Confusion with binomial factorization












1












$begingroup$


Say you have the term: $-3x^2+12$ and you want to factor it out:



$$-3(x^2 - 4)$$
$$-3((x+2)(x-2))$$



However you can also write the above as:



$$-3(x+2) (x-2)$$



But in many other cases, e.g if you have $3(4 + 5)$, you can't just turn that into $3(4) + 5$ as you'll get a different result. What's the intuition behind being able to do that in the above example?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Say you have the term: $-3x^2+12$ and you want to factor it out:



    $$-3(x^2 - 4)$$
    $$-3((x+2)(x-2))$$



    However you can also write the above as:



    $$-3(x+2) (x-2)$$



    But in many other cases, e.g if you have $3(4 + 5)$, you can't just turn that into $3(4) + 5$ as you'll get a different result. What's the intuition behind being able to do that in the above example?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Say you have the term: $-3x^2+12$ and you want to factor it out:



      $$-3(x^2 - 4)$$
      $$-3((x+2)(x-2))$$



      However you can also write the above as:



      $$-3(x+2) (x-2)$$



      But in many other cases, e.g if you have $3(4 + 5)$, you can't just turn that into $3(4) + 5$ as you'll get a different result. What's the intuition behind being able to do that in the above example?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Say you have the term: $-3x^2+12$ and you want to factor it out:



      $$-3(x^2 - 4)$$
      $$-3((x+2)(x-2))$$



      However you can also write the above as:



      $$-3(x+2) (x-2)$$



      But in many other cases, e.g if you have $3(4 + 5)$, you can't just turn that into $3(4) + 5$ as you'll get a different result. What's the intuition behind being able to do that in the above example?







      polynomials quadratics factoring






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 28 '18 at 1:16









      Click UpvoteClick Upvote

      1257




      1257






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          You can do the above example because $(x+2)$ and $(x-2)$ are multiplied together. If you add them together, notice that
          $$-3((x+2)+(x-2))neq-3(x+2)+(x-2)$$
          The general rule is that
          $$a(bc)=abc$$
          $$a(b+c)=ab+ac$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            Dec 28 '18 at 1:32











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054494%2fconfusion-with-binomial-factorization%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          You can do the above example because $(x+2)$ and $(x-2)$ are multiplied together. If you add them together, notice that
          $$-3((x+2)+(x-2))neq-3(x+2)+(x-2)$$
          The general rule is that
          $$a(bc)=abc$$
          $$a(b+c)=ab+ac$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            Dec 28 '18 at 1:32
















          4












          $begingroup$

          You can do the above example because $(x+2)$ and $(x-2)$ are multiplied together. If you add them together, notice that
          $$-3((x+2)+(x-2))neq-3(x+2)+(x-2)$$
          The general rule is that
          $$a(bc)=abc$$
          $$a(b+c)=ab+ac$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 2




            $begingroup$
            +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            Dec 28 '18 at 1:32














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          You can do the above example because $(x+2)$ and $(x-2)$ are multiplied together. If you add them together, notice that
          $$-3((x+2)+(x-2))neq-3(x+2)+(x-2)$$
          The general rule is that
          $$a(bc)=abc$$
          $$a(b+c)=ab+ac$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          You can do the above example because $(x+2)$ and $(x-2)$ are multiplied together. If you add them together, notice that
          $$-3((x+2)+(x-2))neq-3(x+2)+(x-2)$$
          The general rule is that
          $$a(bc)=abc$$
          $$a(b+c)=ab+ac$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:26









          LarryLarry

          2,41331129




          2,41331129








          • 2




            $begingroup$
            +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            Dec 28 '18 at 1:32














          • 2




            $begingroup$
            +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
            $endgroup$
            – Ethan Bolker
            Dec 28 '18 at 1:32








          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
          $endgroup$
          – Ethan Bolker
          Dec 28 '18 at 1:32




          $begingroup$
          +1 It might be useful to note that the second of the rules has a name: the distributive law - and that factoring is (in a sense) undoing a distributed calculation.
          $endgroup$
          – Ethan Bolker
          Dec 28 '18 at 1:32


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054494%2fconfusion-with-binomial-factorization%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei