Periodic function with period $T$; show that there exists a point in the interval with $f(x) = f(x + T /2).$












0












$begingroup$



Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$




Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.



This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?





  1. $f(x)$ is continuous, useful.


  2. $f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
    My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
















0












$begingroup$



Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$




Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.



This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?





  1. $f(x)$ is continuous, useful.


  2. $f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
    My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:32














0












0








0





$begingroup$



Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$




Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.



This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?





  1. $f(x)$ is continuous, useful.


  2. $f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
    My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





Let $f$: $Rrightarrow R$ be a continuous periodic function with period $T > 0$.
Show: There is an $x in R$ such that $$f(x) = f(x + T /2).$$




Trivial case: If $f(x)$ is constant, this statement is always true, but this cannot happen as $T>0$, and for a constant function $T=0$, so we are not dealing with a constant function.



This really feels like an intermediate value theorem question, but I am very used to working with concrete functions and wouldn't immediately know how to apply this to an arbitrary function. What do I know about this function?





  1. $f(x)$ is continuous, useful.


  2. $f(x)=f(x+T)$ for every single $x$ in the domain.
    My intuition tells me it would be useful to consider the values $x=0$ and $x=T$, but to which function would I apply this?







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 8 '18 at 14:27









Wesley StrikWesley Strik

1,741423




1,741423












  • $begingroup$
    You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:32


















  • $begingroup$
    You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:31










  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:32
















$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31




$begingroup$
You don't need to exclude $T=0$, because $f(x)=f(x)$ for all $x$.
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Dec 8 '18 at 14:31












$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32




$begingroup$
Yeah I know, it might as well be $T geq 0$
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:32










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:52










  • $begingroup$
    I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:53












  • $begingroup$
    A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – sdcvvc
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:59











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031167%2fperiodic-function-with-period-t-show-that-there-exists-a-point-in-the-interva%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:52










  • $begingroup$
    I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:53












  • $begingroup$
    A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – sdcvvc
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
















4












$begingroup$

$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:52










  • $begingroup$
    I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:53












  • $begingroup$
    A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – sdcvvc
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:59














4












4








4





$begingroup$

$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$g(x)=f(x)-f(x+T/2)$, $g(0)=f(0)-f(T/2)$, $g(T/2)=f(T/2)-f(T)=f(T/2)-f(0)$ apply intermediate value to $[0,T/2]$ since $g(0)$ and $g(T/2)$ have opposite signs.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Dec 8 '18 at 14:31









Tsemo AristideTsemo Aristide

57.5k11444




57.5k11444












  • $begingroup$
    I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:52










  • $begingroup$
    I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:53












  • $begingroup$
    A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – sdcvvc
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:59


















  • $begingroup$
    I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:52










  • $begingroup$
    I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Wesley Strik
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:53












  • $begingroup$
    A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – sdcvvc
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:59
















$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52




$begingroup$
I see, this argument makes sense, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:52












$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53






$begingroup$
I can argue that for some value $c$, we have that $g(c)=0$ and Bob's your uncle, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Wesley Strik
Dec 8 '18 at 14:53














$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59




$begingroup$
A similar approach is to argue that if $f(x) neq f(x+T/2)$, then we must have $f(x) > f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$, or $f(x) < f(x+T/2)$ for all $x$. Then $f(x+T) > f(x+T/2) > f(x) = f(x+T)$, contradiction.
$endgroup$
– sdcvvc
Dec 8 '18 at 14:59


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031167%2fperiodic-function-with-period-t-show-that-there-exists-a-point-in-the-interva%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei