Upgrade from Server 16 to 18.04 LTS breaks Samba shares from XP machines
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have had Samba working for years with Server version 16. This morning, I upgraded to 18.04 LTS, and Windows XP now gets
System error 1326 has occurred.
Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
I have always had Samba configured to us pam to sync with system passwords. I also ran smbpasswd manually, but it did not help.
Active lines of smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = RHFACTOR
dns proxy = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
syslog = 0
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
server role = standalone server
passdb backend = tdbsam
obey pam restrictions = yes
unix password sync = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Entersnews*spassword:* %nn *Retypesnews*spassword:*%nn *passwordsupdatedssuccessfully* .
pam password change = yes
map to guest = bad user
usershare max shares = 10
usershare allow guests = no
[share0]
comment = share0 zero
path = /winbackup/zero
browsable = yes
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0755
(Three more shares identical to above, except for share name and directory.
I reviewed the Samba and AppArmor sections of the 18.04 manual. I tried disabling AppArmor and restarting Samba, but it made no difference.
upgrade 18.04 samba windows-xp
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have had Samba working for years with Server version 16. This morning, I upgraded to 18.04 LTS, and Windows XP now gets
System error 1326 has occurred.
Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
I have always had Samba configured to us pam to sync with system passwords. I also ran smbpasswd manually, but it did not help.
Active lines of smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = RHFACTOR
dns proxy = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
syslog = 0
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
server role = standalone server
passdb backend = tdbsam
obey pam restrictions = yes
unix password sync = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Entersnews*spassword:* %nn *Retypesnews*spassword:*%nn *passwordsupdatedssuccessfully* .
pam password change = yes
map to guest = bad user
usershare max shares = 10
usershare allow guests = no
[share0]
comment = share0 zero
path = /winbackup/zero
browsable = yes
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0755
(Three more shares identical to above, except for share name and directory.
I reviewed the Samba and AppArmor sections of the 18.04 manual. I tried disabling AppArmor and restarting Samba, but it made no difference.
upgrade 18.04 samba windows-xp
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
Are you sure the samba on XP is compatible with the versions 18.04 uses?
– Rinzwind
Aug 16 at 21:20
Check the manual. Less secure version of Samba may be disabled by default in the newer release. It can probably be re-enabled.
– Ken Sharp
Aug 17 at 1:28
Moribus1 nailed it with the lanman auth and ntlm auth parameters. Ken Sharp, there is no mention of more or less secure versions in the Ubutu manual's Samba chapter. The Samba manual I could find was mighty ugly, and I had no idea about security levels at the time
– Sawdust and Noise
Aug 17 at 23:37
If you are so inclined please mark my answer below as "accepted": askubuntu.com/help/someone-answers We win prizes based on the number of correct answers. At least I think we do - maybe not.
– Morbius1
Aug 18 at 13:04
@Morbius1 I got a mail from the head honcho of Stack and a ton of swag (heck I was allowed to pick it myself) when I won the 100k rep race ;-) +1 on the answer from me.
– Rinzwind
Aug 27 at 9:49
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have had Samba working for years with Server version 16. This morning, I upgraded to 18.04 LTS, and Windows XP now gets
System error 1326 has occurred.
Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
I have always had Samba configured to us pam to sync with system passwords. I also ran smbpasswd manually, but it did not help.
Active lines of smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = RHFACTOR
dns proxy = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
syslog = 0
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
server role = standalone server
passdb backend = tdbsam
obey pam restrictions = yes
unix password sync = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Entersnews*spassword:* %nn *Retypesnews*spassword:*%nn *passwordsupdatedssuccessfully* .
pam password change = yes
map to guest = bad user
usershare max shares = 10
usershare allow guests = no
[share0]
comment = share0 zero
path = /winbackup/zero
browsable = yes
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0755
(Three more shares identical to above, except for share name and directory.
I reviewed the Samba and AppArmor sections of the 18.04 manual. I tried disabling AppArmor and restarting Samba, but it made no difference.
upgrade 18.04 samba windows-xp
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
I have had Samba working for years with Server version 16. This morning, I upgraded to 18.04 LTS, and Windows XP now gets
System error 1326 has occurred.
Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password.
I have always had Samba configured to us pam to sync with system passwords. I also ran smbpasswd manually, but it did not help.
Active lines of smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = RHFACTOR
dns proxy = no
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 1000
syslog = 0
panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d
server role = standalone server
passdb backend = tdbsam
obey pam restrictions = yes
unix password sync = yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
passwd chat = *Entersnews*spassword:* %nn *Retypesnews*spassword:*%nn *passwordsupdatedssuccessfully* .
pam password change = yes
map to guest = bad user
usershare max shares = 10
usershare allow guests = no
[share0]
comment = share0 zero
path = /winbackup/zero
browsable = yes
guest ok = no
read only = no
create mask = 0755
(Three more shares identical to above, except for share name and directory.
I reviewed the Samba and AppArmor sections of the 18.04 manual. I tried disabling AppArmor and restarting Samba, but it made no difference.
upgrade 18.04 samba windows-xp
upgrade 18.04 samba windows-xp
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
edited Aug 17 at 1:26
Organic Marble
10.4k63257
10.4k63257
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
asked Aug 16 at 21:11
Sawdust and Noise
32
32
Are you sure the samba on XP is compatible with the versions 18.04 uses?
– Rinzwind
Aug 16 at 21:20
Check the manual. Less secure version of Samba may be disabled by default in the newer release. It can probably be re-enabled.
– Ken Sharp
Aug 17 at 1:28
Moribus1 nailed it with the lanman auth and ntlm auth parameters. Ken Sharp, there is no mention of more or less secure versions in the Ubutu manual's Samba chapter. The Samba manual I could find was mighty ugly, and I had no idea about security levels at the time
– Sawdust and Noise
Aug 17 at 23:37
If you are so inclined please mark my answer below as "accepted": askubuntu.com/help/someone-answers We win prizes based on the number of correct answers. At least I think we do - maybe not.
– Morbius1
Aug 18 at 13:04
@Morbius1 I got a mail from the head honcho of Stack and a ton of swag (heck I was allowed to pick it myself) when I won the 100k rep race ;-) +1 on the answer from me.
– Rinzwind
Aug 27 at 9:49
add a comment |
Are you sure the samba on XP is compatible with the versions 18.04 uses?
– Rinzwind
Aug 16 at 21:20
Check the manual. Less secure version of Samba may be disabled by default in the newer release. It can probably be re-enabled.
– Ken Sharp
Aug 17 at 1:28
Moribus1 nailed it with the lanman auth and ntlm auth parameters. Ken Sharp, there is no mention of more or less secure versions in the Ubutu manual's Samba chapter. The Samba manual I could find was mighty ugly, and I had no idea about security levels at the time
– Sawdust and Noise
Aug 17 at 23:37
If you are so inclined please mark my answer below as "accepted": askubuntu.com/help/someone-answers We win prizes based on the number of correct answers. At least I think we do - maybe not.
– Morbius1
Aug 18 at 13:04
@Morbius1 I got a mail from the head honcho of Stack and a ton of swag (heck I was allowed to pick it myself) when I won the 100k rep race ;-) +1 on the answer from me.
– Rinzwind
Aug 27 at 9:49
Are you sure the samba on XP is compatible with the versions 18.04 uses?
– Rinzwind
Aug 16 at 21:20
Are you sure the samba on XP is compatible with the versions 18.04 uses?
– Rinzwind
Aug 16 at 21:20
Check the manual. Less secure version of Samba may be disabled by default in the newer release. It can probably be re-enabled.
– Ken Sharp
Aug 17 at 1:28
Check the manual. Less secure version of Samba may be disabled by default in the newer release. It can probably be re-enabled.
– Ken Sharp
Aug 17 at 1:28
Moribus1 nailed it with the lanman auth and ntlm auth parameters. Ken Sharp, there is no mention of more or less secure versions in the Ubutu manual's Samba chapter. The Samba manual I could find was mighty ugly, and I had no idea about security levels at the time
– Sawdust and Noise
Aug 17 at 23:37
Moribus1 nailed it with the lanman auth and ntlm auth parameters. Ken Sharp, there is no mention of more or less secure versions in the Ubutu manual's Samba chapter. The Samba manual I could find was mighty ugly, and I had no idea about security levels at the time
– Sawdust and Noise
Aug 17 at 23:37
If you are so inclined please mark my answer below as "accepted": askubuntu.com/help/someone-answers We win prizes based on the number of correct answers. At least I think we do - maybe not.
– Morbius1
Aug 18 at 13:04
If you are so inclined please mark my answer below as "accepted": askubuntu.com/help/someone-answers We win prizes based on the number of correct answers. At least I think we do - maybe not.
– Morbius1
Aug 18 at 13:04
@Morbius1 I got a mail from the head honcho of Stack and a ton of swag (heck I was allowed to pick it myself) when I won the 100k rep race ;-) +1 on the answer from me.
– Rinzwind
Aug 27 at 9:49
@Morbius1 I got a mail from the head honcho of Stack and a ton of swag (heck I was allowed to pick it myself) when I won the 100k rep race ;-) +1 on the answer from me.
– Rinzwind
Aug 27 at 9:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Samba is doing its best to keep up with the Win10s and macOSs of the world so it has moved on.
Add these lines in the [global] section of smb.conf:
lanman auth = yes
ntlm auth = yes
Then restart smbd:
sudo service smbd restart
Note: I remember coming across a situation where you actually had to degrade the max server smb dialect used in addition to the lines above:
server max protocol = NT1
That would be a travesty. I don't know how a Win10 machine would ever be able to connect to it.
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Samba is doing its best to keep up with the Win10s and macOSs of the world so it has moved on.
Add these lines in the [global] section of smb.conf:
lanman auth = yes
ntlm auth = yes
Then restart smbd:
sudo service smbd restart
Note: I remember coming across a situation where you actually had to degrade the max server smb dialect used in addition to the lines above:
server max protocol = NT1
That would be a travesty. I don't know how a Win10 machine would ever be able to connect to it.
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Samba is doing its best to keep up with the Win10s and macOSs of the world so it has moved on.
Add these lines in the [global] section of smb.conf:
lanman auth = yes
ntlm auth = yes
Then restart smbd:
sudo service smbd restart
Note: I remember coming across a situation where you actually had to degrade the max server smb dialect used in addition to the lines above:
server max protocol = NT1
That would be a travesty. I don't know how a Win10 machine would ever be able to connect to it.
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Samba is doing its best to keep up with the Win10s and macOSs of the world so it has moved on.
Add these lines in the [global] section of smb.conf:
lanman auth = yes
ntlm auth = yes
Then restart smbd:
sudo service smbd restart
Note: I remember coming across a situation where you actually had to degrade the max server smb dialect used in addition to the lines above:
server max protocol = NT1
That would be a travesty. I don't know how a Win10 machine would ever be able to connect to it.
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
Samba is doing its best to keep up with the Win10s and macOSs of the world so it has moved on.
Add these lines in the [global] section of smb.conf:
lanman auth = yes
ntlm auth = yes
Then restart smbd:
sudo service smbd restart
Note: I remember coming across a situation where you actually had to degrade the max server smb dialect used in addition to the lines above:
server max protocol = NT1
That would be a travesty. I don't know how a Win10 machine would ever be able to connect to it.
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
answered Aug 16 at 21:51
Morbius1
1,216127
1,216127
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
add a comment |
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
Great. How did you know this was the way to go?
– Marc Vanhoomissen
Aug 29 at 12:08
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
DIdn't work for me. The last thing I was expecting was to have to reinstall 16.04 on my file server. Ubuntu have really taken a big step backwards with the 18.04 release. I shudder when I realise that this is the LTS release. It's bad on so many other levels.
– thomas-peter
Oct 7 at 10:49
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1066035%2fupgrade-from-server-16-to-18-04-lts-breaks-samba-shares-from-xp-machines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you sure the samba on XP is compatible with the versions 18.04 uses?
– Rinzwind
Aug 16 at 21:20
Check the manual. Less secure version of Samba may be disabled by default in the newer release. It can probably be re-enabled.
– Ken Sharp
Aug 17 at 1:28
Moribus1 nailed it with the lanman auth and ntlm auth parameters. Ken Sharp, there is no mention of more or less secure versions in the Ubutu manual's Samba chapter. The Samba manual I could find was mighty ugly, and I had no idea about security levels at the time
– Sawdust and Noise
Aug 17 at 23:37
If you are so inclined please mark my answer below as "accepted": askubuntu.com/help/someone-answers We win prizes based on the number of correct answers. At least I think we do - maybe not.
– Morbius1
Aug 18 at 13:04
@Morbius1 I got a mail from the head honcho of Stack and a ton of swag (heck I was allowed to pick it myself) when I won the 100k rep race ;-) +1 on the answer from me.
– Rinzwind
Aug 27 at 9:49