if H is f.g, $Qlhd_f H$ and $phi in operatorname{Aut}(H)$ then $bigcaplimits_{i in mathbb Z} phi^i(Q) lhd_f...











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I need to prove that if H is finitely generated, $Qlhd_f H$ (normal of finite index) and $phi in operatorname{Aut}(H)$ then $cap_{i in mathbb Z} phi^i(Q) lhd_f H$.



Given that H is f.g and Q is of finite index, I do know that Q is f.g and thus all $phi^i(Q)$ are f.g . That does not mean however that their intersection is f.g. Other than that I have no clue on how to even approach such a problem and how does H being f.g have anything to do with the intersection being of finite index.



Other than a solution, I would also appreciate any reference to any book which is concerned with these type of topics (the general topic I am trying to study is residual finiteness where these type of questions seem to come up as 'obvious remarks').










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I need to prove that if H is finitely generated, $Qlhd_f H$ (normal of finite index) and $phi in operatorname{Aut}(H)$ then $cap_{i in mathbb Z} phi^i(Q) lhd_f H$.



    Given that H is f.g and Q is of finite index, I do know that Q is f.g and thus all $phi^i(Q)$ are f.g . That does not mean however that their intersection is f.g. Other than that I have no clue on how to even approach such a problem and how does H being f.g have anything to do with the intersection being of finite index.



    Other than a solution, I would also appreciate any reference to any book which is concerned with these type of topics (the general topic I am trying to study is residual finiteness where these type of questions seem to come up as 'obvious remarks').










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I need to prove that if H is finitely generated, $Qlhd_f H$ (normal of finite index) and $phi in operatorname{Aut}(H)$ then $cap_{i in mathbb Z} phi^i(Q) lhd_f H$.



      Given that H is f.g and Q is of finite index, I do know that Q is f.g and thus all $phi^i(Q)$ are f.g . That does not mean however that their intersection is f.g. Other than that I have no clue on how to even approach such a problem and how does H being f.g have anything to do with the intersection being of finite index.



      Other than a solution, I would also appreciate any reference to any book which is concerned with these type of topics (the general topic I am trying to study is residual finiteness where these type of questions seem to come up as 'obvious remarks').










      share|cite|improve this question















      I need to prove that if H is finitely generated, $Qlhd_f H$ (normal of finite index) and $phi in operatorname{Aut}(H)$ then $cap_{i in mathbb Z} phi^i(Q) lhd_f H$.



      Given that H is f.g and Q is of finite index, I do know that Q is f.g and thus all $phi^i(Q)$ are f.g . That does not mean however that their intersection is f.g. Other than that I have no clue on how to even approach such a problem and how does H being f.g have anything to do with the intersection being of finite index.



      Other than a solution, I would also appreciate any reference to any book which is concerned with these type of topics (the general topic I am trying to study is residual finiteness where these type of questions seem to come up as 'obvious remarks').







      group-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 at 23:24









      DonAntonio

      176k1491224




      176k1491224










      asked Nov 16 at 22:49









      Foivos

      42629




      42629






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Here is a sketch solution. There is no need to assume that $Q$ is normal in $H$. If $|H:Q|=r$, then there is a homomorphism $phi:H to S_r$ with $phi(H)$ equal to the stabilizer of the first point.



          Since $H$ is finitely generated, there are only finitely many such homomorphisms, so there are finitely many subgroups of $H$ with index $r$. So the intersection of all of them has finite index in $H$ and, in particular the intersection of $phi(Q)$ for all $phi in {rm Aut}(H)$ has finite index in $H$.



          This can be false when $H$ is not finitely generated. For example, if $H$ is a direct prodcut of infinitely many copies of $C_2$, then the intersection of all subgroups of index $2$ is trivial, and all these subgroups can all be mapped to each other by automorphisms of $H$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001728%2fif-h-is-f-g-q-lhd-f-h-and-phi-in-operatornameauth-then-bigcap-limi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            Here is a sketch solution. There is no need to assume that $Q$ is normal in $H$. If $|H:Q|=r$, then there is a homomorphism $phi:H to S_r$ with $phi(H)$ equal to the stabilizer of the first point.



            Since $H$ is finitely generated, there are only finitely many such homomorphisms, so there are finitely many subgroups of $H$ with index $r$. So the intersection of all of them has finite index in $H$ and, in particular the intersection of $phi(Q)$ for all $phi in {rm Aut}(H)$ has finite index in $H$.



            This can be false when $H$ is not finitely generated. For example, if $H$ is a direct prodcut of infinitely many copies of $C_2$, then the intersection of all subgroups of index $2$ is trivial, and all these subgroups can all be mapped to each other by automorphisms of $H$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Here is a sketch solution. There is no need to assume that $Q$ is normal in $H$. If $|H:Q|=r$, then there is a homomorphism $phi:H to S_r$ with $phi(H)$ equal to the stabilizer of the first point.



              Since $H$ is finitely generated, there are only finitely many such homomorphisms, so there are finitely many subgroups of $H$ with index $r$. So the intersection of all of them has finite index in $H$ and, in particular the intersection of $phi(Q)$ for all $phi in {rm Aut}(H)$ has finite index in $H$.



              This can be false when $H$ is not finitely generated. For example, if $H$ is a direct prodcut of infinitely many copies of $C_2$, then the intersection of all subgroups of index $2$ is trivial, and all these subgroups can all be mapped to each other by automorphisms of $H$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                Here is a sketch solution. There is no need to assume that $Q$ is normal in $H$. If $|H:Q|=r$, then there is a homomorphism $phi:H to S_r$ with $phi(H)$ equal to the stabilizer of the first point.



                Since $H$ is finitely generated, there are only finitely many such homomorphisms, so there are finitely many subgroups of $H$ with index $r$. So the intersection of all of them has finite index in $H$ and, in particular the intersection of $phi(Q)$ for all $phi in {rm Aut}(H)$ has finite index in $H$.



                This can be false when $H$ is not finitely generated. For example, if $H$ is a direct prodcut of infinitely many copies of $C_2$, then the intersection of all subgroups of index $2$ is trivial, and all these subgroups can all be mapped to each other by automorphisms of $H$.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Here is a sketch solution. There is no need to assume that $Q$ is normal in $H$. If $|H:Q|=r$, then there is a homomorphism $phi:H to S_r$ with $phi(H)$ equal to the stabilizer of the first point.



                Since $H$ is finitely generated, there are only finitely many such homomorphisms, so there are finitely many subgroups of $H$ with index $r$. So the intersection of all of them has finite index in $H$ and, in particular the intersection of $phi(Q)$ for all $phi in {rm Aut}(H)$ has finite index in $H$.



                This can be false when $H$ is not finitely generated. For example, if $H$ is a direct prodcut of infinitely many copies of $C_2$, then the intersection of all subgroups of index $2$ is trivial, and all these subgroups can all be mapped to each other by automorphisms of $H$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 17 at 8:53









                Derek Holt

                51.7k53466




                51.7k53466






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001728%2fif-h-is-f-g-q-lhd-f-h-and-phi-in-operatornameauth-then-bigcap-limi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei