Is it correct to say that points of inflection of $f$ are local minima/maxima of $f'$?












1












$begingroup$


Let $fin C^{infty}(mathbb{R})$. A point of inflection of $f$ is a point where the function changes from concave to convex or vice-versa. Equivalently, it is a point at which $f''$ changes sign.



Is it correct to say that points of inflection of $f$ are local minima/maxima of $f'$?



Can points of inflection of $f'$ also be points of inflection of $f$? Or are these points of undulation of $f$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $fin C^{infty}(mathbb{R})$. A point of inflection of $f$ is a point where the function changes from concave to convex or vice-versa. Equivalently, it is a point at which $f''$ changes sign.



    Is it correct to say that points of inflection of $f$ are local minima/maxima of $f'$?



    Can points of inflection of $f'$ also be points of inflection of $f$? Or are these points of undulation of $f$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $fin C^{infty}(mathbb{R})$. A point of inflection of $f$ is a point where the function changes from concave to convex or vice-versa. Equivalently, it is a point at which $f''$ changes sign.



      Is it correct to say that points of inflection of $f$ are local minima/maxima of $f'$?



      Can points of inflection of $f'$ also be points of inflection of $f$? Or are these points of undulation of $f$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $fin C^{infty}(mathbb{R})$. A point of inflection of $f$ is a point where the function changes from concave to convex or vice-versa. Equivalently, it is a point at which $f''$ changes sign.



      Is it correct to say that points of inflection of $f$ are local minima/maxima of $f'$?



      Can points of inflection of $f'$ also be points of inflection of $f$? Or are these points of undulation of $f$?







      calculus






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 8 '18 at 14:03







      rbird

















      asked Dec 8 '18 at 13:26









      rbirdrbird

      1,20414




      1,20414






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I think that once you read my answer to your second question, you may begin to doubt your definition of inflection point, or at least realize that you need to make very clear the notion of "changes sign".



          For the second question, you're looking for a function $f$ where both $f''$ and $f'''$ change sign at some point $a$, which we might as well assume (by shifting coordinates) is zero. Now look at $g = f''$. That's a continuous function such that $g$ and $g'$ both change sign at zero and are continuous.



          Now we have to make sense of "change sign"; I'm going to assume that "$h$ changes sign at $0$" means that for some small interval around $0$, we have $h(x) < 0$ for $x < 0$, and $h(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$, or vice versa. An alternative notion would be "$h$ changes sign at $0$ if, for every number $c>0$, there are numbers $p$ and $q$ with $-c < p < 0 < q < c$ and $h(p) cdot h(q) < 0$." I'll discuss that second case in a moment.



          For the first definition:



          By continuity, $g(0) = 0$. By negating, if necessary, we can assume that for $0 < x < c$, for some small $c$, we have $g'(x) > 0$, and for $-c < x < 0$, we have $g'(x) < 0$. Use these facts, and the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can conclude that for $-c < x < c$, we have $f(x) ge 0$, hence $f$ does not change sign.



          For the second definition:



          Let
          $$
          h(x) = begin{cases}
          exp(frac{-1}{x^2}) & x ne 0 \
          0 & x = 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          Then $h$ is infinitely differentiable, and all derivatives of $h$ at $0$ are $0$. It's "extremely flat" at zero. It's also even (i.e., $h(-x) = h(x)$), so its derivative is odd, i.e., $h'(-x) = -h'(x)$. Let $k = h'$.



          Let's define
          $$
          k(x) = begin{cases}
          h(x) sinfrac{1}{x} & x ne 0 \
          0 & x = 0
          end{cases}
          $$

          Clearly $k$ is nice away from $0$. What about derivatives? Well,
          begin{align}
          k'(0)
          &= lim_{s to 0} frac{k(s) - k(0)}{s} \
          &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s} - 0}{s}
          &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s}
          end{align}

          Now
          $$
          frac{-h(s)}{s} le frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s} le frac{h(s)}{s}
          $$

          so by the squeeze lemma, the limit is between $-h'(0)$ and $h'(0)$, which are both $0$, so the limit exists and is zero. I believe (but have not checked!) that a similar computation shows that all other derivatives also exist at zero.



          But clearly both $k$ and its derivative oscillate wildly (but with very tiny amplitude!) near $0$, so they change sign infinitely often near zero, hence satisfy the second definition of "change sign at zero".






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            A point of inflection $a$ of $f$ may occur when $f'$ does not exist in a whole neighborhood of $a$. For example $f'$ may fail to exist on a countable dense set.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
              $endgroup$
              – rbird
              Dec 8 '18 at 13:58











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031108%2fis-it-correct-to-say-that-points-of-inflection-of-f-are-local-minima-maxima-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            I think that once you read my answer to your second question, you may begin to doubt your definition of inflection point, or at least realize that you need to make very clear the notion of "changes sign".



            For the second question, you're looking for a function $f$ where both $f''$ and $f'''$ change sign at some point $a$, which we might as well assume (by shifting coordinates) is zero. Now look at $g = f''$. That's a continuous function such that $g$ and $g'$ both change sign at zero and are continuous.



            Now we have to make sense of "change sign"; I'm going to assume that "$h$ changes sign at $0$" means that for some small interval around $0$, we have $h(x) < 0$ for $x < 0$, and $h(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$, or vice versa. An alternative notion would be "$h$ changes sign at $0$ if, for every number $c>0$, there are numbers $p$ and $q$ with $-c < p < 0 < q < c$ and $h(p) cdot h(q) < 0$." I'll discuss that second case in a moment.



            For the first definition:



            By continuity, $g(0) = 0$. By negating, if necessary, we can assume that for $0 < x < c$, for some small $c$, we have $g'(x) > 0$, and for $-c < x < 0$, we have $g'(x) < 0$. Use these facts, and the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can conclude that for $-c < x < c$, we have $f(x) ge 0$, hence $f$ does not change sign.



            For the second definition:



            Let
            $$
            h(x) = begin{cases}
            exp(frac{-1}{x^2}) & x ne 0 \
            0 & x = 0
            end{cases}
            $$

            Then $h$ is infinitely differentiable, and all derivatives of $h$ at $0$ are $0$. It's "extremely flat" at zero. It's also even (i.e., $h(-x) = h(x)$), so its derivative is odd, i.e., $h'(-x) = -h'(x)$. Let $k = h'$.



            Let's define
            $$
            k(x) = begin{cases}
            h(x) sinfrac{1}{x} & x ne 0 \
            0 & x = 0
            end{cases}
            $$

            Clearly $k$ is nice away from $0$. What about derivatives? Well,
            begin{align}
            k'(0)
            &= lim_{s to 0} frac{k(s) - k(0)}{s} \
            &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s} - 0}{s}
            &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s}
            end{align}

            Now
            $$
            frac{-h(s)}{s} le frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s} le frac{h(s)}{s}
            $$

            so by the squeeze lemma, the limit is between $-h'(0)$ and $h'(0)$, which are both $0$, so the limit exists and is zero. I believe (but have not checked!) that a similar computation shows that all other derivatives also exist at zero.



            But clearly both $k$ and its derivative oscillate wildly (but with very tiny amplitude!) near $0$, so they change sign infinitely often near zero, hence satisfy the second definition of "change sign at zero".






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              I think that once you read my answer to your second question, you may begin to doubt your definition of inflection point, or at least realize that you need to make very clear the notion of "changes sign".



              For the second question, you're looking for a function $f$ where both $f''$ and $f'''$ change sign at some point $a$, which we might as well assume (by shifting coordinates) is zero. Now look at $g = f''$. That's a continuous function such that $g$ and $g'$ both change sign at zero and are continuous.



              Now we have to make sense of "change sign"; I'm going to assume that "$h$ changes sign at $0$" means that for some small interval around $0$, we have $h(x) < 0$ for $x < 0$, and $h(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$, or vice versa. An alternative notion would be "$h$ changes sign at $0$ if, for every number $c>0$, there are numbers $p$ and $q$ with $-c < p < 0 < q < c$ and $h(p) cdot h(q) < 0$." I'll discuss that second case in a moment.



              For the first definition:



              By continuity, $g(0) = 0$. By negating, if necessary, we can assume that for $0 < x < c$, for some small $c$, we have $g'(x) > 0$, and for $-c < x < 0$, we have $g'(x) < 0$. Use these facts, and the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can conclude that for $-c < x < c$, we have $f(x) ge 0$, hence $f$ does not change sign.



              For the second definition:



              Let
              $$
              h(x) = begin{cases}
              exp(frac{-1}{x^2}) & x ne 0 \
              0 & x = 0
              end{cases}
              $$

              Then $h$ is infinitely differentiable, and all derivatives of $h$ at $0$ are $0$. It's "extremely flat" at zero. It's also even (i.e., $h(-x) = h(x)$), so its derivative is odd, i.e., $h'(-x) = -h'(x)$. Let $k = h'$.



              Let's define
              $$
              k(x) = begin{cases}
              h(x) sinfrac{1}{x} & x ne 0 \
              0 & x = 0
              end{cases}
              $$

              Clearly $k$ is nice away from $0$. What about derivatives? Well,
              begin{align}
              k'(0)
              &= lim_{s to 0} frac{k(s) - k(0)}{s} \
              &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s} - 0}{s}
              &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s}
              end{align}

              Now
              $$
              frac{-h(s)}{s} le frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s} le frac{h(s)}{s}
              $$

              so by the squeeze lemma, the limit is between $-h'(0)$ and $h'(0)$, which are both $0$, so the limit exists and is zero. I believe (but have not checked!) that a similar computation shows that all other derivatives also exist at zero.



              But clearly both $k$ and its derivative oscillate wildly (but with very tiny amplitude!) near $0$, so they change sign infinitely often near zero, hence satisfy the second definition of "change sign at zero".






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                I think that once you read my answer to your second question, you may begin to doubt your definition of inflection point, or at least realize that you need to make very clear the notion of "changes sign".



                For the second question, you're looking for a function $f$ where both $f''$ and $f'''$ change sign at some point $a$, which we might as well assume (by shifting coordinates) is zero. Now look at $g = f''$. That's a continuous function such that $g$ and $g'$ both change sign at zero and are continuous.



                Now we have to make sense of "change sign"; I'm going to assume that "$h$ changes sign at $0$" means that for some small interval around $0$, we have $h(x) < 0$ for $x < 0$, and $h(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$, or vice versa. An alternative notion would be "$h$ changes sign at $0$ if, for every number $c>0$, there are numbers $p$ and $q$ with $-c < p < 0 < q < c$ and $h(p) cdot h(q) < 0$." I'll discuss that second case in a moment.



                For the first definition:



                By continuity, $g(0) = 0$. By negating, if necessary, we can assume that for $0 < x < c$, for some small $c$, we have $g'(x) > 0$, and for $-c < x < 0$, we have $g'(x) < 0$. Use these facts, and the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can conclude that for $-c < x < c$, we have $f(x) ge 0$, hence $f$ does not change sign.



                For the second definition:



                Let
                $$
                h(x) = begin{cases}
                exp(frac{-1}{x^2}) & x ne 0 \
                0 & x = 0
                end{cases}
                $$

                Then $h$ is infinitely differentiable, and all derivatives of $h$ at $0$ are $0$. It's "extremely flat" at zero. It's also even (i.e., $h(-x) = h(x)$), so its derivative is odd, i.e., $h'(-x) = -h'(x)$. Let $k = h'$.



                Let's define
                $$
                k(x) = begin{cases}
                h(x) sinfrac{1}{x} & x ne 0 \
                0 & x = 0
                end{cases}
                $$

                Clearly $k$ is nice away from $0$. What about derivatives? Well,
                begin{align}
                k'(0)
                &= lim_{s to 0} frac{k(s) - k(0)}{s} \
                &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s} - 0}{s}
                &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s}
                end{align}

                Now
                $$
                frac{-h(s)}{s} le frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s} le frac{h(s)}{s}
                $$

                so by the squeeze lemma, the limit is between $-h'(0)$ and $h'(0)$, which are both $0$, so the limit exists and is zero. I believe (but have not checked!) that a similar computation shows that all other derivatives also exist at zero.



                But clearly both $k$ and its derivative oscillate wildly (but with very tiny amplitude!) near $0$, so they change sign infinitely often near zero, hence satisfy the second definition of "change sign at zero".






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I think that once you read my answer to your second question, you may begin to doubt your definition of inflection point, or at least realize that you need to make very clear the notion of "changes sign".



