Is it true for any $n=2p$ where $p$ is prime, that the number of twin primes less than $n$ approaches the...
$begingroup$
Is it true for any $n=2p$ where $p$ is prime, that the number of twin primes less than $n$ approaches the number of prime pairs $(p_{1},p_{2})$ such that $p_{1} + p_{2} = n$?
For example,
If we choose prime number 499, then $n=998$.
For $n = 998$ there are 33 prime pairs and there are 35 twin primes less than 998.
If we choose larger values of $n=2p$, the number of prime pairs will converge to the number of twin primes less than $n$?
number-theory prime-numbers prime-twins goldbachs-conjecture
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true for any $n=2p$ where $p$ is prime, that the number of twin primes less than $n$ approaches the number of prime pairs $(p_{1},p_{2})$ such that $p_{1} + p_{2} = n$?
For example,
If we choose prime number 499, then $n=998$.
For $n = 998$ there are 33 prime pairs and there are 35 twin primes less than 998.
If we choose larger values of $n=2p$, the number of prime pairs will converge to the number of twin primes less than $n$?
number-theory prime-numbers prime-twins goldbachs-conjecture
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This may be a reasonable conjecture. However proving it will be quite difficult - just proving that the number of prime pairs $(p_1, p_2)$ such that $p_1 + p_2 = n$ is always nonzero is Goldbach's conjecture, a long-standing unsolved problem.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
Dec 12 '18 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it true for any $n=2p$ where $p$ is prime, that the number of twin primes less than $n$ approaches the number of prime pairs $(p_{1},p_{2})$ such that $p_{1} + p_{2} = n$?
For example,
If we choose prime number 499, then $n=998$.
For $n = 998$ there are 33 prime pairs and there are 35 twin primes less than 998.
If we choose larger values of $n=2p$, the number of prime pairs will converge to the number of twin primes less than $n$?
number-theory prime-numbers prime-twins goldbachs-conjecture
$endgroup$
Is it true for any $n=2p$ where $p$ is prime, that the number of twin primes less than $n$ approaches the number of prime pairs $(p_{1},p_{2})$ such that $p_{1} + p_{2} = n$?
For example,
If we choose prime number 499, then $n=998$.
For $n = 998$ there are 33 prime pairs and there are 35 twin primes less than 998.
If we choose larger values of $n=2p$, the number of prime pairs will converge to the number of twin primes less than $n$?
number-theory prime-numbers prime-twins goldbachs-conjecture
number-theory prime-numbers prime-twins goldbachs-conjecture
edited Dec 12 '18 at 19:20
temp watts
asked Dec 12 '18 at 19:15
temp wattstemp watts
373
373
$begingroup$
This may be a reasonable conjecture. However proving it will be quite difficult - just proving that the number of prime pairs $(p_1, p_2)$ such that $p_1 + p_2 = n$ is always nonzero is Goldbach's conjecture, a long-standing unsolved problem.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
Dec 12 '18 at 19:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This may be a reasonable conjecture. However proving it will be quite difficult - just proving that the number of prime pairs $(p_1, p_2)$ such that $p_1 + p_2 = n$ is always nonzero is Goldbach's conjecture, a long-standing unsolved problem.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
Dec 12 '18 at 19:26
$begingroup$
This may be a reasonable conjecture. However proving it will be quite difficult - just proving that the number of prime pairs $(p_1, p_2)$ such that $p_1 + p_2 = n$ is always nonzero is Goldbach's conjecture, a long-standing unsolved problem.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
Dec 12 '18 at 19:26
$begingroup$
This may be a reasonable conjecture. However proving it will be quite difficult - just proving that the number of prime pairs $(p_1, p_2)$ such that $p_1 + p_2 = n$ is always nonzero is Goldbach's conjecture, a long-standing unsolved problem.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
Dec 12 '18 at 19:26
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Hardy-Littlewood conjecture would tell us that the number of primes $p$ less than $x$ such that $p+2$ is also a prime should asymptotically satisfy: $$pi_2(x)sim 2C_2frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
Where $C_2approx .66$
On the other hand, standard heuristics tell us that the number of ways to express an even $x$ as the sum of two primes should be asymptotically $$2C_2times prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-1}{p-2}times frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
See, e.g., this.
Thus, standard conjectures would tell us that, for large even $x$:
$$frac {text {the number of prime pairs} ≤ x}{text {the number of ways to write} ;x;text{as the sum of two primes}}sim prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-2}{p-1}$$
To be sure, both conjectures are entirely unproven.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037104%2fis-it-true-for-any-n-2p-where-p-is-prime-that-the-number-of-twin-primes-les%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The Hardy-Littlewood conjecture would tell us that the number of primes $p$ less than $x$ such that $p+2$ is also a prime should asymptotically satisfy: $$pi_2(x)sim 2C_2frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
Where $C_2approx .66$
On the other hand, standard heuristics tell us that the number of ways to express an even $x$ as the sum of two primes should be asymptotically $$2C_2times prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-1}{p-2}times frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
See, e.g., this.
Thus, standard conjectures would tell us that, for large even $x$:
$$frac {text {the number of prime pairs} ≤ x}{text {the number of ways to write} ;x;text{as the sum of two primes}}sim prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-2}{p-1}$$
To be sure, both conjectures are entirely unproven.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Hardy-Littlewood conjecture would tell us that the number of primes $p$ less than $x$ such that $p+2$ is also a prime should asymptotically satisfy: $$pi_2(x)sim 2C_2frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
Where $C_2approx .66$
On the other hand, standard heuristics tell us that the number of ways to express an even $x$ as the sum of two primes should be asymptotically $$2C_2times prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-1}{p-2}times frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
See, e.g., this.
Thus, standard conjectures would tell us that, for large even $x$:
$$frac {text {the number of prime pairs} ≤ x}{text {the number of ways to write} ;x;text{as the sum of two primes}}sim prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-2}{p-1}$$
To be sure, both conjectures are entirely unproven.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Hardy-Littlewood conjecture would tell us that the number of primes $p$ less than $x$ such that $p+2$ is also a prime should asymptotically satisfy: $$pi_2(x)sim 2C_2frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
Where $C_2approx .66$
On the other hand, standard heuristics tell us that the number of ways to express an even $x$ as the sum of two primes should be asymptotically $$2C_2times prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-1}{p-2}times frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
See, e.g., this.
Thus, standard conjectures would tell us that, for large even $x$:
$$frac {text {the number of prime pairs} ≤ x}{text {the number of ways to write} ;x;text{as the sum of two primes}}sim prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-2}{p-1}$$
To be sure, both conjectures are entirely unproven.
$endgroup$
The Hardy-Littlewood conjecture would tell us that the number of primes $p$ less than $x$ such that $p+2$ is also a prime should asymptotically satisfy: $$pi_2(x)sim 2C_2frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
Where $C_2approx .66$
On the other hand, standard heuristics tell us that the number of ways to express an even $x$ as the sum of two primes should be asymptotically $$2C_2times prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-1}{p-2}times frac x{(ln x)^2}$$
See, e.g., this.
Thus, standard conjectures would tell us that, for large even $x$:
$$frac {text {the number of prime pairs} ≤ x}{text {the number of ways to write} ;x;text{as the sum of two primes}}sim prod_{p,|,x,;p≥3}frac {p-2}{p-1}$$
To be sure, both conjectures are entirely unproven.
edited Dec 12 '18 at 20:52
answered Dec 12 '18 at 20:46
lulululu
40.9k24879
40.9k24879
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Thank you for your response. I am only looking for values of x that are equal to 2p where p is a prime number.
$endgroup$
– temp watts
Dec 13 '18 at 14:21
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
Well, my response covers that case. If $x=2p$ then that product is just $frac {p-2}{p-1}$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:04
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
$begingroup$
They key point, of course, is that neither of these conjectures is even close to being proven. There are sensible heuristic arguments for both, but so what? Neither Twin Primes nor Goldbach is at all well understood so the heuristic arguments might entirely miss the point.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Dec 13 '18 at 15:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037104%2fis-it-true-for-any-n-2p-where-p-is-prime-that-the-number-of-twin-primes-les%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
This may be a reasonable conjecture. However proving it will be quite difficult - just proving that the number of prime pairs $(p_1, p_2)$ such that $p_1 + p_2 = n$ is always nonzero is Goldbach's conjecture, a long-standing unsolved problem.
$endgroup$
– Michael Lugo
Dec 12 '18 at 19:26