The solutions to some Diophantine equations












1












$begingroup$


I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 5 at 2:55
















1












$begingroup$


I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 5 at 2:55














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.



enter image description here



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.



enter image description here



enter image description here







reference-request






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 5 at 2:46









saisai

1376




1376












  • $begingroup$
    um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 5 at 2:55


















  • $begingroup$
    um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
    $endgroup$
    – Will Jagy
    Jan 5 at 2:55
















$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55




$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.



Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.



As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    @sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:40










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for your help.
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 4:44











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062354%2fthe-solutions-to-some-diophantine-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.



Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.



As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    @sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:40










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for your help.
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 4:44
















0












$begingroup$

Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.



Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.



As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    @sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:40










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for your help.
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 4:44














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.



Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.



As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.



Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.



As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 5 at 3:07









ItsJustTranscendenceBroItsJustTranscendenceBro

1712




1712












  • $begingroup$
    But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    @sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:40










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for your help.
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 4:44


















  • $begingroup$
    But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 3:15










  • $begingroup$
    @sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:37










  • $begingroup$
    @sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
    $endgroup$
    – ItsJustTranscendenceBro
    Jan 5 at 3:40










  • $begingroup$
    Okay, thank you for your help.
    $endgroup$
    – sai
    Jan 5 at 4:44
















$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15




$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15












$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37




$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37












$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40




$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40












$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44




$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062354%2fthe-solutions-to-some-diophantine-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Ellipse (mathématiques)

Mont Emei

Quarter-circle Tiles