Is this a valid way to prove that $x > 4$ $Rightarrow$ $x^2 > 9$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












$x > 4$



$rightarrow$ $x - 1 > 3$



$rightarrow$ $(x - 1)^2 > 9$
and obviously if $(x - 1)^2 > 9$ then $x^2 > 9$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/568780/…
    – NoChance
    Nov 18 at 4:50










  • It's not true that $(x-1)^{2}>9$ implies that $x^{2}>9$. For example, if $x=-2.5$, then $(x-1)^{2}>9$ but $x^{2}<9$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Nov 18 at 4:52










  • @BrianBorchers $x>4$ from the start.
    – Rócherz
    Nov 18 at 4:53






  • 1




    I guess somewhere you need to use that $x>0$ in an essential way.
    – Andres Mejia
    Nov 18 at 4:53















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












$x > 4$



$rightarrow$ $x - 1 > 3$



$rightarrow$ $(x - 1)^2 > 9$
and obviously if $(x - 1)^2 > 9$ then $x^2 > 9$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/568780/…
    – NoChance
    Nov 18 at 4:50










  • It's not true that $(x-1)^{2}>9$ implies that $x^{2}>9$. For example, if $x=-2.5$, then $(x-1)^{2}>9$ but $x^{2}<9$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Nov 18 at 4:52










  • @BrianBorchers $x>4$ from the start.
    – Rócherz
    Nov 18 at 4:53






  • 1




    I guess somewhere you need to use that $x>0$ in an essential way.
    – Andres Mejia
    Nov 18 at 4:53













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











$x > 4$



$rightarrow$ $x - 1 > 3$



$rightarrow$ $(x - 1)^2 > 9$
and obviously if $(x - 1)^2 > 9$ then $x^2 > 9$










share|cite|improve this question















$x > 4$



$rightarrow$ $x - 1 > 3$



$rightarrow$ $(x - 1)^2 > 9$
and obviously if $(x - 1)^2 > 9$ then $x^2 > 9$







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 18 at 4:51









gt6989b

32.1k22351




32.1k22351










asked Nov 18 at 4:43









ming

374




374












  • See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/568780/…
    – NoChance
    Nov 18 at 4:50










  • It's not true that $(x-1)^{2}>9$ implies that $x^{2}>9$. For example, if $x=-2.5$, then $(x-1)^{2}>9$ but $x^{2}<9$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Nov 18 at 4:52










  • @BrianBorchers $x>4$ from the start.
    – Rócherz
    Nov 18 at 4:53






  • 1




    I guess somewhere you need to use that $x>0$ in an essential way.
    – Andres Mejia
    Nov 18 at 4:53


















  • See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/568780/…
    – NoChance
    Nov 18 at 4:50










  • It's not true that $(x-1)^{2}>9$ implies that $x^{2}>9$. For example, if $x=-2.5$, then $(x-1)^{2}>9$ but $x^{2}<9$.
    – Brian Borchers
    Nov 18 at 4:52










  • @BrianBorchers $x>4$ from the start.
    – Rócherz
    Nov 18 at 4:53






  • 1




    I guess somewhere you need to use that $x>0$ in an essential way.
    – Andres Mejia
    Nov 18 at 4:53
















See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/568780/…
– NoChance
Nov 18 at 4:50




See: math.stackexchange.com/questions/568780/…
– NoChance
Nov 18 at 4:50












It's not true that $(x-1)^{2}>9$ implies that $x^{2}>9$. For example, if $x=-2.5$, then $(x-1)^{2}>9$ but $x^{2}<9$.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 18 at 4:52




It's not true that $(x-1)^{2}>9$ implies that $x^{2}>9$. For example, if $x=-2.5$, then $(x-1)^{2}>9$ but $x^{2}<9$.
– Brian Borchers
Nov 18 at 4:52












@BrianBorchers $x>4$ from the start.
– Rócherz
Nov 18 at 4:53




@BrianBorchers $x>4$ from the start.
– Rócherz
Nov 18 at 4:53




1




1




I guess somewhere you need to use that $x>0$ in an essential way.
– Andres Mejia
Nov 18 at 4:53




I guess somewhere you need to use that $x>0$ in an essential way.
– Andres Mejia
Nov 18 at 4:53










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













Why don't you use
$$x>4implies x^2>16>9$$



Note: How did we arrive at the second step from the first one?






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
    – ming
    Nov 18 at 5:30










  • @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
    – tatan
    Nov 18 at 15:50


















up vote
0
down vote













There are two underlying facts in what you label as "obvious" in your last step.



$x-1>3 implies x-1>0$.



$x>x-1$ (this one is universal) and $x-1>0 implies x^2>(x-1)^2$.



But of course the fastest way is as Andrés Mejía and tatan suggested.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003142%2fis-this-a-valid-way-to-prove-that-x-4-rightarrow-x2-9%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Why don't you use
    $$x>4implies x^2>16>9$$



    Note: How did we arrive at the second step from the first one?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
      – ming
      Nov 18 at 5:30










    • @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
      – tatan
      Nov 18 at 15:50















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Why don't you use
    $$x>4implies x^2>16>9$$



    Note: How did we arrive at the second step from the first one?






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
      – ming
      Nov 18 at 5:30










    • @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
      – tatan
      Nov 18 at 15:50













    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    Why don't you use
    $$x>4implies x^2>16>9$$



    Note: How did we arrive at the second step from the first one?






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Why don't you use
    $$x>4implies x^2>16>9$$



    Note: How did we arrive at the second step from the first one?







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 18 at 4:47









    tatan

    5,52462555




    5,52462555












    • Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
      – ming
      Nov 18 at 5:30










    • @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
      – tatan
      Nov 18 at 15:50


















    • Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
      – ming
      Nov 18 at 5:30










    • @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
      – tatan
      Nov 18 at 15:50
















    Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
    – ming
    Nov 18 at 5:30




    Oh that's probably better haha. But does mine make sense at least? Like if I used it on an exam would I get full marks?
    – ming
    Nov 18 at 5:30












    @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
    – tatan
    Nov 18 at 15:50




    @ming Your argument is also correct however to be on the safe side in an exam, you should write that "...since,we know, $x^2$ is an increasing function, hence the result follows...". You should explicitly mention that $x^2$ is an increasing function.
    – tatan
    Nov 18 at 15:50










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    There are two underlying facts in what you label as "obvious" in your last step.



    $x-1>3 implies x-1>0$.



    $x>x-1$ (this one is universal) and $x-1>0 implies x^2>(x-1)^2$.



    But of course the fastest way is as Andrés Mejía and tatan suggested.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      There are two underlying facts in what you label as "obvious" in your last step.



      $x-1>3 implies x-1>0$.



      $x>x-1$ (this one is universal) and $x-1>0 implies x^2>(x-1)^2$.



      But of course the fastest way is as Andrés Mejía and tatan suggested.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        There are two underlying facts in what you label as "obvious" in your last step.



        $x-1>3 implies x-1>0$.



        $x>x-1$ (this one is universal) and $x-1>0 implies x^2>(x-1)^2$.



        But of course the fastest way is as Andrés Mejía and tatan suggested.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        There are two underlying facts in what you label as "obvious" in your last step.



        $x-1>3 implies x-1>0$.



        $x>x-1$ (this one is universal) and $x-1>0 implies x^2>(x-1)^2$.



        But of course the fastest way is as Andrés Mejía and tatan suggested.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 18 at 5:10

























        answered Nov 18 at 4:59









        Rócherz

        2,6162720




        2,6162720






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003142%2fis-this-a-valid-way-to-prove-that-x-4-rightarrow-x2-9%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei