For a sequence $(a_n)$ of real numbers, $sum_{n=1}^infty |a_{n+1}-a_n|$ converges implies...
$begingroup$
I know that when the series $sum_{n=1}^infty |a_{n+1}-a_n|$ converges, then we have $|a_{n+1}-a_n|rightarrow 0$
So by using this I was going to prove that the sequence $a_n$ is Cauchy. But couldn't come up with a correct way.
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence cauchy-sequences
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that when the series $sum_{n=1}^infty |a_{n+1}-a_n|$ converges, then we have $|a_{n+1}-a_n|rightarrow 0$
So by using this I was going to prove that the sequence $a_n$ is Cauchy. But couldn't come up with a correct way.
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence cauchy-sequences
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that when the series $sum_{n=1}^infty |a_{n+1}-a_n|$ converges, then we have $|a_{n+1}-a_n|rightarrow 0$
So by using this I was going to prove that the sequence $a_n$ is Cauchy. But couldn't come up with a correct way.
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence cauchy-sequences
$endgroup$
I know that when the series $sum_{n=1}^infty |a_{n+1}-a_n|$ converges, then we have $|a_{n+1}-a_n|rightarrow 0$
So by using this I was going to prove that the sequence $a_n$ is Cauchy. But couldn't come up with a correct way.
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence cauchy-sequences
real-analysis sequences-and-series convergence cauchy-sequences
edited Jan 5 at 20:54
Davide Giraudo
127k16154268
127k16154268
asked Jan 5 at 20:31
DD90DD90
2648
2648
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: For every $n geq 0$, $p geq 0$, $$|a_{n+p}-a_n| leq sum_{k=n}^{infty}{|a_{k+1}-a_k|}.$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
$S_n:=sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}|.$
Since $S_n$ converges , $S_n$ is Cauchy.
$epsilon >0$ given, there exists a $n_0$ s.t. for $m ge n ge n_0$
$|S_m-S_n| =|sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}||$
$=sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_k| < epsilon.$
Show that $(a_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is Cauchy.
For $m ge n ge (n_0 +1)$ we have:
$|a_m-a_n| le |a_m-a_{m-1}| +..$
$|a_{m-1}-a_{m-2}|+.......|a_{n+1}-a_n| $
$=S_{m-1}-S_{n-1} lt epsilon.$
Hence Cauchy, hence convergent.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063159%2ffor-a-sequence-a-n-of-real-numbers-sum-n-1-infty-a-n1-a-n-conver%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: For every $n geq 0$, $p geq 0$, $$|a_{n+p}-a_n| leq sum_{k=n}^{infty}{|a_{k+1}-a_k|}.$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: For every $n geq 0$, $p geq 0$, $$|a_{n+p}-a_n| leq sum_{k=n}^{infty}{|a_{k+1}-a_k|}.$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Hint: For every $n geq 0$, $p geq 0$, $$|a_{n+p}-a_n| leq sum_{k=n}^{infty}{|a_{k+1}-a_k|}.$$
$endgroup$
Hint: For every $n geq 0$, $p geq 0$, $$|a_{n+p}-a_n| leq sum_{k=n}^{infty}{|a_{k+1}-a_k|}.$$
answered Jan 5 at 20:42
MindlackMindlack
4,885210
4,885210
1
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
1
1
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Can you please explain more.
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:50
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Triangle inequality.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
Yes. But how does this leads to the convergence of the sequence?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:51
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
This proves $(a_n)$ to be Cauchy.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 5 at 20:52
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
$begingroup$
Seems like I'm missing a theory? I'm sorry but still don't get it.. Why does the above inequality says that $forall epsilon >0, exists Ninmathbb{N}$ such that for $p>0$ and $n>N$, $|a_{n+p}-a_n|<epsilon$ ?
$endgroup$
– DD90
Jan 5 at 20:56
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
$S_n:=sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}|.$
Since $S_n$ converges , $S_n$ is Cauchy.
$epsilon >0$ given, there exists a $n_0$ s.t. for $m ge n ge n_0$
$|S_m-S_n| =|sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}||$
$=sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_k| < epsilon.$
Show that $(a_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is Cauchy.
For $m ge n ge (n_0 +1)$ we have:
$|a_m-a_n| le |a_m-a_{m-1}| +..$
$|a_{m-1}-a_{m-2}|+.......|a_{n+1}-a_n| $
$=S_{m-1}-S_{n-1} lt epsilon.$
Hence Cauchy, hence convergent.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$S_n:=sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}|.$
Since $S_n$ converges , $S_n$ is Cauchy.
$epsilon >0$ given, there exists a $n_0$ s.t. for $m ge n ge n_0$
$|S_m-S_n| =|sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}||$
$=sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_k| < epsilon.$
Show that $(a_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is Cauchy.
For $m ge n ge (n_0 +1)$ we have:
$|a_m-a_n| le |a_m-a_{m-1}| +..$
$|a_{m-1}-a_{m-2}|+.......|a_{n+1}-a_n| $
$=S_{m-1}-S_{n-1} lt epsilon.$
Hence Cauchy, hence convergent.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$S_n:=sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}|.$
Since $S_n$ converges , $S_n$ is Cauchy.
$epsilon >0$ given, there exists a $n_0$ s.t. for $m ge n ge n_0$
$|S_m-S_n| =|sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}||$
$=sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_k| < epsilon.$
Show that $(a_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is Cauchy.
For $m ge n ge (n_0 +1)$ we have:
$|a_m-a_n| le |a_m-a_{m-1}| +..$
$|a_{m-1}-a_{m-2}|+.......|a_{n+1}-a_n| $
$=S_{m-1}-S_{n-1} lt epsilon.$
Hence Cauchy, hence convergent.
$endgroup$
$S_n:=sum_{k=1}^{n}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}|.$
Since $S_n$ converges , $S_n$ is Cauchy.
$epsilon >0$ given, there exists a $n_0$ s.t. for $m ge n ge n_0$
$|S_m-S_n| =|sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_{k}||$
$=sum_{k=n+1}^{m}|a_{k+1}-a_k| < epsilon.$
Show that $(a_n)_{n in mathbb{N}}$ is Cauchy.
For $m ge n ge (n_0 +1)$ we have:
$|a_m-a_n| le |a_m-a_{m-1}| +..$
$|a_{m-1}-a_{m-2}|+.......|a_{n+1}-a_n| $
$=S_{m-1}-S_{n-1} lt epsilon.$
Hence Cauchy, hence convergent.
answered Jan 5 at 22:28
Peter SzilasPeter Szilas
11.4k2822
11.4k2822
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063159%2ffor-a-sequence-a-n-of-real-numbers-sum-n-1-infty-a-n1-a-n-conver%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown