Are there any airlines that fly a route that has an arrival time earlier than its departure time? [closed]
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Imagine the scenario where an airline flys a short 30 minute route which crosses a timezone going west. They could theoretically leave at 00:15 (local) and arrive at 23:45 local the previous day. I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route.
P.S. I'm specifically interested in how the airline allows booking such a flight and the UI that is presented, but am leaving this question more general for any flights that do this.
P.P.S. If someone could help with the tags for this question, it'd be much appreciated.
airline-operations
closed as off-topic by fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin Nov 29 at 3:16
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not appear to be about aviation, within the scope defined in the help center." – fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Imagine the scenario where an airline flys a short 30 minute route which crosses a timezone going west. They could theoretically leave at 00:15 (local) and arrive at 23:45 local the previous day. I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route.
P.S. I'm specifically interested in how the airline allows booking such a flight and the UI that is presented, but am leaving this question more general for any flights that do this.
P.P.S. If someone could help with the tags for this question, it'd be much appreciated.
airline-operations
closed as off-topic by fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin Nov 29 at 3:16
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not appear to be about aviation, within the scope defined in the help center." – fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
hum, that's not very different from DST events happening twice a year.
– mins
Nov 28 at 18:07
1
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/14480/… is basically the same question.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:20
Looks like this isn't on topic for this Stack. Should be on travel instead. Sorry guys but thanks for the great answers!
– Sandy Chapman
Nov 29 at 19:48
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Imagine the scenario where an airline flys a short 30 minute route which crosses a timezone going west. They could theoretically leave at 00:15 (local) and arrive at 23:45 local the previous day. I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route.
P.S. I'm specifically interested in how the airline allows booking such a flight and the UI that is presented, but am leaving this question more general for any flights that do this.
P.P.S. If someone could help with the tags for this question, it'd be much appreciated.
airline-operations
Imagine the scenario where an airline flys a short 30 minute route which crosses a timezone going west. They could theoretically leave at 00:15 (local) and arrive at 23:45 local the previous day. I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route.
P.S. I'm specifically interested in how the airline allows booking such a flight and the UI that is presented, but am leaving this question more general for any flights that do this.
P.P.S. If someone could help with the tags for this question, it'd be much appreciated.
airline-operations
airline-operations
asked Nov 28 at 17:31
Sandy Chapman
1326
1326
closed as off-topic by fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin Nov 29 at 3:16
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not appear to be about aviation, within the scope defined in the help center." – fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as off-topic by fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin Nov 29 at 3:16
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not appear to be about aviation, within the scope defined in the help center." – fooot, David Richerby, SMS von der Tann, Sean, kevin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
hum, that's not very different from DST events happening twice a year.
– mins
Nov 28 at 18:07
1
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/14480/… is basically the same question.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:20
Looks like this isn't on topic for this Stack. Should be on travel instead. Sorry guys but thanks for the great answers!
– Sandy Chapman
Nov 29 at 19:48
add a comment |
1
hum, that's not very different from DST events happening twice a year.
– mins
Nov 28 at 18:07
1
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/14480/… is basically the same question.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:20
Looks like this isn't on topic for this Stack. Should be on travel instead. Sorry guys but thanks for the great answers!
– Sandy Chapman
Nov 29 at 19:48
1
1
hum, that's not very different from DST events happening twice a year.
– mins
Nov 28 at 18:07
hum, that's not very different from DST events happening twice a year.
– mins
Nov 28 at 18:07
1
1
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/14480/… is basically the same question.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:20
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/14480/… is basically the same question.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:20
Looks like this isn't on topic for this Stack. Should be on travel instead. Sorry guys but thanks for the great answers!
– Sandy Chapman
Nov 29 at 19:48
Looks like this isn't on topic for this Stack. Should be on travel instead. Sorry guys but thanks for the great answers!
– Sandy Chapman
Nov 29 at 19:48
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
UA892 leaves ICN at 6PM Friday (KT) and arrives at SFO at 11:30AM Friday (ET).
There's dozens of flights that leave Korea/Japan/etc and go to the US West Coast that arrive "before" they take off.
I'm not able to find a flight in these circumstances that leaves in the early AM from the west side of the Pacific, because that would seem to meet your criteria of arriving the previous day. The same flight leaving at 6AM Friday would arrive 11:30PM Thursday.
add a comment |
up vote
17
down vote
I found such a route for you. KATL (Atlanta) to KHSV (Huntsville, AL) is a 57 minute hop from the Eastern time zone to the Central time zone. It appears how you would expect:
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
1
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
Back when Concorde was still a thing, British Airways' motto was 'Arrive before you leave', illustrating how you could arrive in North America sooner (in local time) than when you left Europe.
7
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
2
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Yes, there are loads of these. My personal most frequent return flight - Atlanta to Nashville - is a good example. It's 35-40 minutes flying time, but moves from the Eastern time zone to Central, thus landing 20-25 minutes before it took off.
Much more extreme examples happen when you cross the International Date Line going East. For example, I've flown from Seoul (Incheon,) South Korea to San Francisco in about 10.5 hours. However, Seoul's time zone is 17 hours ahead of San Francisco's, so, despite the flight being 10.5 hours in duration, it landed 6.5 hours before it took off in local time.
Even flights with 14+ hour duration from East Asia to the U.S. mainland frequently land earlier than they take off.
The most extreme examples would be from an airport just on the Western side of the International Date Line to one just on the East side. These can land almost a full day before their departure in local time. In some cases, it's even possible to land slightly more than a full day before their departure, such as flights from the Line Islands of Kiribati (UTC+14) to, say, American Samoa (UTC-11).
And this is why aviation always uses Zulu time (UTC), not local time.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, being a pretty frequent traveler between the US and Australia I've very often technically 'arrived' before I left. I tend to book through Orbitz and while the trip to Australia is often marked with a +2 to show that crossing the date line adds another day to your trip (ie, you leave on Monday and get there on Wednesday even though the flight is only 13 hours), when you return it's common to find flights that look like this one below. Where you leave Australia at 9:35am, fly for over 13 hours, and arrive three hours earlier:
Personally, I'm not a big fan of how Orbitz doesn't show the actual dates with the times. It'd help clear up confusion here.
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
I like JQ129 from Auckland (AKL) to Rarotonga (RAR). You arrive 19 hours before you depart.
1
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
UA892 leaves ICN at 6PM Friday (KT) and arrives at SFO at 11:30AM Friday (ET).
There's dozens of flights that leave Korea/Japan/etc and go to the US West Coast that arrive "before" they take off.
I'm not able to find a flight in these circumstances that leaves in the early AM from the west side of the Pacific, because that would seem to meet your criteria of arriving the previous day. The same flight leaving at 6AM Friday would arrive 11:30PM Thursday.
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
UA892 leaves ICN at 6PM Friday (KT) and arrives at SFO at 11:30AM Friday (ET).
There's dozens of flights that leave Korea/Japan/etc and go to the US West Coast that arrive "before" they take off.
I'm not able to find a flight in these circumstances that leaves in the early AM from the west side of the Pacific, because that would seem to meet your criteria of arriving the previous day. The same flight leaving at 6AM Friday would arrive 11:30PM Thursday.
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
up vote
11
down vote
accepted
UA892 leaves ICN at 6PM Friday (KT) and arrives at SFO at 11:30AM Friday (ET).
There's dozens of flights that leave Korea/Japan/etc and go to the US West Coast that arrive "before" they take off.
I'm not able to find a flight in these circumstances that leaves in the early AM from the west side of the Pacific, because that would seem to meet your criteria of arriving the previous day. The same flight leaving at 6AM Friday would arrive 11:30PM Thursday.
UA892 leaves ICN at 6PM Friday (KT) and arrives at SFO at 11:30AM Friday (ET).
There's dozens of flights that leave Korea/Japan/etc and go to the US West Coast that arrive "before" they take off.
I'm not able to find a flight in these circumstances that leaves in the early AM from the west side of the Pacific, because that would seem to meet your criteria of arriving the previous day. The same flight leaving at 6AM Friday would arrive 11:30PM Thursday.
answered Nov 28 at 18:27
Aaron
861822
861822
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
17
down vote
I found such a route for you. KATL (Atlanta) to KHSV (Huntsville, AL) is a 57 minute hop from the Eastern time zone to the Central time zone. It appears how you would expect:
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
1
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
add a comment |
up vote
17
down vote
I found such a route for you. KATL (Atlanta) to KHSV (Huntsville, AL) is a 57 minute hop from the Eastern time zone to the Central time zone. It appears how you would expect:
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
1
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
add a comment |
up vote
17
down vote
up vote
17
down vote
I found such a route for you. KATL (Atlanta) to KHSV (Huntsville, AL) is a 57 minute hop from the Eastern time zone to the Central time zone. It appears how you would expect:
I found such a route for you. KATL (Atlanta) to KHSV (Huntsville, AL) is a 57 minute hop from the Eastern time zone to the Central time zone. It appears how you would expect:
answered Nov 28 at 18:09
Chris
2712
2712
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
1
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
add a comment |
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
1
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
There used to be similar flights westbound into Chicago O'Hare, but it appears that United has padded the schedules a bit. Presumably schedules are padded a bit more into the hub - for example Delta HSV-ATL appears to be scheduled for between 1:03 and 1:09. There are some ATL-BHM (Birmingham, AL) flights that show the same effect.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:24
1
1
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
Even better, Atlanta to Birmingham is only 47 minutes, so you can take off at 9:44AM and land at 9:31AM.
– zymhan
Nov 28 at 21:39
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
Back when Concorde was still a thing, British Airways' motto was 'Arrive before you leave', illustrating how you could arrive in North America sooner (in local time) than when you left Europe.
7
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
2
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
Back when Concorde was still a thing, British Airways' motto was 'Arrive before you leave', illustrating how you could arrive in North America sooner (in local time) than when you left Europe.
7
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
2
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
up vote
14
down vote
Back when Concorde was still a thing, British Airways' motto was 'Arrive before you leave', illustrating how you could arrive in North America sooner (in local time) than when you left Europe.
Back when Concorde was still a thing, British Airways' motto was 'Arrive before you leave', illustrating how you could arrive in North America sooner (in local time) than when you left Europe.
edited Nov 28 at 22:41
answered Nov 28 at 20:45
Maxime
1494
1494
7
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
2
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
add a comment |
7
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
2
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
7
7
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
How does this not provide an answer to the question? It's no longer a current option, but it describes an example of such flights and shows that there's a long history of them.
– Zach Lipton
Nov 28 at 22:35
2
2
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
The question says, "I'm wondering if there are any airlines which fly such a route." No airlines fly Concorde currently, so this doesn't provide a current answer to the question.
– Tanner Swett
Nov 28 at 22:40
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Yes, there are loads of these. My personal most frequent return flight - Atlanta to Nashville - is a good example. It's 35-40 minutes flying time, but moves from the Eastern time zone to Central, thus landing 20-25 minutes before it took off.
Much more extreme examples happen when you cross the International Date Line going East. For example, I've flown from Seoul (Incheon,) South Korea to San Francisco in about 10.5 hours. However, Seoul's time zone is 17 hours ahead of San Francisco's, so, despite the flight being 10.5 hours in duration, it landed 6.5 hours before it took off in local time.
Even flights with 14+ hour duration from East Asia to the U.S. mainland frequently land earlier than they take off.
The most extreme examples would be from an airport just on the Western side of the International Date Line to one just on the East side. These can land almost a full day before their departure in local time. In some cases, it's even possible to land slightly more than a full day before their departure, such as flights from the Line Islands of Kiribati (UTC+14) to, say, American Samoa (UTC-11).
And this is why aviation always uses Zulu time (UTC), not local time.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Yes, there are loads of these. My personal most frequent return flight - Atlanta to Nashville - is a good example. It's 35-40 minutes flying time, but moves from the Eastern time zone to Central, thus landing 20-25 minutes before it took off.
Much more extreme examples happen when you cross the International Date Line going East. For example, I've flown from Seoul (Incheon,) South Korea to San Francisco in about 10.5 hours. However, Seoul's time zone is 17 hours ahead of San Francisco's, so, despite the flight being 10.5 hours in duration, it landed 6.5 hours before it took off in local time.
Even flights with 14+ hour duration from East Asia to the U.S. mainland frequently land earlier than they take off.
The most extreme examples would be from an airport just on the Western side of the International Date Line to one just on the East side. These can land almost a full day before their departure in local time. In some cases, it's even possible to land slightly more than a full day before their departure, such as flights from the Line Islands of Kiribati (UTC+14) to, say, American Samoa (UTC-11).
And this is why aviation always uses Zulu time (UTC), not local time.
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Yes, there are loads of these. My personal most frequent return flight - Atlanta to Nashville - is a good example. It's 35-40 minutes flying time, but moves from the Eastern time zone to Central, thus landing 20-25 minutes before it took off.
Much more extreme examples happen when you cross the International Date Line going East. For example, I've flown from Seoul (Incheon,) South Korea to San Francisco in about 10.5 hours. However, Seoul's time zone is 17 hours ahead of San Francisco's, so, despite the flight being 10.5 hours in duration, it landed 6.5 hours before it took off in local time.
Even flights with 14+ hour duration from East Asia to the U.S. mainland frequently land earlier than they take off.
The most extreme examples would be from an airport just on the Western side of the International Date Line to one just on the East side. These can land almost a full day before their departure in local time. In some cases, it's even possible to land slightly more than a full day before their departure, such as flights from the Line Islands of Kiribati (UTC+14) to, say, American Samoa (UTC-11).
And this is why aviation always uses Zulu time (UTC), not local time.
Yes, there are loads of these. My personal most frequent return flight - Atlanta to Nashville - is a good example. It's 35-40 minutes flying time, but moves from the Eastern time zone to Central, thus landing 20-25 minutes before it took off.
Much more extreme examples happen when you cross the International Date Line going East. For example, I've flown from Seoul (Incheon,) South Korea to San Francisco in about 10.5 hours. However, Seoul's time zone is 17 hours ahead of San Francisco's, so, despite the flight being 10.5 hours in duration, it landed 6.5 hours before it took off in local time.
Even flights with 14+ hour duration from East Asia to the U.S. mainland frequently land earlier than they take off.
The most extreme examples would be from an airport just on the Western side of the International Date Line to one just on the East side. These can land almost a full day before their departure in local time. In some cases, it's even possible to land slightly more than a full day before their departure, such as flights from the Line Islands of Kiribati (UTC+14) to, say, American Samoa (UTC-11).
And this is why aviation always uses Zulu time (UTC), not local time.
edited Nov 28 at 21:03
answered Nov 28 at 20:50
reirab
13.7k135103
13.7k135103
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, being a pretty frequent traveler between the US and Australia I've very often technically 'arrived' before I left. I tend to book through Orbitz and while the trip to Australia is often marked with a +2 to show that crossing the date line adds another day to your trip (ie, you leave on Monday and get there on Wednesday even though the flight is only 13 hours), when you return it's common to find flights that look like this one below. Where you leave Australia at 9:35am, fly for over 13 hours, and arrive three hours earlier:
Personally, I'm not a big fan of how Orbitz doesn't show the actual dates with the times. It'd help clear up confusion here.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, being a pretty frequent traveler between the US and Australia I've very often technically 'arrived' before I left. I tend to book through Orbitz and while the trip to Australia is often marked with a +2 to show that crossing the date line adds another day to your trip (ie, you leave on Monday and get there on Wednesday even though the flight is only 13 hours), when you return it's common to find flights that look like this one below. Where you leave Australia at 9:35am, fly for over 13 hours, and arrive three hours earlier:
Personally, I'm not a big fan of how Orbitz doesn't show the actual dates with the times. It'd help clear up confusion here.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Yes, being a pretty frequent traveler between the US and Australia I've very often technically 'arrived' before I left. I tend to book through Orbitz and while the trip to Australia is often marked with a +2 to show that crossing the date line adds another day to your trip (ie, you leave on Monday and get there on Wednesday even though the flight is only 13 hours), when you return it's common to find flights that look like this one below. Where you leave Australia at 9:35am, fly for over 13 hours, and arrive three hours earlier:
Personally, I'm not a big fan of how Orbitz doesn't show the actual dates with the times. It'd help clear up confusion here.
Yes, being a pretty frequent traveler between the US and Australia I've very often technically 'arrived' before I left. I tend to book through Orbitz and while the trip to Australia is often marked with a +2 to show that crossing the date line adds another day to your trip (ie, you leave on Monday and get there on Wednesday even though the flight is only 13 hours), when you return it's common to find flights that look like this one below. Where you leave Australia at 9:35am, fly for over 13 hours, and arrive three hours earlier:
Personally, I'm not a big fan of how Orbitz doesn't show the actual dates with the times. It'd help clear up confusion here.
answered Nov 28 at 22:39
Jen
411
411
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
I like JQ129 from Auckland (AKL) to Rarotonga (RAR). You arrive 19 hours before you depart.
1
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
I like JQ129 from Auckland (AKL) to Rarotonga (RAR). You arrive 19 hours before you depart.
1
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
add a comment |
up vote
-2
down vote
up vote
-2
down vote
I like JQ129 from Auckland (AKL) to Rarotonga (RAR). You arrive 19 hours before you depart.
I like JQ129 from Auckland (AKL) to Rarotonga (RAR). You arrive 19 hours before you depart.
edited Nov 29 at 15:18
Bianfable
646114
646114
answered Nov 29 at 3:14
user35758
1
1
1
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
add a comment |
1
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
1
1
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
Please don't refer to airports and airlines by just their IATA codes. Almost nobody will know what your answer means without Googling the abbreviations. You saved yourself maybe two seconds of typing and made everybody else spend at least ten times that much time finding out what you're saying.
– David Richerby
Nov 29 at 11:05
add a comment |
1
hum, that's not very different from DST events happening twice a year.
– mins
Nov 28 at 18:07
1
travel.stackexchange.com/questions/14480/… is basically the same question.
– Michael Lugo
Nov 28 at 20:20
Looks like this isn't on topic for this Stack. Should be on travel instead. Sorry guys but thanks for the great answers!
– Sandy Chapman
Nov 29 at 19:48