$operatorname{Ext}^bullet_R(R/rR,M)$ and $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$
$begingroup$
$newcommand{Ext}{operatorname{Ext}}newcommand{Hom}{operatorname{Hom}_R}$Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity and $r in R$.
Applying snake lemma to the following diagram:
$$begin{array}{c} 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 \ && downarrow r && downarrow r && downarrow r \ 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 end{array}$$
We obtain the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$.
Now, assuming that $r$ is not a zero-divisor, $0 to R xrightarrow r R (to R/rR to 0)$ is a projective resolution of $R/rR$, and applying $Hom(-,M)$ for $M in textbf{$R$-Mod}$ gives $0 to Hom(R,M) xrightarrow{f mapsto (x mapsto f(rx))} Hom(R,M) to 0$, i.e. $0 to M xrightarrow r M to 0$, so $Ext^1_R(R/rR, M) = M/rM$ and $Ext^n_R(R/rR, M) = 0$ for $n>1$, matching the exact sequence above.
If $r$ is a zero-divisor though, then according to this answer we do not get $M/rM$, but we need to apply $operatorname{Hom}_R(-,M)$ to the exact sequence $0 to rR to R to R/rR to 0$ to get
$$0 to M[r] to M to Hom(rR,M) to Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) to 0 to cdots$$
Now $Hom(rR,M) cong { m in M cdot forall c in R[r], c cdot m = 0}$ which I will notate as $M[R[r]]$.
So the exact sequence tells us $Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) cong M[R[r]]/rM$ instead of $M/rM$.
The exact sequence also tells us $Ext^{n+1}_R(R/rR,M) cong Ext^n_R(rR,M)$ which may or may not be useful in computing $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,M)$.
My question is: what is the role of the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$ in the grand scheme of things involving $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,-)$? If possible, I would also like to generalize to non-commutative ring with unity $R$ with $r in Z(R)$.
homological-algebra
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$newcommand{Ext}{operatorname{Ext}}newcommand{Hom}{operatorname{Hom}_R}$Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity and $r in R$.
Applying snake lemma to the following diagram:
$$begin{array}{c} 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 \ && downarrow r && downarrow r && downarrow r \ 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 end{array}$$
We obtain the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$.
Now, assuming that $r$ is not a zero-divisor, $0 to R xrightarrow r R (to R/rR to 0)$ is a projective resolution of $R/rR$, and applying $Hom(-,M)$ for $M in textbf{$R$-Mod}$ gives $0 to Hom(R,M) xrightarrow{f mapsto (x mapsto f(rx))} Hom(R,M) to 0$, i.e. $0 to M xrightarrow r M to 0$, so $Ext^1_R(R/rR, M) = M/rM$ and $Ext^n_R(R/rR, M) = 0$ for $n>1$, matching the exact sequence above.
If $r$ is a zero-divisor though, then according to this answer we do not get $M/rM$, but we need to apply $operatorname{Hom}_R(-,M)$ to the exact sequence $0 to rR to R to R/rR to 0$ to get
$$0 to M[r] to M to Hom(rR,M) to Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) to 0 to cdots$$
Now $Hom(rR,M) cong { m in M cdot forall c in R[r], c cdot m = 0}$ which I will notate as $M[R[r]]$.
So the exact sequence tells us $Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) cong M[R[r]]/rM$ instead of $M/rM$.
The exact sequence also tells us $Ext^{n+1}_R(R/rR,M) cong Ext^n_R(rR,M)$ which may or may not be useful in computing $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,M)$.
My question is: what is the role of the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$ in the grand scheme of things involving $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,-)$? If possible, I would also like to generalize to non-commutative ring with unity $R$ with $r in Z(R)$.
homological-algebra
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Please clarify the notation $A[r]$. I suppose it means ${xin Amid rx=0}$, sometimes denoted by $(0:_Ar)$, but this is only a supposition.
$endgroup$
– user26857
Jan 3 at 9:26
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$newcommand{Ext}{operatorname{Ext}}newcommand{Hom}{operatorname{Hom}_R}$Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity and $r in R$.
Applying snake lemma to the following diagram:
$$begin{array}{c} 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 \ && downarrow r && downarrow r && downarrow r \ 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 end{array}$$
We obtain the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$.
Now, assuming that $r$ is not a zero-divisor, $0 to R xrightarrow r R (to R/rR to 0)$ is a projective resolution of $R/rR$, and applying $Hom(-,M)$ for $M in textbf{$R$-Mod}$ gives $0 to Hom(R,M) xrightarrow{f mapsto (x mapsto f(rx))} Hom(R,M) to 0$, i.e. $0 to M xrightarrow r M to 0$, so $Ext^1_R(R/rR, M) = M/rM$ and $Ext^n_R(R/rR, M) = 0$ for $n>1$, matching the exact sequence above.
If $r$ is a zero-divisor though, then according to this answer we do not get $M/rM$, but we need to apply $operatorname{Hom}_R(-,M)$ to the exact sequence $0 to rR to R to R/rR to 0$ to get
$$0 to M[r] to M to Hom(rR,M) to Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) to 0 to cdots$$
Now $Hom(rR,M) cong { m in M cdot forall c in R[r], c cdot m = 0}$ which I will notate as $M[R[r]]$.
So the exact sequence tells us $Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) cong M[R[r]]/rM$ instead of $M/rM$.
The exact sequence also tells us $Ext^{n+1}_R(R/rR,M) cong Ext^n_R(rR,M)$ which may or may not be useful in computing $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,M)$.
My question is: what is the role of the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$ in the grand scheme of things involving $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,-)$? If possible, I would also like to generalize to non-commutative ring with unity $R$ with $r in Z(R)$.
homological-algebra
$endgroup$
$newcommand{Ext}{operatorname{Ext}}newcommand{Hom}{operatorname{Hom}_R}$Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unity and $r in R$.
Applying snake lemma to the following diagram:
$$begin{array}{c} 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 \ && downarrow r && downarrow r && downarrow r \ 0 & longrightarrow & A~~ & longrightarrow & B~~ & longrightarrow & C~~ & longrightarrow & 0 end{array}$$
We obtain the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$.
Now, assuming that $r$ is not a zero-divisor, $0 to R xrightarrow r R (to R/rR to 0)$ is a projective resolution of $R/rR$, and applying $Hom(-,M)$ for $M in textbf{$R$-Mod}$ gives $0 to Hom(R,M) xrightarrow{f mapsto (x mapsto f(rx))} Hom(R,M) to 0$, i.e. $0 to M xrightarrow r M to 0$, so $Ext^1_R(R/rR, M) = M/rM$ and $Ext^n_R(R/rR, M) = 0$ for $n>1$, matching the exact sequence above.
If $r$ is a zero-divisor though, then according to this answer we do not get $M/rM$, but we need to apply $operatorname{Hom}_R(-,M)$ to the exact sequence $0 to rR to R to R/rR to 0$ to get
$$0 to M[r] to M to Hom(rR,M) to Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) to 0 to cdots$$
Now $Hom(rR,M) cong { m in M cdot forall c in R[r], c cdot m = 0}$ which I will notate as $M[R[r]]$.
So the exact sequence tells us $Ext^1_R(R/rR,M) cong M[R[r]]/rM$ instead of $M/rM$.
The exact sequence also tells us $Ext^{n+1}_R(R/rR,M) cong Ext^n_R(rR,M)$ which may or may not be useful in computing $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,M)$.
My question is: what is the role of the exact sequence $0 to A[r] to B[r] to C[r] to A/rA to B/rB to C/rC to 0$ in the grand scheme of things involving $Ext^bullet_R(R/rR,-)$? If possible, I would also like to generalize to non-commutative ring with unity $R$ with $r in Z(R)$.
homological-algebra
homological-algebra
asked Dec 24 '18 at 19:42
Kenny LauKenny Lau
19.9k2159
19.9k2159
1
$begingroup$
Please clarify the notation $A[r]$. I suppose it means ${xin Amid rx=0}$, sometimes denoted by $(0:_Ar)$, but this is only a supposition.
$endgroup$
– user26857
Jan 3 at 9:26
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Please clarify the notation $A[r]$. I suppose it means ${xin Amid rx=0}$, sometimes denoted by $(0:_Ar)$, but this is only a supposition.
$endgroup$
– user26857
Jan 3 at 9:26
1
1
$begingroup$
Please clarify the notation $A[r]$. I suppose it means ${xin Amid rx=0}$, sometimes denoted by $(0:_Ar)$, but this is only a supposition.
$endgroup$
– user26857
Jan 3 at 9:26
$begingroup$
Please clarify the notation $A[r]$. I suppose it means ${xin Amid rx=0}$, sometimes denoted by $(0:_Ar)$, but this is only a supposition.
$endgroup$
– user26857
Jan 3 at 9:26
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051573%2foperatornameext-bullet-rr-rr-m-and-0-to-ar-to-br-to-cr-to-a-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3051573%2foperatornameext-bullet-rr-rr-m-and-0-to-ar-to-br-to-cr-to-a-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Please clarify the notation $A[r]$. I suppose it means ${xin Amid rx=0}$, sometimes denoted by $(0:_Ar)$, but this is only a supposition.
$endgroup$
– user26857
Jan 3 at 9:26