Algebra prerequisites for Hatcher's Algebraic Topology












2












$begingroup$


Is the chapter on groups in Herstein's Topics in Algebra enough to get started? What bare minimum Algebra should I be comfortable with, before studying Algebraic Topology?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    Is the chapter on groups in Herstein's Topics in Algebra enough to get started? What bare minimum Algebra should I be comfortable with, before studying Algebraic Topology?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Is the chapter on groups in Herstein's Topics in Algebra enough to get started? What bare minimum Algebra should I be comfortable with, before studying Algebraic Topology?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Is the chapter on groups in Herstein's Topics in Algebra enough to get started? What bare minimum Algebra should I be comfortable with, before studying Algebraic Topology?







      abstract-algebra reference-request algebraic-topology book-recommendation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 19 '16 at 16:41









      emilranemilran

      606




      606






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Probably not, when covering things like the characterization of the fundamental groups of compact surfaces a couple of facts about free groups are used, also when calculating the abelianizations of the aforementioned groups.



          However, I recommend that you learn these as they appear while you are reading Hatcher. I think that Hatcher's book is going to require a lot of work regardless of whether you know a lot of group theory or not. But it is a great book, and I think that learning the group theory stuff as you advance through the book is a good method.





          As to what the "bare minimum" is: I thing that chapter on Herstein is more than enough.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2064834%2falgebra-prerequisites-for-hatchers-algebraic-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Probably not, when covering things like the characterization of the fundamental groups of compact surfaces a couple of facts about free groups are used, also when calculating the abelianizations of the aforementioned groups.



            However, I recommend that you learn these as they appear while you are reading Hatcher. I think that Hatcher's book is going to require a lot of work regardless of whether you know a lot of group theory or not. But it is a great book, and I think that learning the group theory stuff as you advance through the book is a good method.





            As to what the "bare minimum" is: I thing that chapter on Herstein is more than enough.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Probably not, when covering things like the characterization of the fundamental groups of compact surfaces a couple of facts about free groups are used, also when calculating the abelianizations of the aforementioned groups.



              However, I recommend that you learn these as they appear while you are reading Hatcher. I think that Hatcher's book is going to require a lot of work regardless of whether you know a lot of group theory or not. But it is a great book, and I think that learning the group theory stuff as you advance through the book is a good method.





              As to what the "bare minimum" is: I thing that chapter on Herstein is more than enough.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Probably not, when covering things like the characterization of the fundamental groups of compact surfaces a couple of facts about free groups are used, also when calculating the abelianizations of the aforementioned groups.



                However, I recommend that you learn these as they appear while you are reading Hatcher. I think that Hatcher's book is going to require a lot of work regardless of whether you know a lot of group theory or not. But it is a great book, and I think that learning the group theory stuff as you advance through the book is a good method.





                As to what the "bare minimum" is: I thing that chapter on Herstein is more than enough.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Probably not, when covering things like the characterization of the fundamental groups of compact surfaces a couple of facts about free groups are used, also when calculating the abelianizations of the aforementioned groups.



                However, I recommend that you learn these as they appear while you are reading Hatcher. I think that Hatcher's book is going to require a lot of work regardless of whether you know a lot of group theory or not. But it is a great book, and I think that learning the group theory stuff as you advance through the book is a good method.





                As to what the "bare minimum" is: I thing that chapter on Herstein is more than enough.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 28 '18 at 0:07

























                answered Dec 19 '16 at 16:45









                Jorge Fernández HidalgoJorge Fernández Hidalgo

                75.5k1191192




                75.5k1191192






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2064834%2falgebra-prerequisites-for-hatchers-algebraic-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ellipse (mathématiques)

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Mont Emei