The solutions to some Diophantine equations
$begingroup$
I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.
reference-request
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.
reference-request
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.
reference-request
$endgroup$
I have proved these two theorems (are they correct?) but I think most probably they have occurred somewhere else already. Would you please help me find references. Thank you.
reference-request
reference-request
asked Jan 5 at 2:46
saisai
1376
1376
$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55
$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55
$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.
Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.
As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062354%2fthe-solutions-to-some-diophantine-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.
Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.
As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.
Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.
As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.
Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.
As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.
$endgroup$
Your first theorem is just some subcases of Pell's Equation, so it is possible that this characterization has been done before. You should definitely search the literature further.
Your second theorem deals with a Diophantine equation that can be reduced to an instance of Pell's Equation. Thus I would expect that you might be able to use first theorem to prove the second almost immediately.
As far as verifying your proofs, we can't do that unless you show us your work! But I suspect that what you have done is probably right anyway.
answered Jan 5 at 3:07
ItsJustTranscendenceBroItsJustTranscendenceBro
1712
1712
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
But my first theorem deals also with $m<0$?
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 3:15
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai Ah, I assumed you were only caring about the positive $m$'s. Then a more complete solution is found here on page 92, remark 2.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:37
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
@sai So far, none of the references I have looked at since your comment deal with your cases this succinctly, but I think it is fair to say that these are generally known though specification from other theorems or general solution techniques.
$endgroup$
– ItsJustTranscendenceBro
Jan 5 at 3:40
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
$begingroup$
Okay, thank you for your help.
$endgroup$
– sai
Jan 5 at 4:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062354%2fthe-solutions-to-some-diophantine-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
um, this is usually called stereographic projection. You take a fixed solution, $(1,0)$ take coprime integers $(u,v),$ write $(x,y) = (1+tu,tv)$ and solve for the nonzero value of $t$ that causes $(x,y)$ to solve your equation
$endgroup$
– Will Jagy
Jan 5 at 2:55