Jech Lemma 3.7: Why does this follow?












0












$begingroup$


enter image description here



I'm on Jech Chapter 3 (Cardinal Numbers) on the section on cofinalities. I don't understand why the implication in the red rectangle is true. If the aforementioned gamma-sequence was constant and every term equaled to alpha, why would the right hand limit in the red rectangle necessarily evaluate to gamma?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    enter image description here



    I'm on Jech Chapter 3 (Cardinal Numbers) on the section on cofinalities. I don't understand why the implication in the red rectangle is true. If the aforementioned gamma-sequence was constant and every term equaled to alpha, why would the right hand limit in the red rectangle necessarily evaluate to gamma?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      0



      $begingroup$


      enter image description here



      I'm on Jech Chapter 3 (Cardinal Numbers) on the section on cofinalities. I don't understand why the implication in the red rectangle is true. If the aforementioned gamma-sequence was constant and every term equaled to alpha, why would the right hand limit in the red rectangle necessarily evaluate to gamma?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      enter image description here



      I'm on Jech Chapter 3 (Cardinal Numbers) on the section on cofinalities. I don't understand why the implication in the red rectangle is true. If the aforementioned gamma-sequence was constant and every term equaled to alpha, why would the right hand limit in the red rectangle necessarily evaluate to gamma?







      set-theory cardinals






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:12









      Andrés E. Caicedo

      65.5k8158249




      65.5k8158249










      asked Dec 24 '18 at 20:48









      Barycentric_BashBarycentric_Bash

      42339




      42339






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The key is the phrase "in $alpha$" - that is, $beta_eta<alpha$ for each $eta<gamma$. This rules out the possibility that each $beta$ is equal to $alpha$, and in fact means that while the sequence of $beta$s is not necessarily increasing at each step (it's only guaranteed to be nondecreasing) it does grow unboundedly-in-$gamma$-often.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051621%2fjech-lemma-3-7-why-does-this-follow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The key is the phrase "in $alpha$" - that is, $beta_eta<alpha$ for each $eta<gamma$. This rules out the possibility that each $beta$ is equal to $alpha$, and in fact means that while the sequence of $beta$s is not necessarily increasing at each step (it's only guaranteed to be nondecreasing) it does grow unboundedly-in-$gamma$-often.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              The key is the phrase "in $alpha$" - that is, $beta_eta<alpha$ for each $eta<gamma$. This rules out the possibility that each $beta$ is equal to $alpha$, and in fact means that while the sequence of $beta$s is not necessarily increasing at each step (it's only guaranteed to be nondecreasing) it does grow unboundedly-in-$gamma$-often.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The key is the phrase "in $alpha$" - that is, $beta_eta<alpha$ for each $eta<gamma$. This rules out the possibility that each $beta$ is equal to $alpha$, and in fact means that while the sequence of $beta$s is not necessarily increasing at each step (it's only guaranteed to be nondecreasing) it does grow unboundedly-in-$gamma$-often.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The key is the phrase "in $alpha$" - that is, $beta_eta<alpha$ for each $eta<gamma$. This rules out the possibility that each $beta$ is equal to $alpha$, and in fact means that while the sequence of $beta$s is not necessarily increasing at each step (it's only guaranteed to be nondecreasing) it does grow unboundedly-in-$gamma$-often.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:57









                Noah SchweberNoah Schweber

                125k10150287




                125k10150287






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051621%2fjech-lemma-3-7-why-does-this-follow%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

                    Mont Emei