{ mod } 4 =0$
Can you help me with proving, that the relation is symmetric and is everything else correct?
discrete-mathematics relations equivalence-relations symmetry
add a comment |
Prove, that $M={(a,b)mid a,b in mathbb{N_0} land (a-b) text{ mod } 4 = 0} $ is an equivalence-relation.
Refl.: $a-a=0 text{ mod } 4 =0$
Sym.: $forall x,y in M: (x,y) implies (y,x)$ (Not sure about this.)
Trans.: $left((a-b)+(b-c)right)text{ mod } 4 = 0 iff (a-c)text{ mod } 4 =0$
Can you help me with proving, that the relation is symmetric and is everything else correct?
discrete-mathematics relations equivalence-relations symmetry
For the symmetry, you just need to realize that $-0 = 0$. Transivity is obvious since $(a-b)+(b-c) = a-c$ (so mod should be the same). It might help to realize that $a$ and $b$ are related iff $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder when divided by $4$ which makes three properties pretty obvious
– user160738
Nov 27 '18 at 15:36
Yeah, I've already finished r and t, just needed some help for s. Thanks, that helped!
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 18:47
Can I write: $(a-b) text{ mod } 4=0 iff {mid a-b mid} text{ mod } 4=0$. Therefore, $(b-a) text{ mod } 4=0$ must be ${mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4=0$ and because ${mid a-b mid} = {mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4 =0 $ the relation is symmetric?
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 19:03
add a comment |
Prove, that $M={(a,b)mid a,b in mathbb{N_0} land (a-b) text{ mod } 4 = 0} $ is an equivalence-relation.
Refl.: $a-a=0 text{ mod } 4 =0$
Sym.: $forall x,y in M: (x,y) implies (y,x)$ (Not sure about this.)
Trans.: $left((a-b)+(b-c)right)text{ mod } 4 = 0 iff (a-c)text{ mod } 4 =0$
Can you help me with proving, that the relation is symmetric and is everything else correct?
discrete-mathematics relations equivalence-relations symmetry
Prove, that $M={(a,b)mid a,b in mathbb{N_0} land (a-b) text{ mod } 4 = 0} $ is an equivalence-relation.
Refl.: $a-a=0 text{ mod } 4 =0$
Sym.: $forall x,y in M: (x,y) implies (y,x)$ (Not sure about this.)
Trans.: $left((a-b)+(b-c)right)text{ mod } 4 = 0 iff (a-c)text{ mod } 4 =0$
Can you help me with proving, that the relation is symmetric and is everything else correct?
discrete-mathematics relations equivalence-relations symmetry
discrete-mathematics relations equivalence-relations symmetry
asked Nov 27 '18 at 15:30
Doesbaddel
19910
19910
For the symmetry, you just need to realize that $-0 = 0$. Transivity is obvious since $(a-b)+(b-c) = a-c$ (so mod should be the same). It might help to realize that $a$ and $b$ are related iff $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder when divided by $4$ which makes three properties pretty obvious
– user160738
Nov 27 '18 at 15:36
Yeah, I've already finished r and t, just needed some help for s. Thanks, that helped!
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 18:47
Can I write: $(a-b) text{ mod } 4=0 iff {mid a-b mid} text{ mod } 4=0$. Therefore, $(b-a) text{ mod } 4=0$ must be ${mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4=0$ and because ${mid a-b mid} = {mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4 =0 $ the relation is symmetric?
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 19:03
add a comment |
For the symmetry, you just need to realize that $-0 = 0$. Transivity is obvious since $(a-b)+(b-c) = a-c$ (so mod should be the same). It might help to realize that $a$ and $b$ are related iff $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder when divided by $4$ which makes three properties pretty obvious
– user160738
Nov 27 '18 at 15:36
Yeah, I've already finished r and t, just needed some help for s. Thanks, that helped!
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 18:47
Can I write: $(a-b) text{ mod } 4=0 iff {mid a-b mid} text{ mod } 4=0$. Therefore, $(b-a) text{ mod } 4=0$ must be ${mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4=0$ and because ${mid a-b mid} = {mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4 =0 $ the relation is symmetric?
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 19:03
For the symmetry, you just need to realize that $-0 = 0$. Transivity is obvious since $(a-b)+(b-c) = a-c$ (so mod should be the same). It might help to realize that $a$ and $b$ are related iff $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder when divided by $4$ which makes three properties pretty obvious
– user160738
Nov 27 '18 at 15:36
For the symmetry, you just need to realize that $-0 = 0$. Transivity is obvious since $(a-b)+(b-c) = a-c$ (so mod should be the same). It might help to realize that $a$ and $b$ are related iff $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder when divided by $4$ which makes three properties pretty obvious
– user160738
Nov 27 '18 at 15:36
Yeah, I've already finished r and t, just needed some help for s. Thanks, that helped!
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 18:47
Yeah, I've already finished r and t, just needed some help for s. Thanks, that helped!
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 18:47
Can I write: $(a-b) text{ mod } 4=0 iff {mid a-b mid} text{ mod } 4=0$. Therefore, $(b-a) text{ mod } 4=0$ must be ${mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4=0$ and because ${mid a-b mid} = {mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4 =0 $ the relation is symmetric?
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 19:03
Can I write: $(a-b) text{ mod } 4=0 iff {mid a-b mid} text{ mod } 4=0$. Therefore, $(b-a) text{ mod } 4=0$ must be ${mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4=0$ and because ${mid a-b mid} = {mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4 =0 $ the relation is symmetric?
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 19:03
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015911%2fprove-that-m-a-b-mid-a-b-in-mathbbn-0-land-a-b-text-mod-4-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015911%2fprove-that-m-a-b-mid-a-b-in-mathbbn-0-land-a-b-text-mod-4-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
For the symmetry, you just need to realize that $-0 = 0$. Transivity is obvious since $(a-b)+(b-c) = a-c$ (so mod should be the same). It might help to realize that $a$ and $b$ are related iff $a$ and $b$ have the same remainder when divided by $4$ which makes three properties pretty obvious
– user160738
Nov 27 '18 at 15:36
Yeah, I've already finished r and t, just needed some help for s. Thanks, that helped!
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 18:47
Can I write: $(a-b) text{ mod } 4=0 iff {mid a-b mid} text{ mod } 4=0$. Therefore, $(b-a) text{ mod } 4=0$ must be ${mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4=0$ and because ${mid a-b mid} = {mid b-a mid} text{ mod } 4 =0 $ the relation is symmetric?
– Doesbaddel
Nov 27 '18 at 19:03