Periodic function with period $T$; show that there exists a point in the interval with $f(x) = f(x + T /2).$
$begingroup$
Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$
Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.
This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?
$f(x)$ is continuous, useful.
$f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$
Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.
This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?
$f(x)$ is continuous, useful.
$f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$
Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.
This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?
$f(x)$ is continuous, useful.
$f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?
real-analysis
$endgroup$
Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$
Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.
This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?
$f(x)$ is continuous, useful.
$f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked Dec 8 '18 at 14:27
Wesley StrikWesley Strik
1,741423
1,741423
$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031167%2fperiodic-function-with-period-t-show-that-there-exists-a-point-in-the-interva%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.
$endgroup$
$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.
answered Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide
57.5k11444
57.5k11444
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031167%2fperiodic-function-with-period-t-show-that-there-exists-a-point-in-the-interva%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31
$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32