Taylor expansion on Images which are warped












1












$begingroup$


I'm currently reading following paper: https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub3/baker_simon_2001_2/baker_simon_2001_2.pdf



Here I struggle to follow the Taylor expansion from equation 2 to equation 3. I mean I know in general how Taylor expansion works, but in this case it is not clear to me.



Starting equation:



$$
sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} + Deltamathbf{p})) - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
$$



Taylor expansion



$$
sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} )) + nablamathit{I}frac{partialmathbf{W}}{partialmathbf{p}}Deltamathbf{p} - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
$$



Maybe somebody of you has more experience and can elaborate little more on this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm currently reading following paper: https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub3/baker_simon_2001_2/baker_simon_2001_2.pdf



    Here I struggle to follow the Taylor expansion from equation 2 to equation 3. I mean I know in general how Taylor expansion works, but in this case it is not clear to me.



    Starting equation:



    $$
    sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} + Deltamathbf{p})) - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
    $$



    Taylor expansion



    $$
    sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} )) + nablamathit{I}frac{partialmathbf{W}}{partialmathbf{p}}Deltamathbf{p} - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
    $$



    Maybe somebody of you has more experience and can elaborate little more on this?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm currently reading following paper: https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub3/baker_simon_2001_2/baker_simon_2001_2.pdf



      Here I struggle to follow the Taylor expansion from equation 2 to equation 3. I mean I know in general how Taylor expansion works, but in this case it is not clear to me.



      Starting equation:



      $$
      sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} + Deltamathbf{p})) - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
      $$



      Taylor expansion



      $$
      sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} )) + nablamathit{I}frac{partialmathbf{W}}{partialmathbf{p}}Deltamathbf{p} - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
      $$



      Maybe somebody of you has more experience and can elaborate little more on this?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm currently reading following paper: https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub3/baker_simon_2001_2/baker_simon_2001_2.pdf



      Here I struggle to follow the Taylor expansion from equation 2 to equation 3. I mean I know in general how Taylor expansion works, but in this case it is not clear to me.



      Starting equation:



      $$
      sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} + Deltamathbf{p})) - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
      $$



      Taylor expansion



      $$
      sum_{x} [ mathit{I}(mathbf{W}(mathbf{x};mathbf{p} )) + nablamathit{I}frac{partialmathbf{W}}{partialmathbf{p}}Deltamathbf{p} - mathit{T}(mathbf{x})]^2
      $$



      Maybe somebody of you has more experience and can elaborate little more on this?







      taylor-expansion






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 1 '18 at 17:42









      antibusantibus

      1083




      1083






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You just need to apply the expansion twice. First for ${bf W}$ up to first order in $Delta {bf p}$, we get



          $$
          {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p}) approx {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p}) + frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} equiv {bf W} + Delta{bf W}tag{1}
          $$



          Now for $I$ up to first order in $Delta {bf W}$,



          $$
          I({bf W} + Delta{bf W}) approx I({bf W}) + nabla I Delta{bf W} = I({bf W}) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} tag{2}
          $$



          Putting everything together



          $$
          I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p})) approx I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p})) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p}
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021613%2ftaylor-expansion-on-images-which-are-warped%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            You just need to apply the expansion twice. First for ${bf W}$ up to first order in $Delta {bf p}$, we get



            $$
            {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p}) approx {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p}) + frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} equiv {bf W} + Delta{bf W}tag{1}
            $$



            Now for $I$ up to first order in $Delta {bf W}$,



            $$
            I({bf W} + Delta{bf W}) approx I({bf W}) + nabla I Delta{bf W} = I({bf W}) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} tag{2}
            $$



            Putting everything together



            $$
            I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p})) approx I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p})) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p}
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              You just need to apply the expansion twice. First for ${bf W}$ up to first order in $Delta {bf p}$, we get



              $$
              {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p}) approx {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p}) + frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} equiv {bf W} + Delta{bf W}tag{1}
              $$



              Now for $I$ up to first order in $Delta {bf W}$,



              $$
              I({bf W} + Delta{bf W}) approx I({bf W}) + nabla I Delta{bf W} = I({bf W}) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} tag{2}
              $$



              Putting everything together



              $$
              I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p})) approx I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p})) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                You just need to apply the expansion twice. First for ${bf W}$ up to first order in $Delta {bf p}$, we get



                $$
                {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p}) approx {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p}) + frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} equiv {bf W} + Delta{bf W}tag{1}
                $$



                Now for $I$ up to first order in $Delta {bf W}$,



                $$
                I({bf W} + Delta{bf W}) approx I({bf W}) + nabla I Delta{bf W} = I({bf W}) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} tag{2}
                $$



                Putting everything together



                $$
                I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p})) approx I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p})) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p}
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                You just need to apply the expansion twice. First for ${bf W}$ up to first order in $Delta {bf p}$, we get



                $$
                {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p}) approx {bf W}({bf x}; {bf p}) + frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} equiv {bf W} + Delta{bf W}tag{1}
                $$



                Now for $I$ up to first order in $Delta {bf W}$,



                $$
                I({bf W} + Delta{bf W}) approx I({bf W}) + nabla I Delta{bf W} = I({bf W}) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p} tag{2}
                $$



                Putting everything together



                $$
                I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p} + Delta {bf p})) approx I({bf W}({bf x}; {bf p})) + nabla I frac{partial {bf W}}{partial {bf p}}Delta {bf p}
                $$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 1 '18 at 21:17









                caveraccaverac

                14.2k21130




                14.2k21130






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3021613%2ftaylor-expansion-on-images-which-are-warped%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei