Prove inequalities with Cauchy's integral theorem [closed]












2












$begingroup$


Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show



(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane



(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$



Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$



(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$



Can anyone help?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What have tou tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:53










  • $begingroup$
    And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:01










  • $begingroup$
    @mathcounterexamples.net why not?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:21
















2












$begingroup$


Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show



(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane



(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$



Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$



(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$



Can anyone help?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What have tou tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:53










  • $begingroup$
    And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:01










  • $begingroup$
    @mathcounterexamples.net why not?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:21














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show



(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane



(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$



Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$



(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$



Can anyone help?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show



(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane



(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$



Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$



(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$



Can anyone help?







complex-analysis cauchy-integral-formula






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 12 '18 at 20:39









mathcounterexamples.net

26.6k22157




26.6k22157










asked Dec 12 '18 at 19:58









dimadima

173




173




closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What have tou tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:53










  • $begingroup$
    And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:01










  • $begingroup$
    @mathcounterexamples.net why not?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:21














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What have tou tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:44






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 20:53










  • $begingroup$
    And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
    $endgroup$
    – mathcounterexamples.net
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:01










  • $begingroup$
    @mathcounterexamples.net why not?
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    @zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Dec 12 '18 at 21:21








1




1




$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44




$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44




1




1




$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53




$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53












$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01




$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01












$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20




$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20












$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21




$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:



$1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.



$2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).



$3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
    $endgroup$
    – dima
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:34





















0












$begingroup$

For (i):



Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.



When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.



Do i have an error in reasoning?



Edit:



My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):



$$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
$$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$



$$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$



$$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
$$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$



When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
Is this right or nonsense?






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:



    $1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.



    $2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).



    $3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
      $endgroup$
      – dima
      Dec 13 '18 at 9:34


















    0












    $begingroup$

    I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:



    $1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.



    $2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).



    $3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
      $endgroup$
      – dima
      Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
















    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:



    $1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.



    $2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).



    $3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:



    $1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.



    $2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).



    $3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 12 '18 at 21:49

























    answered Dec 12 '18 at 21:31









    MatematletaMatematleta

    10.7k2918




    10.7k2918












    • $begingroup$
      $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
      $endgroup$
      – dima
      Dec 13 '18 at 9:34




















    • $begingroup$
      $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
      $endgroup$
      – dima
      Dec 13 '18 at 9:34


















    $begingroup$
    $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
    $endgroup$
    – dima
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:34






    $begingroup$
    $overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
    $endgroup$
    – dima
    Dec 13 '18 at 9:34













    0












    $begingroup$

    For (i):



    Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.



    When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.



    Do i have an error in reasoning?



    Edit:



    My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):



    $$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
    $$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$



    $$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$



    $$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
    $$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$



    When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
    Is this right or nonsense?






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      For (i):



      Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.



      When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.



      Do i have an error in reasoning?



      Edit:



      My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):



      $$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
      $$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$



      $$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$



      $$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
      $$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$



      When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
      Is this right or nonsense?






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        For (i):



        Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.



        When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.



        Do i have an error in reasoning?



        Edit:



        My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):



        $$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
        $$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$



        $$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$



        $$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
        $$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$



        When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
        Is this right or nonsense?






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For (i):



        Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.



        When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.



        Do i have an error in reasoning?



        Edit:



        My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):



        $$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
        $$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$



        $$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$



        $$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
        $$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$



        When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
        Is this right or nonsense?







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 13 '18 at 13:04

























        answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:48









        dimadima

        173




        173















            Popular posts from this blog

            Quarter-circle Tiles

            build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

            Mont Emei