Extension of Mantel's theorem












4












$begingroup$


How would one extend the proof of Mantel's Theorem to show that if $G$ is a graph with $n$ vertices and $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - t$ edges then $G$ contains a bipartite subgraph with at least $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - 2t$ edges?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since this is intended to be an extension of Mantel's Theorem, do you assume that $G$ is triangle-free?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Uzzell
    Apr 23 '13 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, we assume G has no K3.
    $endgroup$
    – Musegirl
    Apr 23 '13 at 15:12
















4












$begingroup$


How would one extend the proof of Mantel's Theorem to show that if $G$ is a graph with $n$ vertices and $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - t$ edges then $G$ contains a bipartite subgraph with at least $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - 2t$ edges?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since this is intended to be an extension of Mantel's Theorem, do you assume that $G$ is triangle-free?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Uzzell
    Apr 23 '13 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, we assume G has no K3.
    $endgroup$
    – Musegirl
    Apr 23 '13 at 15:12














4












4








4





$begingroup$


How would one extend the proof of Mantel's Theorem to show that if $G$ is a graph with $n$ vertices and $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - t$ edges then $G$ contains a bipartite subgraph with at least $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - 2t$ edges?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




How would one extend the proof of Mantel's Theorem to show that if $G$ is a graph with $n$ vertices and $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - t$ edges then $G$ contains a bipartite subgraph with at least $lfloor n^2/4rfloor - 2t$ edges?







graph-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 23 '13 at 14:58









Kundor

5,47621338




5,47621338










asked Apr 23 '13 at 14:43









MusegirlMusegirl

241




241








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since this is intended to be an extension of Mantel's Theorem, do you assume that $G$ is triangle-free?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Uzzell
    Apr 23 '13 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, we assume G has no K3.
    $endgroup$
    – Musegirl
    Apr 23 '13 at 15:12














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Since this is intended to be an extension of Mantel's Theorem, do you assume that $G$ is triangle-free?
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Uzzell
    Apr 23 '13 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, we assume G has no K3.
    $endgroup$
    – Musegirl
    Apr 23 '13 at 15:12








1




1




$begingroup$
Since this is intended to be an extension of Mantel's Theorem, do you assume that $G$ is triangle-free?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Uzzell
Apr 23 '13 at 14:58




$begingroup$
Since this is intended to be an extension of Mantel's Theorem, do you assume that $G$ is triangle-free?
$endgroup$
– Andrew Uzzell
Apr 23 '13 at 14:58












$begingroup$
Yes, we assume G has no K3.
$endgroup$
– Musegirl
Apr 23 '13 at 15:12




$begingroup$
Yes, we assume G has no K3.
$endgroup$
– Musegirl
Apr 23 '13 at 15:12










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Here is an attempt: Consider a bipartition $(A,B)$ of the vertices of the graph $G$ such that the number of edges between the two bipartition is maximized. So then we can see that this bipartite subgraph $H$ has the property: $v in V(H)$ then $deg(v)_{H} geq frac{deg(v)_G}{2}$. So $2|E(H)|=sum_{vin V(H)}deg(v) geq sum_{vin V(G)}frac{deg(v)}{2}=frac{2|E(G)|}{2}=lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t$. so then $|E(H)|geq frac{lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t}{2}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:29





















0





+100







$begingroup$

For every vertex $x$, we can let $A_x$ be all the neighbors of $x$ and $B_x$ be all the non-neighbors of $x$. Because $G$ is triangle-free, $A_x$ is an independent set, so if we delete all the edges in $E(B_x)$, we get a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A_x, B_x cup {x})$.



It remains to choose a vertex $x$ for which $|E(B_x)|$ is small. What follows is just an elaboration on the one-line proof of Lemma 2.1 in "How to make a graph bipartite" by Erdős, Faudree, Pach, and Spencer.



We have
$$
sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)).
$$

The second sum counts for every edge $vw$ all the vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$: here we are using the fact that $G$ is triangle-free and therefore no vertex is adjacent to both. The vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$ are precisely the vertices $x$ for which $vw in E(B_x)$. Therefore the two sums count pairs $(x, vw)$ where $vw in E(B_x)$ in two different ways, so they're equal.



Expanding out the second sum, we get
$$
sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)) = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2
$$

because $deg(v)$ is subtracted once for each of the $deg(v)$ edges out of $v$. By the convexity of $x mapsto x^2$, or by Cauchy-Schwarz, the sum of squares is minimized when $deg(v) = frac{2|E(G)|}{n}$ for all $v$, and therefore
$$
sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2 le n|E(G)| - n cdot frac{4|E(G)|^2}{n^2}.
$$

If we substitute $|E(G)| = frac{n^2}{4} - t$ into this inequality and simplify, the left-hand side becomes $n(frac{n^2}{4}-t) - frac{4}{n}(frac{n^2}{4}-t)^2 = frac{n^3}{4} - nt - frac{n^3}{4} + 2nt - frac{4t^2}{n} = nt - frac{4t^2}{n}$, so we get
$$
sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le tn - frac{4t^2}{n} iff frac1n sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}
$$

and therefore there is some choice of $x$ for which $|E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$. By deleting the edges of $B_x$ from $G$, we get a bipartite subgraph containing all but at most $ t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$ edges of $G$: therefore we have at least
$$
frac{n^2}{4} - t - left(t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}right) = frac{n^2}{4} - 2t + frac{4t^2}{n^2} ge frac{n^2}{4} - 2t
$$

edges in the bipartite subgraph.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f370398%2fextension-of-mantels-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Here is an attempt: Consider a bipartition $(A,B)$ of the vertices of the graph $G$ such that the number of edges between the two bipartition is maximized. So then we can see that this bipartite subgraph $H$ has the property: $v in V(H)$ then $deg(v)_{H} geq frac{deg(v)_G}{2}$. So $2|E(H)|=sum_{vin V(H)}deg(v) geq sum_{vin V(G)}frac{deg(v)}{2}=frac{2|E(G)|}{2}=lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t$. so then $|E(H)|geq frac{lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t}{2}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
      $endgroup$
      – nafhgood
      Dec 6 '18 at 20:29


















    0












    $begingroup$

    Here is an attempt: Consider a bipartition $(A,B)$ of the vertices of the graph $G$ such that the number of edges between the two bipartition is maximized. So then we can see that this bipartite subgraph $H$ has the property: $v in V(H)$ then $deg(v)_{H} geq frac{deg(v)_G}{2}$. So $2|E(H)|=sum_{vin V(H)}deg(v) geq sum_{vin V(G)}frac{deg(v)}{2}=frac{2|E(G)|}{2}=lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t$. so then $|E(H)|geq frac{lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t}{2}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
      $endgroup$
      – nafhgood
      Dec 6 '18 at 20:29
















    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    Here is an attempt: Consider a bipartition $(A,B)$ of the vertices of the graph $G$ such that the number of edges between the two bipartition is maximized. So then we can see that this bipartite subgraph $H$ has the property: $v in V(H)$ then $deg(v)_{H} geq frac{deg(v)_G}{2}$. So $2|E(H)|=sum_{vin V(H)}deg(v) geq sum_{vin V(G)}frac{deg(v)}{2}=frac{2|E(G)|}{2}=lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t$. so then $|E(H)|geq frac{lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t}{2}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Here is an attempt: Consider a bipartition $(A,B)$ of the vertices of the graph $G$ such that the number of edges between the two bipartition is maximized. So then we can see that this bipartite subgraph $H$ has the property: $v in V(H)$ then $deg(v)_{H} geq frac{deg(v)_G}{2}$. So $2|E(H)|=sum_{vin V(H)}deg(v) geq sum_{vin V(G)}frac{deg(v)}{2}=frac{2|E(G)|}{2}=lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t$. so then $|E(H)|geq frac{lfloor frac{n^2}{4} rfloor -t}{2}$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Dec 4 '18 at 17:30









    nafhgoodnafhgood

    1,801422




    1,801422












    • $begingroup$
      can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
      $endgroup$
      – nafhgood
      Dec 6 '18 at 20:29




















    • $begingroup$
      can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
      $endgroup$
      – nafhgood
      Dec 6 '18 at 20:29


















    $begingroup$
    can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:29






    $begingroup$
    can anyone complete the proof or give a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – nafhgood
    Dec 6 '18 at 20:29













    0





    +100







    $begingroup$

    For every vertex $x$, we can let $A_x$ be all the neighbors of $x$ and $B_x$ be all the non-neighbors of $x$. Because $G$ is triangle-free, $A_x$ is an independent set, so if we delete all the edges in $E(B_x)$, we get a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A_x, B_x cup {x})$.



    It remains to choose a vertex $x$ for which $|E(B_x)|$ is small. What follows is just an elaboration on the one-line proof of Lemma 2.1 in "How to make a graph bipartite" by Erdős, Faudree, Pach, and Spencer.



    We have
    $$
    sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)).
    $$

    The second sum counts for every edge $vw$ all the vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$: here we are using the fact that $G$ is triangle-free and therefore no vertex is adjacent to both. The vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$ are precisely the vertices $x$ for which $vw in E(B_x)$. Therefore the two sums count pairs $(x, vw)$ where $vw in E(B_x)$ in two different ways, so they're equal.



    Expanding out the second sum, we get
    $$
    sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)) = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2
    $$

    because $deg(v)$ is subtracted once for each of the $deg(v)$ edges out of $v$. By the convexity of $x mapsto x^2$, or by Cauchy-Schwarz, the sum of squares is minimized when $deg(v) = frac{2|E(G)|}{n}$ for all $v$, and therefore
    $$
    sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2 le n|E(G)| - n cdot frac{4|E(G)|^2}{n^2}.
    $$

    If we substitute $|E(G)| = frac{n^2}{4} - t$ into this inequality and simplify, the left-hand side becomes $n(frac{n^2}{4}-t) - frac{4}{n}(frac{n^2}{4}-t)^2 = frac{n^3}{4} - nt - frac{n^3}{4} + 2nt - frac{4t^2}{n} = nt - frac{4t^2}{n}$, so we get
    $$
    sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le tn - frac{4t^2}{n} iff frac1n sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}
    $$

    and therefore there is some choice of $x$ for which $|E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$. By deleting the edges of $B_x$ from $G$, we get a bipartite subgraph containing all but at most $ t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$ edges of $G$: therefore we have at least
    $$
    frac{n^2}{4} - t - left(t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}right) = frac{n^2}{4} - 2t + frac{4t^2}{n^2} ge frac{n^2}{4} - 2t
    $$

    edges in the bipartite subgraph.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0





      +100







      $begingroup$

      For every vertex $x$, we can let $A_x$ be all the neighbors of $x$ and $B_x$ be all the non-neighbors of $x$. Because $G$ is triangle-free, $A_x$ is an independent set, so if we delete all the edges in $E(B_x)$, we get a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A_x, B_x cup {x})$.



      It remains to choose a vertex $x$ for which $|E(B_x)|$ is small. What follows is just an elaboration on the one-line proof of Lemma 2.1 in "How to make a graph bipartite" by Erdős, Faudree, Pach, and Spencer.



      We have
      $$
      sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)).
      $$

      The second sum counts for every edge $vw$ all the vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$: here we are using the fact that $G$ is triangle-free and therefore no vertex is adjacent to both. The vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$ are precisely the vertices $x$ for which $vw in E(B_x)$. Therefore the two sums count pairs $(x, vw)$ where $vw in E(B_x)$ in two different ways, so they're equal.



      Expanding out the second sum, we get
      $$
      sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)) = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2
      $$

      because $deg(v)$ is subtracted once for each of the $deg(v)$ edges out of $v$. By the convexity of $x mapsto x^2$, or by Cauchy-Schwarz, the sum of squares is minimized when $deg(v) = frac{2|E(G)|}{n}$ for all $v$, and therefore
      $$
      sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2 le n|E(G)| - n cdot frac{4|E(G)|^2}{n^2}.
      $$

      If we substitute $|E(G)| = frac{n^2}{4} - t$ into this inequality and simplify, the left-hand side becomes $n(frac{n^2}{4}-t) - frac{4}{n}(frac{n^2}{4}-t)^2 = frac{n^3}{4} - nt - frac{n^3}{4} + 2nt - frac{4t^2}{n} = nt - frac{4t^2}{n}$, so we get
      $$
      sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le tn - frac{4t^2}{n} iff frac1n sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}
      $$

      and therefore there is some choice of $x$ for which $|E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$. By deleting the edges of $B_x$ from $G$, we get a bipartite subgraph containing all but at most $ t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$ edges of $G$: therefore we have at least
      $$
      frac{n^2}{4} - t - left(t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}right) = frac{n^2}{4} - 2t + frac{4t^2}{n^2} ge frac{n^2}{4} - 2t
      $$

      edges in the bipartite subgraph.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0





        +100







        0





        +100



        0




        +100



        $begingroup$

        For every vertex $x$, we can let $A_x$ be all the neighbors of $x$ and $B_x$ be all the non-neighbors of $x$. Because $G$ is triangle-free, $A_x$ is an independent set, so if we delete all the edges in $E(B_x)$, we get a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A_x, B_x cup {x})$.



        It remains to choose a vertex $x$ for which $|E(B_x)|$ is small. What follows is just an elaboration on the one-line proof of Lemma 2.1 in "How to make a graph bipartite" by Erdős, Faudree, Pach, and Spencer.



        We have
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)).
        $$

        The second sum counts for every edge $vw$ all the vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$: here we are using the fact that $G$ is triangle-free and therefore no vertex is adjacent to both. The vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$ are precisely the vertices $x$ for which $vw in E(B_x)$. Therefore the two sums count pairs $(x, vw)$ where $vw in E(B_x)$ in two different ways, so they're equal.



        Expanding out the second sum, we get
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)) = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2
        $$

        because $deg(v)$ is subtracted once for each of the $deg(v)$ edges out of $v$. By the convexity of $x mapsto x^2$, or by Cauchy-Schwarz, the sum of squares is minimized when $deg(v) = frac{2|E(G)|}{n}$ for all $v$, and therefore
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2 le n|E(G)| - n cdot frac{4|E(G)|^2}{n^2}.
        $$

        If we substitute $|E(G)| = frac{n^2}{4} - t$ into this inequality and simplify, the left-hand side becomes $n(frac{n^2}{4}-t) - frac{4}{n}(frac{n^2}{4}-t)^2 = frac{n^3}{4} - nt - frac{n^3}{4} + 2nt - frac{4t^2}{n} = nt - frac{4t^2}{n}$, so we get
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le tn - frac{4t^2}{n} iff frac1n sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}
        $$

        and therefore there is some choice of $x$ for which $|E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$. By deleting the edges of $B_x$ from $G$, we get a bipartite subgraph containing all but at most $ t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$ edges of $G$: therefore we have at least
        $$
        frac{n^2}{4} - t - left(t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}right) = frac{n^2}{4} - 2t + frac{4t^2}{n^2} ge frac{n^2}{4} - 2t
        $$

        edges in the bipartite subgraph.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For every vertex $x$, we can let $A_x$ be all the neighbors of $x$ and $B_x$ be all the non-neighbors of $x$. Because $G$ is triangle-free, $A_x$ is an independent set, so if we delete all the edges in $E(B_x)$, we get a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A_x, B_x cup {x})$.



        It remains to choose a vertex $x$ for which $|E(B_x)|$ is small. What follows is just an elaboration on the one-line proof of Lemma 2.1 in "How to make a graph bipartite" by Erdős, Faudree, Pach, and Spencer.



        We have
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)).
        $$

        The second sum counts for every edge $vw$ all the vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$: here we are using the fact that $G$ is triangle-free and therefore no vertex is adjacent to both. The vertices not adjacent to $v$ or $w$ are precisely the vertices $x$ for which $vw in E(B_x)$. Therefore the two sums count pairs $(x, vw)$ where $vw in E(B_x)$ in two different ways, so they're equal.



        Expanding out the second sum, we get
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = sum_{vw in E(G)} (n - deg(v) - deg(w)) = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2
        $$

        because $deg(v)$ is subtracted once for each of the $deg(v)$ edges out of $v$. By the convexity of $x mapsto x^2$, or by Cauchy-Schwarz, the sum of squares is minimized when $deg(v) = frac{2|E(G)|}{n}$ for all $v$, and therefore
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| = n|E(G)| - sum_{v in V(G)} deg(v)^2 le n|E(G)| - n cdot frac{4|E(G)|^2}{n^2}.
        $$

        If we substitute $|E(G)| = frac{n^2}{4} - t$ into this inequality and simplify, the left-hand side becomes $n(frac{n^2}{4}-t) - frac{4}{n}(frac{n^2}{4}-t)^2 = frac{n^3}{4} - nt - frac{n^3}{4} + 2nt - frac{4t^2}{n} = nt - frac{4t^2}{n}$, so we get
        $$
        sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le tn - frac{4t^2}{n} iff frac1n sum_{x in V(G)} |E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}
        $$

        and therefore there is some choice of $x$ for which $|E(B_x)| le t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$. By deleting the edges of $B_x$ from $G$, we get a bipartite subgraph containing all but at most $ t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}$ edges of $G$: therefore we have at least
        $$
        frac{n^2}{4} - t - left(t - frac{4t^2}{n^2}right) = frac{n^2}{4} - 2t + frac{4t^2}{n^2} ge frac{n^2}{4} - 2t
        $$

        edges in the bipartite subgraph.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 9 '18 at 19:14

























        answered Dec 9 '18 at 17:17









        Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

        45.1k656107




        45.1k656107






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f370398%2fextension-of-mantels-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei