What is the meaning of grabbing the mace in the British parliament?
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
I gather from this tweet that grabbing the mace laying on the table of the British House of Commons is an act of protest and has some kind of significance.
What significance does this gesture have?
united-kingdom parliament
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
I gather from this tweet that grabbing the mace laying on the table of the British House of Commons is an act of protest and has some kind of significance.
What significance does this gesture have?
united-kingdom parliament
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_mace#Houses_of_Parliament
– Steve Melnikoff
22 hours ago
1
LOL... checked news, expected a serious altercation with blunt weapons, was disappointed....
– rackandboneman
16 hours ago
It's called being a prima donna.
– Valorum
11 hours ago
1
@cat it has been edited away a few hours ago into a separate article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_maces_in_the_United_Kingdom
– Federico
10 hours ago
1
@cat: Blimey; things move fast around here. :-)
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
up vote
23
down vote
favorite
I gather from this tweet that grabbing the mace laying on the table of the British House of Commons is an act of protest and has some kind of significance.
What significance does this gesture have?
united-kingdom parliament
I gather from this tweet that grabbing the mace laying on the table of the British House of Commons is an act of protest and has some kind of significance.
What significance does this gesture have?
united-kingdom parliament
united-kingdom parliament
edited 10 hours ago
blahdiblah
1052
1052
asked 23 hours ago
Federico
3,63432448
3,63432448
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_mace#Houses_of_Parliament
– Steve Melnikoff
22 hours ago
1
LOL... checked news, expected a serious altercation with blunt weapons, was disappointed....
– rackandboneman
16 hours ago
It's called being a prima donna.
– Valorum
11 hours ago
1
@cat it has been edited away a few hours ago into a separate article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_maces_in_the_United_Kingdom
– Federico
10 hours ago
1
@cat: Blimey; things move fast around here. :-)
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_mace#Houses_of_Parliament
– Steve Melnikoff
22 hours ago
1
LOL... checked news, expected a serious altercation with blunt weapons, was disappointed....
– rackandboneman
16 hours ago
It's called being a prima donna.
– Valorum
11 hours ago
1
@cat it has been edited away a few hours ago into a separate article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_maces_in_the_United_Kingdom
– Federico
10 hours ago
1
@cat: Blimey; things move fast around here. :-)
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_mace#Houses_of_Parliament
– Steve Melnikoff
22 hours ago
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_mace#Houses_of_Parliament
– Steve Melnikoff
22 hours ago
1
1
LOL... checked news, expected a serious altercation with blunt weapons, was disappointed....
– rackandboneman
16 hours ago
LOL... checked news, expected a serious altercation with blunt weapons, was disappointed....
– rackandboneman
16 hours ago
It's called being a prima donna.
– Valorum
11 hours ago
It's called being a prima donna.
– Valorum
11 hours ago
1
1
@cat it has been edited away a few hours ago into a separate article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_maces_in_the_United_Kingdom
– Federico
10 hours ago
@cat it has been edited away a few hours ago into a separate article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_maces_in_the_United_Kingdom
– Federico
10 hours ago
1
1
@cat: Blimey; things move fast around here. :-)
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
@cat: Blimey; things move fast around here. :-)
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The mace is a symbol of the Queen's Authority. Its presence in the House of Commons signifies that the House has the Queen's authority to pass laws, etc.
It is not unknown for an MP to make some kind of protest by grabbing it, but they always seem to look a bit foolish as a result, and it never accomplishes anything except for a bit of light-relief in the news headlines.
I have also known MPs that have committed some kind of parliamentary misdemeanour to be made to "apologise to the mace".
Update: asked to clarify "what does the gesture mean?"
The gesture has no defined or agreed meaning. The only meaning is whatever was in the head of the person who grabbed the mace. In the most recent case he did explain afterwards why he had done it - something about the government having lost its privilege to rule - but I think it would be a different reason every time.
5
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
2
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The mace is a symbol of the Queen's Authority. Its presence in the House of Commons signifies that the House has the Queen's authority to pass laws, etc.
It is not unknown for an MP to make some kind of protest by grabbing it, but they always seem to look a bit foolish as a result, and it never accomplishes anything except for a bit of light-relief in the news headlines.
I have also known MPs that have committed some kind of parliamentary misdemeanour to be made to "apologise to the mace".
Update: asked to clarify "what does the gesture mean?"
The gesture has no defined or agreed meaning. The only meaning is whatever was in the head of the person who grabbed the mace. In the most recent case he did explain afterwards why he had done it - something about the government having lost its privilege to rule - but I think it would be a different reason every time.
5
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
2
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The mace is a symbol of the Queen's Authority. Its presence in the House of Commons signifies that the House has the Queen's authority to pass laws, etc.
It is not unknown for an MP to make some kind of protest by grabbing it, but they always seem to look a bit foolish as a result, and it never accomplishes anything except for a bit of light-relief in the news headlines.
I have also known MPs that have committed some kind of parliamentary misdemeanour to be made to "apologise to the mace".
Update: asked to clarify "what does the gesture mean?"
The gesture has no defined or agreed meaning. The only meaning is whatever was in the head of the person who grabbed the mace. In the most recent case he did explain afterwards why he had done it - something about the government having lost its privilege to rule - but I think it would be a different reason every time.
5
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
2
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The mace is a symbol of the Queen's Authority. Its presence in the House of Commons signifies that the House has the Queen's authority to pass laws, etc.
It is not unknown for an MP to make some kind of protest by grabbing it, but they always seem to look a bit foolish as a result, and it never accomplishes anything except for a bit of light-relief in the news headlines.
I have also known MPs that have committed some kind of parliamentary misdemeanour to be made to "apologise to the mace".
Update: asked to clarify "what does the gesture mean?"
The gesture has no defined or agreed meaning. The only meaning is whatever was in the head of the person who grabbed the mace. In the most recent case he did explain afterwards why he had done it - something about the government having lost its privilege to rule - but I think it would be a different reason every time.
The mace is a symbol of the Queen's Authority. Its presence in the House of Commons signifies that the House has the Queen's authority to pass laws, etc.
It is not unknown for an MP to make some kind of protest by grabbing it, but they always seem to look a bit foolish as a result, and it never accomplishes anything except for a bit of light-relief in the news headlines.
I have also known MPs that have committed some kind of parliamentary misdemeanour to be made to "apologise to the mace".
Update: asked to clarify "what does the gesture mean?"
The gesture has no defined or agreed meaning. The only meaning is whatever was in the head of the person who grabbed the mace. In the most recent case he did explain afterwards why he had done it - something about the government having lost its privilege to rule - but I think it would be a different reason every time.
edited 20 hours ago
answered 22 hours ago
Martin
703611
703611
5
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
2
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
add a comment |
5
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
2
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
5
5
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
The ceremonial mace has been removed or damaged in protest at least five times.
– Ambo100
16 hours ago
2
2
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It might be worth adding that the mace is required to be present in order for the house to conduct most of its business; hence the house cannot continue what it was doing until the mace is put back.
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
It the most recent incident, I believe the member of the Commons who tried to take it was making a statement about the delayed vote on Brexit as if to say, "We the members of the Commons are no longer determinant of what we do as far as business."
– Karlomanio
8 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36034%2fwhat-is-the-meaning-of-grabbing-the-mace-in-the-british-parliament%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
See also: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_mace#Houses_of_Parliament
– Steve Melnikoff
22 hours ago
1
LOL... checked news, expected a serious altercation with blunt weapons, was disappointed....
– rackandboneman
16 hours ago
It's called being a prima donna.
– Valorum
11 hours ago
1
@cat it has been edited away a few hours ago into a separate article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceremonial_maces_in_the_United_Kingdom
– Federico
10 hours ago
1
@cat: Blimey; things move fast around here. :-)
– Steve Melnikoff
10 hours ago