Properties of analytic functions











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I read some chapters of Penrose book "Road to Reality".
It seems that analytic functions are one of the more important concepts of the book.



They are listed many properties:



1) Analytic functions are of class $C^omega$. Why symbol $omega$ ?



2) Analytic functions are more smooth than $C^infty$ functions. What does it mean ? Only that there are $C^infty$ functions not analytic ? Or there is a more deep meaning ?



3) An analytic function is really a single function, we can't construct an analytic function gluing together different pieces. I don't understand this one. Where can I find the theorems ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Re the last question: the Identity Theorem is probably the theorem you want.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 17 at 0:12















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I read some chapters of Penrose book "Road to Reality".
It seems that analytic functions are one of the more important concepts of the book.



They are listed many properties:



1) Analytic functions are of class $C^omega$. Why symbol $omega$ ?



2) Analytic functions are more smooth than $C^infty$ functions. What does it mean ? Only that there are $C^infty$ functions not analytic ? Or there is a more deep meaning ?



3) An analytic function is really a single function, we can't construct an analytic function gluing together different pieces. I don't understand this one. Where can I find the theorems ?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Re the last question: the Identity Theorem is probably the theorem you want.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 17 at 0:12













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I read some chapters of Penrose book "Road to Reality".
It seems that analytic functions are one of the more important concepts of the book.



They are listed many properties:



1) Analytic functions are of class $C^omega$. Why symbol $omega$ ?



2) Analytic functions are more smooth than $C^infty$ functions. What does it mean ? Only that there are $C^infty$ functions not analytic ? Or there is a more deep meaning ?



3) An analytic function is really a single function, we can't construct an analytic function gluing together different pieces. I don't understand this one. Where can I find the theorems ?










share|cite|improve this question













I read some chapters of Penrose book "Road to Reality".
It seems that analytic functions are one of the more important concepts of the book.



They are listed many properties:



1) Analytic functions are of class $C^omega$. Why symbol $omega$ ?



2) Analytic functions are more smooth than $C^infty$ functions. What does it mean ? Only that there are $C^infty$ functions not analytic ? Or there is a more deep meaning ?



3) An analytic function is really a single function, we can't construct an analytic function gluing together different pieces. I don't understand this one. Where can I find the theorems ?







analytic-functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 17 at 0:07









Valerio

484414




484414












  • Re the last question: the Identity Theorem is probably the theorem you want.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 17 at 0:12


















  • Re the last question: the Identity Theorem is probably the theorem you want.
    – Patrick Stevens
    Nov 17 at 0:12
















Re the last question: the Identity Theorem is probably the theorem you want.
– Patrick Stevens
Nov 17 at 0:12




Re the last question: the Identity Theorem is probably the theorem you want.
– Patrick Stevens
Nov 17 at 0:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













1) $omega$ is the ordinal number that is the order type of the natural numbers. I'm not sure if there's a particularly good reason for using it, other than that it's a convenient "infinity" symbol that isn't $infty$ (which is already taken)



2) Mostly just that all analytic functions are $C^infty$, but not all $C^infty$ functions are analytic. There's nothing overly interesting going on there.



3) Probably the Identity Theorem is what you're after here: broadly, if you know what an analytic function does "somewhere" (for a suitable definition of "somewhere"), then you know what it looks like everywhere else. In particular, you can't take two analytic functions on different domains and "join them up" to get an analytic function on all of $mathbb{C}$, except for at most one choice of the second function (in contrast to smooth functions, for which you can always do this if there's a gap between the domains, regardless of what the functions are).






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001806%2fproperties-of-analytic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    1) $omega$ is the ordinal number that is the order type of the natural numbers. I'm not sure if there's a particularly good reason for using it, other than that it's a convenient "infinity" symbol that isn't $infty$ (which is already taken)



    2) Mostly just that all analytic functions are $C^infty$, but not all $C^infty$ functions are analytic. There's nothing overly interesting going on there.



    3) Probably the Identity Theorem is what you're after here: broadly, if you know what an analytic function does "somewhere" (for a suitable definition of "somewhere"), then you know what it looks like everywhere else. In particular, you can't take two analytic functions on different domains and "join them up" to get an analytic function on all of $mathbb{C}$, except for at most one choice of the second function (in contrast to smooth functions, for which you can always do this if there's a gap between the domains, regardless of what the functions are).






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      1) $omega$ is the ordinal number that is the order type of the natural numbers. I'm not sure if there's a particularly good reason for using it, other than that it's a convenient "infinity" symbol that isn't $infty$ (which is already taken)



      2) Mostly just that all analytic functions are $C^infty$, but not all $C^infty$ functions are analytic. There's nothing overly interesting going on there.



      3) Probably the Identity Theorem is what you're after here: broadly, if you know what an analytic function does "somewhere" (for a suitable definition of "somewhere"), then you know what it looks like everywhere else. In particular, you can't take two analytic functions on different domains and "join them up" to get an analytic function on all of $mathbb{C}$, except for at most one choice of the second function (in contrast to smooth functions, for which you can always do this if there's a gap between the domains, regardless of what the functions are).






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        1) $omega$ is the ordinal number that is the order type of the natural numbers. I'm not sure if there's a particularly good reason for using it, other than that it's a convenient "infinity" symbol that isn't $infty$ (which is already taken)



        2) Mostly just that all analytic functions are $C^infty$, but not all $C^infty$ functions are analytic. There's nothing overly interesting going on there.



        3) Probably the Identity Theorem is what you're after here: broadly, if you know what an analytic function does "somewhere" (for a suitable definition of "somewhere"), then you know what it looks like everywhere else. In particular, you can't take two analytic functions on different domains and "join them up" to get an analytic function on all of $mathbb{C}$, except for at most one choice of the second function (in contrast to smooth functions, for which you can always do this if there's a gap between the domains, regardless of what the functions are).






        share|cite|improve this answer












        1) $omega$ is the ordinal number that is the order type of the natural numbers. I'm not sure if there's a particularly good reason for using it, other than that it's a convenient "infinity" symbol that isn't $infty$ (which is already taken)



        2) Mostly just that all analytic functions are $C^infty$, but not all $C^infty$ functions are analytic. There's nothing overly interesting going on there.



        3) Probably the Identity Theorem is what you're after here: broadly, if you know what an analytic function does "somewhere" (for a suitable definition of "somewhere"), then you know what it looks like everywhere else. In particular, you can't take two analytic functions on different domains and "join them up" to get an analytic function on all of $mathbb{C}$, except for at most one choice of the second function (in contrast to smooth functions, for which you can always do this if there's a gap between the domains, regardless of what the functions are).







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 17 at 0:16









        user3482749

        1,447411




        1,447411






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001806%2fproperties-of-analytic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei