Why do manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points?












2












$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.



many regards,
and thanks in advance,
Leo










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.



    many regards,
    and thanks in advance,
    Leo










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      3



      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.



      many regards,
      and thanks in advance,
      Leo










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to understand why manifolds with negative sectional curvature not have conjugate points. In fact for me it is sufficient to understand it for surfaces, but of course i'd be interested in the general case.



      many regards,
      and thanks in advance,
      Leo







      differential-geometry dynamical-systems






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 24 '13 at 18:28









      MarloMarlo

      455414




      455414






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.



          I remind you that :




          1. $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.

          2. $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.


          Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
          $$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$



          In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.



          So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:04












          • $begingroup$
            I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Bebop
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:19



















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:



          The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.



          Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.



          Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.



          For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.



          Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:59











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371757%2fwhy-do-manifolds-with-negative-sectional-curvature-not-have-conjugate-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5












          $begingroup$

          Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.



          I remind you that :




          1. $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.

          2. $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.


          Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
          $$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$



          In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.



          So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:04












          • $begingroup$
            I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Bebop
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
















          5












          $begingroup$

          Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.



          I remind you that :




          1. $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.

          2. $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.


          Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
          $$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$



          In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.



          So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:04












          • $begingroup$
            I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Bebop
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:19














          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.



          I remind you that :




          1. $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.

          2. $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.


          Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
          $$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$



          In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.



          So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $gamma:[0,epsilon]rightarrow M$ be a geodesic curve, $epsilon>0$ and $J$ be a Jacobi vector field along $gamma$ with $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$.



          I remind you that :




          1. $J$ being a Jacobi vector field means that $dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J+R(gamma',J)gamma'=0$ with the usual notation for the covariant derivative $D$ and $R$ the Riemannian curvature tensor.

          2. $left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right] kappa(X,Y)=langle R(X,Y)X,Yrangle$ for any $X,Yin TM$ with $kappa$ the sectional curvature.


          Now look at the map $phi:tmapsto |J(t)|^2$. Its second derivative is easy to compute and using the two remarks you get :
          $$begin{align} phi''(t) & = langle dfrac{D^2}{dt^2}J,Jrangle + langle dfrac{D}{dt}J,dfrac{D}{dt}Jrangle\ & = -langle R(gamma',J)gamma',Jrangle + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2 \ & = -left[|X|^2|Y|^2-langle X,Yrangle^2right]kappa(gamma',J) + |dfrac{D}{dt}J|^2.end{align}$$



          In particular, if all sectional curvatures are non-positive then $phi''geq 0$. So $phi$ is a convex map and since $phi(0)=phi(epsilon)=0$, $phi(t)=0$ for any $tin [0,epsilon]$. It follows that $J$ has to be trivial.



          So we can't have conjugate points in $M$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Apr 24 '13 at 23:20

























          answered Apr 24 '13 at 22:45









          BebopBebop

          2,805714




          2,805714












          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:04












          • $begingroup$
            I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Bebop
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:19


















          • $begingroup$
            thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:04












          • $begingroup$
            I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Bebop
            Apr 24 '13 at 23:19
















          $begingroup$
          thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
          $endgroup$
          – Marlo
          Apr 24 '13 at 23:04






          $begingroup$
          thanks a lot Bebop for the very nice answer. So the argument goes: 1. the Jacobi field has $frac{d^2}{dt^2}||J(t)||^2>0$, i.e. the length squared is a convex function on $[0,epsilon]$ 2. $||J(0)||^2=||J(epsilon)||^2$ implies that J is trivial. But why do we require $J(0)=J(epsilon)$? Is that the condition for conjugate points?
          $endgroup$
          – Marlo
          Apr 24 '13 at 23:04














          $begingroup$
          I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
          $endgroup$
          – Bebop
          Apr 24 '13 at 23:19




          $begingroup$
          I forgot to write that $J(0)=J(epsilon)=0$, otherwise the conclusion would be that $phi$ is constant. But don't you know the definition of conjugate points ? This is all about your question ? Go on wikipedia to get the full definition.
          $endgroup$
          – Bebop
          Apr 24 '13 at 23:19











          1












          $begingroup$

          This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:



          The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.



          Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.



          Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.



          For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.



          Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
















          1












          $begingroup$

          This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:



          The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.



          Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.



          Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.



          For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.



          Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:59














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:



          The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.



          Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.



          Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.



          For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.



          Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is very late, but to provide an alternative proof:



          The setup for the Rauch Comparison Theorem is very wordy, but the claim follows immediately from comparison with $mathbb{R}^m$.



          Assume that $M$ is a Riemannian manifold with nonpositive sectional curvature, that $pin M$, and that $gamma:left[0,Tright]to M$ is any unit speed geodesic originating at $p$. Let $m=dim(M)$. Take any Jacobian vector field $J$ along $gamma$ with $J(0)=0$ and $||J'(0)||>0$.



          Let $tildegamma(t)=(t,0,0,...,0)$ be a unit-speed geodesic in $mathbb{R}^m$. Let $tilde{J}$ be the Jacobian vector field along $tildegamma$ satisfying $tilde{J}(0)=0$, $tilde{J}'(0)=(<gamma'(0),J'(0)>,(||J'(0)||^2-<gamma'(0),J'(0)>^2)^frac{1}{2},0,0,...,0)$. Then $J(0)=0=tilde{J}(0)$, $||tilde{J}'(0)||=||J'(0)||$, and $<tilde{gamma}'(0),tilde{J}'(0)>=<gamma(0),J'(0)>$.



          For all $tinleft[0,Tright]$, $max(K(gamma'(t),X))leq0=min(tilde{K}(tilde{gamma}'(t),tilde{X}))$ and $dim(mathbb{R}^m)leq dim(M)$ so, by the Rauch Comparison Theorem, $||J(t)||geq||tilde{J}(t)||$ for all $tinleft[0,Tright]$. In particular, since $mathbb{R}^m$ has no conjugate points, $tilde{J}'(0)not=0$ guarantees that $||tilde{J}||>0$ for all positive $t$, hence $||J(t)||>0$ for all positive $t$, thus $p$ has no conjugate points along $gamma$.



          Since $p$ and $gamma$ were arbitrary, $M$ has no conjugate points.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Dec 24 '18 at 16:44









          PepperPepper

          508




          508












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:59


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
            $endgroup$
            – Marlo
            Dec 25 '18 at 17:59
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
          $endgroup$
          – Marlo
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:59




          $begingroup$
          Thanks @Pepper! That's also a nice way of showing it :)
          $endgroup$
          – Marlo
          Dec 25 '18 at 17:59


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f371757%2fwhy-do-manifolds-with-negative-sectional-curvature-not-have-conjugate-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Quarter-circle Tiles

          build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

          Mont Emei