                For the second question, you're looking for a function $f$ where both $f''$ and $f'''$ change sign at some point $a$, which we might as well assume (by shifting coordinates) is zero. Now look at $g = f''$. That's a continuous function such that $g$ and $g'$ both change sign at zero and are continuous.



                Now we have to make sense of "change sign"; I'm going to assume that "$h$ changes sign at $0$" means that for some small interval around $0$, we have $h(x) < 0$ for $x < 0$, and $h(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$, or vice versa. An alternative notion would be "$h$ changes sign at $0$ if, for every number $c>0$, there are numbers $p$ and $q$ with $-c < p < 0 < q < c$ and $h(p) cdot h(q) < 0$." I'll discuss that second case in a moment.



                For the first definition:



                By continuity, $g(0) = 0$. By negating, if necessary, we can assume that for $0 < x < c$, for some small $c$, we have $g'(x) > 0$, and for $-c < x < 0$, we have $g'(x) < 0$. Use these facts, and the fundamental theorem of calculus, we can conclude that for $-c < x < c$, we have $f(x) ge 0$, hence $f$ does not change sign.



                For the second definition:



                Let
                $$
                h(x) = begin{cases}
                exp(frac{-1}{x^2}) & x ne 0 \
                0 & x = 0
                end{cases}
                $$

                Then $h$ is infinitely differentiable, and all derivatives of $h$ at $0$ are $0$. It's "extremely flat" at zero. It's also even (i.e., $h(-x) = h(x)$), so its derivative is odd, i.e., $h'(-x) = -h'(x)$. Let $k = h'$.



                Let's define
                $$
                k(x) = begin{cases}
                h(x) sinfrac{1}{x} & x ne 0 \
                0 & x = 0
                end{cases}
                $$

                Clearly $k$ is nice away from $0$. What about derivatives? Well,
                begin{align}
                k'(0)
                &= lim_{s to 0} frac{k(s) - k(0)}{s} \
                &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s} - 0}{s}
                &= lim_{s to 0} frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s}
                end{align}

                Now
                $$
                frac{-h(s)}{s} le frac{h(s) sinfrac{1}{s}}{s} le frac{h(s)}{s}
                $$

                so by the squeeze lemma, the limit is between $-h'(0)$ and $h'(0)$, which are both $0$, so the limit exists and is zero. I believe (but have not checked!) that a similar computation shows that all other derivatives also exist at zero.



                But clearly both $k$ and its derivative oscillate wildly (but with very tiny amplitude!) near $0$, so they change sign infinitely often near zero, hence satisfy the second definition of "change sign at zero".







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 8 '18 at 16:13

























                answered Dec 8 '18 at 15:54









                John HughesJohn Hughes

                63.3k24090




                63.3k24090























                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    A point of inflection $a$ of $f$ may occur when $f'$ does not exist in a whole neighborhood of $a$. For example $f'$ may fail to exist on a countable dense set.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rbird
                      Dec 8 '18 at 13:58
















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    A point of inflection $a$ of $f$ may occur when $f'$ does not exist in a whole neighborhood of $a$. For example $f'$ may fail to exist on a countable dense set.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rbird
                      Dec 8 '18 at 13:58














                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    A point of inflection $a$ of $f$ may occur when $f'$ does not exist in a whole neighborhood of $a$. For example $f'$ may fail to exist on a countable dense set.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    A point of inflection $a$ of $f$ may occur when $f'$ does not exist in a whole neighborhood of $a$. For example $f'$ may fail to exist on a countable dense set.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Dec 8 '18 at 13:56









                    GEdgarGEdgar

                    62.2k267169




                    62.2k267169












                    • $begingroup$
                      How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rbird
                      Dec 8 '18 at 13:58


















                    • $begingroup$
                      How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – rbird
                      Dec 8 '18 at 13:58
















                    $begingroup$
                    How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rbird
                    Dec 8 '18 at 13:58




                    $begingroup$
                    How about if $f$ is smooth? Is it true then?
                    $endgroup$
                    – rbird
                    Dec 8 '18 at 13:58


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031108%2fis-it-correct-to-say-that-points-of-inflection-of-f-are-local-minima-maxima-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei