Why do manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points?
$begingroup$
I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.
many regards,
and thanks in advance,
Leo
differential-geometry dynamical-systems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.
many regards,
and thanks in advance,
Leo
differential-geometry dynamical-systems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.
many regards,
and thanks in advance,
Leo
differential-geometry dynamical-systems
$endgroup$
I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.
many regards,
and thanks in advance,
Leo
differential-geometry dynamical-systems
differential-geometry dynamical-systems
asked Apr 24 '13 at 18:28
MarloMarlo
455414
455414
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.
I remind you that :
- $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.
- $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.
Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
$$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$
In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.
So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:
The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.
Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.
Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.
For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.
Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371757%2fwhy-do-manifolds-with-negative-sectional-curvature-not-have-conjugate-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.
I remind you that :
- $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.
- $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.
Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
$$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$
In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.
So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.
I remind you that :
- $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.
- $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.
Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
$$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$
In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.
So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.
I remind you that :
- $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.
- $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.
Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
$$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$
In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.
So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.
$endgroup$
Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.
I remind you that :
- $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.
- $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.
Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
$$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$
In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.
So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.
edited Apr 24 '13 at 23:20
answered Apr 24 '13 at 22:45
BebopBebop
2,805714
2,805714
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Apr 24 '13 at 23:04
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
$begingroup$
I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
$endgroup$
– Bebop
Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:
The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.
Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.
Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.
For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.
Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:
The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.
Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.
Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.
For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.
Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:
The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.
Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.
Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.
For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.
Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.
$endgroup$
This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:
The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.
Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.
Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.
For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.
Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.
answered Dec 24 '18 at 16:44
PepperPepper
508
508
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
$begingroup$
Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
$endgroup$
– Marlo
Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371757%2fwhy-do-manifolds-with-negative-sectional-curvature-not-have-conjugate-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown