Show that $C={x in mathbb{R}^4 mid x^TAx geq 1}$ is not empty?
$begingroup$
Consider the set $C={x in mathbb{R}^4 mid x^TAx geq 1}$ where $A in mathbb{R}^{4 times 4}$ is a symmetric matrix with two distinct positive eigenvalues and other eigenvalues of $A$ are nonpositive.
Show $C$ is not empty?
My try:
$A$ is symmetric, so it can be written as $A=u Lambda u^T$. Hence,
$$
x^TAx=x^Tu Lambda u^Tx geq 1
$$
So
$$
z^T Lambda z geq 1
$$
where $u^Tx=z in mathbb{R}^4$.
Let $a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4$ be eigenvalues of $A$ so $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2+a_3z_3^2+a_4z_4^2 -1 geq 0$. Since two of the eigenvalues are nonpositive, assume they are zero. Hence, $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2 -1 geq 0$ which is the region outside of an ellipsoid in a 2D plain.
Am I write, or there is a more beautiful way to show it?
linear-algebra inequality convex-analysis symmetric-matrices constraints
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the set $C={x in mathbb{R}^4 mid x^TAx geq 1}$ where $A in mathbb{R}^{4 times 4}$ is a symmetric matrix with two distinct positive eigenvalues and other eigenvalues of $A$ are nonpositive.
Show $C$ is not empty?
My try:
$A$ is symmetric, so it can be written as $A=u Lambda u^T$. Hence,
$$
x^TAx=x^Tu Lambda u^Tx geq 1
$$
So
$$
z^T Lambda z geq 1
$$
where $u^Tx=z in mathbb{R}^4$.
Let $a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4$ be eigenvalues of $A$ so $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2+a_3z_3^2+a_4z_4^2 -1 geq 0$. Since two of the eigenvalues are nonpositive, assume they are zero. Hence, $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2 -1 geq 0$ which is the region outside of an ellipsoid in a 2D plain.
Am I write, or there is a more beautiful way to show it?
linear-algebra inequality convex-analysis symmetric-matrices constraints
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Why don't you just take a vector $x$ with $x^T Ax> 0$ and scale it such that it is in $C$?
$endgroup$
– sehigle
Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
$begingroup$
Suppose we make the eigenvector of a positive eigenvalue long enough. Then it's an element of C isn't it?
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Dec 17 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the set $C={x in mathbb{R}^4 mid x^TAx geq 1}$ where $A in mathbb{R}^{4 times 4}$ is a symmetric matrix with two distinct positive eigenvalues and other eigenvalues of $A$ are nonpositive.
Show $C$ is not empty?
My try:
$A$ is symmetric, so it can be written as $A=u Lambda u^T$. Hence,
$$
x^TAx=x^Tu Lambda u^Tx geq 1
$$
So
$$
z^T Lambda z geq 1
$$
where $u^Tx=z in mathbb{R}^4$.
Let $a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4$ be eigenvalues of $A$ so $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2+a_3z_3^2+a_4z_4^2 -1 geq 0$. Since two of the eigenvalues are nonpositive, assume they are zero. Hence, $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2 -1 geq 0$ which is the region outside of an ellipsoid in a 2D plain.
Am I write, or there is a more beautiful way to show it?
linear-algebra inequality convex-analysis symmetric-matrices constraints
$endgroup$
Consider the set $C={x in mathbb{R}^4 mid x^TAx geq 1}$ where $A in mathbb{R}^{4 times 4}$ is a symmetric matrix with two distinct positive eigenvalues and other eigenvalues of $A$ are nonpositive.
Show $C$ is not empty?
My try:
$A$ is symmetric, so it can be written as $A=u Lambda u^T$. Hence,
$$
x^TAx=x^Tu Lambda u^Tx geq 1
$$
So
$$
z^T Lambda z geq 1
$$
where $u^Tx=z in mathbb{R}^4$.
Let $a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4$ be eigenvalues of $A$ so $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2+a_3z_3^2+a_4z_4^2 -1 geq 0$. Since two of the eigenvalues are nonpositive, assume they are zero. Hence, $a_1z_1^2+a_2z_2^2 -1 geq 0$ which is the region outside of an ellipsoid in a 2D plain.
Am I write, or there is a more beautiful way to show it?
linear-algebra inequality convex-analysis symmetric-matrices constraints
linear-algebra inequality convex-analysis symmetric-matrices constraints
asked Dec 17 '18 at 0:41
SepideSepide
3038
3038
2
$begingroup$
Why don't you just take a vector $x$ with $x^T Ax> 0$ and scale it such that it is in $C$?
$endgroup$
– sehigle
Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
$begingroup$
Suppose we make the eigenvector of a positive eigenvalue long enough. Then it's an element of C isn't it?
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Dec 17 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Why don't you just take a vector $x$ with $x^T Ax> 0$ and scale it such that it is in $C$?
$endgroup$
– sehigle
Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
$begingroup$
Suppose we make the eigenvector of a positive eigenvalue long enough. Then it's an element of C isn't it?
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Dec 17 '18 at 0:52
2
2
$begingroup$
Why don't you just take a vector $x$ with $x^T Ax> 0$ and scale it such that it is in $C$?
$endgroup$
– sehigle
Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
$begingroup$
Why don't you just take a vector $x$ with $x^T Ax> 0$ and scale it such that it is in $C$?
$endgroup$
– sehigle
Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
$begingroup$
Suppose we make the eigenvector of a positive eigenvalue long enough. Then it's an element of C isn't it?
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Dec 17 '18 at 0:52
$begingroup$
Suppose we make the eigenvector of a positive eigenvalue long enough. Then it's an element of C isn't it?
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Dec 17 '18 at 0:52
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can't simply assume that the non-positive eigenvalues of $A$ are zero.
Note that to show that $C$ is non-empty, you only need to show that there is at least one vector in $C$.
Let $lambda$ be the one of the positive eigenvalues of $A$, and let $v$ be a corresponding eigenvector with unit norm.
If $x = alpha v$ for some constant $alpha$, then how big is $x^TAx$? Can you find a large enough $alpha$ such that $x = alpha v in C?$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in R^4$ be the eigenvector corresponding to one of the positive eigenvalues $lambda_1$. Then $x^TAx = lambda_1 x^Tx > 0$. Now all you have to do is multiply $x$ by a normalizing scalar to get some $y in R^4$ and you have $y^TAy = 1 Rightarrow y in C$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043403%2fshow-that-c-x-in-mathbbr4-mid-xtax-geq-1-is-not-empty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can't simply assume that the non-positive eigenvalues of $A$ are zero.
Note that to show that $C$ is non-empty, you only need to show that there is at least one vector in $C$.
Let $lambda$ be the one of the positive eigenvalues of $A$, and let $v$ be a corresponding eigenvector with unit norm.
If $x = alpha v$ for some constant $alpha$, then how big is $x^TAx$? Can you find a large enough $alpha$ such that $x = alpha v in C?$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't simply assume that the non-positive eigenvalues of $A$ are zero.
Note that to show that $C$ is non-empty, you only need to show that there is at least one vector in $C$.
Let $lambda$ be the one of the positive eigenvalues of $A$, and let $v$ be a corresponding eigenvector with unit norm.
If $x = alpha v$ for some constant $alpha$, then how big is $x^TAx$? Can you find a large enough $alpha$ such that $x = alpha v in C?$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't simply assume that the non-positive eigenvalues of $A$ are zero.
Note that to show that $C$ is non-empty, you only need to show that there is at least one vector in $C$.
Let $lambda$ be the one of the positive eigenvalues of $A$, and let $v$ be a corresponding eigenvector with unit norm.
If $x = alpha v$ for some constant $alpha$, then how big is $x^TAx$? Can you find a large enough $alpha$ such that $x = alpha v in C?$
$endgroup$
You can't simply assume that the non-positive eigenvalues of $A$ are zero.
Note that to show that $C$ is non-empty, you only need to show that there is at least one vector in $C$.
Let $lambda$ be the one of the positive eigenvalues of $A$, and let $v$ be a corresponding eigenvector with unit norm.
If $x = alpha v$ for some constant $alpha$, then how big is $x^TAx$? Can you find a large enough $alpha$ such that $x = alpha v in C?$
answered Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
JimmyK4542JimmyK4542
41.1k245106
41.1k245106
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in R^4$ be the eigenvector corresponding to one of the positive eigenvalues $lambda_1$. Then $x^TAx = lambda_1 x^Tx > 0$. Now all you have to do is multiply $x$ by a normalizing scalar to get some $y in R^4$ and you have $y^TAy = 1 Rightarrow y in C$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in R^4$ be the eigenvector corresponding to one of the positive eigenvalues $lambda_1$. Then $x^TAx = lambda_1 x^Tx > 0$. Now all you have to do is multiply $x$ by a normalizing scalar to get some $y in R^4$ and you have $y^TAy = 1 Rightarrow y in C$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $x in R^4$ be the eigenvector corresponding to one of the positive eigenvalues $lambda_1$. Then $x^TAx = lambda_1 x^Tx > 0$. Now all you have to do is multiply $x$ by a normalizing scalar to get some $y in R^4$ and you have $y^TAy = 1 Rightarrow y in C$.
$endgroup$
Let $x in R^4$ be the eigenvector corresponding to one of the positive eigenvalues $lambda_1$. Then $x^TAx = lambda_1 x^Tx > 0$. Now all you have to do is multiply $x$ by a normalizing scalar to get some $y in R^4$ and you have $y^TAy = 1 Rightarrow y in C$.
edited Dec 17 '18 at 0:57
answered Dec 17 '18 at 0:51
svailsvail
12
12
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3043403%2fshow-that-c-x-in-mathbbr4-mid-xtax-geq-1-is-not-empty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Why don't you just take a vector $x$ with $x^T Ax> 0$ and scale it such that it is in $C$?
$endgroup$
– sehigle
Dec 17 '18 at 0:50
$begingroup$
Suppose we make the eigenvector of a positive eigenvalue long enough. Then it's an element of C isn't it?
$endgroup$
– I like Serena
Dec 17 '18 at 0:52