Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p$
$begingroup$
Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$
As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):
EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.
Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.
Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$
As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):
EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.
Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.
Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$
As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):
EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.
Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.
Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
Prove that if $a > b > 0, p > 0$, then $a^p > b^p.$
As I was reading baby Rudin, this fact was a step that Rudin skipped (Theorem 3.20a), but it is not obvious to me how to prove this.
Thanks in advance.
EDIT (relevant definitions and results from exercise 6, chapter 1):
EDIT 2 - Presume $b > 1$.
Let $r = m/n, n>0$, where $m$ and $n$ are integers. Then $b^r = (b^m)^{1/n}$.
It is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^rb^s$. If $x$ is real and if we let $$B(x) = { b^r | r in mathbb{Q}, rleq x }$$
then $b^r = sup B(r)$ and we define $b^x = sup B(x) $ for any real $x$.
Also it is proved that $b^{r+s} = b^xb^y$, for real $x$ and $y$.
Hopefully that helps, my bad for not including it the first time around.
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:22
Steven Wagter
asked Dec 24 '18 at 20:20
Steven WagterSteven Wagter
1569
1569
2
$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51
|
show 9 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51
2
2
$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
1
1
$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34
$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51
$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51
|
show 9 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.
Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.
Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
(Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
$y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.
Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.
So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.
So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.
So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;
For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.
The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.
But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.
And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:
If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.
So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.
And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.
Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".
====in recap ==
For natural numbers it's clear by induction.
If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.
For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.
If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.
So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.
ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is another potential route through this.
Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.
For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051598%2fprove-that-if-a-b-0-p-0-then-ap-bp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.
Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.
Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
(Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
$y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.
Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.
Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.
Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
(Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
$y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.
Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.
Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.
Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
(Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
$y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.
Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.
$endgroup$
Let $a>b>0$. We go to prove that $a^{p}>b^{p}$ for any $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$.
Firstly, we prove that $a^{n}>b^{n}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$. This
can be proved easily by induction. For, the formula is obviously true
for $n=1$. Suppose that the formula is true for $n=k$, i.e., $a^{k}>b^{k}$,
then $a^{k+1}=acdot a^{k}>acdot b^{k}>bcdot b^{k}=b^{k+1}$. By
mathematical induction, the formula is true for all $ninmathbb{N}$.
Next, we show that $a^{frac{1}{n}}>b^{frac{1}{n}}$ for any $ninmathbb{N}$
(Here, we assume that for any $x>0$, $ninmathbb{N}$, there exists
$y>0$ such that $y^{n}=x$. Note that $y$ can be shown unique and
is denoted by $x^{frac{1}{n}}.$). Prove by contradiction, suppose
the contrary that there exists $ninmathbb{N}$ such that $a^{frac{1}{n}}leq b^{frac{1}{n}}$.
If $a^{frac{1}{n}}=b^{frac{1}{n}},$ we have $a=left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}=b$,
which is a contradiction. If $a^{frac{1}{n}}<b^{frac{1}{n}}$, then
by the previous result, $left(a^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}<left(b^{frac{1}{n}}right)^{n}$.
That is, $a<b$, which is also a contradiction.
Finally, let $pinmathbb{Q}cap(0,infty)$. Choose $m,ninmathbb{N}$
such that $p=frac{m}{n}$. Then by the first part, $a^{m}>b^{m}$.
By the second part, $left(a^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}>left(b^{m}right)^{frac{1}{n}}$.
Hence $a^{p}>b^{p}$.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:38
Danny Pak-Keung ChanDanny Pak-Keung Chan
2,34138
2,34138
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
For the case that $pinmathbb{R}cap(0,infty)$, we need the precise definition of $a^p$. (Notice that there are many different but equivalent ways to define $a^p$). As I do not have the book nor the precise definition of $a^p$, so I skip the proof for the most general case.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:40
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
$begingroup$
The asker included the definition from Rudin, in a comment above.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.
So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.
So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.
So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.
So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.
So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.
So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.
So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.
So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.
So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.
$endgroup$
We know that $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}$. And we know that both $dfrac{1}{x}>0$ and $x^p>0$ so it follows that $x^{p-1}>0$. So $f^prime(x)=px^{p-1}>0$.
So $f$ is increasing on the interval $(0,infty)$.
So a power function $f(x)=x^p$ is an increasing function when $p>0$.
So by the definition of an increasing function on $(0,infty)$ $a>b$ if and only if $a^p>b^p$.
edited Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:27
John Wayland BalesJohn Wayland Bales
14.4k21238
14.4k21238
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I know that, but isn't that a restatement of the result I am trying to prove?
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
I will add more to my answer.
$endgroup$
– John Wayland Bales
Dec 24 '18 at 20:36
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
Does the proposition say anything about $f(x) = x^p$ being an increasing function? That's an observation you need to argue that $a> b iff a^p >b^p$. For a non-increasing function, we can't conclude that. You need to use information about the function you defined in comments.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:37
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
However, you don't need to prove all of "if and only if"; you need only prove $a>b implies a^pgt b^p$ for $a>b>0, p>0$.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
$begingroup$
I'm sorry, John Wayland Bales, my second to last comment above was addressing the asker, not you or your answer.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;
For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.
The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.
But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.
And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:
If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.
So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.
And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.
Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".
====in recap ==
For natural numbers it's clear by induction.
If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.
For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.
If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.
So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.
ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;
For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.
The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.
But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.
And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:
If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.
So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.
And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.
Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".
====in recap ==
For natural numbers it's clear by induction.
If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.
For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.
If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.
So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.
ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;
For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.
The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.
But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.
And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:
If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.
So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.
And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.
Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".
====in recap ==
For natural numbers it's clear by induction.
If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.
For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.
If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.
So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.
ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.
$endgroup$
You are using Rudin's "Principals of Mathematical Induction" and you are doing Chapter 1, Excercise 6. Which relies very heavily on the Theorem 1.21 and the proof thereof that;
For any $b > 1$ and $n in mathbb N$ there is a unique positive $c$ so that $c^n =b$. We call such a $c:= b^{frac 1n}$.
The proof makes use of the least upper bound property and the archimedian principal and the fact that for all $c < b$ then $c^n < b*c^{n-1} < b^2*c^{n-2} < ....< b^n$. We then consider $C= sup {c|c^n < b}$ and... the proof writes itself.
But HERE's the thing. In the process of doing this we have established that for all $c < b$ than so that $d= c^n < b$ that $c < b^{frac 1n} = sup {c|c^n < b}$. Thus for $d < b$ we have $c = d^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n}$.
And if that WASN't immediately clear, it'd have to be by contradiction:
If $d^{frac 1n} ge b^{frac 1n}$ then $d=(d^{frac 1n})^n ge (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$ which is a contradiction.
So if we show that it is consistent to define for $p =frac mn$ that $b^p = (b^{frac 1n})^m$ we would have $0 < a < b iff 0 < a^{frac 1n} < b^{frac 1n} iff a^{frac mn} < b^{frac mn}$.
And it'd only take a line to extend that result to $a^x = sup {a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q}< sup{a^q|q< x; qin mathbb Q} = b^x$.
Which is why Rudin "took it for granted".
====in recap ==
For natural numbers it's clear by induction.
If $a^n > b^n > 0$ then $a^{n+1} =a^n*a > a^n*b > b^n*b = b^{n+1}$.
For $p = frac 1n; nin mathbb N$ it's clear by contradiction.
If $a^{frac 1n}le b^{frac 1n}$ we'd have $a = (a^{frac 1n})^n le (b^{frac 1n})^n = b$.
So for rational $p = frac nm; n,min mathbb n$ then $a^p = (a^n)^{frac 1m} > (b^n)^{frac 1m} = b^p$.
ANd for any real $x>0$ we have $a^x = sup{a^q|q < x} > sup {b^q|q < x}$ [admittedly that step would need a sentence or two but it'd be straight forward] $= b^x$.
edited Dec 24 '18 at 22:36
answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:59
fleabloodfleablood
71.2k22686
71.2k22686
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.
$endgroup$
If $pin mathbb{N}$ induction mathematical.
edited Dec 24 '18 at 20:29
answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
Julio Trujillo GonzalezJulio Trujillo Gonzalez
856
856
1
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
1
1
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
I am seeking a proof where p can be any real number.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
If $a^n leq b^n Rightarrow ln a leq ln b$ Is a contradiction, since $a>b Rightarrow ln a> ln b$
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
$begingroup$
natural logarithm is a function monotonically increasing
$endgroup$
– Julio Trujillo Gonzalez
Dec 24 '18 at 20:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is another potential route through this.
Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.
For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is another potential route through this.
Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.
For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is another potential route through this.
Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.
For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.
$endgroup$
Here is another potential route through this.
Since $agt bgt 0$ we have $frac abgt 1$ and we might be in a position to say that $frac ab=1+r$ with $rgt 0$ and $left(frac abright)^p=(1+r)^pgt 1$.
For example we can show that $(1+r)^ngt 1^m$ for integer $n, m$ so we can do this for $p$ a positive rational.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 20:47
Mark BennetMark Bennet
81.3k983180
81.3k983180
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051598%2fprove-that-if-a-b-0-p-0-then-ap-bp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Firstly, you need to ask how is $a^p$ defined.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
If you know the derivative of $x mapsto x^p$, then it's very easy. But as Danny points out, this involves knowing the definition of this function.
$endgroup$
– parsiad
Dec 24 '18 at 20:28
1
$begingroup$
Then Steven, please include exercise 6, chapter 1, in an edit to your question post.
$endgroup$
– amWhy
Dec 24 '18 at 20:34
$begingroup$
@amWhy you're right, should have included this. Editing the question now.
$endgroup$
– Steven Wagter
Dec 24 '18 at 20:39
$begingroup$
I do not have the book "Rudin". For the sake of completeness, it is better for you to type the definition. Moreover, $a^p$, being a real number, is obviously NOT the set ${a^x mid xmbox{ is rational}}$.
$endgroup$
– Danny Pak-Keung Chan
Dec 24 '18 at 20:51