Prove inequalities with Cauchy's integral theorem [closed]
$begingroup$
Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show
(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane
(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$
Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$
(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$
Can anyone help?
complex-analysis cauchy-integral-formula
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show
(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane
(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$
Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$
(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$
Can anyone help?
complex-analysis cauchy-integral-formula
$endgroup$
closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53
$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show
(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane
(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$
Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$
(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$
Can anyone help?
complex-analysis cauchy-integral-formula
$endgroup$
Let $$f:overline{B(0,1)}rightarrowmathbb{C}$$ be continuous and holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Consider the function $$zmapsto F(z):=f(z)overline{f(overline{z})}.$$ Show
(i) $int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$ for the semicircle around $0$ and radius $1$ in the upper half-plane
(ii) $int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqsqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta}sqrt{int_{0}^{pi}|f(e^{-iTheta})|^2dTheta}$
Note: Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for $L^2([0,pi])$
(iii) $2int_{-1}^{1}|f(x)|^2dxleqint_{0}^{2pi}|f(e^{iTheta})|^2dTheta$
Can anyone help?
complex-analysis cauchy-integral-formula
complex-analysis cauchy-integral-formula
edited Dec 12 '18 at 20:39
mathcounterexamples.net
26.6k22157
26.6k22157
asked Dec 12 '18 at 19:58
dimadima
173
173
closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted Dec 14 '18 at 4:51
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Did, Adrian Keister, Davide Giraudo, KReiser, choco_addicted
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53
$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21
|
show 2 more comments
1
$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53
$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21
1
1
$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44
$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44
1
1
$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53
$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53
$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01
$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21
$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:
$1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.
$2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).
$3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For (i):
Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.
When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.
Do i have an error in reasoning?
Edit:
My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):
$$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
$$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$
$$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$
$$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
$$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$
When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
Is this right or nonsense?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:
$1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.
$2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).
$3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:
$1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.
$2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).
$3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:
$1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.
$2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).
$3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?
$endgroup$
I am assuming you mean the $textit{closed}$ curve consisting of the segment $-1$ to $1$ followed by the upper unit semicircle. Hints:
$1). F$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$. Once you show this, i) is immediate.
$2). F(x+iy)=|f(x)|^2$ on the segment. Now split up the contour and use i).
$3). $ What happens if you integrate over the contour consisting of the segment and the lower semicircle?
edited Dec 12 '18 at 21:49
answered Dec 12 '18 at 21:31
MatematletaMatematleta
10.7k2918
10.7k2918
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
$begingroup$
$overline{B(0,1)}$ should be the closed disk around $0$ and radius $1$. $$ $$ So for (i) I should use the Cauchy's integral theorem? But the semicircle is not closed. So the conditions are not fulfilled
$endgroup$
– dima
Dec 13 '18 at 9:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For (i):
Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.
When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.
Do i have an error in reasoning?
Edit:
My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):
$$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
$$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$
$$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$
$$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
$$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$
When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
Is this right or nonsense?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For (i):
Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.
When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.
Do i have an error in reasoning?
Edit:
My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):
$$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
$$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$
$$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$
$$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
$$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$
When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
Is this right or nonsense?
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For (i):
Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.
When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.
Do i have an error in reasoning?
Edit:
My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):
$$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
$$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$
$$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$
$$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
$$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$
When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
Is this right or nonsense?
$endgroup$
For (i):
Using the differential quotient i showed that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$. Hence $F(z)$ is holomorphic on $B(0,1)$ as a product of two holomorphic functions and thus $F(z)$ is analytic on $B(0,1)$.
When $gamma$ would be a closed curve i would be able to use the Cauchy's integral theorem. But $gamma$ is an arc of a circle and thus not closed.
Do i have an error in reasoning?
Edit:
My idea: I consider first the full circle $psi$ around $0$ and radius $1$. According to Cauchy's integral theorem $int_{psi}F(z)dz=0$. Now $psi$ is composed of $gamma$ and $rho$ in which $rho$ is the semicircle in the lower half-plane. Using the computational rules for curvilinear integrales i can maybe show (i):
$$gamma(t)=e^{it},tin[0,pi]$$
$$rho(t)=e^{it},tin[pi,2pi]$$
$$psi(t)=e^{it},tin[0,2pi]$$
$$Rightarrow0=int_{psi}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz$$
$$Leftrightarrowint_{gamma}F(z)dz+int_{rho}F(z)dz=0$$
When $$int_{rho}F(z)dz=-int_{-gamma}F(z)dz=int_{gamma}F(z)dz$$ would apply we would have $$int_{gamma}F(z)dz=0$$
Is this right or nonsense?
edited Dec 13 '18 at 13:04
answered Dec 13 '18 at 9:48
dimadima
173
173
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
What have tou tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Dec 12 '18 at 20:44
1
$begingroup$
You will need the fact that $overline{f(overline{z})}$ is holomorphic
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 20:53
$begingroup$
And it seems that (i) doesn’t hold if $f$ is a constant map.
$endgroup$
– mathcounterexamples.net
Dec 12 '18 at 21:01
$begingroup$
@mathcounterexamples.net why not?
$endgroup$
– zhw.
Dec 12 '18 at 21:20
$begingroup$
@zhw. Because $gamma$ is not a loop.
$endgroup$
– Did
Dec 12 '18 at 21:21