On the integral $mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx$












1












$begingroup$


While thinking about this recent question I thought about an attempt utilizing derivatives of the Beta Function. Sadly I realized that it does not work out for the linked integral but possible for a quite similiar one. To be precise consider the integral




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx$$




Splitting the integral up in the two intervals $[0,pi/2]$ and $[pi/2,pi]$ and applying the substitution $x=x-pi/2$ to the second one leads to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}=int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_{pi/2}^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx
end{align}$$



Using the fundamental property of the exponential and expanding the integrand as a series yields to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}e^{sin(x)log(cos(x))}dx+int_0^{pi/2}e^{-cos(x)log(sin(x))}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))}{n!}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-cos)^n(x)log^n(sin(x))}{n!}dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx
end{align}$$



Hence we are dealing with positive integer $n$ we can interpret the inner integral as derivatives of the Beta Function in polar form. Thus the two sums become



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



By using the symmetry of the arguments of the Beta Function we can further simplify this to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



Presumed all steps done are valid we may conclude that




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx~=~sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}$$




Howsoever I have no clue how to proceed from hereon. Hence the derivatives of the Beta Function are getting more and more complicated as $n$ increases, and I am not aware of a simple formula for them, I do not know how to further simplify this monstrosity.



According to WolframAlpha the integral is complex valued for the interval $[0,pi]$ and is approximately $mathfrak{I}=1.03698346829659... + i0.67952701272618...~$. Further note that for the interval $[0,pi/2]$ the value is given by $mathfrak{I}_1=1.05917952027...$ and for $[pi/2,pi]$ given by $mathfrak{I}_2=-0.022196051969... + i0.679527012726...$ which seems to at least justify the separating of the integral numerically.




I am interested in three things. $(1)$ First of all the explicit evaluation of either the integral $mathfrak{I}$ itself or of the derived sum $-$ under the preassumption that this sum in fact equals the integral $-$ if it is in fact possible.$(2)$ Following the latter is my process of approaching valid; if not where did I went wrong?$(3)$ Additionally I want to know how to approach to this kind of sum. For this purpose I would also be satisfied with a evaluation of $mathfrak{I}_1$ or $mathfrak{I}_2$ alone.




Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What justifies the change from $int_{pi/2}^picos x^{sin x}dx$ to $int_0^{pi/2}sin x^{cos x}dx$? For $pi/2lt xltpi$, $cos x$ is negative, so $cos x^{sin x}$ is, in general, complex.
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:37










  • $begingroup$
    Apart from the fact Barry Cipra pointed out, I just want to say that in the second last step you can interpret the sum as $1/2$ times the taylor series about $1/2$ evaluated at $1$ and $0$ respectively.
    $endgroup$
    – Diger
    Dec 8 '18 at 18:55
















1












$begingroup$


While thinking about this recent question I thought about an attempt utilizing derivatives of the Beta Function. Sadly I realized that it does not work out for the linked integral but possible for a quite similiar one. To be precise consider the integral




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx$$




Splitting the integral up in the two intervals $[0,pi/2]$ and $[pi/2,pi]$ and applying the substitution $x=x-pi/2$ to the second one leads to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}=int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_{pi/2}^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx
end{align}$$



Using the fundamental property of the exponential and expanding the integrand as a series yields to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}e^{sin(x)log(cos(x))}dx+int_0^{pi/2}e^{-cos(x)log(sin(x))}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))}{n!}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-cos)^n(x)log^n(sin(x))}{n!}dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx
end{align}$$



Hence we are dealing with positive integer $n$ we can interpret the inner integral as derivatives of the Beta Function in polar form. Thus the two sums become



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



By using the symmetry of the arguments of the Beta Function we can further simplify this to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



Presumed all steps done are valid we may conclude that




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx~=~sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}$$




Howsoever I have no clue how to proceed from hereon. Hence the derivatives of the Beta Function are getting more and more complicated as $n$ increases, and I am not aware of a simple formula for them, I do not know how to further simplify this monstrosity.



According to WolframAlpha the integral is complex valued for the interval $[0,pi]$ and is approximately $mathfrak{I}=1.03698346829659... + i0.67952701272618...~$. Further note that for the interval $[0,pi/2]$ the value is given by $mathfrak{I}_1=1.05917952027...$ and for $[pi/2,pi]$ given by $mathfrak{I}_2=-0.022196051969... + i0.679527012726...$ which seems to at least justify the separating of the integral numerically.




I am interested in three things. $(1)$ First of all the explicit evaluation of either the integral $mathfrak{I}$ itself or of the derived sum $-$ under the preassumption that this sum in fact equals the integral $-$ if it is in fact possible.$(2)$ Following the latter is my process of approaching valid; if not where did I went wrong?$(3)$ Additionally I want to know how to approach to this kind of sum. For this purpose I would also be satisfied with a evaluation of $mathfrak{I}_1$ or $mathfrak{I}_2$ alone.




Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What justifies the change from $int_{pi/2}^picos x^{sin x}dx$ to $int_0^{pi/2}sin x^{cos x}dx$? For $pi/2lt xltpi$, $cos x$ is negative, so $cos x^{sin x}$ is, in general, complex.
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:37










  • $begingroup$
    Apart from the fact Barry Cipra pointed out, I just want to say that in the second last step you can interpret the sum as $1/2$ times the taylor series about $1/2$ evaluated at $1$ and $0$ respectively.
    $endgroup$
    – Diger
    Dec 8 '18 at 18:55














1












1








1





$begingroup$


While thinking about this recent question I thought about an attempt utilizing derivatives of the Beta Function. Sadly I realized that it does not work out for the linked integral but possible for a quite similiar one. To be precise consider the integral




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx$$




Splitting the integral up in the two intervals $[0,pi/2]$ and $[pi/2,pi]$ and applying the substitution $x=x-pi/2$ to the second one leads to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}=int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_{pi/2}^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx
end{align}$$



Using the fundamental property of the exponential and expanding the integrand as a series yields to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}e^{sin(x)log(cos(x))}dx+int_0^{pi/2}e^{-cos(x)log(sin(x))}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))}{n!}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-cos)^n(x)log^n(sin(x))}{n!}dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx
end{align}$$



Hence we are dealing with positive integer $n$ we can interpret the inner integral as derivatives of the Beta Function in polar form. Thus the two sums become



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



By using the symmetry of the arguments of the Beta Function we can further simplify this to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



Presumed all steps done are valid we may conclude that




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx~=~sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}$$




Howsoever I have no clue how to proceed from hereon. Hence the derivatives of the Beta Function are getting more and more complicated as $n$ increases, and I am not aware of a simple formula for them, I do not know how to further simplify this monstrosity.



According to WolframAlpha the integral is complex valued for the interval $[0,pi]$ and is approximately $mathfrak{I}=1.03698346829659... + i0.67952701272618...~$. Further note that for the interval $[0,pi/2]$ the value is given by $mathfrak{I}_1=1.05917952027...$ and for $[pi/2,pi]$ given by $mathfrak{I}_2=-0.022196051969... + i0.679527012726...$ which seems to at least justify the separating of the integral numerically.




I am interested in three things. $(1)$ First of all the explicit evaluation of either the integral $mathfrak{I}$ itself or of the derived sum $-$ under the preassumption that this sum in fact equals the integral $-$ if it is in fact possible.$(2)$ Following the latter is my process of approaching valid; if not where did I went wrong?$(3)$ Additionally I want to know how to approach to this kind of sum. For this purpose I would also be satisfied with a evaluation of $mathfrak{I}_1$ or $mathfrak{I}_2$ alone.




Thanks in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




While thinking about this recent question I thought about an attempt utilizing derivatives of the Beta Function. Sadly I realized that it does not work out for the linked integral but possible for a quite similiar one. To be precise consider the integral




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx$$




Splitting the integral up in the two intervals $[0,pi/2]$ and $[pi/2,pi]$ and applying the substitution $x=x-pi/2$ to the second one leads to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}=int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_{pi/2}^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx
end{align}$$



Using the fundamental property of the exponential and expanding the integrand as a series yields to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=int_0^{pi/2}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sin(x)^{-cos(x)}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}e^{sin(x)log(cos(x))}dx+int_0^{pi/2}e^{-cos(x)log(sin(x))}dx\
&=int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))}{n!}dx+int_0^{pi/2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-cos)^n(x)log^n(sin(x))}{n!}dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx
end{align}$$



Hence we are dealing with positive integer $n$ we can interpret the inner integral as derivatives of the Beta Function in polar form. Thus the two sums become



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}int_0^{pi/2}sin^n(x)log^n(cos(x))dx+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}int_0^{pi/2}cos^n(x)log^n(sin(x))dx\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



By using the symmetry of the arguments of the Beta Function we can further simplify this to



$$begin{align}
mathfrak{I}&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dy^n}Bleft(frac{n+1}2,yright)right|_{y=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}+sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^n}{n!}frac1{2^{n+1}}left.frac{d^n}{dx^n}Bleft(x,frac{n+1}2right)right|_{x=1/2}\
&=sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}
end{align}$$



Presumed all steps done are valid we may conclude that




$$mathfrak{I}~=~int_0^{pi}cos(x)^{sin(x)}dx~=~sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac1{(2n)!}frac1{2^{2n}}left.frac{d^{2n}}{dx^{2n}}Bleft(x,n+frac12right)right|_{x=1/2}$$




Howsoever I have no clue how to proceed from hereon. Hence the derivatives of the Beta Function are getting more and more complicated as $n$ increases, and I am not aware of a simple formula for them, I do not know how to further simplify this monstrosity.



According to WolframAlpha the integral is complex valued for the interval $[0,pi]$ and is approximately $mathfrak{I}=1.03698346829659... + i0.67952701272618...~$. Further note that for the interval $[0,pi/2]$ the value is given by $mathfrak{I}_1=1.05917952027...$ and for $[pi/2,pi]$ given by $mathfrak{I}_2=-0.022196051969... + i0.679527012726...$ which seems to at least justify the separating of the integral numerically.




I am interested in three things. $(1)$ First of all the explicit evaluation of either the integral $mathfrak{I}$ itself or of the derived sum $-$ under the preassumption that this sum in fact equals the integral $-$ if it is in fact possible.$(2)$ Following the latter is my process of approaching valid; if not where did I went wrong?$(3)$ Additionally I want to know how to approach to this kind of sum. For this purpose I would also be satisfied with a evaluation of $mathfrak{I}_1$ or $mathfrak{I}_2$ alone.




Thanks in advance!







integration definite-integrals summation closed-form beta-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 8 '18 at 14:31









mrtaurhomrtaurho

4,23421234




4,23421234








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What justifies the change from $int_{pi/2}^picos x^{sin x}dx$ to $int_0^{pi/2}sin x^{cos x}dx$? For $pi/2lt xltpi$, $cos x$ is negative, so $cos x^{sin x}$ is, in general, complex.
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:37










  • $begingroup$
    Apart from the fact Barry Cipra pointed out, I just want to say that in the second last step you can interpret the sum as $1/2$ times the taylor series about $1/2$ evaluated at $1$ and $0$ respectively.
    $endgroup$
    – Diger
    Dec 8 '18 at 18:55














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    What justifies the change from $int_{pi/2}^picos x^{sin x}dx$ to $int_0^{pi/2}sin x^{cos x}dx$? For $pi/2lt xltpi$, $cos x$ is negative, so $cos x^{sin x}$ is, in general, complex.
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    Dec 8 '18 at 14:37










  • $begingroup$
    Apart from the fact Barry Cipra pointed out, I just want to say that in the second last step you can interpret the sum as $1/2$ times the taylor series about $1/2$ evaluated at $1$ and $0$ respectively.
    $endgroup$
    – Diger
    Dec 8 '18 at 18:55








3




3




$begingroup$
What justifies the change from $int_{pi/2}^picos x^{sin x}dx$ to $int_0^{pi/2}sin x^{cos x}dx$? For $pi/2lt xltpi$, $cos x$ is negative, so $cos x^{sin x}$ is, in general, complex.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 8 '18 at 14:37




$begingroup$
What justifies the change from $int_{pi/2}^picos x^{sin x}dx$ to $int_0^{pi/2}sin x^{cos x}dx$? For $pi/2lt xltpi$, $cos x$ is negative, so $cos x^{sin x}$ is, in general, complex.
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
Dec 8 '18 at 14:37












$begingroup$
Apart from the fact Barry Cipra pointed out, I just want to say that in the second last step you can interpret the sum as $1/2$ times the taylor series about $1/2$ evaluated at $1$ and $0$ respectively.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 8 '18 at 18:55




$begingroup$
Apart from the fact Barry Cipra pointed out, I just want to say that in the second last step you can interpret the sum as $1/2$ times the taylor series about $1/2$ evaluated at $1$ and $0$ respectively.
$endgroup$
– Diger
Dec 8 '18 at 18:55










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031168%2fon-the-integral-mathfraki-int-0-pi-cosx-sinxdx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031168%2fon-the-integral-mathfraki-int-0-pi-cosx-sinxdx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei