If the party is hidden prior to attacking enemies, do they surprise the enemies and/or get advantage on their...











up vote
8
down vote

favorite












Our adroit heroes tracked the goblins back to a small camp in the woods. Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.



The party attacks! Arrows rain down, spells are cast, and sword wielders rush in. Does our party:




  • attack with advantage because they are hidden?

  • only cause the unaware goblins to be surprised for the first round?

  • get both surprise and advantage?


What are scenarios in which each of the above would occur?










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    You should keep in mind that there is no concept of a 'surprise round' in 5e; it might be clearer if your question doesn't imply it to be the case.
    – Glen_b
    2 days ago

















up vote
8
down vote

favorite












Our adroit heroes tracked the goblins back to a small camp in the woods. Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.



The party attacks! Arrows rain down, spells are cast, and sword wielders rush in. Does our party:




  • attack with advantage because they are hidden?

  • only cause the unaware goblins to be surprised for the first round?

  • get both surprise and advantage?


What are scenarios in which each of the above would occur?










share|improve this question




















  • 3




    You should keep in mind that there is no concept of a 'surprise round' in 5e; it might be clearer if your question doesn't imply it to be the case.
    – Glen_b
    2 days ago















up vote
8
down vote

favorite









up vote
8
down vote

favorite











Our adroit heroes tracked the goblins back to a small camp in the woods. Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.



The party attacks! Arrows rain down, spells are cast, and sword wielders rush in. Does our party:




  • attack with advantage because they are hidden?

  • only cause the unaware goblins to be surprised for the first round?

  • get both surprise and advantage?


What are scenarios in which each of the above would occur?










share|improve this question















Our adroit heroes tracked the goblins back to a small camp in the woods. Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.



The party attacks! Arrows rain down, spells are cast, and sword wielders rush in. Does our party:




  • attack with advantage because they are hidden?

  • only cause the unaware goblins to be surprised for the first round?

  • get both surprise and advantage?


What are scenarios in which each of the above would occur?







dnd-5e stealth advantage surprise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday

























asked 2 days ago









SeeDerekEngineer

1,0831932




1,0831932








  • 3




    You should keep in mind that there is no concept of a 'surprise round' in 5e; it might be clearer if your question doesn't imply it to be the case.
    – Glen_b
    2 days ago
















  • 3




    You should keep in mind that there is no concept of a 'surprise round' in 5e; it might be clearer if your question doesn't imply it to be the case.
    – Glen_b
    2 days ago










3




3




You should keep in mind that there is no concept of a 'surprise round' in 5e; it might be clearer if your question doesn't imply it to be the case.
– Glen_b
2 days ago






You should keep in mind that there is no concept of a 'surprise round' in 5e; it might be clearer if your question doesn't imply it to be the case.
– Glen_b
2 days ago












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










It's all in your description:




Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.




You, the GM, have already determined that the goblins are completely unaware and that the adventurers are hidden. (Some GMs might have compared stealth vs. perception, some might let the fiction do the talking for them, you may have done neither; see DMG p. 237 for more on how to decide whether or not to require checks in this instance.)





  • That the goblins are completely unaware means they are surprised. From PHB p.189 at "Surprise":




    Any character or monster that doesn't notice a threat is surprised.





  • That the adventurers are hidden means that they attack at advantage. From PHB p.195 at "Unseen Attackers and Targets":




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    So as you describe it your archers and (presumably-ranged casters) would have advantage. Those sword-wielders, though... they lose their advantage as they come into sight and attack (presumably while visible) the goblins in melee.








share|improve this answer























  • But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
    – SeeDerekEngineer
    2 days ago






  • 9




    @SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
    – nitsua60
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
    – KorvinStarmast
    2 days ago










  • Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
    – XAQT78
    yesterday










  • @XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
    – nitsua60
    yesterday











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136453%2fif-the-party-is-hidden-prior-to-attacking-enemies-do-they-surprise-the-enemies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
18
down vote



accepted










It's all in your description:




Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.




You, the GM, have already determined that the goblins are completely unaware and that the adventurers are hidden. (Some GMs might have compared stealth vs. perception, some might let the fiction do the talking for them, you may have done neither; see DMG p. 237 for more on how to decide whether or not to require checks in this instance.)





  • That the goblins are completely unaware means they are surprised. From PHB p.189 at "Surprise":




    Any character or monster that doesn't notice a threat is surprised.





  • That the adventurers are hidden means that they attack at advantage. From PHB p.195 at "Unseen Attackers and Targets":




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    So as you describe it your archers and (presumably-ranged casters) would have advantage. Those sword-wielders, though... they lose their advantage as they come into sight and attack (presumably while visible) the goblins in melee.








share|improve this answer























  • But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
    – SeeDerekEngineer
    2 days ago






  • 9




    @SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
    – nitsua60
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
    – KorvinStarmast
    2 days ago










  • Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
    – XAQT78
    yesterday










  • @XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
    – nitsua60
    yesterday















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










It's all in your description:




Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.




You, the GM, have already determined that the goblins are completely unaware and that the adventurers are hidden. (Some GMs might have compared stealth vs. perception, some might let the fiction do the talking for them, you may have done neither; see DMG p. 237 for more on how to decide whether or not to require checks in this instance.)





  • That the goblins are completely unaware means they are surprised. From PHB p.189 at "Surprise":




    Any character or monster that doesn't notice a threat is surprised.





  • That the adventurers are hidden means that they attack at advantage. From PHB p.195 at "Unseen Attackers and Targets":




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    So as you describe it your archers and (presumably-ranged casters) would have advantage. Those sword-wielders, though... they lose their advantage as they come into sight and attack (presumably while visible) the goblins in melee.








share|improve this answer























  • But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
    – SeeDerekEngineer
    2 days ago






  • 9




    @SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
    – nitsua60
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
    – KorvinStarmast
    2 days ago










  • Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
    – XAQT78
    yesterday










  • @XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
    – nitsua60
    yesterday













up vote
18
down vote



accepted







up vote
18
down vote



accepted






It's all in your description:




Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.




You, the GM, have already determined that the goblins are completely unaware and that the adventurers are hidden. (Some GMs might have compared stealth vs. perception, some might let the fiction do the talking for them, you may have done neither; see DMG p. 237 for more on how to decide whether or not to require checks in this instance.)





  • That the goblins are completely unaware means they are surprised. From PHB p.189 at "Surprise":




    Any character or monster that doesn't notice a threat is surprised.





  • That the adventurers are hidden means that they attack at advantage. From PHB p.195 at "Unseen Attackers and Targets":




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    So as you describe it your archers and (presumably-ranged casters) would have advantage. Those sword-wielders, though... they lose their advantage as they come into sight and attack (presumably while visible) the goblins in melee.








share|improve this answer














It's all in your description:




Completely unaware of the threat around them, the goblins sit around a fire, easy prey to the hidden band of adventurers lurking in the trees.




You, the GM, have already determined that the goblins are completely unaware and that the adventurers are hidden. (Some GMs might have compared stealth vs. perception, some might let the fiction do the talking for them, you may have done neither; see DMG p. 237 for more on how to decide whether or not to require checks in this instance.)





  • That the goblins are completely unaware means they are surprised. From PHB p.189 at "Surprise":




    Any character or monster that doesn't notice a threat is surprised.





  • That the adventurers are hidden means that they attack at advantage. From PHB p.195 at "Unseen Attackers and Targets":




    When a creature can't see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it.




    So as you describe it your archers and (presumably-ranged casters) would have advantage. Those sword-wielders, though... they lose their advantage as they come into sight and attack (presumably while visible) the goblins in melee.









share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









nitsua60

71.7k12294418




71.7k12294418












  • But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
    – SeeDerekEngineer
    2 days ago






  • 9




    @SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
    – nitsua60
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
    – KorvinStarmast
    2 days ago










  • Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
    – XAQT78
    yesterday










  • @XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
    – nitsua60
    yesterday


















  • But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
    – SeeDerekEngineer
    2 days ago






  • 9




    @SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
    – nitsua60
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
    – KorvinStarmast
    2 days ago










  • Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
    – XAQT78
    yesterday










  • @XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
    – nitsua60
    yesterday
















But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
– SeeDerekEngineer
2 days ago




But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden. For the enemy to be completely unaware the party must be hidden, no?
– SeeDerekEngineer
2 days ago




9




9




@SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
– nitsua60
2 days ago






@SeeDerekEngineer the classic surprise scenario that doesn't involve hidden attackers is when you and I can hear orcs in the next room, so we bust down the door swords-a-blazin' and attack. We got the drop on them for surprise-purposes, but they can actually see us swinging and so our attacks aren't advantaged. Another might be if we were negotiating with innocent do-gooders while intending to double-cross them the entire time. On your signal we both draw and stab--surprise! (Perhaps contingent on the result of a deception-insight contest.) But seen.
– nitsua60
2 days ago






1




1




@SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
– KorvinStarmast
2 days ago




@SeeDerekEngineer this isn't a line of computer code in a computer game. But wouldnt every Instance of surprise entail the party be hidden
– KorvinStarmast
2 days ago












Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
– XAQT78
yesterday




Don’t forget passive perception check to determine who is actually receives the “surprise” condition.
– XAQT78
yesterday












@XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
– nitsua60
yesterday




@XAQT78 I'm not sure what you're suggesting--isn't that covered by the parenthetical in the first paragraph?
– nitsua60
yesterday


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136453%2fif-the-party-is-hidden-prior-to-attacking-enemies-do-they-surprise-the-enemies%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quarter-circle Tiles

build a pushdown automaton that recognizes the reverse language of a given pushdown automaton?

Mont Emei