variance of conditional multivariate gaussian
$begingroup$
I was playing around with Gaussian Distributions on my machine and I was interesting in making a pretty plot. I wanted to show the distribution of $x_1$ if $x_2$ was given if $x_1,x_2$ were distributed by a multivariate normal distribution.
The image feels "wrong". I would imagine that the red likelihood in the center of the blue distribution would be wider than at the edge. After double checking the code, I notice it might be the maths.
Maths on wikipedia as well as my books confirm that the distribution of $x_1$ conditional on $x_2$ = $a$ is multivariate normal $(x_1 | x_2 = a) sim N(hat{mu}, hat{Sigma})$ where
$$
bar{boldsymbolmu}
=
boldsymbolmu_1 + boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1}
left(
mathbf{a} - boldsymbolmu_2
right)
$$
and covariance matrix
$$
overline{boldsymbolSigma}
=
boldsymbolSigma_{11} - boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1} boldsymbolSigma_{21}.
$$
When looking at the maths, it seems that the variance of $p(x_1|x_2 = a)$ does not depend on the value of $a$. This is starting to feel very counter intuitive so I am wondering if I am missing something.
The code that generated the plot
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import torch
from torch.distributions import Normal as norm
from torch.distributions.multivariate_normal import MultivariateNormal as mvnorm
#@title different given values { run: "auto" }
g1 = -3.5 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g2 = 0.2 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g3 = 2.9 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
m = torch.tensor([0.0, 0.0])
c = torch.tensor([[1.0, 0.9], [0.9, 1.0]])
s = mvnorm(m, c).sample(sample_shape=(5000,))
s_np = s.numpy().reshape(5000, 2)
plt.figure(figsize=(6,5))
plt.scatter(s_np[:, 0], s_np[:, 1], alpha=0.3)
for g in [g1, g2, g3]:
mu_pred = m[1] + c[0][1]/c[1][1]*(g - m[0])
sigma_pred = c[1][1] - c[1][0]/c[0][0]*c[0][1]
fitted_distr = norm(mu_pred, sigma_pred)
print(f"g:{g:.3}, mu:{mu_pred:.2}, sigma:{sigma_pred:.4}")
xs = torch.linspace(-4, 4, 300)
likelihood = torch.exp(fitted_distr.log_prob(xs)).numpy()
plt.plot(xs.numpy(), g + likelihood, c='red')
probability-distributions normal-distribution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was playing around with Gaussian Distributions on my machine and I was interesting in making a pretty plot. I wanted to show the distribution of $x_1$ if $x_2$ was given if $x_1,x_2$ were distributed by a multivariate normal distribution.
The image feels "wrong". I would imagine that the red likelihood in the center of the blue distribution would be wider than at the edge. After double checking the code, I notice it might be the maths.
Maths on wikipedia as well as my books confirm that the distribution of $x_1$ conditional on $x_2$ = $a$ is multivariate normal $(x_1 | x_2 = a) sim N(hat{mu}, hat{Sigma})$ where
$$
bar{boldsymbolmu}
=
boldsymbolmu_1 + boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1}
left(
mathbf{a} - boldsymbolmu_2
right)
$$
and covariance matrix
$$
overline{boldsymbolSigma}
=
boldsymbolSigma_{11} - boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1} boldsymbolSigma_{21}.
$$
When looking at the maths, it seems that the variance of $p(x_1|x_2 = a)$ does not depend on the value of $a$. This is starting to feel very counter intuitive so I am wondering if I am missing something.
The code that generated the plot
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import torch
from torch.distributions import Normal as norm
from torch.distributions.multivariate_normal import MultivariateNormal as mvnorm
#@title different given values { run: "auto" }
g1 = -3.5 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g2 = 0.2 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g3 = 2.9 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
m = torch.tensor([0.0, 0.0])
c = torch.tensor([[1.0, 0.9], [0.9, 1.0]])
s = mvnorm(m, c).sample(sample_shape=(5000,))
s_np = s.numpy().reshape(5000, 2)
plt.figure(figsize=(6,5))
plt.scatter(s_np[:, 0], s_np[:, 1], alpha=0.3)
for g in [g1, g2, g3]:
mu_pred = m[1] + c[0][1]/c[1][1]*(g - m[0])
sigma_pred = c[1][1] - c[1][0]/c[0][0]*c[0][1]
fitted_distr = norm(mu_pred, sigma_pred)
print(f"g:{g:.3}, mu:{mu_pred:.2}, sigma:{sigma_pred:.4}")
xs = torch.linspace(-4, 4, 300)
likelihood = torch.exp(fitted_distr.log_prob(xs)).numpy()
plt.plot(xs.numpy(), g + likelihood, c='red')
probability-distributions normal-distribution
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was playing around with Gaussian Distributions on my machine and I was interesting in making a pretty plot. I wanted to show the distribution of $x_1$ if $x_2$ was given if $x_1,x_2$ were distributed by a multivariate normal distribution.
The image feels "wrong". I would imagine that the red likelihood in the center of the blue distribution would be wider than at the edge. After double checking the code, I notice it might be the maths.
Maths on wikipedia as well as my books confirm that the distribution of $x_1$ conditional on $x_2$ = $a$ is multivariate normal $(x_1 | x_2 = a) sim N(hat{mu}, hat{Sigma})$ where
$$
bar{boldsymbolmu}
=
boldsymbolmu_1 + boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1}
left(
mathbf{a} - boldsymbolmu_2
right)
$$
and covariance matrix
$$
overline{boldsymbolSigma}
=
boldsymbolSigma_{11} - boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1} boldsymbolSigma_{21}.
$$
When looking at the maths, it seems that the variance of $p(x_1|x_2 = a)$ does not depend on the value of $a$. This is starting to feel very counter intuitive so I am wondering if I am missing something.
The code that generated the plot
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import torch
from torch.distributions import Normal as norm
from torch.distributions.multivariate_normal import MultivariateNormal as mvnorm
#@title different given values { run: "auto" }
g1 = -3.5 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g2 = 0.2 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g3 = 2.9 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
m = torch.tensor([0.0, 0.0])
c = torch.tensor([[1.0, 0.9], [0.9, 1.0]])
s = mvnorm(m, c).sample(sample_shape=(5000,))
s_np = s.numpy().reshape(5000, 2)
plt.figure(figsize=(6,5))
plt.scatter(s_np[:, 0], s_np[:, 1], alpha=0.3)
for g in [g1, g2, g3]:
mu_pred = m[1] + c[0][1]/c[1][1]*(g - m[0])
sigma_pred = c[1][1] - c[1][0]/c[0][0]*c[0][1]
fitted_distr = norm(mu_pred, sigma_pred)
print(f"g:{g:.3}, mu:{mu_pred:.2}, sigma:{sigma_pred:.4}")
xs = torch.linspace(-4, 4, 300)
likelihood = torch.exp(fitted_distr.log_prob(xs)).numpy()
plt.plot(xs.numpy(), g + likelihood, c='red')
probability-distributions normal-distribution
$endgroup$
I was playing around with Gaussian Distributions on my machine and I was interesting in making a pretty plot. I wanted to show the distribution of $x_1$ if $x_2$ was given if $x_1,x_2$ were distributed by a multivariate normal distribution.
The image feels "wrong". I would imagine that the red likelihood in the center of the blue distribution would be wider than at the edge. After double checking the code, I notice it might be the maths.
Maths on wikipedia as well as my books confirm that the distribution of $x_1$ conditional on $x_2$ = $a$ is multivariate normal $(x_1 | x_2 = a) sim N(hat{mu}, hat{Sigma})$ where
$$
bar{boldsymbolmu}
=
boldsymbolmu_1 + boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1}
left(
mathbf{a} - boldsymbolmu_2
right)
$$
and covariance matrix
$$
overline{boldsymbolSigma}
=
boldsymbolSigma_{11} - boldsymbolSigma_{12} boldsymbolSigma_{22}^{-1} boldsymbolSigma_{21}.
$$
When looking at the maths, it seems that the variance of $p(x_1|x_2 = a)$ does not depend on the value of $a$. This is starting to feel very counter intuitive so I am wondering if I am missing something.
The code that generated the plot
import matplotlib.pylab as plt
import torch
from torch.distributions import Normal as norm
from torch.distributions.multivariate_normal import MultivariateNormal as mvnorm
#@title different given values { run: "auto" }
g1 = -3.5 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g2 = 0.2 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
g3 = 2.9 #@param {type:"slider", min:-4, max:4, step:0.1}
m = torch.tensor([0.0, 0.0])
c = torch.tensor([[1.0, 0.9], [0.9, 1.0]])
s = mvnorm(m, c).sample(sample_shape=(5000,))
s_np = s.numpy().reshape(5000, 2)
plt.figure(figsize=(6,5))
plt.scatter(s_np[:, 0], s_np[:, 1], alpha=0.3)
for g in [g1, g2, g3]:
mu_pred = m[1] + c[0][1]/c[1][1]*(g - m[0])
sigma_pred = c[1][1] - c[1][0]/c[0][0]*c[0][1]
fitted_distr = norm(mu_pred, sigma_pred)
print(f"g:{g:.3}, mu:{mu_pred:.2}, sigma:{sigma_pred:.4}")
xs = torch.linspace(-4, 4, 300)
likelihood = torch.exp(fitted_distr.log_prob(xs)).numpy()
plt.plot(xs.numpy(), g + likelihood, c='red')
probability-distributions normal-distribution
probability-distributions normal-distribution
asked Jan 6 at 8:38
Vincent WarmerdamVincent Warmerdam
15217
15217
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This question was also asked on another stack-exchange website and that question has been answered there.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063616%2fvariance-of-conditional-multivariate-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This question was also asked on another stack-exchange website and that question has been answered there.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question was also asked on another stack-exchange website and that question has been answered there.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question was also asked on another stack-exchange website and that question has been answered there.
$endgroup$
This question was also asked on another stack-exchange website and that question has been answered there.
answered Jan 15 at 10:21
Vincent WarmerdamVincent Warmerdam
15217
15217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063616%2fvariance-of-conditional-multivariate-gaussian%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown