How to determine the side lengths of an irregular polygon when all interior angles are known?












7












$begingroup$



  1. Given an irregular polygon where all of the angles are known, how many side lengths need to be known, at minimum, to determine the length of the remaining sides?


  2. Given all the angles and the requisite number of side lengths, how to actually calculate the remaining side length?



Example: a 5 Sided polygon's interior angles will add up to 540 degrees. ((5-2)*180=540).



Given the following interior angles:



AB 140 degrees
BC 144 degrees
CD 78 degrees
DE 102 degrees
EA 76 degrees


And knowing that Side A is 12 units long, can we determine the remaining side lengths? Or are more side lengths needed?



UPDATE:



Since you need three consecutive side lengths of a five sided figure, I'm adding three sides here so I can see an example of how the calculations are done for the remaining two sides:



Side A = 27 7/8"
Side B = 7"
Side c = 13 1/4"









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    7












    $begingroup$



    1. Given an irregular polygon where all of the angles are known, how many side lengths need to be known, at minimum, to determine the length of the remaining sides?


    2. Given all the angles and the requisite number of side lengths, how to actually calculate the remaining side length?



    Example: a 5 Sided polygon's interior angles will add up to 540 degrees. ((5-2)*180=540).



    Given the following interior angles:



    AB 140 degrees
    BC 144 degrees
    CD 78 degrees
    DE 102 degrees
    EA 76 degrees


    And knowing that Side A is 12 units long, can we determine the remaining side lengths? Or are more side lengths needed?



    UPDATE:



    Since you need three consecutive side lengths of a five sided figure, I'm adding three sides here so I can see an example of how the calculations are done for the remaining two sides:



    Side A = 27 7/8"
    Side B = 7"
    Side c = 13 1/4"









    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      7












      7








      7


      0



      $begingroup$



      1. Given an irregular polygon where all of the angles are known, how many side lengths need to be known, at minimum, to determine the length of the remaining sides?


      2. Given all the angles and the requisite number of side lengths, how to actually calculate the remaining side length?



      Example: a 5 Sided polygon's interior angles will add up to 540 degrees. ((5-2)*180=540).



      Given the following interior angles:



      AB 140 degrees
      BC 144 degrees
      CD 78 degrees
      DE 102 degrees
      EA 76 degrees


      And knowing that Side A is 12 units long, can we determine the remaining side lengths? Or are more side lengths needed?



      UPDATE:



      Since you need three consecutive side lengths of a five sided figure, I'm adding three sides here so I can see an example of how the calculations are done for the remaining two sides:



      Side A = 27 7/8"
      Side B = 7"
      Side c = 13 1/4"









      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      1. Given an irregular polygon where all of the angles are known, how many side lengths need to be known, at minimum, to determine the length of the remaining sides?


      2. Given all the angles and the requisite number of side lengths, how to actually calculate the remaining side length?



      Example: a 5 Sided polygon's interior angles will add up to 540 degrees. ((5-2)*180=540).



      Given the following interior angles:



      AB 140 degrees
      BC 144 degrees
      CD 78 degrees
      DE 102 degrees
      EA 76 degrees


      And knowing that Side A is 12 units long, can we determine the remaining side lengths? Or are more side lengths needed?



      UPDATE:



      Since you need three consecutive side lengths of a five sided figure, I'm adding three sides here so I can see an example of how the calculations are done for the remaining two sides:



      Side A = 27 7/8"
      Side B = 7"
      Side c = 13 1/4"






      geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 11 '12 at 20:10







      Nick

















      asked Dec 11 '12 at 17:27









      NickNick

      145126




      145126






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          For a $n$ sided polygon, you need all the angles in order and $n-2$ consecutive side lengths in order to construct the polygon.
          So, you need the lengths of sides $B,C$ or $E,B$ or $D,E$ to construct your polygon.



          The best way to find out the length of the remaining side is by drawing diagonals and applying triangle laws (sine or cosine rule).



          Consider the (very badly drawn) pentagon. It is not drawn to scale, but you get the idea.
          Here are the steps you will take to find out the lengths of $D,E$.




          1.Find out length of $X$ using cosine rule in $Delta ABX$.



          2.Knowing $angle a,X,A,B$, find out $angle e,angle b$ using sine rule.



          3.$angle c = anglembox{(between B,C)} -angle b$. So, $angle c$ is known.



          4.Repeat the whole procedure for $Delta CXY$. Find out $Y,angle d, angle f$.



          5.$angle g, angle h$ are easily calculated now.



          6.$angle i$ is known. Apply sine rule in $Delta DEY$ to find out $D,E$-the two unknown sides.




          A (very crude) pentagon






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 18:33










          • $begingroup$
            I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 20:11










          • $begingroup$
            I have added an explanation. Got it?
            $endgroup$
            – dexter04
            Dec 11 '12 at 20:48










          • $begingroup$
            Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 21:44












          • $begingroup$
            @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
            $endgroup$
            – user1271772
            Nov 30 '17 at 2:52



















          1












          $begingroup$

          Here's a straightforward way of 'back-of-the-envelope'ing the number of sides needed: arbitrarily translate one of your polygon's points to the origin, and align its first side along the positive $x$ axis; it should be intuitively obvious (though it's a little trickier to prove) that this uses all the degrees of freedom that are available in the isometries of the plane. Once this has been done, then since we've set the 'root' of the figure to be the origin we have $(x_0, y_0) = (0, 0)$) and setting the first side along the $x$ axis has given us $y_1 = 0$; on the other hand, it should be clear (though again, a little tricky to prove) that all the other coordinates ${(x_i, y_i): 1leq ileq n-1}$ of the polygon are essentially unspecified. This means that there are $2(n-1)-1 = 2n-3$ degrees of freedom available to describe the polygon. (Alternately, you can think of this as the $2n$ degrees of freedom inherent in $n$ $2$-dimensional points minus the $3$ degrees of freedom in isometries of the plane.) Since there are $n-1$ degrees of freedom in the polygon's angles (the sum of the angles is constant, which removes one degree of freedom), then an additional $(2n-3)-(n-1) = n-2$ values — in other words, the length of all but $2$ sides — will need to be provided in order to eliminate all the degrees of freedom and completely specify the polygon.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f256412%2fhow-to-determine-the-side-lengths-of-an-irregular-polygon-when-all-interior-angl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            For a $n$ sided polygon, you need all the angles in order and $n-2$ consecutive side lengths in order to construct the polygon.
            So, you need the lengths of sides $B,C$ or $E,B$ or $D,E$ to construct your polygon.



            The best way to find out the length of the remaining side is by drawing diagonals and applying triangle laws (sine or cosine rule).



            Consider the (very badly drawn) pentagon. It is not drawn to scale, but you get the idea.
            Here are the steps you will take to find out the lengths of $D,E$.




            1.Find out length of $X$ using cosine rule in $Delta ABX$.



            2.Knowing $angle a,X,A,B$, find out $angle e,angle b$ using sine rule.



            3.$angle c = anglembox{(between B,C)} -angle b$. So, $angle c$ is known.



            4.Repeat the whole procedure for $Delta CXY$. Find out $Y,angle d, angle f$.



            5.$angle g, angle h$ are easily calculated now.



            6.$angle i$ is known. Apply sine rule in $Delta DEY$ to find out $D,E$-the two unknown sides.




            A (very crude) pentagon






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 18:33










            • $begingroup$
              I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:11










            • $begingroup$
              I have added an explanation. Got it?
              $endgroup$
              – dexter04
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:48










            • $begingroup$
              Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 21:44












            • $begingroup$
              @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
              $endgroup$
              – user1271772
              Nov 30 '17 at 2:52
















            2












            $begingroup$

            For a $n$ sided polygon, you need all the angles in order and $n-2$ consecutive side lengths in order to construct the polygon.
            So, you need the lengths of sides $B,C$ or $E,B$ or $D,E$ to construct your polygon.



            The best way to find out the length of the remaining side is by drawing diagonals and applying triangle laws (sine or cosine rule).



            Consider the (very badly drawn) pentagon. It is not drawn to scale, but you get the idea.
            Here are the steps you will take to find out the lengths of $D,E$.




            1.Find out length of $X$ using cosine rule in $Delta ABX$.



            2.Knowing $angle a,X,A,B$, find out $angle e,angle b$ using sine rule.



            3.$angle c = anglembox{(between B,C)} -angle b$. So, $angle c$ is known.



            4.Repeat the whole procedure for $Delta CXY$. Find out $Y,angle d, angle f$.



            5.$angle g, angle h$ are easily calculated now.



            6.$angle i$ is known. Apply sine rule in $Delta DEY$ to find out $D,E$-the two unknown sides.




            A (very crude) pentagon






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 18:33










            • $begingroup$
              I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:11










            • $begingroup$
              I have added an explanation. Got it?
              $endgroup$
              – dexter04
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:48










            • $begingroup$
              Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 21:44












            • $begingroup$
              @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
              $endgroup$
              – user1271772
              Nov 30 '17 at 2:52














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            For a $n$ sided polygon, you need all the angles in order and $n-2$ consecutive side lengths in order to construct the polygon.
            So, you need the lengths of sides $B,C$ or $E,B$ or $D,E$ to construct your polygon.



            The best way to find out the length of the remaining side is by drawing diagonals and applying triangle laws (sine or cosine rule).



            Consider the (very badly drawn) pentagon. It is not drawn to scale, but you get the idea.
            Here are the steps you will take to find out the lengths of $D,E$.




            1.Find out length of $X$ using cosine rule in $Delta ABX$.



            2.Knowing $angle a,X,A,B$, find out $angle e,angle b$ using sine rule.



            3.$angle c = anglembox{(between B,C)} -angle b$. So, $angle c$ is known.



            4.Repeat the whole procedure for $Delta CXY$. Find out $Y,angle d, angle f$.



            5.$angle g, angle h$ are easily calculated now.



            6.$angle i$ is known. Apply sine rule in $Delta DEY$ to find out $D,E$-the two unknown sides.




            A (very crude) pentagon






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            For a $n$ sided polygon, you need all the angles in order and $n-2$ consecutive side lengths in order to construct the polygon.
            So, you need the lengths of sides $B,C$ or $E,B$ or $D,E$ to construct your polygon.



            The best way to find out the length of the remaining side is by drawing diagonals and applying triangle laws (sine or cosine rule).



            Consider the (very badly drawn) pentagon. It is not drawn to scale, but you get the idea.
            Here are the steps you will take to find out the lengths of $D,E$.




            1.Find out length of $X$ using cosine rule in $Delta ABX$.



            2.Knowing $angle a,X,A,B$, find out $angle e,angle b$ using sine rule.



            3.$angle c = anglembox{(between B,C)} -angle b$. So, $angle c$ is known.



            4.Repeat the whole procedure for $Delta CXY$. Find out $Y,angle d, angle f$.



            5.$angle g, angle h$ are easily calculated now.



            6.$angle i$ is known. Apply sine rule in $Delta DEY$ to find out $D,E$-the two unknown sides.




            A (very crude) pentagon







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jul 17 '16 at 15:58









            wythagoras

            21.6k444104




            21.6k444104










            answered Dec 11 '12 at 18:17









            dexter04dexter04

            1,6701027




            1,6701027












            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 18:33










            • $begingroup$
              I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:11










            • $begingroup$
              I have added an explanation. Got it?
              $endgroup$
              – dexter04
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:48










            • $begingroup$
              Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 21:44












            • $begingroup$
              @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
              $endgroup$
              – user1271772
              Nov 30 '17 at 2:52


















            • $begingroup$
              Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 18:33










            • $begingroup$
              I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:11










            • $begingroup$
              I have added an explanation. Got it?
              $endgroup$
              – dexter04
              Dec 11 '12 at 20:48










            • $begingroup$
              Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
              $endgroup$
              – Nick
              Dec 11 '12 at 21:44












            • $begingroup$
              @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
              $endgroup$
              – user1271772
              Nov 30 '17 at 2:52
















            $begingroup$
            Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 18:33




            $begingroup$
            Could you provide more details or a link on "drawing diagonals and aplying triangle laws"? I'm not familiar with how that works.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 18:33












            $begingroup$
            I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 20:11




            $begingroup$
            I've added an update with example dimensions of three consecutive sides.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 20:11












            $begingroup$
            I have added an explanation. Got it?
            $endgroup$
            – dexter04
            Dec 11 '12 at 20:48




            $begingroup$
            I have added an explanation. Got it?
            $endgroup$
            – dexter04
            Dec 11 '12 at 20:48












            $begingroup$
            Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 21:44






            $begingroup$
            Got it! Thanks for the picture and details. +1 and accepted.
            $endgroup$
            – Nick
            Dec 11 '12 at 21:44














            $begingroup$
            @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
            $endgroup$
            – user1271772
            Nov 30 '17 at 2:52




            $begingroup$
            @dexter04 What about if we know there is an axis of symmetry? For example let's say there's a hexagon which can be folded in half horizontally to give overlapping halves, but not vertically. Only 2 unique angles are needed to determine the rest (there's 3 pairs of angles, so the 3rd pair can be determined from the other two), but what about the 4 unique lengths? By drawing two examples with same angles and one common side, I can see 1 side-length isn't enough, but it seems knowing 2 side-lengths can determine the remaining 4 side lengths. Is there a general rule/theorem/proof for all polygons?
            $endgroup$
            – user1271772
            Nov 30 '17 at 2:52











            1












            $begingroup$

            Here's a straightforward way of 'back-of-the-envelope'ing the number of sides needed: arbitrarily translate one of your polygon's points to the origin, and align its first side along the positive $x$ axis; it should be intuitively obvious (though it's a little trickier to prove) that this uses all the degrees of freedom that are available in the isometries of the plane. Once this has been done, then since we've set the 'root' of the figure to be the origin we have $(x_0, y_0) = (0, 0)$) and setting the first side along the $x$ axis has given us $y_1 = 0$; on the other hand, it should be clear (though again, a little tricky to prove) that all the other coordinates ${(x_i, y_i): 1leq ileq n-1}$ of the polygon are essentially unspecified. This means that there are $2(n-1)-1 = 2n-3$ degrees of freedom available to describe the polygon. (Alternately, you can think of this as the $2n$ degrees of freedom inherent in $n$ $2$-dimensional points minus the $3$ degrees of freedom in isometries of the plane.) Since there are $n-1$ degrees of freedom in the polygon's angles (the sum of the angles is constant, which removes one degree of freedom), then an additional $(2n-3)-(n-1) = n-2$ values — in other words, the length of all but $2$ sides — will need to be provided in order to eliminate all the degrees of freedom and completely specify the polygon.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              Here's a straightforward way of 'back-of-the-envelope'ing the number of sides needed: arbitrarily translate one of your polygon's points to the origin, and align its first side along the positive $x$ axis; it should be intuitively obvious (though it's a little trickier to prove) that this uses all the degrees of freedom that are available in the isometries of the plane. Once this has been done, then since we've set the 'root' of the figure to be the origin we have $(x_0, y_0) = (0, 0)$) and setting the first side along the $x$ axis has given us $y_1 = 0$; on the other hand, it should be clear (though again, a little tricky to prove) that all the other coordinates ${(x_i, y_i): 1leq ileq n-1}$ of the polygon are essentially unspecified. This means that there are $2(n-1)-1 = 2n-3$ degrees of freedom available to describe the polygon. (Alternately, you can think of this as the $2n$ degrees of freedom inherent in $n$ $2$-dimensional points minus the $3$ degrees of freedom in isometries of the plane.) Since there are $n-1$ degrees of freedom in the polygon's angles (the sum of the angles is constant, which removes one degree of freedom), then an additional $(2n-3)-(n-1) = n-2$ values — in other words, the length of all but $2$ sides — will need to be provided in order to eliminate all the degrees of freedom and completely specify the polygon.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Here's a straightforward way of 'back-of-the-envelope'ing the number of sides needed: arbitrarily translate one of your polygon's points to the origin, and align its first side along the positive $x$ axis; it should be intuitively obvious (though it's a little trickier to prove) that this uses all the degrees of freedom that are available in the isometries of the plane. Once this has been done, then since we've set the 'root' of the figure to be the origin we have $(x_0, y_0) = (0, 0)$) and setting the first side along the $x$ axis has given us $y_1 = 0$; on the other hand, it should be clear (though again, a little tricky to prove) that all the other coordinates ${(x_i, y_i): 1leq ileq n-1}$ of the polygon are essentially unspecified. This means that there are $2(n-1)-1 = 2n-3$ degrees of freedom available to describe the polygon. (Alternately, you can think of this as the $2n$ degrees of freedom inherent in $n$ $2$-dimensional points minus the $3$ degrees of freedom in isometries of the plane.) Since there are $n-1$ degrees of freedom in the polygon's angles (the sum of the angles is constant, which removes one degree of freedom), then an additional $(2n-3)-(n-1) = n-2$ values — in other words, the length of all but $2$ sides — will need to be provided in order to eliminate all the degrees of freedom and completely specify the polygon.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Here's a straightforward way of 'back-of-the-envelope'ing the number of sides needed: arbitrarily translate one of your polygon's points to the origin, and align its first side along the positive $x$ axis; it should be intuitively obvious (though it's a little trickier to prove) that this uses all the degrees of freedom that are available in the isometries of the plane. Once this has been done, then since we've set the 'root' of the figure to be the origin we have $(x_0, y_0) = (0, 0)$) and setting the first side along the $x$ axis has given us $y_1 = 0$; on the other hand, it should be clear (though again, a little tricky to prove) that all the other coordinates ${(x_i, y_i): 1leq ileq n-1}$ of the polygon are essentially unspecified. This means that there are $2(n-1)-1 = 2n-3$ degrees of freedom available to describe the polygon. (Alternately, you can think of this as the $2n$ degrees of freedom inherent in $n$ $2$-dimensional points minus the $3$ degrees of freedom in isometries of the plane.) Since there are $n-1$ degrees of freedom in the polygon's angles (the sum of the angles is constant, which removes one degree of freedom), then an additional $(2n-3)-(n-1) = n-2$ values — in other words, the length of all but $2$ sides — will need to be provided in order to eliminate all the degrees of freedom and completely specify the polygon.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Apr 2 '14 at 0:45









                Steven StadnickiSteven Stadnicki

                41.3k868122




                41.3k868122






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f256412%2fhow-to-determine-the-side-lengths-of-an-irregular-polygon-when-all-interior-angl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Ellipse (mathématiques)

                    Quarter-circle Tiles

                    Mont Emei